Mini Normal 1911 | Penguin Mafia Redux | Endgame


User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Fri May 12, 2017 10:20 am

Post by Zulfy »

Transcend didnt like your rqs gamma
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Fri May 12, 2017 10:26 am

Post by Zulfy »

I dont have an opinion of the rqs itself.

Also none about the reactions so far to the rqs, mine included.

Your reaction to my reaction to transcend's reaction has been noted tho.

Hello other person
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Fri May 12, 2017 10:30 am

Post by Zulfy »

Cuz it's over VOTE: Tammy
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #275 (isolation #3) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:07 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 35, Agent Sparkles wrote:
In post 33, Ranmaru wrote:
In post 26, Agent Sparkles wrote:What's everyone's deal with ignoring Gamma's questions and avoiding RQS? It helps advance the game just like RVS does.
Doesn't help to find mafia, and can stagnate the game, and also helps people avoid RVS. What do you think of the people including myself who ignored the questions? Scum or Town and why?

1) I don't think I agree that it doesn't help. It may not be as effective as RVS, but it's still a starting point.
2) It doesn't need to stagnate anything. RVS and RQS are not mutually exclusive and people can easily do both at once.
3) I think it's NAI on its own, but I'm still interested in knowing why people are shutting it down the way they have.
So you asked: Why are people ignoring it, someone told you why they are ignoring it, and then you ask
I'm still interested in knowing why people are shutting it down the way they have.
When, despite the fact you disagree with their conclusion, someone told you why. This looks like air. This is smoke. You get a plus 1 I am putting it in the notepad as we speak

Pedit: active game ooh
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #301 (isolation #4) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:27 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 116, Mulch wrote:*Says people townreading him are susp*
*Peroson twnreads him*

That took guts
what are you saying what is this
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #303 (isolation #5) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:31 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 128, Ryker wrote:
In post 86, Mulch wrote:
In post 84, Ranmaru wrote:Can you guys be more concise and snip quotes? It'll save people the head ache when reading and reading. No point to quote a huge as quote when you just need to answer one question. Look at how I do it:

@
Gamma
: Town don't want to be lynched either. Also Ryker doesn't seem highly defensive there. Thoughts on Agent Sparkle and Mulch?
@
Agent Sparkle
: Read on Mulch?
@
Marshy
: Move your vote, Tammy won't be around early as stated in the pre-game thread. I pushed her to join (while she said she had other games at the moment) because I wanted to play with her.
@
Zulphy
: Same to you.

Neat.
Whats YOUR opinion on me?
Unvote: Mulch
What was it about this post that impressed you so, Ryker?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #304 (isolation #6) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:31 am

Post by Zulfy »

@Ryker
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #305 (isolation #7) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:32 am

Post by Zulfy »

And also
@Mulch
for the thing above
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #306 (isolation #8) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:36 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 139, Mulch wrote:
In post 133, Ryker wrote:
In post 94, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 93, Mulch wrote:
In post 88, Mulch wrote:Dodging what exactly?
@Gamma
The fact that scum are more likely to become defensive because they have more on the line if they are lynched.
That is entirely dependent on the circumstances of the lynch. Sometimes it is true and sometimes it is wrong.

Please try again.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boy,

Gamma himself said that in the case of a PR your view is right that town would be more defensive. Pay attention.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #315 (isolation #9) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:40 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 177, Transcend wrote:Ryker mild town lean.
Whoaa explain this
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #319 (isolation #10) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:44 am

Post by Zulfy »

@Ranmaru
In post 145, Ranmaru wrote:VOTE: Transcend

Gamma does seem town, meta wise. I liked Mulch's response to Adum. Seemed genuine. He's been pretty active, and he responded well to my and other's pressure.
nono, ¿where has he responded well to the pressure? Must have missed it.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #320 (isolation #11) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:44 am

Post by Zulfy »

^ I didn't see Adum's same sentiment
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #326 (isolation #12) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:54 am

Post by Zulfy »

Agent Sparkles +1
viewtopic.php?p=9212517#p9212517

viewtopic.php?p=9210207#p9210207
Ryker +1

Mulch +1
The whole I am conveniently firm in my belief that overdefensiveness is NAI exemplified here viewtopic.php?p=9210700#p9210700

Mulch +1
In post 113, Mulch wrote:I don't think it's something that a townie would neccecarily go full ham on defending him for. It seems such a weird thing, and he is IMMEDIATELY almost white knighted for a LONG time by sparkles.
Mulch is using hyperbolic speech for something that seemed fairly benign to me.
Sparkles explained himself already and it seems pretty reasonable but still "such a weird thing" for Mulch, which seems unreasonable.

On the topic of Sparkles defending that one guy for asking those mod questions that Mulch didn't like AdumbroDeus says
In post 115, AdumbroDeus wrote:Townie AF.
when it's not. I imagine the reasoning here though is how sloppy Mulch is being, in the sense that he just says these
things
, which I suppose isn't unreasonable metaplay.
Says
In post 115, AdumbroDeus wrote: You're wrong though, what makes it a scumtell is being disingenuous, the scum incentive is there but town will do it all the time to stop bad lynches.
Which I would now like him to explain because I really am not seeing it.
But then:
In post 115, AdumbroDeus wrote:Reasoning for it is really townie though.
I suppose he doesn't think Mulch is too bombastic to be town, but he actually likes the reasoning he's given. This doesn't seem right, cuz Mulch's reasoning
isn't
right.
AdumbroDeus +1 for you

Mulch +1
Back to I lost in LYLO cuz scum looked squeaky clean compared to the character that was town and so I don't wanna fall for that again. Vote for people please. You literally do not scunrrad everyone

@Mulch

I want you to do more than show unearned condescenscion for a valid thought on

viewtopic.php?p=9211073#p9211073
Lol yea exactly wtf Ryker


+1 Mulch, ah damn!
viewtopic.php?p=9211048#p9211048
It feels like you are extending this artificially. Asking in thread for the sake of public information is enough of an answer.

Good luck smashing Ryker
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #328 (isolation #13) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:56 am

Post by Zulfy »

Sparkles 1
Ryker 1
Mulch 1 2 3 4
AdumbroDeus 1

i don't like it
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #331 (isolation #14) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:58 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 327, Ranmaru wrote:@
Zulfy
: #67, and he didn't clam up under pressure. He continued to be active and scumhunt. If you disagree, burden is on you to explain that.
The context of that pressure is being voted by one of his targets which can easily be brushed off and a vote from you that I think you're giving too much weight to. I'm unimpressed.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #332 (isolation #15) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:59 am

Post by Zulfy »

I've only digested the first 10 pages does anyone else have any more questions?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #342 (isolation #16) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:05 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 327, Ranmaru wrote:@
Zulfy
: #67, and he didn't clam up under pressure. He continued to be active and scumhunt. If you disagree, burden is on you to explain that.
wait so just so we're clear this is your response to my question of where he reacted well under pressure, I suppose I should have asked where he was pressured cuz that's what I had to look back at but all he does here is says that he didn't wanna vote and bemoaning the failure of his ingenious trap.

I'm not following.

Pedit:
If any player gets to 25 the game ends
those pluses are scumpoints
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #345 (isolation #17) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:09 am

Post by Zulfy »

Believing that overdefensiveness is NAI lets you yourself act overdefensive and have an ideological base for not being self-conscious about that and also allows you to ignore any potential scumbuddies that would be acting that way.

Scum"ping" is a better term and the one I usually use. A single one doesn't mean much, it's the accumulation that interests me.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #351 (isolation #18) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:15 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 346, Ranmaru wrote:@
Zulfy
: #48 and on.
You asked him questions he would have the answer to, nothing anyone would really crumble because of.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #353 (isolation #19) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:16 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 347, Mulch wrote:That is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard. No matter WHAT my allignment I ever scumread people for being defensive. When I am town, I am MORE defenseives than if I am scum, not less, because I know that it is dumbly scrutinized and that I would get ---- if I was scum. It's a horrible thing to read because self preservation is natural in ALL people. If you were at L-3, I bet you would be defensive too no matter WHAT your allignment is
No I wouldn't be.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #357 (isolation #20) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:18 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 348, Mulch wrote:Ok, the hyperbolic speech is dumb too, I do it in all of my games, again no matter what allignment.
Hyperbolic speech is fine when it's not disingenuous. Sparkles wasn't going full ham on anything, he was just bringing up a counterargument. You were setting up a frame of discussion that benefited an erroneous outlook.

Pedit: He's not a newbie
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #358 (isolation #21) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:19 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 349, Mulch wrote:Did you just metaread me as scum without knowing my meta?
Where did I metaread you?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #361 (isolation #22) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:20 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 352, Mulch wrote:You even said "It does not matter right now, but in the future it might", which allows you to avoid conflict now while prepping you for the future if you ever want to call ino a scumread to me.
This is a recurring complaint about my playstyle but I'll keep at it.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #362 (isolation #23) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:22 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 355, Mulch wrote:And do you think ALL people wouldent be?

And stop nitpicking- if you were at L-1 would you feel any annoyance at all
Most town players I have played with don't flip out when they're getting to L1.
And yea sure but I wouldn't be overdefensive. I'd just keep bringing up my points until either the wagon went away or I got lynched. Such is life.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #365 (isolation #24) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:23 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 352, Mulch wrote:What bothers me most is that 2 of the 4 points are based on meta without you even knowing my meta in the first place. That's ridiculous.
Haha false equivalence.
I can be wary of something that might be a scum strategy because I have seen it in the past regardless of the posts you have made in previous games.
Plus.
One.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #369 (isolation #25) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:27 am

Post by Zulfy »

Ranmaru, I'm going to call out things I see regardless of how much someone misspells things.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #371 (isolation #26) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:29 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 367, Mulch wrote:talking in caps
I don't give a poop if you talk in caps, you implying that I have is a straight up lie.

Pedit: No, feel free to discredit that one point as much as you want, I won't stop you. As I've said, all that matters to me is watching it build up and up.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #374 (isolation #27) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:31 am

Post by Zulfy »

I'm not gonna do more work than that one point is due.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #376 (isolation #28) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:32 am

Post by Zulfy »

You seem to have clinged to the only part of my argument you have a rebuttal against.

Pedit: I agree.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #379 (isolation #29) » Sat May 13, 2017 8:37 am

Post by Zulfy »

What was your answer to my fourth point?
Here:
In post 144, Mulch wrote:
In post 143, Ryker wrote:
In post 140, Mulch wrote:So, stop avoiding it. WHY did you ask in thread?
But, I did say. I asked in thread because I didn't know and there was no reason not to have the information publicly available. I ask again, is there a reason not to ask in thread?
But is there a reason NOT to ask the mod?
"Why did you ask the teacher in class instead of asking her in private?"
"Well there wasn't any reason to not let the whole class know the answer to the question."
"But is there any reason NOT to ask the teacher?"

??? He's answered your question what are you going on about? I saw it as extending an argument that you're comfortable with, which is what scum usually do to keep up their activity while actually not bringing anything to the discussion.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1076 (isolation #30) » Tue May 16, 2017 7:27 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Still here, had a bunch stuff I had to write and then the wifi gave out, my vla would have ended a day earlier otherwise.

Will catch up later today, there will be plusses and ones involved so anticipate accordingly
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1077 (isolation #31) » Tue May 16, 2017 7:28 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Wait shit am I too late?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1116 (isolation #32) » Wed May 17, 2017 11:15 am

Post by Zulfy »

Here
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1173 (isolation #33) » Wed May 17, 2017 5:54 pm

Post by Zulfy »

I did it
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1174 (isolation #34) » Wed May 17, 2017 5:55 pm

Post by Zulfy »

First the proxy didn't work and then when it did the wifi didn't and then I got distracted with not doing my schoolwork which made me feel bad but now I am here.

I remember when I tried posting the last time I was trying to post this snarky thing at Mulch but I don't feel like redoing that
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1176 (isolation #35) » Wed May 17, 2017 5:59 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Don't posture mane
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1178 (isolation #36) » Wed May 17, 2017 6:04 pm

Post by Zulfy »

I'm serious too. It's pretty obvious that that's what's expected from me after 30 pages of content without me. You're just saying these things and I don't see the motivation for it.

I'm gonna write something on my notepad now
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1180 (isolation #37) » Wed May 17, 2017 6:09 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Sorry I was reading something but I had to click on first unread post when I saw it and now I feel like I have to explain myself
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1191 (isolation #38) » Wed May 17, 2017 6:31 pm

Post by Zulfy »

First off excuse me Ranmaru I've never played with you before. It seems this is just what you're like

Spoiler: GAMMA EMERALD
In post 1135, Gamma Emerald wrote:It's two-fold: I didn't like his reaction to LaLight's content, and I feel the Zulfy push had scum on it.
Lemme take a look at LaLight's content. I did it.


RANMARU
In post 1175, Ranmaru wrote:Zulfy, can you do a catch up and full reads list? It's about that time now. I also want to know your bottom four, and I want a vote from you.
this is posturing +1
See above

LALIGHT
In post 652, LaLight wrote:
I don't like Mulch's play at all. Most of the posts are quite simple and empty, everyone who looks at him says he's newbie and tr's him. Actually, being newbie!scum is the easiest thing to do ever, because if you do something suspicious and strange like flailing, weak reasoning, etc. you may always say you're newbie and people will say, well, yeah, it works. There is, of course a problem that you may still be a town!newbie with all that stuff, but I don't buy it.
Fair but earlier you said
In post 201, LaLight wrote: Mulch seems townie

Did you just take a closer look at things? +1
In post 652, LaLight wrote: Firescreamer lurking for some time and coming into game aggressively and textwally after called for it is scummy imo.
Hipocrisy

RYKER

GAMMA
In post 699, Gamma Emerald wrote:Still creeped by the timing
ahhh what was up with the timing? Was looking for it but it will be easier just to ask you
Ryker's mentionings of LaLight I mean.

It's 11:30 and I have a sharp headache. Will continue down this rabbit hole later tho

Excuse the formatting Ran
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1192 (isolation #39) » Wed May 17, 2017 6:32 pm

Post by Zulfy »

When I said excuse the formatting I meant the lack of neatness but excuse this also
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1196 (isolation #40) » Wed May 17, 2017 6:37 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1191, Zulfy wrote:First off excuse me Ranmaru I've never played with you before. It seems this is just what you're like

Spoiler: GAMMA EMERALD
In post 1135, Gamma Emerald wrote:It's two-fold: I didn't like his reaction to LaLight's content, and I feel the Zulfy push had scum on it.
Lemme take a look at LaLight's content. I did it.



Spoiler: LALIGHT
In post 652, LaLight wrote:
I don't like Mulch's play at all. Most of the posts are quite simple and empty, everyone who looks at him says he's newbie and tr's him. Actually, being newbie!scum is the easiest thing to do ever, because if you do something suspicious and strange like flailing, weak reasoning, etc. you may always say you're newbie and people will say, well, yeah, it works. There is, of course a problem that you may still be a town!newbie with all that stuff, but I don't buy it.
Fair but earlier you said
In post 201, LaLight wrote: Mulch seems townie
Did you just take a closer look at things? +1
In post 652, LaLight wrote: Firescreamer lurking for some time and coming into game aggressively and textwally after called for it is scummy imo.
Hipocrisy


RYKER

Spoiler: GAMMA
In post 699, Gamma Emerald wrote:Still creeped by the timing
ahhh what was up with the timing? Was looking for it but it will be easier just to ask you
Ryker's mentionings of LaLight I mean.

It's 11:30 and I
tthere
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1197 (isolation #41) » Wed May 17, 2017 6:38 pm

Post by Zulfy »

If you're wondering how I'm gonna do this it's like: Gonna make sure your votes make sense and to do that I have to check things that unfortunately compel me to check other thing

okay night
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1320 (isolation #42) » Thu May 18, 2017 8:13 pm

Post by Zulfy »

FROZENFLAME



When asked about his bottom four
In post 865, FrozenFlame wrote:Prob Zulfy, Sparkles, LaLight, Gamma in nor particular order right now. Still thinking about where to push for real rn
his only post about Sparkles hitherto was
In post 779, FrozenFlame wrote:this post scumpings hard for me but I'm having trouble articulating it. Will try to do so after lunch
are u still eating

On me he said:
In post 486, FrozenFlame wrote:I'm not understanding zulfy's popularity can someone sell me on that wagon?
two posts earlier. Would like it elaborated.


Feel like this was mostly a jumping off point for you but would like to know what you were standing on.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1321 (isolation #43) » Thu May 18, 2017 8:14 pm

Post by Zulfy »

UNVOTE:
Taking my rvs off
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1322 (isolation #44) » Thu May 18, 2017 8:21 pm

Post by Zulfy »

tammy's fine
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1325 (isolation #45) » Thu May 18, 2017 9:39 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 784, Ranmaru wrote:This seems a bit less fueled by being rational but rather by emotion
Spoiler: read this exchange and tell me where passion overtakes reason
In post 449, Agent Sparkles wrote:
In post 445, Gamma Emerald wrote:As for my Zulfy vote, I feel he's keeping vague on his scumreads by just saying "+1", which allows him to explain later with any logic he feels fits.
This is way off. He supported his scumreads in the same exact post that he listed those.
In post 450, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn't really notice it then
In post 451, Agent Sparkles wrote:You noticed all the +1s but somehow missed the explanations right next to them?
In post 455, Agent Sparkles wrote:I don't think I buy this. If you were paying this little attention, I don't see how you'd come to the conclusion that he was being vague about all of his scumreads, much less doing it intentionally.
In post 456, Agent Sparkles wrote:UNVOTE: Mulch

VOTE: Gamma Emerald
In post 460, Agent Sparkles wrote:
In post 457, Gamma Emerald wrote:I was trying to read quickly since I was on mobile at the time.
What I'm trying to say is, how did you come to the conclusion that he wasn't supporting his reads if you weren't actually paying attention to whether he was?
In post 461, Gamma Emerald wrote:I made an inference of motive. I'm sure I found something else scummy that's just what I articulated
In post 463, Agent Sparkles wrote:
In post 461, Gamma Emerald wrote:I made an inference of motive. I'm sure I found something else scummy that's just what I articulated
I'm curious about what this other scummy thing was.




455 and 456, the ones ranmaru picked out, are strange ones to pick out from that whole thing.

In post 793, Agent Sparkles wrote:What do you mean when you say 77 "doesn't go anywhere"?
ikr
Mulch wasn't null. He was a mixture of both and I wasn't sure which way I was leaning yet. As I got caught up the scum pings became noticably stronger than the town ones.Which question by LaLight? ANd FF never answered me so I'm waiting for that.
Sparkles doesn't challenge the weird bit about playing with his emotions and not using logic
doesn't protest that he's been busy/unmotivated

And on another note, thinks that a net zero and null are completely different concepts.

Anyway when there's so much to pick from Sparkles just sort of accepts it. It's possible these two are buddies and ranmaru is the one driving the bus

+1 Ranmaru for the misrepresentation of sparkles' push on gamma
+1 sparkles for what I just mentioned
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1326 (isolation #46) » Thu May 18, 2017 9:40 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Hi transcend.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1487 (isolation #47) » Sat May 20, 2017 6:30 am

Post by Zulfy »

but do you like me
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1488 (isolation #48) » Sat May 20, 2017 6:32 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1435, Tammy wrote:Could be confirmation bias but he does seem to be doing more actual scum hunting there whereas here most of it is focused on mulch and the defensiveness and hyperbole.
that's not true
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #3214 (isolation #49) » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:45 pm

Post by Zulfy »

sigh

I could have been more active but at least I was right
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #3215 (isolation #50) » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:46 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Great job tho scumteam geeze

And yea Ran I know I know
no investigation no right to speak

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”