Okay!In post 1083, keyenpeydee wrote:Let's start over guys
I'm replacing Jaack.
I'm guessing this means I don't need to read back?
I mean, I wasn't planning to anyway, but if we're starting a new it's even better for me
Okay!In post 1083, keyenpeydee wrote:Let's start over guys
MoI? Or MoOoO
Grey, don't leave me!!!In post 1097, -Grey- wrote:The fact there are so many players already being replaced is pretty much the only reason I haven't asked to be.
Yet.
In post 1075, -Grey- wrote:I'm Bulletproof.
In post 1076, -Grey- wrote:Just kidding.
That explains this otherwise confusing set of quotes!In post 1077, -Grey- wrote:Oh noez, I must be scumz.
I see some backlash in his ISO, as in TF's LAL stuff and the claim bring mentioned, but I see no claim between his "Boonskies might Lol hammer without a claim" and "Your LAL policy because I Fakeclaimed and rescinded it, like RC and FB do, is shit."In post 1103, Aristophanes wrote:I guess I'll ISO him for the claim and backlash...
Woohoo! How are you my friend? <3In post 1106, ThinkBig wrote:I'm here buddy. Let's chat.
I don't think that's how RVS works, and I'm not reading 45 pages, especially if they're filled with toxicity and NAI shit.In post 1107, keyenpeydee wrote:Let's do a RVS again, this time, who you think is scum based on the 45 pages.
What makes them sticking to their opinion ignorant to the rest of the thread? What makes this scummy?In post 1115, ZZZX wrote:They are just ignorently sticking to their intial opinion from page 5 or something.In post 1099, Aristophanes wrote:@Eceryone else, why are we Voting MoI? What has he done which is scummy and deserves a D1 lynch?
Ooooooh!In post 1117, ZZZX wrote:Its not MoI who is sticking to the opinionIn post 1116, Aristophanes wrote:What makes them sticking to their opinion ignorant to the rest of the thread? What makes this scummy?In post 1115, ZZZX wrote:They are just ignorently sticking to their intial opinion from page 5 or something.In post 1099, Aristophanes wrote:@Eceryone else, why are we Voting MoI? What has he done which is scummy and deserves a D1 lynch?
everyone else is
Why would scum do this tho!?In post 1142, Boonskiies wrote:Her play from before TwoFace/myself started. Her putting votes on town reads of hers. Not explaining why, still. And sheeping every single wagon.
Sure they do, but lurking in the chaos is far more beneficial, or at least far more common.In post 1150, -Grey- wrote:Not always true.In post 1148, Boonskiies wrote:Because the game being so chaotic, he was actually straightening things out and making them less chaotic. Might not agree with everything, but it was chaos earlier. That benefits scum more than town to keep things like that.
Scum also plays mediator for towncred.
Then you play scum differently than I my friend!In post 1156, -Grey- wrote:It's not more beneficial when the source of the chaos is town, because that source will constantly be reigniting it for them to play peacekeeper.In post 1154, Aristophanes wrote:Sure they do, but lurking in the chaos is far more beneficial, or at least far more common.In post 1150, -Grey- wrote:Not always true.In post 1148, Boonskiies wrote:Because the game being so chaotic, he was actually straightening things out and making them less chaotic. Might not agree with everything, but it was chaos earlier. That benefits scum more than town to keep things like that.
Scum also plays mediator for towncred.
Is Elena not new? I've never encountered them bofore!
Duh.
I mean, I replace into normals, but I have found them the least enjoyable of this site no matter how good the mod...In post 1173, keyenpeydee wrote:sigh
Do i have to experience every unenjoyable mini normal games this site has to offer?
#Twinsies~!In post 1182, keyenpeydee wrote:I thought I was the only one.In post 1175, Aristophanes wrote:I mean, I replace into normals, but I have found them the least enjoyable of this site no matter how good the mod...In post 1173, keyenpeydee wrote:sigh
Do i have to experience every unenjoyable mini normal games this site has to offer?
It's the only queue I'm not Ego'd in
Lol all this talk of claims and nobody mentions this. wtf!In post 1237, -Grey- wrote:He's a claimed fucking mason.In post 1235, Lycanfire wrote:What's your read on the 2F slot right now boons?
Vote Boon or tell me why the fuck you won't.
On odd occasion, yeah.In post 1290, Lycanfire wrote:Do any of you ever think you're on the opposite of the autism spectrum and you're social on levels other people simply aren't?
Well, I haven't read back on TF and probably won't, but that is integral info!In post 1294, Boonskiies wrote:@Ari.In post 1250, Boonskiies wrote:why would lycan of all people be my buddy? Lol. And where did 2F claim mason?
Oh.In post 1295, Lycanfire wrote:well, yeahIn post 1291, Aristophanes wrote:On odd occasion, yeah.In post 1290, Lycanfire wrote:Do any of you ever think you're on the opposite of the autism spectrum and you're social on levels other people simply aren't?
Is this relevant?
Don't give up, Cuzco!!In post 1296, Boonskiies wrote:I'm done. I like some of the players here, but most of the players are just fucking idiot bad players who just vote for people who say fucking anything. Lynch me already so I can find out who is scum so I don't blacklist the people who were playing toward their wincon.
Because it coincides with their own! I have seen this and questioned it before, but voting with a scumread doesn't mean you don't scumread them still.In post 1301, -Grey- wrote:Tell me, why does town "go along with" their scumread's townread?In post 1297, Aristophanes wrote:And I like you as town, Boon!
Hey hey! Definitely town here, don't you worryIn post 1356, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Welcome Aristophanes – are you scum? You know I’ll know if so soon enough so just come out and admit it now and save yourself the stress of faking Town which I know you detest doing as scum.
Are you saying that I haven’t posted enough previously to be read?In post 1125, Aristophanes wrote:I want MoI to post now that I'm here so I can read them.
Didn't he claim Mason? Didn't he, like, just reiterate that?In post 1363, Boonskiies wrote:In post 1361, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Again why are you scum-reading a player not in the game?In post 1360, ThinkBig wrote:You, boon, and fire.
because he's not thinking about lynching scum, just sticking to his thoughts because he's scum.
From the Mason Wiki wrote:moderators may introduce Werewolves into Masonries (and likewise Mafia members into Monasteries) without bastardry, as the definition of a Mason or Monk is that they are confirmed not to be a member of a specific non-Town faction.
Which is what all of you are arguing.From the Norman Guidelines wrote:The game should have at least one Mafia or Werewolf group (of at least two members). A second anti-town group can be given a separate Mafia family name, or can be a Werewolf group. There should be no more than two mafia/werewolf factions, and no more than one Serial Killer.
The Answer wrote:Masons, regardless of when they are allowed to speak to each other, are considered Normal on mafiascum.net, provided they are Town-aligned. A Masonry must contain at least two Masons.
Once More wrote:Masons, regardless of when they are allowed to speak to each other, are considered Normal on mafiascum.net, provided they are Town-aligned.
Zoomed Right In wrote:Masons...are considered Normal...provided they are Town-aligned.
Can we move on yet?In case you missed it wrote:provided they are Town-aligned.
XDIn post 1415, ZZZX wrote:Lmao Aristo you made me laugh out loud
Oh Grey, whatIn post 1416, -Grey- wrote:So, Masons can be werewolves?
Absolutely!In post 1419, -Grey- wrote:I think Aristo is saying we should lynch ThinkBig.
Ah, but do claimed masons have to be masons in normals?In post 1422, -Grey- wrote:VOTE: AristoIn post 1420, Aristophanes wrote:Absolutely!In post 1419, -Grey- wrote:I think Aristo is saying we should lynch ThinkBig.
VOTE: Thinkbig
Scum claim.
Masons have to be town in normals.
Anytime my friend!
Why Momo?In post 1432, Elena Fisher wrote:Who would you rather lynch? I feel like the only other person I feel good on is momo
<3In post 1436, Lycanfire wrote:bolds are changes since vc 1.9, aristo joke voted in between. pedit fuck off aristophanes
You rush too much sirIn post 1452, momo wrote:What is the deadline???
All my best to you and her Titus!!In post 1495, Titus wrote:Got my role pm. Mother in law just got admitted to the hospital. I am going to be a little slow here. Bare with me.
...In post 1499, Boonskiies wrote:He had a full group of people he
Nah, I have lots of fun!In post 1516, massive wrote:Are y'all so focused and hardcore aggressive that there is no humor, no fun in these games any more? Hoo geez.
And they don't stop coming!In post 1551, massive wrote:Lessee. Shade on reasoning behind vote: check. Shade on individual: check. Shade on whole game: check. You've hit for the scumbag trifecta.
What are you doing in the dead thread!?!? :OIn post 1616, Cooperative Sheep wrote:Dead thread is dead.
In post 1755, keyenpeydee wrote:@Mod, should be killed!
I'm really really sure that momo will flip scum.
<3In post 1801, Boonskiies wrote:Hell, scum definitely should have killed Aristo over Titus then.
You mean KNPD?In post 1960, CloudKicker wrote:keye
Next as in tomorrow?In post 1961, keyenpeydee wrote:Let's lynch sheep next
XD XD