Eddie knows this because he's scum.In post 9, Eddie Cane wrote:please unvote. Skittles is town.
VOTE: Eddie Cane
Eddie knows this because he's scum.In post 9, Eddie Cane wrote:please unvote. Skittles is town.
Scumreading Una for being so tryhard that he is digging up meta from 14 years ago.In post 164, UnaBombaH wrote:Posts #130 and #140 for example.In post 162, rb wrote:@unabombah, what do you find forced about flavor leaf
For one, I dont feel selfvoting is ever a "natural" reaction to pressure. We are not deep into the game, but we shouldnt keep playing RVS either.
Wouldn't that tell you that you're town together?In post 174, Ausuka wrote:I have no idea why my reads are so similar to rb's.
Yes.In post 215, NotTheRealPaul wrote:is this a joke? or do u have real reasoning for it?
You.In post 198, Ausuka wrote:@NTRP; Do you think scum would have had time to effectively build a counterwagon? If the answer is yes; who is scum on the wagon who opts to be on it instead of counterwagoning?
I mean, they'd have to be pretty stupid to do that in such a manner.In post 271, Eddie Cane wrote:i think scum is in the oeople who have moved from leaf. I think scum were scared of bring on the mislynch and scared of me tunnelling them for it. 9/10 mafia players are terrified of me if you aren't aware.
In post 266, Thor665 wrote:I approve of the Sunlight counter wagon.
I don't understand your position.In post 291, Thor665 wrote:The Sunlight case for me is - opportunism.
So because I have a theory that someone is likely scum I can't scrutinize their words anymore? I genuinely wanted to understand what his position actually was.rb wrote:But if youd already thought thor was scum, why are you assessing his words like you dont already think hes scum?
Point is, it seems you've concluded prior to any reasoning and are either confbiasing or just making shit up
Uh, this doesn't really track logically. Yes, it's unlikely for wagons to form on scum quickly, but that's not my only reason for thinking FL is town. That would be foolish. I think he's town because I don't scumread his actions. Conversely, I wouldn't flip around my scumread on SD simply because people are agreeing with me.In post 304, Thor665 wrote:How do you feel about the Sunlight wagon, which...formed rather quickly last I checked.
What makes it different?
And, if not different, why are you still voting it?
That's an interesting assertion. Can you give me an example of you asking someone questions and gathering information from that? I can't seem to find a single one.In post 337, Sunlit Diamond wrote:I was asking questions and gathering information
Beautiful. Now they're both on me.In post 174, Ausuka wrote:@Perfect Fifth; Why would you claim PR at this point in the game?
@skitter30; That's interesting. I think I found the game you were referring to (Newbie 1797?) Your case in Dunker was because he couldn't give reasoning for his vote and unvoted when pressured. Although it does show that Dunker can be scummy as town, I don't think that's the same as what's happened this game; he wasn't pressured, but he voluntarily gave up his vote and stopped scumhunting while appealing to rb.
I still agree with pretty much everything SD is saying and I have a townread there.
I don't really like 131- it feels like busywork. I don't like 140 either. It just seems like there's no actual good reason to self-vote there; it could be a sarcastic meme, but it's just way too awkward, especially since they haven't unvoted yet.
I don't really like Ciara's fixation on Unabombah. He looks like town so far and she's basically used her vote on him to avoid pushing or actually doing anything other than a few statements. I could vote there. (I have no idea why my reads are so similar to rb's.)
I feel like NTRP isn't that suspicious. Sure, he hasn't done that much, but he took the step to call Una scum over PF and has contributed @ Dunkerdoodles.
I'd be willing to vote in {Ciara24, Dunkerdoodles, Flavour Leaf} at this point in time.
Sorry, I don't understand this. Is that a typo? Or did you misread. I said "help keep rb at arm's length". As in, you were resistant, like Ausuka was, to the idea that Ausuka should consider rb towny since they have the same reads. You had an attitude of, well, let's see whether his reads are right or not, then decide if he's scum. Which is a pretty scummy attitude to have, IMO. "If he is scum, the holes in his reads will become apparent as time passes." Uhhh, what? Even if he's town, holes will start to appear in his reads. How can town know for sure anything? You basically just declared intent to turn on rb once flavor leaf flipped town.In post 392, Sunlit Diamond wrote:he says I made an effort to help rb at arm's length. I did no such thing. I had no reason to believe rb was town when I posted about him, and have since changed my mind.
In post 51, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: Perfect Fifth
I'm being blatantly oppurtunistic in the name of wagoning scumfucks.
Why did Ausuka sheep rb, then turn around and insist (not suggest, but actively insist) that Dunkerdoodles was scummy for doing the same thing? And for some reason she seems very certain about someone who several people said and provided evidence that his actions are not necessarily scum-indicative for him. And she repeatedly dismissed any arguments to the contrary.In post 174, Ausuka wrote:@Perfect Fifth; Why would you claim PR at this point in the game?
@skitter30; That's interesting. I think I found the game you were referring to (Newbie 1797?) Your case in Dunker was because he couldn't give reasoning for his vote and unvoted when pressured. Although it does show that Dunker can be scummy as town, I don't think that's the same as what's happened this game; he wasn't pressured, but he voluntarily gave up his vote and stopped scumhunting while appealing to rb.
I still agree with pretty much everything SD is saying and I have a townread there.
Doesn't feel like a "weak" read to me. Feels like a fixation.In post 90, Ausuka wrote:@skitter30/wavemode: Itcouldsimply be a matter of personality or playstyle, in that Dunker is choosing to sit back in the early-game. However, I feel like him abandoning his (presumably serious?) vote immediately to help rb is somewhat suspicious, and posts afterwards like 61 make me feel like he's trying to get on rb's good side. It's weak, but right now, I don't have anything better.
ThinkBig had literally only one post of substance, which was #19. If that one post makes him a "scumfuck" then Ausuka must be some kind of genius.In post 54, Ausuka wrote:Nothing I say or do is scummy. Do better.
I think Perfect is a better lynch because, although both are kind of awkward, Unabombah's awkwardness feels personality-based and Perfect's doesn't.
That's true but sort of missing the point. Ausuka's problem was that Dunker wasnt generating reads or asking questions, yet it was literally only page 2/3 of the game - she herself only had BS reasons to go off of, and was clearly just following the crowd on Perfect Fifth rather than thinking to go on him herself. And even later when Dunker started asking people some questions and participating in the game, Ausuka did not reverse or reconsider her scumread on him, she doubled down further.Thor665 wrote:I like your case okay and don't trust the Ausuka slot - but this is a misrep or misunderstanding of her stated position since her issue involved not his vote, but his unvote.In post 414, wavemode wrote:Why did Ausuka sheep rb, then turn around and insist (not suggest, but actively insist) that Dunkerdoodles was scummy for doing the same thing?
Does that thought adjust your case?
In post 70, Ausuka wrote: VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
You're approaching this entire thing way too awkwardly. Instead of helping rb and making reads / generating reactions, you're just sitting back and agreeing with everything he says. I get that this isn't entirely serious, but it's also not what I'd expect from town.
pedit:
Three statements, three lies:Ausuka wrote: I'm pretty confident in wave!scum because you're trying to push a mislynch confidently on really, really, really weak logic, and everything you do is shaped around your """theory""" of Aus/SD without actually participating or doing anything useful.
I think skitter is the one who initiated it with her #108. Assuming skitter is town, scum!Ausuka would clearly see someone like that as an ally not worth attacking.In post 570, Thor665 wrote:Because most of my personal issues with her were odd reads on her reads list, but if you're town and are also low poster, it doesn't make a ton of sense to bother buddying you for no reason.