Mini Normal 1948: BooneyToonz V - The Boon 'N Bed Express!

Chip Butty · Post Post #33 (isolation #0) » Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:47 am

In post 31, TywinL wrote:You guys have it all wrong...

VOTE: Chip Butty

How can someone with a name like that possibly be town?

Yeah, says the guy whose name is clearly short for 'Thank you win LOL', which is an ultramafian thing to say...

I'll have you know, we Buttys have an an ancient and glorious family history, which we can trace back as far as the Battle of Haggis Hill in 849 A.D.

Chip Butty · Post Post #34 (isolation #1) » Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:50 am

Oh yeah, and VOTE: TywinL.

Chip Butty · Post Post #187 (isolation #2) » Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:22 pm

In post 185, Theta Alpine wrote:why are we doing fake mason claims again

it only causes confusion

This. It muddies the waters and is thereby antitown. I think the only way to deal with it is to test.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: DunkerDoodles

Chip Butty · Post Post #191 (isolation #3) » Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:40 pm

In post 188, Dunkerdoodles wrote:ok this is really pissing me off
it should've been obvious the fact i wasn't actually mason. it was a reaction test, and it got good reactions and bad reactions. it also sparked discussion which helps town. it really shoudn't have created confusion

If it was obvious, then it would be a shit reaction test, right?

Chip Butty · Post Post #192 (isolation #4) » Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:42 pm

In post 189, skirt skirt wrote:VOTE: dunker

this is bad town but i want to vote it anyways

That's L - 2, I believe...

Chip Butty · Post Post #218 (isolation #5) » Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:25 pm

Assuming can also be fun. Like, I'm assuming your avatar comes from you sitting on a tortilla while nude, then making a taco with the tortilla, then making a picture of it.

Chip Butty · Post Post #231 (isolation #6) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:33 am

In post 230, TywinL wrote:VOTE: Havo

While I wait for answers, I would like to put my vote on this slot.

Great. Prepare for a wall of 'OMG! How can you vote me when everything I typed is so Towny this is so unfair you must be a real genius to make accurate reads in the first twenty four hours of the game when it takes me at least a week to tune my exquisite scumhunting powers.'

Chip Butty · Post Post #242 (isolation #7) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 4:09 am

In post 239, skirt skirt wrote:I'm town

This is truly breathtaking in its directness, utter simplicity, and, dare I say, sheer audacity. I mean, isn't this what we all want to say, with every post, regardless of alignment? Skirt Skirt has captured the distilled, crystal-pure essence of Mafia in this disarmingly forthright two-word post, and I, for one, am filled with unadulterated admiration and gratitude. Thank you so much, Skirt Skirt.

Chip Butty · Post Post #303 (isolation #8) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 2:39 pm

In post 272, Havo wrote:
In post 191, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 188, Dunkerdoodles wrote:ok this is really pissing me off
it should've been obvious the fact i wasn't actually mason. it was a reaction test, and it got good reactions and bad reactions. it also sparked discussion which helps town. it really shoudn't have created confusion
If it was obvious, then it would be a shit reaction test, right?
Where are you at with this now?

Haven't shifted. I really hate that kind of stunt and I can't move forward until I get it resolved.

Chip Butty · Post Post #306 (isolation #9) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:13 pm

@Havo: Exactimundo!

You're a lot better in this game...

Chip Butty · Post Post #310 (isolation #10) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:33 pm

In post 307, Mulch wrote:Friendly reminder not to reference ongoing games.

This Dunker wagon is very bad

Technically i didn't, but i see where you're coming from.

What's bad about the wagon?

Chip Butty · Post Post #317 (isolation #11) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 4:00 pm

In post 313, Mulch wrote:
In post 312, Theta Alpine wrote:
In post 311, Mulch wrote:
In post 310, Chip Butty wrote:What's bad about the wagon?
It comes from bad reasons
how are they bad
It's based on the fucking stupid mason claim

ftfy

Chip Butty · Post Post #319 (isolation #12) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 4:13 pm

So you were masons then neighbours then reaction testing then just two guys who townread each other? I'm having trouble keeping a straight face here.

Chip Butty · Post Post #339 (isolation #13) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:38 pm

See, my prob is that I can't really tell if the "mason" are Town who just played a silly prank that went wrong, or scum who were really hoping to pull off the mason caper. And that doubt is going to be lingering behind every decision I face in the game until it is resolved.

Chip Butty · Post Post #342 (isolation #14) » Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:11 pm

In post 340, Mulch wrote:Lmao I must be a better actor than I think I thought it was obvious it was fake lol

What you typed is all i have to go on.

And if obvious fake, how could it be a reaction test? See? We're just going around in circles.

Chip Butty · Post Post #346 (isolation #15) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 2:06 am

In post 344, Klazam wrote:Why mumble

Good question. I said, 'GOOD QUESTION'.

Chip Butty · Post Post #357 (isolation #16) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:22 am

In post 350, Mulch wrote:
In post 342, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 340, Mulch wrote:Lmao I must be a better actor than I think I thought it was obvious it was fake lol

What you typed is all i have to go on.

And if obvious fake, how could it be a reaction test? See? We're just going around in circles.
Quote me where I said it was a reaction test

I didn't say it was you, and my vote isn't on you. Must have been your mason buddy...but now the two of you are inextricably bound together in my mind until we resolve this thing.

Chip Butty · Post Post #359 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:26 am

In post 351, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 350, Mulch wrote:
In post 342, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 340, Mulch wrote:Lmao I must be a better actor than I think I thought it was obvious it was fake lol

What you typed is all i have to go on.

And if obvious fake, how could it be a reaction test? See? We're just going around in circles.
Quote me where I said it was a reaction test
This sounds so scummy to me.
VOTE: Mulch FOUND SCUM

Looks like a legitimate question, unless you can actuallu quote him...This just looks bizarre, really...

Chip Butty · Post Post #360 (isolation #18) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:31 am

More to the point: Don't worry for now, my vote is on DunkerDoodles and might soon be on Serg...

Chip Butty · Post Post #361 (isolation #19) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:33 am

^@Mulch

Chip Butty · Post Post #364 (isolation #20) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:49 am

In post 362, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 360, Chip Butty wrote:More to the point: Don't worry for now, my vote is on DunkerDoodles and might soon be on Serg...
Curious, why me?

Uh, because of your weird scumclaim against Mulch? Where did that come from?

Chip Butty · Post Post #366 (isolation #21) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:42 am

@Taco: I think you're SUI...

Chip Butty · Post Post #380 (isolation #22) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:32 pm

In post 368, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 366, Chip Butty wrote:@Taco: I think you're SUI...
SUI?

Scumming under the influence.

Chip Butty · Post Post #387 (isolation #23) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:21 pm

Okay, this is interesting. If Doodles and Taco are both scum, Doodles is going way above and beyond bussing. And Taco looks so scummy I could lynch him as a Doodle-test...

Chip Butty · Post Post #388 (isolation #24) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:22 pm

GM, could we have a vc please?

Chip Butty · Post Post #390 (isolation #25) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:27 pm

In post 389, skirt skirt wrote:is this secretly a newbie game?

He's discovered our secret, guys...Put code 41b into immediate effect.

Chip Butty · Post Post #392 (isolation #26) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:31 pm

In post 391, TywinL wrote:So no one is gonna take the time to note that tchill did a complete 180 on his reads thus proving that his reads are actually inconsistent which indicates that tchill might actually be scum???

Ok.

Not to defend Tchill, but changing your mind in response to new data is a thing.

Chip Butty · Post Post #395 (isolation #27) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:55 pm

@Tywin: Okay, I'll ISO him...

Chip Butty · Post Post #399 (isolation #28) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:20 pm

In post 359, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 351, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 350, Mulch wrote:
In post 342, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 340, Mulch wrote:Lmao I must be a better actor than I think I thought it was obvious it was fake lol

What you typed is all i have to go on.

And if obvious fake, how could it be a reaction test? See? We're just going around in circles.
Quote me where I said it was a reaction test
This sounds so scummy to me.
VOTE: Mulch FOUND SCUM
Looks like a legitimate question, unless you can actuallu quote him...This just looks bizarre, really...

In post 365, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 364, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 362, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 360, Chip Butty wrote:More to the point: Don't worry for now, my vote is on DunkerDoodles and might soon be on Serg...
Curious, why me?
Uh, because of your weird scumclaim against Mulch? Where did that come from?
Magic. I have gut telling he scum. Vote on him plz.

In post 396, Sergtacos wrote:Lol im not scum xD

In post 397, Sergtacos wrote:I sense that chip butt is scum. I decided to make that move because i wanted to draw out more information. A reaction test which therefore i drew out a lot of reaction and i dont like chip butt's reaction. But i don't like how doodle lied about claiming mason then kept on lying about my case. so my vote stays, if anyone wanna know how he's lying, check his
ISO, I'm lazy to post his quotes bs.

I'm worried that if I don't vote you now, you'll get so massively scummy that you'll rip a hole in the fabric of spacetime.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Taco

Chip Butty · Post Post #400 (isolation #29) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:23 pm

That's L - 2, I think...

Chip Butty · Post Post #402 (isolation #30) » Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:06 pm

In post 401, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 400, Chip Butty wrote:That's L - 2, I think...
I just checked the most recent vote count, im the only person whos voting for fykgus. So yeah, L-2 is a lie, just doing that to draw out reactions for analyzation purposes.

This is the point where your lawyer seals your mouth with masking tape.

Chip Butty · Post Post #407 (isolation #31) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:57 am

In post 404, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 402, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 401, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 400, Chip Butty wrote:That's L - 2, I think...
I just checked the most recent vote count, im the only person whos voting for fykgus. So yeah, L-2 is a lie, just doing that to draw out reactions for analyzation purposes.
This is the point where your lawyer seals your mouth with masking tape.
I'll seal your mouth with masking tape.

Ooh, I'm so scared...

Chip Butty · Post Post #408 (isolation #32) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:58 am

I'm being threatened by a bum-shaped taco. HELP! HELP!

Chip Butty · Post Post #409 (isolation #33) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:07 am

I'll do a proper tchill iso later, I'm too tired right now. I took a quick look and I'm not yet seeing whatever Tywin is seeing.

Chip Butty · Post Post #545 (isolation #34) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:10 am

In post 399, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 359, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 351, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 350, Mulch wrote:
In post 342, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 340, Mulch wrote:Lmao I must be a better actor than I think I thought it was obvious it was fake lol

What you typed is all i have to go on.

And if obvious fake, how could it be a reaction test? See? We're just going around in circles.
Quote me where I said it was a reaction test
This sounds so scummy to me.
VOTE: Mulch FOUND SCUM
Looks like a legitimate question, unless you can actuallu quote him...This just looks bizarre, really...

In post 365, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 364, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 362, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 360, Chip Butty wrote:More to the point: Don't worry for now, my vote is on DunkerDoodles and might soon be on Serg...
Curious, why me?
Uh, because of your weird scumclaim against Mulch? Where did that come from?
Magic. I have gut telling he scum. Vote on him plz.

In post 396, Sergtacos wrote:Lol im not scum xD

In post 397, Sergtacos wrote:I sense that chip butt is scum. I decided to make that move because i wanted to draw out more information. A reaction test which therefore i drew out a lot of reaction and i dont like chip butt's reaction. But i don't like how doodle lied about claiming mason then kept on lying about my case. so my vote stays, if anyone wanna know how he's lying, check his
ISO, I'm lazy to post his quotes bs.
I'm worried that if I don't vote you now, you'll get so massively scummy that you'll rip a hole in the fabric of spacetime.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Taco

Vote count is wrong. My vote isn't on Tylenol it's on Taco...

Taco is L - 1

Chip Butty · Post Post #548 (isolation #35) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:11 am

Actually i think Mulch just hammered...

Chip Butty · Post Post #554 (isolation #36) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:15 am

With my vote on him?

Chip Butty · Post Post #557 (isolation #37) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:17 am

Okay then...

Chip Butty · Post Post #560 (isolation #38) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:20 am

You know, like an ellipse of the sun.

Chip Butty · Post Post #563 (isolation #39) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:20 am

Um, that's an ellipsis.

Chip Butty · Post Post #567 (isolation #40) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:21 am

In post 562, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 560, Chip Butty wrote:You know, like an ellipse of the sun.
Ok so whats Mulch trying to say?

LOL. For real.

Chip Butty · Post Post #571 (isolation #41) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:24 am

In post 566, Mulch wrote:...

THAT'S AN ELLIPSE

IT INDICATES PAUSE

An ellipse is an oval shape

...is an ellipsis

Chip Butty · Post Post #589 (isolation #42) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:37 am

In post 577, Theta Alpine wrote:an ellipsis indicates a pause or a breath in a sentence

According to Urban Dictionary, it's a weird sex thing. But then, according to Urban Dictionary, everything is a weird sex thing.

Chip Butty · Post Post #595 (isolation #43) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:42 am

In post 591, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 589, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 577, Theta Alpine wrote:an ellipsis indicates a pause or a breath in a sentence
According to Urban Dictionary, it's a weird sex thing. But then, according to Urban Dictionary, everything is a weird sex thing.
So mulch was trying to hit on me?

You'll have to ask him that.

Chip Butty · Post Post #600 (isolation #44) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:46 am

In post 599, Mulch wrote:
In post 597, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 592, Tchill13 wrote:You're claiming everything I post is fake from a biased point of view. I've yet to see anything other than one good case as to why I'm scum based in my change in reads. If I'm not allowed to change reads on day 1 then I don't see the point in giving reads at all. It's such an early game state and hardly anyone gets it right on the first shot. I poked and prodded one way and I decided to poke and prod another and that is the only reason my name has been thrown around as scum.
What's biased about my view?
I'm dying lmao

That's the best way to go out.

Chip Butty · Post Post #604 (isolation #45) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:48 am

In post 601, Tchill13 wrote:Lots of fluff coming from chip butty.

I was waiting for that. Also for Taco to get hammered.

Chip Butty · Post Post #614 (isolation #46) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:53 am

In post 605, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 604, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 601, Tchill13 wrote:Lots of fluff coming from chip butty.

I was waiting for that. Also for Taco to get hammered.
Why so desperate for my hammer?

Even though you make the game entertaining, I'm sure you're scum and i want to see you flip so we can look at associations and move on.

Chip Butty · Post Post #621 (isolation #47) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:00 am

In post 615, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 614, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 605, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 604, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 601, Tchill13 wrote:Lots of fluff coming from chip butty.

I was waiting for that. Also for Taco to get hammered.
Why so desperate for my hammer?
Even though you make the game entertaining, I'm sure you're scum and i want to see you flip so we can look at associations and move on.
I'm not scum. Try again.

You're tightly-argued defence has almost convinced me.

Chip Butty · Post Post #624 (isolation #48) » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:03 am

In post 620, Theta Alpine wrote:wait what happened to all the votes on dunker

Taco's scumminess started generating its own gravity and pulled them away.

Chip Butty · Post Post #774 (isolation #49) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:36 pm

In post 698, Dunkerdoodles wrote:hardclaim cop with red on mulch
VOTE: mulch

You're a cop, and you start the game by claiming mason? I find that very plausible. I don't really need to add "/sarcasm", do I?

Chip Butty · Post Post #780 (isolation #50) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:49 pm

In post 777, Fykus wrote:Mulch make me a list of people here whove seen you play town properly. Make me another of people you havent played with

I can see that you're a master baiter. Please stop master baiting Mulch. You'll make him explode.

Chip Butty · Post Post #785 (isolation #51) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:53 pm

In post 782, TywinL wrote:
In post 780, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 777, Fykus wrote:Mulch make me a list of people here whove seen you play town properly. Make me another of people you havent played with
I can see that you're a master baiter. Please stop master baiting Mulch.
Say this out loud and hope that you laughed like I did.

Yes, but the part about making Mulch explode was also part of the joke...

Chip Butty · Post Post #808 (isolation #52) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:10 pm

In post 761, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 759, Mulch wrote:
In post 753, Dunkerdoodles wrote:you not claiming after a guilty is scummy in itself is it not?
Not in the slightest, I'm not claiming unless i need to and I have the feeling town will make the right choice and support me in a 1v1 without me claiming.

YOU are the one that needs to claim before you have time to think of a fake one.
i'm not claiming because then you can easily fakeclaim your way out of this

This seems to be saying that your guilty on Mulch isn't certain? I mean, you're saying there is a role Mulch could have that would invalidate your read? And if he knew your full role, he would know what role invalidates your reads?

Chip Butty · Post Post #811 (isolation #53) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:12 pm

In post 805, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 796, Mulch wrote:
In post 777, Fykus wrote:Mulch make me a list of people here whove seen you play town properly. Make me another of people you havent played with
What does this mean
He wants you to make two lists. In the first list, put the names of everyone here who's been in the same game as you when you were town. The rest go on the second list.

No, no. He's saying Mulch never plays town properly.

Chip Butty · Post Post #814 (isolation #54) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:13 pm

In post 810, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 808, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 761, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 759, Mulch wrote:
In post 753, Dunkerdoodles wrote:you not claiming after a guilty is scummy in itself is it not?
Not in the slightest, I'm not claiming unless i need to and I have the feeling town will make the right choice and support me in a 1v1 without me claiming.

YOU are the one that needs to claim before you have time to think of a fake one.
i'm not claiming because then you can easily fakeclaim your way out of this
This seems to be saying that your guilty on Mulch isn't certain? I mean, you're saying there is a role Mulch could have that would invalidate your read? And if he knew your full role, he would know what role invalidates your reads?
exactly, bang on

Uh...

Chip Butty · Post Post #822 (isolation #55) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:15 pm

In post 812, Mulch wrote:
Bolded: Has been in a completed town!mulch game

Italicized: Has NOT been in a completed town!mulch game

Underlined: Unsure and would require research or a better memory

1. Fykus

2. Mumble*

3. Carcalilly

4. Tchill13
5. Klazam
6. Sergtacos

7. Assemblerotws

8. TywinL

9. Dunkerdoodles

10. Theta Alpine

11. Mulch

12. Chip Butty
13. Havo

Chip Butty · Post Post #843 (isolation #56) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:23 pm

In post 802, Carcalilly wrote:show me whenever dunker fakeclaimed a guilty and I'll eat my words

Have you seen him fakeclaim mason as a cop before? If not, drop the this bs 'meta' defence of him.

Chip Butty · Post Post #858 (isolation #57) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:27 pm

In post 836, Mulch wrote:
In post 827, Dunkerdoodles wrote:you seem to be pushing the fact i was going to be today's lynch which is simply not true

quote a post where someone said "we're lynching dunker if tacos flips town" and i'll retract my words, it might be there and i don't remember it so
You got 2 fucking votes and hammered the power role and Serge declared in his dying breaths that your scum and dead town reads are more accurate than live ones. YOu were eating rope

Are you under a post restriction to say 'eating rope' as many times as possible today?

Chip Butty · Post Post #872 (isolation #58) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:31 pm

In post 862, TywinL wrote:Don't use my gif pls.

You scrub up pretty good.

Chip Butty · Post Post #893 (isolation #59) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:41 pm

In post 877, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 854, Mumble wrote:
In post 848, TywinL wrote:Full claim doesn't clear them...
Explain further, because Dunker said there is a claim that clears Mulch and Mulch said the same.
Somewhere, there is a pair of roles where one is capable of getting a guilty on the other even if the second one is town. Only the role Mulch is hinting at would provide a fake guilty to what Dunker is claiming, and only Dunker's claim could get a fake guilty on the role Mulch is hinting at. Both Mulch and Dunker know what both roles are, even if they don't actually have them. Therefore, if Mulch fullclaims, Dunker would just look at what Mulch posted and be able to fakeclaim the counterpart, while Mulch could do the same if Dunker claims first.

I think i know what ot is, and Mulch saw it in a game i can't discuss. Which makes me kinda suspect him.

Chip Butty · Post Post #901 (isolation #60) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:44 pm

In post 884, Fykus wrote:Carca its time to stop. Noone full claims til tomorrow thus saving town getting killed. Aka mulch and dunk both lynch candidates let mafia do it for us

Dunket has already claimed cop. He can't get more NKable than that.

Chip Butty · Post Post #923 (isolation #61) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:51 pm

In post 918, Mulch wrote:
In post 915, Fykus wrote:VOTE: mulch
I sincerely hope this was a misvote

Xomedy vote, perhaps.

Chip Butty · Post Post #926 (isolation #62) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:52 pm

Xomedy is a lot like comedy.

Chip Butty · Post Post #946 (isolation #63) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:03 pm

Wait, Dunker and Mulch both claim to be mason buddies, then later go head to head in a claim duel to the death in which they both come up with convenient weird-ass claims that support each other? Scum v scum much?

Chip Butty · Post Post #952 (isolation #64) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:06 pm

In post 946, Chip Butty wrote:Wait, Dunker and Mulch both claim to be mason buddies, then later go head to head in a claim duel to the death in which they both come up with convenient weird-ass claims that support each other? Scum v scum much?

VOTE: Mulch as the less valuable claim.

Chip Butty · Post Post #959 (isolation #65) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:12 pm

In post 955, Mulch wrote:
In post 952, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 946, Chip Butty wrote:Wait, Dunker and Mulch both claim to be mason buddies, then later go head to head in a claim duel to the death in which they both come up with convenient weird-ass claims that support each other? Scum v scum much?
VOTE: Mulch as the less valuable claim.
In order for us to be scumvscum we would have to take the risk of BOTH of our claims not being cced by any of the town, let alone having dunk claim a vig which is literally a town only role and proveable af.

Yeah but they're such weird roles the risk of cc is low, and being odd-night, It gives Dunker a free might before he has to prove himself. Besides he can always say he was blocked.

Chip Butty · Post Post #966 (isolation #66) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:16 pm

In post 954, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 946, Chip Butty wrote:Wait, Dunker and Mulch both claim to be mason buddies, then later go head to head in a claim duel to the death in which they both come up with convenient weird-ass claims that support each other? Scum v scum much?
The mason stunt was a joke about a game Mulch, Dunker, and I were all in; the claims sound like the sort of weird interaction only Boonskiies would think of, and I doubt either Mulch or Dunker would have been able to think of that interaction if they didn't have a role it depended on.

I like that you're first to pour water on a line of thought that might have taken heat off you...

Chip Butty · Post Post #974 (isolation #67) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:19 pm

In post 962, Mulch wrote:You think we would take that risk having both of our claims not being cced by any of the town?

@Chip

Well, Dunker is playing weird whatever the truth is, so maybe. I mean a vig who claims mason then cop?

Chip Butty · Post Post #976 (isolation #68) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:21 pm

In post 968, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 965, Assemblerotws wrote:
@Boonskiies, would a Vigilante receive any information at all about the reason their shot didn't work?

No.

Okay, so scum.Dunket can just say his shot didn't go through, for unknown reasons.

Chip Butty · Post Post #977 (isolation #69) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:24 pm

In post 975, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 973, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 966, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 954, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 946, Chip Butty wrote:Wait, Dunker and Mulch both claim to be mason buddies, then later go head to head in a claim duel to the death in which they both come up with convenient weird-ass claims that support each other? Scum v scum much?
The mason stunt was a joke about a game Mulch, Dunker, and I were all in; the claims sound like the sort of weird interaction only Boonskiies would think of, and I doubt either Mulch or Dunker would have been able to think of that interaction if they didn't have a role it depended on.
I like that you're first to pour water on a line of thought that might have taken heat off you...
If Mulch, Dunker, and I are all Town, I'm definitely the one we can afford to lose. Also, that argument was based off faulty data.
Fixed borked quote.

Yeah i wasn't being sarcastic. I really think it makes you look better.

Chip Butty · Post Post #981 (isolation #70) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:26 pm

I don't care if the mason thing references another game. That would be the perect cover if it went wrong, which it did.

Chip Butty · Post Post #984 (isolation #71) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:28 pm

In post 979, Fykus wrote:Alright.

1. Im a town enchantress - boon gives shit weird names so he wouldnt straight up call you a commuter.

2. My role lets me force commute others, i.e you. Im also 1 shot bp

3. It seems like scum knew that something like this happened last night because their kill didnt come through. You and dunk probably thought up this whole drama in the scum chat.

Therefore we have to lynch dunk and find out. If hes vig no big loss we lynch you tomorrow.

4. Why would scum of targeted you last night after the way you carried on yesterday. Had you kept it up youd of been helping scum this game in their eyes

Lynch mulch first. Less valuable claim.

Chip Butty · Post Post #995 (isolation #72) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:35 pm

In post 991, TywinL wrote:

P-Edit: Yeah I thought this was normal, not theme

There's a reason you get to read ninja posts before hitting submit. Just sayin'.

Chip Butty · Post Post #999 (isolation #73) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:36 pm

In post 994, TywinL wrote:Can we like, lynch someone else and do this tomorrow?

Why? Tonight is an even night. What is it going to prove?

Ohhhh.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1005 (isolation #74) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:40 pm

In post 986, Fykus wrote:Nope. Dunk first incase the whole things a ruse

If it's a ruse, they're both in on it.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1007 (isolation #75) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:44 pm

In post 1002, Fykus wrote:Boon wouldnt make 2 commuters on the same team. The whole matching claims is too convenient. Lynch dunk today mulch tomorrow

A man who can make an odd-night one-shot bulletproof forced commuter is capable of anything.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1009 (isolation #76) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:46 pm

I might have conflated their roles slightly there...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1010 (isolation #77) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:47 pm

In post 1008, Fykus wrote:
In post 1005, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 986, Fykus wrote:Nope. Dunk first incase the whole things a ruse
If it's a ruse, they're both in on it.
Exactly. Dunk first

Maybe I'm being thick here, but why not the less valuable claim first.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1019 (isolation #78) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:06 pm

In post 1016, Fykus wrote:I targeted mulch cause he was acting stupid and it was highly unlikely mafia would target him. Imagine my face when a no kill happened

Technically, a kill failed to happen. Sorry, I'm anal when it comes to ontology.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1021 (isolation #79) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:08 pm

Is that the same guy who did that viral star wars thing years ago?

Chip Butty · Post Post #1032 (isolation #80) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:39 pm

In post 1030, Havo wrote:
In post 1028, TywinL wrote:Hey Havo, can you explain your vote on Taco on Day 1?
Sure. It was a pretty selfish vote tbh. I've played with Tacos before and I find it extremely difficult to read him.

And he has a way of spamming the thread that derails my senses. So after he posted a couple of things I didn't like, I felt like there was a decent chance he might flip scum. So that with the above reasons was good enough for me.

I can buy this.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1040 (isolation #81) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:48 pm

I can't see scum.Fykus outing himself to take down a vig.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1050 (isolation #82) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:01 pm

In post 1046, Tchill13 wrote:hey guys its multiball and we have a claimed vig but nobody died night 1...

It's...it's a miracle!

Chip Butty · Post Post #1052 (isolation #83) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:07 pm

In post 1051, Fykus wrote:How could i come up with such an outlandish role to counter claim someone town was just about to lock town all for the purpose of trying to lynch 1 town member? Thats like a 2 for 1 deal with mafia coming out the losers

Town wasn't about to locktown anyone. I'd already re-raised suspicion of Dunker and Mulch. But you're right about the 2 for 1 part.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1059 (isolation #84) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:15 pm

I'm starting to think Boon put something in the water...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1060 (isolation #85) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:15 pm

I can switch to Dunker...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1067 (isolation #86) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:25 pm

In post 1062, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 956, Fykus wrote:
In post 953, Mulch wrote:
In post 951, Fykus wrote:Give us the names of the roles boon gave you both
Town odd-night commuter
Ok now dunk give us the name of the role boon gave you, not a description of what it is
Town Odd-Night Loyal Vigilante

Let me see if i am keeping track right:

You're a mason neighbour cope odd-night loyal vig? Did i miss anything?

Chip Butty · Post Post #1073 (isolation #87) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:42 pm

In post 1072, Klazam wrote:20 pages to catch up on, oh god

also y all idiots for lynching taco.

It would have been 40 pages if we hadn't.

That's the thanks we get...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1087 (isolation #88) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:04 pm

In post 1084, Mulch wrote:VOTE: dunkerdoodles

OMGUS

I love the way people think if you say 'OMGUS', it somehow makes it less OMGUS.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1088 (isolation #89) » Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:07 pm

In post 1087, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1084, Mulch wrote:VOTE: dunkerdoodles

OMGUS
I love the way people think if you say 'OMGUS', it somehow makes it less OMGUS.

It's funny because it's true.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1119 (isolation #90) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:39 am

In post 698, Dunkerdoodles wrote:hardclaim cop with red on mulch
VOTE: mulch

In post 699, Fykus wrote:VOTE: mulch

In post 700, Mulch wrote:LMAO

VOTE: Dunkerdoodles

You can't have targeted me last night LOL

Can you guys check this theory and tell me if I'm being dumb here:

1. Town.Mulch commutes N1
2. Town.Dunker shoots Mulch N1, but learns his shot didn't go through and concludes Mulch is scum.
3. Town.Dunker hardclaims cop to prevent Mulch from fakeclaming commuter, and accuses Mulch.
4. Scum.Fykus, who didn't force-commute Mulch at all, and thus doesn't know that a cop investigation of Mulch wouldn't go through, jumps on the Mulch wagon.
5. Mulch knows a cop investigation of him would have failed and suspects Dunker of fakeclaiming.
6. 1v1 clusterfuck etc.

So...Town.Mulch, Town.Dunker, Scum.Fykus

Also, enchanted princess sounds like someone is taking the piss...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1120 (isolation #91) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:44 am

^In this scenario, Mulch and Dunker's claims (loyal commuter, vig) are true...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1125 (isolation #92) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:52 am

UNVOTE: Mulch

Almost forgot...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1126 (isolation #93) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:53 am

VOTE: Fykus

Chip Butty · Post Post #1135 (isolation #94) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:04 am

In post 952, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 946, Chip Butty wrote:Wait, Dunker and Mulch both claim to be mason buddies, then later go head to head in a claim duel to the death in which they both come up with convenient weird-ass claims that support each other? Scum v scum much?
VOTE: Mulch as the less valuable claim.

In post 1130, Tchill13 wrote:Mulch/dunker are practically conf scum at this point there's really no reason for one of them not to be lynched. Anyone pushing anybody else at least for this day phase looks a little scummy. I believe fykus claim at the moment.

I was the one who threw shade on them when town was about to townlock them following the 1v1...

Chip Butty · Post Post #1140 (isolation #95) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:10 am

In post 1137, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1135, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 952, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 946, Chip Butty wrote:Wait, Dunker and Mulch both claim to be mason buddies, then later go head to head in a claim duel to the death in which they both come up with convenient weird-ass claims that support each other? Scum v scum much?
VOTE: Mulch as the less valuable claim.

In post 1130, Tchill13 wrote:Mulch/dunker are practically conf scum at this point there's really no reason for one of them not to be lynched. Anyone pushing anybody else at least for this day phase looks a little scummy. I believe fykus claim at the moment.
I was the one who threw shade on them when town was about to townlock them following the 1v1...
I called dunker/mulch scum team after the Mason claim.

Yeah but they got past that with their 1v1. Read through the sequence after they both produced their current claims.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1142 (isolation #96) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:11 am

It was my #946 that put the spotlight back on them until now.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1145 (isolation #97) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:16 am

In post 1143, Tchill13 wrote:OK I understand you're trying to get town cred right here but fykus is really the only reason they're gonna get lynched.

If by lynched you mean mislynched, I agree.

Chip Butty · Post Post #1147 (isolation #98) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:17 am

Tchill, which part of my analysis clashes with the known facts?

Chip Butty · Post Post #1150 (isolation #99) » Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:21 am

In post 1119, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 698, Dunkerdoodles wrote:hardclaim cop with red on mulch
VOTE: mulch

In post 699, Fykus wrote:VOTE: mulch

In post 700, Mulch wrote:LMAO

VOTE: Dunkerdoodles

You can't have targeted me last night LOL
Can you guys check this theory and tell me if I'm being dumb here:

1. Town.Mulch commutes N1
2. Town.Dunker shoots Mulch N1, but learns his shot didn't go through and concludes Mulch is scum.
3. Town.Dunker hardclaims cop to prevent Mulch from fakeclaming commuter, and accuses Mulch.
4. Scum.Fykus, who didn't force-commute Mulch at all, and thus doesn't know that a cop investigation of Mulch wouldn't go through, jumps on the Mulch wagon.
5. Mulch knows a cop investigation of him would have failed and suspects Dunker of fakeclaiming.
6. 1v1 clusterfuck etc.

So...Town.Mulch, Town.Dunker, Scum.Fykus

Also, enchanted princess sounds like someone is taking the piss...

In post 1149, Tchill13 wrote:You said it was scum v scum? I agree with that chip. Why are you saying they'll be mislynched?

Because now i think this is what happened. Did you even fucking read it before leaping to judgement?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:23 am

It explains that sequence #698-#700 perfectly.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:26 am

In post 1148, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1142, Chip Butty wrote:It was my #946 that put the spotlight back on them until now.

In post 1145, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1143, Tchill13 wrote:OK I understand you're trying to get town cred right here but fykus is really the only reason they're gonna get lynched.
If by lynched you mean mislynched, I agree.
Well in your mind if they're "mislynched" it's your fault because you put the spot light back on them. So bravo chip butty if they're "mislynched".

I've done my best to prevent it. If people push on with it, it won't be my fault.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:27 am

In post 1152, Tchill13 wrote:You said 900 something you didn't point out that post.

What?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:51 am

In post 1156, Tchill13 wrote:Let's lynch mulch. If he's scum we lynch dunker. If he's town we lynch fykus. Trading a townie for a scum is fine. We also have a possibility of catching 2 scum with this. I don't see why you'd push against that.

I'm not lynching Mulch or Dunker unless someone can show me an alternative theory that explains #698-#700 including the Fykus vote on Mulch, and in which Mulch and/or Dunker are scum and Fykus isn't.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:59 am

FoS @ Tchill. He's arguing like he knows Fykus is going to hang but wants to take at least one of Mulch/Dunker down first.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:29 am

In post 1206, Fykus wrote:No. Boon can create 1 new wacky role per game. Noone has come out and said that no, they have a wacky role

Maybe there is a whacky vig who is going to whack your whacky ass. And no that isn't a claim of any kind.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:33 am

In post 1162, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1159, Chip Butty wrote:FoS @ Tchill. He's arguing like he knows Fykus is going to hang but wants to take at least one of Mulch/Dunker down first.
You're play this day phase seems like you're either trying to come off as a genius and making things more complicated than they actually are.

That doesn't even make sense. I can only come across as a genius if i am correct. Which means that if that is what i am trying to do then i believe what i say. Which in turn means I'm just scum hunting.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:43 am

I don't see why scum.Mulch would claim commuter, knowing that there was no NK. why incriminate himself like that? If Mulch and Dunker are scum and planned that, they are idiots.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:49 am

In post 1283, TywinL wrote:
You know what, fuck it. This is ridiculous. I am having a hard time believing that everyone actually targeted Mulch because I am a PR and I did not target Mulch.

That...could be the dumbest argument I've ever read.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:52 am

In post 1289, Tchill13 wrote:Everyone targets mulch... Not enough people want to lynch him after a no kill/no result commute... What the hell?

Again, Fykus is lying about his force commute, hence his Much vote at #699. And why would scum.Mulch claim commuter and incriminaye himself?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:06 am

In post 1303, Mulch wrote:I OBVIOUSLY WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE NIGHTKILLED STOP VOTING ME

You know, Havo actually pointed out that your commuting yourself / being commuted was equiv to being jailed. Yet he just took this as evidence you were the designated NKer, without considering you might have been the NK target. How scummy / dumb is that?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:08 am

Fykus-Teech-Havo

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:10 am

I'm a VT.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:47 am

In post 1340, Havo wrote:
In post 1316, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1303, Mulch wrote:I OBVIOUSLY WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE NIGHTKILLED STOP VOTING ME
You know, Havo actually pointed out that your commuting yourself / being commuted was equiv to being jailed. Yet he just took this as evidence you were the designated NKer, without considering you might have been the NK target. How scummy / dumb is that?
You know Chip I'm really starting to dislike you as a person. No need for the personal attacks. You were wrong before and you are wrong again.

Well, do you have an explanation for your oversight that doesn't involve you being scummy or dumb?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:55 am

In post 1119, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 698, Dunkerdoodles wrote:hardclaim cop with red on mulch
VOTE: mulch

In post 699, Fykus wrote:VOTE: mulch

In post 700, Mulch wrote:LMAO

VOTE: Dunkerdoodles

You can't have targeted me last night LOL
Can you guys check this theory and tell me if I'm being dumb here:

1. Town.Mulch commutes N1
2. Town.Dunker shoots Mulch N1, but learns his shot didn't go through and concludes Mulch is scum.
3. Town.Dunker hardclaims cop to prevent Mulch from fakeclaming commuter, and accuses Mulch.
4. Scum.Fykus, who didn't force-commute Mulch at all, and thus doesn't know that a cop investigation of Mulch wouldn't go through, jumps on the Mulch wagon.
5. Mulch knows a cop investigation of him would have failed and suspects Dunker of fakeclaiming.
6. 1v1 clusterfuck etc.

So...Town.Mulch, Town.Dunker, Scum.Fykus

Also, enchanted princess sounds like someone is taking the piss...

Fykus, can you (or anyone) actually point to any known facts that refute any of this?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:58 am

In post 1354, Havo wrote:
In post 1353, Mulch wrote:
In post 1351, Havo wrote:I believed Fykus's claim. And it was Mulch's REACTION!!!!!!!! That convinced me he was scum.
I would not give up as scum. The multiball was a classic reaction test. Your looking really scummy here trying to jump on a "scumclaim" that dosen't exist. How are you gonna look when I flip town, hmmmm with you pushing me as a "scumclaim"
I'll believe you're town when I see the Mod post it.

Then I'll blame it on your poor play and not take any responsibility for it at all.

That's how it's done here. Ain't it Chip?

Sounds like you have a Chip on your shoulder.

Fuck, I'm hilarious.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:00 am

In post 1347, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1340, Havo wrote:
In post 1316, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1303, Mulch wrote:I OBVIOUSLY WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE NIGHTKILLED STOP VOTING ME
You know, Havo actually pointed out that your commuting yourself / being commuted was equiv to being jailed. Yet he just took this as evidence you were the designated NKer, without considering you might have been the NK target. How scummy / dumb is that?
You know Chip I'm really starting to dislike you as a person. No need for the personal attacks. You were wrong before and you are wrong again.

Well, do you have an explanation for your oversight that doesn't involve you being scummy or dumb?

Apparently not.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:10 am

In post 1374, Fykus wrote:Chip ill respond when mass claim is finished

Okey-dokely.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:30 am

In post 1382, Mulch wrote:Rolestop would stop the commuterizer. Which means if Theta is town it's 100% confirmed that I took the nightkill.

What if there is a BP we haven't heard from? Or something? 100% seems to be going a little too far at this point.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:47 am

According to the wiki, Rolestoppers aren't necessarily town.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:10 pm

Oh man! Another 8 pages? Okay, reading through...

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:16 pm

In post 1429, Fykus wrote:Na its gone. Hasnt been there all game

I thought it was deliberate. I was thinking 'How artistic!'

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:29 pm

In post 1544, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1537, Mulch wrote:
In post 1532, Tchill13 wrote:If mulch was town he would have done this a long time ago so town wouldn't have been distracted going further. Scum already got their information with enough claims.
Cut your FUCKING BULLSHIT, you SAID YOURSELF YOU SCUMREAD ME FOR SELF VOTING EARLIER, YOU IDIOT CONFLICTING SCUM, YOU ARE OBVIOUS TO ME AND YOU WILL BE LYNCHED TOMORROW
Ah. This captain goes down angrily with his ship.

Lol

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:32 pm

In post 1552, Mulch wrote:
If town does not trust my reads, you deserve to lose.

Stop acting like an idiot. This isn't a game where you trust people easily.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:46 pm

Haven't seen anything to change my mind. Looking forward to seeing what Fykus has to say for himself after Carca claims.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:48 pm

In post 1605, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1604, Fykus wrote:I agree though the lynch is between me and theta
and mulch. we lynch mulch to catch the 90 percent scum instead of the 100 percent to make sure one does't get away.

Death-tunnelling much?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:50 pm

In post 1612, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1610, Chip Butty wrote:Haven't seen anything to change my mind. Looking forward to seeing what Fykus has to say for himself after Carca claims.
fykus bp tag is what condemns him.

Yeah i don't like that either. Ninja'd

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:52 pm

In post 1616, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1613, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1605, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1604, Fykus wrote:I agree though the lynch is between me and theta
and mulch. we lynch mulch to catch the 90 percent scum instead of the 100 percent to make sure one does't get away.
Death-tunnelling much?
no, death tunneling mulch. lol

Lol

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:56 pm

In post 1588, Tchill13 wrote:My guess is that the 3rd scum is in VT's. It's not have due to his interaction with mulch. Probably chip butty.

If me and Mulch were both scum, wtf would i throw a bucket of shade on him and Dunker just when they were going to be townlocked following the role 1v1?

And why would i then argue against Fykus that we should lynch Mulch before Dunker?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:01 pm

In post 1623, Tchill13 wrote:hey man its just a guess. the 3rd isn't important right now. lynching the first 2 are.

Well, guess again...

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:07 pm

In post 1625, Tchill13 wrote:i dont even care to figure the 3rd out right now

Unless Fykus comes up with something really special when the massclaim is done, we should lynch him, since we agree he is scum.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:11 pm

In post 1627, Tchill13 wrote:nah mulch first

Your doing that for personal reasons, not town reasons. Your precious read record on Mulch. Nobody gives a shit, besides you.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:21 pm

In post 1630, Tchill13 wrote:think about it like this. we had mulch dead to rights, he voted himself tipped his hat and we went from that to a mass claim. so explain to me why we shouldn't lynch mulch when we were that close to lynching "certain" scum and the scum team managed to convince town mass claiming was a good idea.

Fykus was the one pushing the massclaim, and from way earlier in the game too. Ithink you are just engaging in one upmanship with Mulch, so worried about how good he will look if he wins as scum that you are tunnelling him.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:23 pm

Or, of course, that you are scum with Fykus.

And Havo, prob.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:25 pm

I think the hat-tipping was sarcasm and the self-vote was frustration, as i think he said. Seems believable from what I have seen of Mulch so far.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:47 pm

In post 1634, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 1633, Chip Butty wrote:I think the hat-tipping was sarcasm and the self-vote was frustration, as i think he said. Seems believable from what I have seen of Mulch so far.
yeah, definately not a last ditch gambit from mulch.

You've already admitted that my analysis showing town Mulch and Dunker and scum Fykus is viable. It stands to reason you can't be as sure about Mulch as you are making out.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:56 pm

In post 1640, Dunkerdoodles wrote:right now i want mulch lynched, i'm not letting someone that claims scum get away with it

That's not a good reason to lynch. The only good reason is that you think he is scum.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:07 pm

In post 1647, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 1038, Mulch wrote:
@Fykus

explain how this is not a scumclaim

Have you ever seen Mulch do that as scum before?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:11 pm

In post 1655, TywinL wrote:I will say it again. I think it would be best if we lynched in the VT pool. Decent chance of hitting scum while minimizing our loss if we pick wrong.

We have three PRs fighting to get their heads in the noose, and you want to lynch among VTs? That is either scummy or sooooo bad.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:14 pm

Whoops! Two PRs and a VT.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:18 pm

Wait. That just shows Havo wasn't the designated NKer. It doesn't clear him.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:20 pm

In post 1676, TywinL wrote:
In post 1667, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1655, TywinL wrote:I will say it again. I think it would be best if we lynched in the VT pool. Decent chance of hitting scum while minimizing our loss if we pick wrong.
We have three PRs fighting to get their heads in the noose, and you want to lynch among VTs? That is either scummy or sooooo bad.
This is a bad post.

Why? And why are you being so quick to clear Havo?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:21 pm

You implied it by linking your result on Havo to improved chances of success by randomly lynching among VTs.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:23 pm

Your result is exactly neutral with regard to Havo alignment.

Have is nowhere near 95% confirmed VT.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:24 pm

We don't even know if you are really a tracker yet.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:26 pm

In post 1687, TywinL wrote:To sum, Havo is just as clear as Carca at the moment.

P-edit: *sigh*

No he isn't. You're beginning to replace tchill in my affections.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:27 pm

Why are you death tunnelling Assembler?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:37 pm

In post 1355, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1119, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 698, Dunkerdoodles wrote:hardclaim cop with red on mulch
VOTE: mulch

In post 699, Fykus wrote:VOTE: mulch

In post 700, Mulch wrote:LMAO

VOTE: Dunkerdoodles

You can't have targeted me last night LOL
Can you guys check this theory and tell me if I'm being dumb here:

1. Town.Mulch commutes N1
2. Town.Dunker shoots Mulch N1, but learns his shot didn't go through and concludes Mulch is scum.
3. Town.Dunker hardclaims cop to prevent Mulch from fakeclaming commuter, and accuses Mulch.
4. Scum.Fykus, who didn't force-commute Mulch at all, and thus doesn't know that a cop investigation of Mulch wouldn't go through, jumps on the Mulch wagon.
5. Mulch knows a cop investigation of him would have failed and suspects Dunker of fakeclaiming.
6. 1v1 clusterfuck etc.

So...Town.Mulch, Town.Dunker, Scum.Fykus

Also, enchanted princess sounds like someone is taking the piss...
Fykus, can you (or anyone) actually point to any known facts that refute any of this?

Okay Fykus. If we're assuming Carco gets massive town cred from skirt's departure, it's time to cough up on that IOU...

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:46 pm

In post 1701, Fykus wrote:
In post 1699, TywinL wrote:I am not liking Chip Butty rn, he's so eager to lynch one in the PR pool.
so am i. thats why i wanted the mass claim. now we can look objectively at the claimed roles and pick out which ones dont seem to fit. i agree that there is probably a scum in the vt's though.

And that doesn't have anything ro do with the fact i am pushing to getvyou lynched, i suppose?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:48 pm

In post 1707, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 1702, TywinL wrote:
In post 1700, Fykus wrote:mafia prs can pr and kill at the same time.
If that's true, then I guess my result is useless...
not true
it still gives us info

Very little info. Itvonly tells us Havo stayed home. And that's only if Ty is really a tracker.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:50 pm

In post 1710, Fykus wrote:
In post 1708, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1701, Fykus wrote:
In post 1699, TywinL wrote:I am not liking Chip Butty rn, he's so eager to lynch one in the PR pool.
so am i. thats why i wanted the mass claim. now we can look objectively at the claimed roles and pick out which ones dont seem to fit. i agree that there is probably a scum in the vt's though.

And that doesn't have anything ro do with the fact i am pushing to getvyou lynched, i suppose?
are you insinuating im trying to pocket you by saying that i wanna lynch within the prs?

Sorry i misread you. I thought you were agreeing with Tywin thatci looked scummy.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:01 pm

Tywin confirmable by tracking scum.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:10 pm

In post 1730, Tchill13 wrote:still want to lynch mulch then fykus.

Why can't Mulch have been the NK target?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:35 pm

I'm having trouble getting my Fykus hard-on down. Gimme time...

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:50 pm

In post 1755, Fykus wrote:im willing to lynch mulch after we lynch theta. theta is a scum rolestopper so obviously we should deal with him first yeah?
i find it really hard to get my head around a commuterizer plus am odd night commuter in one game.

mulch i know your gonna say red herring and what not so for me i want you to make a list of what you think the towns pr's consist of. like whos lying and whos telling the truth. please and thankyou.

So...you're saying your role is incompatible with Theta's AND with Mulch's? So we have to believe you are lying, or both of them are? Is that what you're saying?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:53 pm

You were lying about the BP part. Maybe the rest, too?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:06 pm

In post 1785, Klazam wrote:wait.

isnt a forced commuterizer basically a jailkeeper?

That's been pointed out at least twice.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:36 pm

In post 1830, Fykus wrote:but theta didnt cc me teech? this is a boon game teech, wheres the boon role teech wheres the boon role?

You are the Boon role. Just maybe not the one you claimed.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:40 pm

In post 1815, Mulch wrote:
In post 1813, Klazam wrote:okay.

Thought about it hard. I actually wanna lynch tywin. I dont see a tracker happening in this setup.

Can a tracker track rolestopping or whatever the neighbour thing is? Because if not, Tracker doesn't seem super useful here. Can track NKer and confirm a vig shot but that's about it.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:47 pm

In post 1836, Fykus wrote:your making my eyes roll into the back of my head chip boy me bob.

Iwhen Carca has claimed and if you can then debunk my analysis of #698-#700, I'll reconsider my position.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:54 pm

In post 1842, Fykus wrote:is that the thing where mulch and theta and dunk are all town?

No just Mulch and Dunk.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:08 pm

In post 1844, Fykus wrote:im sorry but i cant see a commuterizer and a commuter. as much as mulch loves his role miller dealy, i just cant believe it. sorry

I agree. One of you is scum.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:10 pm

The role miller part: I dunno but everyone keeps saying Ooooh Boonie game! It's going to be insaaaaaane!

So, why not?

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:18 pm

In post 1850, Fykus wrote:cool. so now we just have to agree on the order.

or better yet you can let me try verify mulch tonight?

I think I'm fine with letting you commuterise Mulch tonight. If there is an NK, he's clear and you hang.

Unless you're the NK, in which case you're clear lol.

I honestly don't know who else i want vote for right now...

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:21 pm

In post 1851, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1850, Fykus wrote:cool. so now we just have to agree on the order.

or better yet you can let me try verify mulch tonight?
I think I'm fine with letting you commuterise Mulch tonight. If there is an NK, he's clear and you hang.

Unless you're the NK, in which case you're clear lol.

I honestly don't know who else i want vote for right now...

Actually disregard that. I need a break. See you all later...

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:22 pm

I've been following the thread for hours. My head is starting to spin.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:23 pm

In post 1853, Klazam wrote:(Also i wasnt serious about tywin, was fishing for comments from you all. still undecided on where i wanna go)

Surprise! It was a reaction test!

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:57 pm

In post 1784, Dunkerdoodles wrote:we also keep forgetting tacos was WEAK, therefore he dies if he targets scum
making him also a really bad cop with upside kinda. idk how to explain it

with that
2 shot friendly neighbor
odd night loyal vig
odd night commuter
tracker
non consecutive bg
vs
scum rolestopper
scum other pr
goon
how does this look?

highly doubt town also gets a rolestopper with THIS setup, but i don't want to lynch theta.

I just dropped back in for a mo because i was taking a dump and it struck me what else was bothering me about the tracker claim. Look at all the other PR claims: they all have a twist, like odd night, non consec, weak friendly etc. Or scum they're slighty unusual like role stopper or weird like enchantress.

And in the middle of all that role-fuckery stands...a tracker. A plain ordinary unadorned bare tracker.

Chip Butty · Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:01 pm

Corrected version. I REALLY need a break...took out the word 'scum'

I just dropped back in for a mo because i was taking a dump and it struck me what else was bothering me about the tracker claim. Look at all the other PR claims: they all have a twist, like odd night, non consec, weak friendly etc. Or they're slighty unusual like role stopper or weird like enchantress.

And in the middle of all that role-fuckery stands...a tracker. A plain ordinary unadorned bare tracker.[/quote]

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:29 am

In post 1863, TywinL wrote:Okay, I am especially not liking Chip Butty right now, just throwing shade everywhere.

Show me where i am "throwing shade everywhere". I'm throwing shade on Fykus for reasons stated, and you because your role seems odd in the context of the game, and Havo, is not at all cleared by your alleged track, even though you keep trying to sell it. Tchill yeah but not really sure now.

I mean, if i only focussed on one player, you'd be accusing me of tunnelling.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:32 am

Your real objection is i'm throwing shade at you.

@Tywin

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:37 am

In post 1862, Havo wrote:After reading all of that, I still think Mulch is the best Lynch.

If not Mulch then Theta.

@Chip, why in Gods name are you so damn sure Mulch is town????
U do realize that when he flips scum you are done right?

You have went way above and beyond to defend him. And keep him alive.

Like i said, once Carca has claimed, I'll see if Fykus can explain his actions, and either stick to my current position or abandon it.

Anyway we have time to calmly examine the proposed solutions to see if they hold water. That should be our next step.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:40 am

In post 1861, Klazam wrote:Having a tracker plays "well" with my role though

But it seems odd that there is no twist to the role, in this game.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:43 am

@Tywin: Of course i am throwing shade on some people. Just as you are and everybody else is.

I dunno. Maybe 'throwing shade' means something different to you. To me it means voicing suspicion.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:49 am

In post 1885, TywinL wrote:
In post 1883, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1861, Klazam wrote:Having a tracker plays "well" with my role though
But it seems odd that there is no twist to the role, in this game.
No, not necessarily. We have a non-consec, odd-night modifiers that can throw off my track results.

P-Edit: Not true, I'm okay with a theta lynch.

Are you deliberately missing the point? The point is that all the other claimed PRs are unusual in some way. But not yours. It's the only xommon bog-standard claim in rhe game.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:57 am

In post 1898, Dunkerdoodles wrote:Chip that has nothing to do with. Regular tracker in this game is fine. Twyin is probably legit

I'll drop it for now. Just struck me as odd. I'm not the only one trying to glean clues from the setup. And Tywin did have an OMGUSy response to my probing.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:11 am

In post 1887, Havo wrote:This is how Town should proceed -

Lynch Mulch first. If one is scum then both are.

Mulch claimed a role that is of no use to town
Theta' s role can be now that we've mass claimed.

If Mulch flips scum we lynch Theta next.
If Mulch flips Town. We have Theta and Fykus target
2 of the claimed VTs tonight.

That's the scummiest plan ever. We lynch Mulch, he flips town. Theta and Fykis target two VTs. If both VTs are town, scum refrain from NKing and sit back and laugh while town lynches two more town. And if one of the VTs is scum they NK in the PRs. Scum can't lose on this plan. And why would we trust Fykus if Mulch flips town?

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:13 am

In post 1902, TywinL wrote:
In post 1901, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1898, Dunkerdoodles wrote:Chip that has nothing to do with. Regular tracker in this game is fine. Twyin is probably legit
I'll drop it for now. Just struck me as odd. I'm not the only one trying to glean clues from the setup. And Tywin did have an OMGUSy response to my probing.
You were literally misrepping and twisting my words when I outed my result so of course I'm gonna suspect you.

It still appears to me you are giving Havo too much credit from your result. How's that?

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:18 am

In post 1674, TywinL wrote:I tracked Havo last night and I got "Target didn't go anywhere"

This is why I'm pushing for a lynch among the VT pool, because Havo is like 95% confirmed VT (more than the other VTs) so our chances are pretty good for hitting scum. If we mislynch, oh well, it's just a VT. Lynching a claimed PR is too risky in my POV.

P-Edit: I would never leave you guys <3

Here is what Tywin said when he announced his result. Havo 95% cleared just because he didn't do an NK that didn't even happen? In what universe is that not ludicrous / scummy?

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:22 am

In post 1911, Tchill13 wrote:Only consistency in chips game play is going above and beyond not to lynch mulch. The other guy who threw shad on havos plan was theta which it could provide incriminating evidence against theta so that makes sense... Any other opinions outside of those 2?

Correction: Chip's RECENT gameplay. Before that i was gung ho to lynch Mulch, for about 200 posts. I've pointed this out to you before, but you keep conveniently forgetting.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:23 am

In post 1914, Tchill13 wrote:In what universe is it not ludicrous/scummy to not lynch someone multiple people claim that he's 100 percent scum.

In all the universes in which he is town, like this one.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:29 am

In post 1919, Tchill13 wrote:So chip has now taken a hard stance mulch is town. More information for the flip.

I'm the most vocal, but if there werent plenty others who think Mulch is town I'm sure you could get the numbers to lynch him.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:32 am

In post 1920, Tchill13 wrote:There reasons for not lynching mulch aren't even the same. It's 2 completely different reasons. No one finds that odd?

Lol if we had the same reasons, you'd be saying we were working it out in daytalk. Keep overreachibg til you fall flat on your face. You're trying way too hard here.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:36 am

As I've said several times, I'm reserving my final verdict on Mulch until Carca has claimed and we hear more from Fykus.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:38 am

Listen to Theta, people. Could someone with a formula like that in his avatar ever be wrong about anything?

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:40 am

I mean, just the aleph null is impressive.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:23 am

In post 1967, Havo wrote:
In post 1965, Theta Alpine wrote:
In post 1964, Havo wrote:
In post 1957, Mulch wrote:Hey havo where did the nightkill go.
What DONT you understand???????

Fykus Comuted U.

Theta lied.
then lynch me
and watch me flip rolestopper
VOTE: Theta

Works for me.

Are you ready to die for this Havo?

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:33 am

In post 1970, Tchill13 wrote:Havo don't change your mindset until the others get on. We do not negotiate with scum lol. Mulch is the lynch you know this havo.

"OMG THERE IS IT THEY STILL CAN'T LYNCH THEIR SCUM PARTNER" - Mulch

Come on teech - 1 town for one scum is a good deal, right? Let's do this. Lynch theta even though his role is potentially valuable for town. When he flips green lynch Havo. To make it interesting, you can lynch me if theta flips red.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:36 am

In post 1975, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 1974, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1970, Tchill13 wrote:Havo don't change your mindset until the others get on. We do not negotiate with scum lol. Mulch is the lynch you know this havo.

"OMG THERE IS IT THEY STILL CAN'T LYNCH THEIR SCUM PARTNER" - Mulch
Come on teech - 1 town for one scum is a good deal, right? Let's do this. Lynch theta even though his role is potentially valuable for town. When he flips green lynch Havo. To make it interesting, you can lynch me if theta flips red.
this is so scummy i can't put it in words

Wut?

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:38 am

In post 1978, Havo wrote:
In post 1975, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 1974, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1970, Tchill13 wrote:Havo don't change your mindset until the others get on. We do not negotiate with scum lol. Mulch is the lynch you know this havo.

"OMG THERE IS IT THEY STILL CAN'T LYNCH THEIR SCUM PARTNER" - Mulch
Come on teech - 1 town for one scum is a good deal, right? Let's do this. Lynch theta even though his role is potentially valuable for town. When he flips green lynch Havo. To make it interesting, you can lynch me if theta flips red.
this is so scummy i can't put it in words
He's been scummy the last 20 pages.

Vindictive much? Let it go.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:41 am

In post 1975, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 1974, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1970, Tchill13 wrote:Havo don't change your mindset until the others get on. We do not negotiate with scum lol. Mulch is the lynch you know this havo.

"OMG THERE IS IT THEY STILL CAN'T LYNCH THEIR SCUM PARTNER" - Mulch
Come on teech - 1 town for one scum is a good deal, right? Let's do this. Lynch theta even though his role is potentially valuable for town. When he flips green lynch Havo. To make it interesting, you can lynch me if theta flips red.
this is so scummy i can't put it in words

Perhaps it would have helped if i had added '/sarcasm'. I thought it was blindingly obvious...

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:42 am

In post 1980, Dunkerdoodles wrote:he was bad town before. that post was actually scummy

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:44 am

In post 1980, Dunkerdoodles wrote:he was bad town before. that post was actually scummy

Badtown is fakeclaiming mason, bozo.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:46 am

In post 1984, Havo wrote:
In post 1981, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1975, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 1974, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1970, Tchill13 wrote:Havo don't change your mindset until the others get on. We do not negotiate with scum lol. Mulch is the lynch you know this havo.

"OMG THERE IS IT THEY STILL CAN'T LYNCH THEIR SCUM PARTNER" - Mulch
Come on teech - 1 town for one scum is a good deal, right? Let's do this. Lynch theta even though his role is potentially valuable for town. When he flips green lynch Havo. To make it interesting, you can lynch me if theta flips red.
this is so scummy i can't put it in words
Perhaps it would have helped if i had added '/sarcasm'. I thought it was blindingly obvious...
How about we leave Sarcasm out of the game?

Because between Mulch and yours claimed Sarcasm it's done nothing but create confusion.

Which is only helpful to scum.

Yeah, fine.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:48 am

In post 1986, Havo wrote:
In post 1979, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1978, Havo wrote:
In post 1975, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
In post 1974, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1970, Tchill13 wrote:Havo don't change your mindset until the others get on. We do not negotiate with scum lol. Mulch is the lynch you know this havo.

"OMG THERE IS IT THEY STILL CAN'T LYNCH THEIR SCUM PARTNER" - Mulch
Come on teech - 1 town for one scum is a good deal, right? Let's do this. Lynch theta even though his role is potentially valuable for town. When he flips green lynch Havo. To make it interesting, you can lynch me if theta flips red.
this is so scummy i can't put it in words
He's been scummy the last 20 pages.
Vindictive much? Let it go.
I've tried to let it go multiple times.

Here I'll try again.

Truce?

Sure. But of course, if we suspect one another, we must do our duty.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:50 am

In post 1989, Havo wrote:
In post 1983, Havo wrote:Wow. Sure got quiet after ma last few posts.
Obviously this was not what they were hoping for. Lol.

Yeah seems ro be just you and me here now.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:59 am

[quote="In post 1992, Havo"]Lynch Theta. If he flips Town I'll proxy my vote to Mulch and follow his lead 100%[/quote

Even if he wants to lynch you?]

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:09 am

In post 1998, Havo wrote:
In post 1995, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 1992, Havo wrote:Lynch Theta. If he flips Town I'll proxy my vote to Mulch and follow his lead 100%[/quote

Even if he wants to lynch you?]
Yes.

I still want to hear from Carca and then Fykus before committing to this, but if what they say raises no obstacles, i could go for this i think. I have to go do stuff. Let's see how things look when i get back...

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:10 am

In post 2001, Theta Alpine wrote:handle what

Havo's proposal.

Chip Butty · Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:11 am

Ah! Speak of the devil, and his imp appears.