Mini 1800 - Game Over

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:40 am

Why did it post twice?

Mizzytastic · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:41 am

In post 45, Kappy wrote:
In post 44, Mizzytastic wrote:Kappy, what do you hope to achieve by moving your vote around?
Absolutely nothing. This is RVS.

But isn't the purpose of RVS to get us out of RVS?

I can think of reasons to self vote in RVS that I don't think are scummy, such as reaction tests. But I don't think we are getting anything like that out of Kappy right now. He seems to want to stay in RVS and I don't think "it's fun" is enough reason. My position isn't as strong as Chumba's but I'm happy for my vote to be a proper one now.

qubixes · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:06 am

@kappy

Going back a bit. Why did you self vote?

Kappy · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:06 am

In post 52, qubixes wrote:
@kappy
Going back a bit. Why did you self vote?

To be funny.

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:10 am

Haha.

karnos · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:12 am

In post 53, Kappy wrote:
In post 52, qubixes wrote:
@kappy
Going back a bit. Why did you self vote?
To be funny.

VOTE: Kappy

I'm trying to be funny too. Is anyone laughing?

karnos · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:16 am

UNVOTE:

In all seriousness, I don't see a good target for a serious vote yet. I don't think kappy is in danger of being quick-lynched, but I don't want to be implicated if it does somehow happen while I am away.

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:20 am

UNVOTE:
Actually Percivuls general misunderstanding and not reading the thread spells s-c-u-m-m-y to me at least
VOTE: Persivul

Persivul · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:23 am

In post 57, Sickofit1138 wrote:Actually Percivuls general misunderstanding and not reading the thread spells s-c-u-m-m-y to me at least

You have that backwards. People tend to be more careful as scum than as town.

Chumba · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:24 am

In post 56, karnos wrote:UNVOTE:

In all seriousness, I don't see a good target for a serious vote yet. I don't think kappy is in danger of being quick-lynched, but I don't want to be implicated if it does somehow happen while I am away.

1. If he's somehow lynched while you are gone why do you think you would be implicated?

2. If you think he's scummy why would you care if you were?

Mizzytastic · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:25 am

In post 56, karnos wrote:UNVOTE:

In all seriousness, I don't see a good target for a serious vote yet. I don't think kappy is in danger of being quick-lynched, but I don't want to be implicated if it does somehow happen while I am away.

Your worry is about being implicated, and not the (highly unlikely) quicklynch itself?

VOTE: karnos

I don't like kappy but it could just be playstyle silliness. This sounds like scum thinking.

Chumba · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:25 am

In post 58, Persivul wrote:
In post 57, Sickofit1138 wrote:Actually Percivuls general misunderstanding and not reading the thread spells s-c-u-m-m-y to me at least
You have that backwards. People tend to be more careful as scum than as town.

You knowing that though just means you can play messy as scum and use that to your advantage

qubixes · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:26 am

In post 49, Sickofit1138 wrote: @Percuvul

Since you are still on this topic and apparently don't understand, I posted my vote and it got to the preview and it showed the two first votes and I was like eh who cares I'm fine with a wagon.

Well, you did say that you didn't know you were joining a wagon when you in actuality did know that. Can we at least agree that is confusing?

In post 7, Sickofit1138 wrote:
In post 5, Kappy wrote:VOTE: Sickofit1138
For following a wagon. Obvscum move.
lol i thought i was first post but to each his own...

In post 9, Sickofit1138 wrote:first to post at all. i didnt know i was hopping on a wagon

If you are fine with a wagon, why do you "defend" yourself like this?

Persivul · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:29 am

In post 61, Chumba wrote:You knowing that though just means you can play messy as scum and use that to your advantage

As wifom applies to like 90% of the game, pointing out its possibility adds nothing.

Persivul · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:33 am

In post 49, Sickofit1138 wrote:Since you are still on this topic and apparently don't understand, I posted my vote and it got to the preview and it showed the two first votes and I was like eh
who cares I'm fine with a wagon
.

I understand that, and by itself it doesn't bother me. The problem is that you said in 9, "

i didnt know i was hopping on a wagon

"

One of the bolded is an outright lie. Which one is the lie, and why did you make it?

Kappy · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:34 am

In post 61, Chumba wrote:
In post 58, Persivul wrote:
In post 57, Sickofit1138 wrote:Actually Percivuls general misunderstanding and not reading the thread spells s-c-u-m-m-y to me at least
You have that backwards. People tend to be more careful as scum than as town.
You knowing that though just means you can play messy as scum and use that to your advantage

Yes, this is why people can't point out why they're town. It shows they knew they were playing like that, so they could've been scum playing like that on purpose. You have to let others point out why you're town.

Chumba · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:51 am

In post 64, Persivul wrote:
In post 49, Sickofit1138 wrote:Since you are still on this topic and apparently don't understand, I posted my vote and it got to the preview and it showed the two first votes and I was like eh
who cares I'm fine with a wagon
.
I understand that, and by itself it doesn't bother me. The problem is that you said in 9, "
i didnt know i was hopping on a wagon
"

One of the bolded is an outright lie. Which one is the lie, and why did you make it?

To be fair he wasn't actually hopping on a wagon though and I actually read that as he was ok with a wagon happening. Wagons don't count as wagons imo until they have more than 50% of the required number of lynches. 2/3 votes does not make a wagon

Persivul · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:55 am

He apparently thought it was a wagon, else he wouldn't have thought "I'm fine with a wagon."

Chumba · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:58 am

In post 66, Chumba wrote:I actually read that as he was ok with a wagon happening.

Persivul · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:05 am

In post 68, Chumba wrote:
In post 66, Chumba wrote:I actually read that as he was ok with a wagon happening.

What, are you saying that he didn't really think a wagon was happening, but just had the thought that,

hey, if a wagon

were

happening, I'd be OK with that...

?

Chumba · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:13 am

I can't speak to what he was thinking. I'm just saying that's how I interpreted it. Either way I don't think it's that damning.

Kappy · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:16 am

I think Sick was just confused.

Persivul · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:17 am

In post 70, Chumba wrote:I can't speak to what he was thinking. I'm just saying that's how I interpreted it.

He told us what he was supposedly thinking. You don't need to guess at it or interpret it.

Either way I don't think it's that damning.

There are lots of issues on D1 that aren't that damning. Small issues can lead to bigger ones. Is it your policy to defend anyone against a charge that you don't find that damning? I doubt it, so...why are you defending in this case?

Sickofit1138 · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:21 am

Because I'm vein pushed at by messy scum.

Per sibyl in order to play a twin game you have to read the thread and you didn't. No widom applies to this.

Chumba · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:30 am

In post 72, Persivul wrote:
In post 70, Chumba wrote:I can't speak to what he was thinking. I'm just saying that's how I interpreted it.
He told us what he was supposedly thinking. You don't need to guess at it or interpret it.
Either way I don't think it's that damning.
There are lots of issues on D1 that aren't that damning. Small issues can lead to bigger ones. Is it your policy to defend anyone against a charge that you don't find that damning? I doubt it, so...why are you defending in this case?

I'm not defending him. I'm just providing my opinion on a game relevant conversation. Otherwise known as playing the game...