Walnut wrote:Day 1 has begun! A weird sense of deja vu comes with it. Hey, anyone think Blackberry is a bit odd?
He hasn't even made a post yet, and he's odd? [Other then confirming.]
CF Riot wrote:Still not random voting, although putting one in for Charter
is
tempting. [= There's a 1/16 chance that Hadhfang would get mafia both games, assuming the number of mafia hasn't changed for this game. That's 6.25% chance he's mafia. Just sayin'.
Farside and Lord Gurgi have already matched the input from Near last game, so that's a good sign.
I don't really see anything too scummy about the statistic, it just seems like a random piece of information. However, saying that it's tempting to put a random vote on charter doesn't seem random.
@Charter's contradictions: Everybody makes assumptions, and it's not that hard to believe that there would be three scum like last game. But, I don't like how you call on CF Riot for it when you've done the same.
Blackberry wrote:I think Tinsley is mafia cuz he tried to post an analysis of everyone. And after what we saw last game.
How is posting an analysis post scummy? Unless this is some tell that I just don't know about?
Blackberry wrote:I might have to be replaced, as I am getting lazy in not only this, but all my games. I will stay in this game however only because I have a super-kick-ass role. I probably shouldn't mention that but I feel like bragging. I wonder what discussion this will bring up by me claiming I have a super-kick-ass role... lol.
It's hard to make heads or tails of this claim. Without any provokation, to make a claim? I mean, on hand it wouldn't be a good idea to fake claim when you intend to be replaced as it could create problems for the replacee. It seems a bit attention seeker, but I believe you about 60 %. :\
CF Riot wrote:I'd also like to add that I'm eating the most delicious apple right now. So good.
Uh... I don't think this was a claim, but it sure seems odd. People speculate that it's a doc claim, but what good does that do him at this moment? He'd get NKed if that was the case.
charter wrote:Don't lynch him today and if he lives through the night lynch him tomorrow. Of course the mafia could always not NK him, but I see that as much more unlikely than him actually being mafia (if he lives). Saying this, there's no point in lynching him today, as there are probably two others, so I'll go ahead and
There seems to be a lot of what 'if's' in this post. I'm getting the feeling you're basically saying: 'Don't lynch him because he'll get NKed anyway.' I don't know whether this is pro-town remark - trying to go after someone else seeing as how he's basically sacrificied himself, or whether you're scum and trying to save your partner.
farside22 wrote:CF Riot wrote:
And if we are letting Had live on the reasoning that he has claimed and could prove himself, why would we vote for BB who
also
claimed?
I wouldn't call what BB said a "claim" a kick ass role could mean anything.
What do you think of his claim?
Walnut wrote:I took more note of you saying that you were feeling lazy and considering being replaced. If that is the case, it is better for you to be replaced than the town to be forced to lynch you.
'Forced'? He hadn't really done that much to deserve to be lynched - his playing is due to him clearly losing interest in the game.
Blackberry wrote:SCUM: Walnut
AND POSSIBLY: Macavenger
It's your last post in that game, you could at least give reasonings as to why you chose those people. Throwing out names is good, but a sentence just pointing something out [about them] would be better.
Blackberry wrote:
I just wanted to note that I was correct on my accusations last game. So maybe yall should follow my accusations this game.
Or atleast pressure Walnut and Macavenger
!
And of course you're always right.
LG wrote:Hmm, I really want Netlava to defend himself first. He might be continuing on a suspicion from the last game. (I have suspicions about a number of players doing this) Did he hound you last game?
That was that game, this is this game. And, you seem like you've practically made up your mind. Also, I would also like to know the basis about bringing up the possibility of a SK.
Still, out of everyone, charter is the one that seems the most suspicious to me. You are hypocritical and call other people out on being so, and that doesn't bode well with me.
Unvote, Vote charter.