heads yes
tails no
heads
such a mischevious little puppy
I never want to assume anything. Plus I like asking questions.In post 11, grapes wrote:VOTE: TwoFace
Why are you asking a question you already know the answer to?
so why is your vote serious?
some would probably say yes, some would say no.In post 20, Toto wrote:Are we out of RVS already?
takes 7 to lynch. you have 3 votes on youIn post 24, Toto wrote:I guess it did not matter that much. Except now it kind of does since It seems I'm at L-2. I was asking since I did not want to keep my vote on a non-serious target if we were being serious.
UNVOTE:
so you are scum or a bad player. noted so I can basically ignore anything you say going forward.In post 25, Xkfyu wrote:I would seriously vote you for far less reasons.In post 16, TwoFace wrote:well it wasn't, but even if it was that would make you want to seriously vote me?
if you are town
SO... why are you asking a question you should already know the answer to?In post 30, grapes wrote:So what's a "serious target" then?
why didn't you answer me?In post 40, grapes wrote:Oh Twoface.In post 37, TwoFace wrote:SO... why are you asking a question you should already know the answer to?In post 30, grapes wrote:So what's a "serious target" then?
that doesn't even make any senseIn post 45, MariaR wrote:In post 44, TwoFace wrote:why didn't you answer me?In post 40, grapes wrote:Oh Twoface.In post 37, TwoFace wrote:SO... why are you asking a question you should already know the answer to?In post 30, grapes wrote:So what's a "serious target" then?
do i vote?
damn, tails.
VOTE: Twoface
The only thing twofaced about you is your alignment
what you are trying to ask him actually doesn't make any senseIn post 46, grapes wrote:Because it was just a misunderstanding - hopefully now toto realizes what I was trying to ask him.
good question.In post 71, Dunnstral wrote:Why do you need a page 3 vote count to decide your vote
TldrIn post 78, Naomi-Tan wrote:Well I normally like to do this post before the game gets rolling but we appear to already be rolling. So I'll do it here;
Okay.. so.. Hi everyone I'm naomi. for those who have played with me before you'll sorta know whats coming so you can skip this; for others. Hi, I'm kinda a strange town player. As both Red and Blue I'm afraid of dying and this influences my posts making them sometimes be more scummy. to counter act this I tend to play very open handed and honestly (unless i'm using PR information or trying to trap scum in which case I come clean as soon as I have the chance) I also like to make read lists every now and then and comment often during the day (staying active) not all my posts will have good content but .. Thats more me being a not strong player :3 This kinda Post I tend to do at the front of my games so.. count this post as an ENTIRE post of NAI but I feel that its important to say so town don't go out there way to lynch me for my normal town play style. If you guys wish you may review my entire history on my wiki page which I update when games close out. Finally I also do LAMIST stuff as I don't wanna die, so if I go around doing that. its normal :3 so with all this said I'm now ready to start properly
@grapes - because he's painfully obvious town. His actions look genuine to me. His response that he was accused of being coached look genuine.In post 127, grapes wrote:Why?In post 77, TwoFace wrote:i'm going to learn hard town on toto right now.
You criticize others and actually suggest he should ask you why you're voting him?In post 135, grapes wrote:Why I'm voting you, for one.
You aren't seriously asking this question are you?In post 166, itlepip wrote:Maria why is asking for reads such a problem?
ok?In post 181, Xkfyu wrote:NOW, however, I am, and my vote will remain on you.
well that's probably what you would do but that isn't what I would do and it certainly isn; what I think a good player would do. Good players know they town, they know other players calling them scum are either scum themselves or just wrong. Given that this particular player has already shown signs of poor judgement, I can (and will) basically ignore anything he has to say especially regarding me.In post 196, Naomi-Tan wrote:I think if you had a green look on this you'd be asking; 'Hey! why you now finding me redish? what changed'
why did that color thing matter?In post 198, massive wrote:Hey Naomi, I'm prolly gonna vote you but uh what made townies go from Blue (78) to Green (above)?
Nos. you don't think this answer helps you better figure out if toto's actions make sense? If the things he's saying and doing look like they come from a true newbie or not? If you say no, I call bullshitIn post 162, Toto wrote:I played a live game with friends about two weeks ago for the first time, then I looked on Google and found epicmafia, played one game there which seemed too confusing (too many weird roles), and then found this site and like very much it so far!In post 149, TwoFace wrote: @toto. Outside this site how many games have you played? Where else have you played? If this is your first site, why did you decide to play here.
No it's not my job to find out who's lying about me. It's the other townies job. I can't remember if it was this game or not where I explained it so I will again. In my experience, especially with me in particular when I try to disprove arguments against me people, myself included are often ignored, called defensive or dismissive and any counter attacks are disregarded as omgus. So no a townie shouldn't worry about the lies that are being said about them. A townie should just play to their win condition which is to find and lynch scum.In post 355, Nosferatu wrote:Are you aware that scum's goal in the game known as mafia, is to mislynch town during the day? Given this, it's pretty likely that if you're being lynched, scum is involved, and it's your duty as town to at least find out the arguments to see if they're legit in any way. Cause if they're not, and you say so, not only do you have a chance of someone else realizing it too, and thereby not dying, you also have a good chance of catching scum.In post 349, TwoFace wrote:1. You shouldn't ever care why somebody wants you dead.
Why shouldn't you care if someone wants to lynch you? The sentiment makes zero sense.
I'll actually agree with this. From what I can tell Gerry is more often a liability to town instead of helpful. The vote on you this game is actually a good example. There was no good reason for it at all.In post 433, massive wrote:Yes. If you are town, you will be a liability for the rest of the town if we let you live to endgame. "Town mindset" isn't JUST about finding scum, it's also about making sure you can convince others to lynch them once you find them, and so far you're not doing any of either.In post 431, gerryoat wrote:How am I not gonna be any help for town? So you'd rather lynch someone that will get no clues as to who is town or maf rather than lynching a potentially scummy person? That doesn't seem like a town mindset.
i really hope you aren't seriousIn post 448, grapes wrote:Classic "why me" scumpost.
Obvious? Not quite. It didn't even look like a subtle joke.In post 451, gerryoat wrote:Also, the vote on him was an obvious joke. But, he started outing bad reasons so now it's a real vote
It's a valid question. One town would also ask if in the situation. This classic why me was disproven on epic mafia like 6 years ago. It's certainly been disproven on this site as well.In post 456, grapes wrote:I am.In post 454, TwoFace wrote:i really hope you aren't seriousIn post 448, grapes wrote:Classic "why me" scumpost.
He asked me why I'm reading him differently to someone with 2 posts. Straight up scumplaining.
It's called looking at your games. Lynched as a town pr in one and can't talk about the other.In post 460, gerryoat wrote:hey buddy, you said from what you've seen im a liability to town. explain that read and where it came from. we have never played together.In post 457, TwoFace wrote:Obvious? Not quite. It didn't even look like a subtle joke.In post 451, gerryoat wrote:Also, the vote on him was an obvious joke. But, he started outing bad reasons so now it's a real vote
We've been arguing? Arguing about Dunn specifically? Both of those are news to me. I didn't really think yuuand inwere even having a discussion let alone an argument.In post 462, grapes wrote:Okay why are you arguing with about one detail that you don't agree with about why dunn's scum when
1) Your vote's there
2) I've got scattered additional reasons why he's a scumlord this game on the very last page and even more in my iso
@twoface
Mine too. I guess people need to quote posts or something cause given order of posts I was sure he was talking about you.In post 466, Naomi-Tan wrote:My mind is blown..In post 465, grapes wrote:Correct.In post 463, Naomi-Tan wrote:Wait you wasn't talking about me there?
I'm wasn't referencing a specific post when I responded to you though.In post 484, grapes wrote:I'm talking about what we've been tlaking about the last page now holy banana muffins.
thisIn post 445, Dunnstral wrote:Actually, explain to me how you can be on my case for thinking Zach is scum and you're town over the course of the game, when Simple Plan has 2 posts and only looked at Naomi
It's also bad because he's trying to shade asp but not really committing to a read.