Mini 1715 - Z - Game over!

zakk · Post Post #0 (ISO) » Fri Sep 04, 2015 4:53 pm

Z

welcome to the experiment. you'll probably die.

Spoiler: MEET THE PLAYERS

Mafia Roleblocker

- Lynched D1
3. Gimlear

Fro99er

4. gummmybear

5. KarmicGuide

-

Mafia Godfather

- Lynched D3
6. Bellaphant
7. Garmr
8. Radja

9. eventi
10. Thor665
11. SilverWolf

WoodyWoodpecker

-

Mafia Rolecop

- Lynched D2
12. pistachi0n

13. davesaz

-

INFRACTION

-

PRODDED

-

DEAD

Replacements:

1. BBmolla
2. Lady Lambdadelta
3. Metal Sonic[/spoiler]

Spoiler: FOLLOW THE RULES

Spoiler: VANILLA ICE CREAM

vanilla townie

you are town aligned.
you win if all threats to the town are eliminated and at least one townie is alive.
you have no abilities besides your voice and your vote.[/spoiler]

Spoiler: SHAKE THE 8 BALL

Spoiler: EXPERIMENT NOTES

Phase termination interval:

(expired on 2015-10-16 11:24:25)

zakk · Post Post #1 (ISO) » Fri Sep 04, 2015 10:04 pm

Please read the game rules

thoroughly

; there are

rules unlike many other games

. Thank you.

Game Status

:

- Game threads created... sending Role PMs...
- Role PMs are out... the game will start when all players have confirmed...
- All players have confirmed... the experiment begins...

zakk · Post Post #2 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:22 am

PHASE 1A OF THE EXPERIMENT HAS BEGUN

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #3 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:31 am

VOTE: Ciara24

davesaz · Post Post #4 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:34 am

How carefully did you read the spoilers?

zakk · Post Post #5 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:39 am

[removed - zakk]

Bellaphant · Post Post #6 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:41 am

Nacho = 1 post = 1 rule infraction.

@zakk, what counts as not random?

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #7 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:41 am

That wasn't a random vote. I'm voting Ciara because I'm aware of my ability to read her well and I'm letting her know that I'm watching her and forming a read there is my highest priority at the moment.

zakk · Post Post #8 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:44 am

[removed - zakk]

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #9 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:48 am

In post 4, davesaz wrote:How carefully did you read the spoilers?

In post 6, Bellaphant wrote:Nacho = 1 post = 1 rule infraction.

@zakk, what counts as not random?

Can we not waste precious time talking about the rules?
If there are infractions, zakk can deal with them.
If you have questions about them, take them to PM.

As for now, if you have a vote that you can make with purpose, make it.
If you can't, start sheeping me.

zakk · Post Post #10 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:48 am

EXPERIMENT NOTES 1.1

Prods and rule infractions will be noted in this area. Three minor rule infractions will result in replacement; major ones will result in replacement or modkill.

SUBJECTS ASSERTING AGGRESSIVE ACTIVITY:

Ciara24 [1] Nachomamma8
Bellaphant [0]
davesaz [0]
eventi [0]
Fro99er [0]
Garmr [0]
gummmybear [0]
KarmicGuide [0]
Nachomamma8 [0]
pistachi0n [0]
Radja [0]
Thor665 [0]
WoodyWoodpecker [0]

SUBJECTS DISPLAYING PASSIVE TENDENCY:

Bellaphant, Ciara24, davesaz, eventi, Fro99er, Garmr, gummmybear, KarmicGuide, pistachi0n, Radja, Thor665, WoodyWoodpecker

zakk · Post Post #11 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:58 am

[removed - zakk]

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #12 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:59 am

In post 5, zakk wrote:
Nachomamma8 has violated rule #5. This is a minor rule infraction.

Damn reminds me of demolition man.

Btw who knows how the 3 seashells work exactly?

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #13 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:00 am

In post 11, zakk wrote:
In post 6, Bellaphant wrote:@zakk, what counts as not random?

If a vote is not sufficiently explained in the same post or a preceding post, or in certain cases, a subsequent post, it is considered random.

Nachomamma8 was given lenience because this standard was not fully explained, and because he explained his vote in a subsequent post.

I will add this to the ruleset directly to alleviate this issue in the future.

**The ruleset has been amended.**

But I like voting without reason. It's a great way to reaction test...

This game is gonna suck

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #14 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:01 am

In post 9, Nachomamma8 wrote:As for now, if you have a vote that you can make with purpose, make it.
If you can't, start sheeping me.

No

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #15 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:01 am

In post 12, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:
In post 5, zakk wrote:
Nachomamma8 has violated rule #5. This is a minor rule infraction.

Damn reminds me of demolition man.

Btw who knows how the 3 seashells work exactly?

No idea what you're talking about re: seashells.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #16 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:02 am

In post 14, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:
In post 9, Nachomamma8 wrote:As for now, if you have a vote that you can make with purpose, make it.
If you can't, start sheeping me.

No

Why not?

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #17 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:03 am

Btw I don't believe nacho, her vote probably was random. The reason given doesn't make sense for a vote. Looks like she's not being truthful

vote: nacho

P.edit - have you never seen demolition man?

P.edit again - I just explained

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #18 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:04 am

In post 17, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:Btw I don't believe nacho, her vote probably was random. The reason given doesn't make sense for a vote. Looks like she's not being truthful

vote: nacho

P.edit - have you never seen demolition man?

P.edit again - I just explained

Oh look. You followed my suggestion.
I'm a guy, and you know this.

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #19 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:06 am

My bad, for some reason I had a girl in my brain

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #20 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:09 am

In post 17, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:The reason given doesn't make sense for a vote. Looks like she's not being truthful

It's a common approach in games to focus first on reading people you're familiar with. I don't see any reason why you wouldn't believe my explanation unless you thought the only purpose of a vote was to express suspicion, which is something that would surprise me since I thought you were a much better player than that.

Thor665 · Post Post #21 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:10 am

VOTE: Ciara24

The mod can ask me for clarification if he needs to.

Bellaphant · Post Post #22 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:22 am

VOTE: thor

He's been scum in every game I've finished with him.

Thor665 · Post Post #23 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:24 am

Would you like me to waste everyone's time pointing out the utter lack of logic there, or would you prefer we skip that and move back to the point where we actually discuss what you think is scummy in this game?
Even if you think I am scummy you ought to be able to do better than that - I'm being a touch obstructionist and cheeky with my answers - at least go with that so your case isn't a waste of time.

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #24 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:25 am

In post 20, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 17, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:The reason given doesn't make sense for a vote. Looks like she's not being truthful

It's a common approach in games to focus first on reading people you're familiar with. I don't see any reason why you wouldn't believe my explanation unless you thought the only purpose of a vote was to express suspicion, which is something that would surprise me since I thought you were a much better player than that.

Apparently I'm not a very good player at all, I definitely think I'm better than I actually am but I suck.

And yes the point of a vote should be to pressure or express suspicion. There's other ways to communicate what you were trying to do without voting.

I honestly think you didn't read the spoilers (I know I hadn't yet) and instead of owning up to it came up with something else.