Open 17 - Strawberry (Game Over) before 416

[Rosso Carne]

*shrug* I'm in no danger of being lynched. What I said was completely correct. look at my post 99. That was in reference to NAR because he said a lot of stuff that added up to about nothing. That reread post was exactly the same thing- a scum saying a whole lot of words equaling zero real output.

Vote Count:

IH - 1 (spectrumvoid)
Caddock - 1 (Ripley)
Ripley - 1 (Caddock)
brewski - 2 (JDodge, IH)
Rosso Carne - 3 (Blackberry, ac1983fan, brewski)
kilmenator - 1 (Rosso Carne)

Not Voting - 3 (kilmenator, al4xz, Earwig)

12 alive, 7 to lynch.

[Rosso Carne]

oh and also, theres really nothing to respond to on that wagon, it came from nowhere for no good reason.

[kilmenator]

Rosso, your reason for a vote was complete crap. You voted because I reread and summarized? How is that scummy at all? It isnt, I put out what my thoughts were on people and am now giving them a chance to respond. Something that is very good for us as town, it isnt however good for scum. It again, restates the different reasons that someone looks scummy. I will agree that NAR was a complete moron, but look up some of his games. He consistently played like an idiot, it wasnt just this game, if you want, I can even find you some links to his games.

While I am still VERY suspicious of you, and your reason for a vote, I am at this point more suspicious of those who just literally jumped on your wagon without stating reasons.

I would like a response from you on how my summary is scummy, because as has been previously stated by myself and IH, it is pro town to have days in which discussion happens, my summary provided discussion. I see your attack on me as completely unfounded and more of an attack because I mentioned what I found scummy about you. Now, if your reason for voting is because I brought to light the things that were scummy about you and you didnt like them, that is one thing, but it is a completely different thing to say you are voting me because I summarized the game. Either way, neither is a reason to vote, but both seem to me like scum being opportunistic to vote for someone and take a little heat off themselves by putting it somewhere else.

Also, those wagoning for Rosso, I would like to hear the reasons for your votes, other than the fact that he voted me for stupid reasons.

[Rosso Carne]

heh, again with saying a lot of words but not really saying anything.

Thats a textbook scum tactic. I use it when im scum. So do you.

[Rosso Carne]

kilen: "oh shit, I've been caught"

*thinks*

"POOR ME ROSSO THE GREAT IS VOTING ME, GET HIM TO STOP"

*nothing happens*

"You're stupid Rosso."




scum.

[kilmenator]

First off Rosso, it is kilmenator, not kilen... get it right...

And secondly, you are way to egotistical, first, why would I be worried about one measly vote from scum, who wont even explain his reasons for a vote? and secondly, who is listening to you? and thirdly, you should worry about the wagon, because you are becoming much more scummy in my eyes all the time, not only my eyes, but the eyes of the other pro-town players. You talk about how my posts are long yet say nothing, my posts say a lot, you are the one who posts short posts with no content whatsoever. You havent even posted logical reasons as to why you are voting me, and pushing me? You need to quit acting so scummy, because in the rare case you are pro-town, you are not helping us whatsoever, because if you are town, you need to act like it instead of using flimsy reasoning, and avoiding questions.

With all that,

vote rosso

until he explains his reasons for voting, and substantiates evidence that my posts say nothing, when in fact they have a lot of content, and until he quits acting so big headed.

Ps. I think I am addicted to scum! and scum chat!

[brewski]

this is interesting what is developing. The reason that i voted for rosso was one, i didnt like how he jumped on you for reposting. i found it helpful, and i thought it was weird that he said it automatically pointed out scum. i liked it because i got to see a review of the events from someone elses view. also,

mod: can we get a prod on Theopor_COD

for the fact that he hasnt posted in a long time. I will enjoy seeing how this all plays out. I am sorry that i appeared scummy earlier, but i really didnt like the way that rosso was playing, and my choice of words was bad, but the reason was the same.

[Rosso Carne]

you want me to do a dreaded pbpa? I will tommorow after class.

[VitaminR]

this is interesting what is developing. The reason that i voted for rosso was one, i didnt like how he jumped on you for reposting. i found it helpful, and i thought it was weird that he said it automatically pointed out scum. i liked it because i got to see a review of the events from someone elses view. also,

mod: can we get a prod on Theopor_COD

for the fact that he hasnt posted in a long time. I will enjoy seeing how this all plays out. I am sorry that i appeared scummy earlier, but i really didnt like the way that rosso was playing, and my choice of words was bad, but the reason was the same.

Theopor_COD is not in this game.

[brewski]

ignore me for being a retard, he is one of my other games. sorry.

[kilmenator]

you want me to do a dreaded pbpa? I will tommorow after class.

I am not asking for a pbpa, because there really is not much to analyze, what I am asking for, is for you to post more than just random votes, without explaining the reasoning behind them. You say my predessor was scummy, well tell me why he was scummy, and i will show you other games where he played like that. Explain why you think it is scumy for me to summarize and then give a brief analysis... what would you have me to do?

Also, Brewski, no worries. The first time I played in more than one games, I played with people who played in both games and I confused games, and thought one person was scummy for reasons that were not even in the game, that is why I currently keep a notepad beside my computer with basic info on the game.

[Ripley]

Rosso Carne never got to lynch -2, did he? I can't find anywhere that he was at more than 4 votes (where he is now) and it's 7 to lynch.

I've seen a similar argument before( and it was between 2 pro-towns) to the one that's going on between RC and kilmenator. kilmenator's posts are wordy and, which can be perceived as scummy by people with a very different playstyle. They think something like "I could have said the entire content of that post in a sentence and a half, therefore it's filled out with fluff, therefore it's scum trying to look like they're posting lots of content". kilmenator is clearly a player who likes to think aloud, and while this may not be to everyone's taste I don't think it necessarily is an indicator of scumminess.

brewski, you made a couple of posts (89, 92) after Rosso Carne's vote on kilmenator (87) without saying anything about it at all. It wasn't until the next day, after IH and ac1983fan voted for Rosso, that you suddenly felt the urge to follow suit, and this is why I find it suspicious.

FOS brewski

for this.

But I can't quite bring myself to unvote my original choice, Caddock, when he's posted a total of 6 words, the last of which was 9 days ago.

[Earwig]

unvote, vote:RossoCarne

vote:kilmenator

that finishes it.
NAR has been compltely useless and following on everyones coattaails and now that his replacement has posted this its pretty much done. Synopsis posts are so fucking useless: i can just go read back, theres no analysis, and shit could be skewed if people were too lazy to read.

Also, anyone who defends lurkers because theres nothing to talk about needs to be killed NOW NOW NOW and then the lurkers need to be killed too

....So a you think someone is scummy.... but don't really say anything to much until that player is replaced. It confirms it for you from someone doing a reread post? That some people would be to lazy to read? How is this suspicious?

I have to agree with IH on this one.

Vote: Rosso Carne

[Rosso Carne]

*shrug* i bear down on someone for pretty damn just reasons and thats the basis of an attack?

can't really defend against that one.

why dont we just attack anyone who attacks anyone? That'd work great. USE YOUR HEADS PEOPLE!

[spectrumvoid]

I don't think kilmenator is scummy. Generally, I've seen most replacements post some kind of summary to make it easier for them to backtrack. Then again, I don't think RC is scummy for accusing kilmen, because it's true that scum might post fluff, and RC might have read that post as fluff (I don't think it is.)

vote: Brewski

Wagoner.

[kilmenator]

I totally agree with the whole Brewski thing, he very much is a wagonner...

Major FOS: Brewski

[brewski]

It would be a mistake to hang me. I jumped on the bandwagon to 1. get the discussion going, and 2. i really didnt like the reasons that he was trying to use. so, i hope that you realize that it was all in good intent, and that i am not ready for a lynch on anyone yet, because the longer the day one, the better chance we have of a scum slipping up and we being able to take them out.

[Earwig]

It would be a mistake to hang me........

Why???

[IH]

Pot 116, appeal to emotion.

[Ripley]

Can we get a prod on Caddock please?

[IH]

I'll get into this game more this week (as well as alot of my other ones) whenever I'm not at the lake.

CAUSE WE'RE ROCKIN LIVE AT SPRING BREAK!

[Rosso Carne]

O_o

idiots voting me and pulling attention away from the scum, please cite my scumminess so i can put it down. kthx.

[IH]

(Dude, seriously, you voted her for having a longish post and summarizing when she

replaced

)

[kilmenator]

O_o

idiots voting me and pulling attention away from the scum, please cite my scumminess so i can put it down. kthx.

1. you act as if you are not worried about the votes on you, but every time you post, you mention the votes on you
2. you are focusing entirely on me because I summarized the game
3. you fail to admit that your reason for a vote was complete nonsense and really had no reason
4. you are insulting people and calling names and just being plain rude
5. you explain the vote you cast as one being placed because of wordiness, while your posts are not excessively wordy, they are void of much content, something you claim is the reason you are voting me.

...just off the top of my head without a look back...

Feel free to explain any of the above as I am not entirely sure of your alignment, as my attention has been moved to Brewski for wagonning for the heck of it and seems eager to get a lynch today, and he just jumped a couple of notches on my scumdar. Anyway,

unvote

for now... at least until I a response comes...

[Earwig]

It would be a mistake to hang me........

Why???

I still haven't heard why it would be a mistake to hang Brewski.