Open 109a - new management/thread soon! (before 722)

[yorgi]

Vote: Yorgi

; let's start a new wagon.

Can I ask why me instead of a non poster? At least I'm saying something which is better next to nothing?
Are one of the lurkers your scum buddy Sens?

[SensFan]

I honestly didn't remember you having posted. You think one of the lurkers is my buddy? Vote a lurker (or anyone other than me in this game), and I promise I will follow.

[yorgi]

sekinj hasn't even confirmed.
Tajo asked a few questions and disappeared and stef just voted and disappeared.

Mod: Prods would be awesome.

unvote:
vote: stef

I know him and tajo are around. I didn't check to see if sekinj was posting elsewhere.

[SensFan]

Unvote, vote: stef

. As promised.

[Zilla]

No, no, and no some more. Random lynching in this game is comparable to random voting in most games. We might happen apon a nice target, but Town really can't win this Day1 anyways.

What? You're being incoherent. What makes random lynching akin to random voting in this game? What happened to "Town has a 33% of winning today"? I call BS.

2) All they have to do is propose the random lynch, and they win by controlling the lynch.

Can you explain where they 'win'? Did I ever suggest randomly lynching tomorrow?

I was under the impression you didn't want anything but random lynching, "otherwise scum can control the lynch with their WILY LOGIC!"

3) Random lynching gives NO accountability. You can't find scum that way, your best bet is to stumble across them.

Hey look, wrong again. I can find Scum from the fucking 'Random' VOTING stage, you don't think I can find Scum from a 'Random' LYNCH?

Total BS, and I can't believe you even suggest this. You wanted a QUICK LYNCH, and on top of that, the only thing you said in your vote was that the vote was L -1. How is that accountable? In fact, town would be up a creek if I was hammered right after your vote, since anyone on that wagon would look scummy.

4) You say the mafia will be obvious from the results of the first lynch. a) how? b) wouldn't targetting anyone no longer be random, defeating the point of only random lynching? c) Who is to say the mafia even vote at all?

We are only 'Random' lynching today; not tomorrow.

This only answers question B. It does not answer A and C.

I'm starting to think you might be dumb Town, and not Scum.

I've seen this line from scum more often than town, bear in mind.

Vote: Yorgi

; let's start a new wagon.

[/quote]

So sorry that your vote on me isn't sticking, scumbag. Lots of conviction you had on Yorgi too.

[SensFan]

Zilla, can you please get your head out of your ass, then take off the blinders you seem to be wearing?

[Zilla]

I will when there's someone else to look at, but I can't go "Hmm, stekinj looks scummy" because there aren't any posts to back it up, and you've made a huge case for yourself with your push for a quicklynch and your horrible logic for random voting.

[Zilla]

Let's add the "Ah, forget it, why can't we all be bandwagon friends? Here, let's bandwagon someone else together!" to the list.

[SensFan]

I will when there's someone else to look at, but I can't go "Hmm, stekinj looks scummy" because there aren't any posts to back it up, and you've made a huge case for yourself with your push for a quicklynch and your horrible logic for random voting.

Let me ask you; do you really think I'm ridiculously stupid Scum - or might there be some method to my madness here?

[Zilla]

I think either you're stupid town or mediocre scum. Stupid scum would have gone off lurking and not even bothered to half-ass a town argument.

[SensFan]

I think either you're stupid town or mediocre scum. Stupid scum would have gone off lurking and not even bothered to half-ass a town argument.

Wrong.

Any form of Scum would be lurking right now; I am starting to think this is largely a case of two Town butting heads due to theory.

Don't forget, when it comes to game theory (which this discussion is), wrong =/= scummy.

[Zilla]

I'm aware wrong =/= scummy; anti-town motivation is scummy, and you've been playing anti-town. Hence either mediocre scum or stupid town.

[SensFan]

No, you disagree with me on theory, actually.

[farside22]

I have prodded the mod for this game.

[yellowbounder]

Vote Count, of-champions

nothing yet, watch this space

sekinj is being replaced.

[Zilla]

It's not all that tough to run up a vote count....

Zilla:

1

Zilla

PopularTajo

SensFan

PopularTajo

1
Stef

Stef:

2

Yorgi

Yorgi
SensFan

SensFan:

1
Zilla

Yorgi

1

SensFan

[Zilla]

EBWOP Sorry, Yorgi does not have any votes and Sens was italicized there because he didn't unvote Zilla to vote for Yorgi so it was questionable, but he unvoted to vote for Stef, which was an unvote of Zilla.

So, Yorgi has no votes.

[Zilla]

No, no, and no some more. Random lynching in this game is comparable to random voting in most games. We might happen apon a nice target, but Town really can't win this Day1 anyways.

What? You're being incoherent. What makes random lynching akin to random voting in this game? What happened to "Town has a 33% of winning today"? I call BS.

2) All they have to do is propose the random lynch, and they win by controlling the lynch.

Can you explain where they 'win'? Did I ever suggest randomly lynching tomorrow?

I was under the impression you didn't want anything but random lynching, "otherwise scum can control the lynch with their WILY LOGIC!"

3) Random lynching gives NO accountability. You can't find scum that way, your best bet is to stumble across them.

Hey look, wrong again. I can find Scum from the fucking 'Random' VOTING stage, you don't think I can find Scum from a 'Random' LYNCH?

Total BS, and I can't believe you even suggest this. You wanted a QUICK LYNCH, and on top of that, the only thing you said in your vote was that the vote was L -1. How is that accountable? In fact, town would be up a creek if I was hammered right after your vote, since anyone on that wagon would look scummy.

4) You say the mafia will be obvious from the results of the first lynch. a) how? b) wouldn't targetting anyone no longer be random, defeating the point of only random lynching? c) Who is to say the mafia even vote at all?

We are only 'Random' lynching today; not tomorrow.

This only answers question B. It does not answer A and C.

I'm starting to think you might be dumb Town, and not Scum.

I've seen this line from scum more often than town, bear in mind.

Vote: Yorgi

; let's start a new wagon.

So sorry that your vote on me isn't sticking, scumbag. Lots of conviction you had on Yorgi too.[/quote]

This went completely unanswered and ignored.

[SensFan]

Like I said, I don't plan on continuing a theory discussion when my wall pays more attention than my fellow debater.

[Zilla]

4) You say the mafia will be obvious from the results of the first lynch. a) how? b) wouldn't targetting anyone no longer be random, defeating the point of only random lynching? c) Who is to say the mafia even vote at all?

If you won't pay attention to anything, at least respond to this, excluding B because you did address that.

[SensFan]

a) Now if I said that, it seems counter-productive. c) No one.

[Zilla]

This game is remarkably inactive. :/

[yorgi]

The mod needs to prod or replace players. The 3 of us being the only ones talking is rediculous.

[Zilla]

And again, the mod needs prodding. :/

[farside22]

I'm sending the mod a PM this is the last warning. I will get a replacement mod if things don't improve. Thank you for your patience