In post 1757, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 1756, acryon wrote:In post 1755, Frozen Angel wrote:
ITS NOT INCREDIBLY LIKELY. its just as probable as for any other two pairs.
It is not. If we are looking at just the set of people we have with 0 information, then of course it's the same, but this isn't just a statistic game and you know that. You have both done things that are actively anti-town, but your responses in general have been worse and there is less damage if we are wrong about you, so it goes to you.
This is scum. VOTE: Acryon
I really can't see you as town. your reason for this is "WE have no information about others so scum must be between you two"Whats the meaning of scum hunting then?
Where are you getting this quote from? That's not even close to the spirit of what I said, much less the quote.
In post 1757, Frozen Angel wrote:why my response in general was been worse? why you think lynching someone you say its a probable mis lynch is "less damage" and therefor justified?
I certainly never said you were a probable mislynch. In fact quite the opposite I think you are a probable scum lynch, as I've made mention of numerous times.
In post 1757, Frozen Angel wrote:if you want to lynch me you need better reasons than those two you already provided. the fact you can't even think about finding scum and just want to lynch between me and RC is another thing I must add to your scum case.
Are you kidding? So you are adding to my scum case the fact that I "can't even think about finding scum" because I want to lynch between two people who I think at least one of is scum?