Page 41 of 140

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:23 pm
by podoboq
Official Vote Count 1.22
LynchingWith 13 votes in play, it takes 7 to lynch.

boring (5): eagerSnake, MariaR, implosion, Gamma Emerald, nn30
eagerSnake (3): Shadow_step, boring, PenguinPower
PenguinPower (2): Dierfire, Grendel
Shadow_step (1): Lil Uzi Vert
implosion (1): Prism

Not Voting (1): Zoronos


V/LA: Gamma Emerald

Deadline: (expired on 2016-10-18 15:22:00)

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:24 pm
by Shadow_step
In post 998, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 994, nn30 wrote:
In post 992, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 991, Shadow_step wrote:No, DF and Grendel will hopefully vote Eager then prism and zoro will need to hammer.

If Eager is scum, Dier and Grendel are likely partners.


How so?

The fact Eager didn't really interact with either of them. I will admit this perception is colored by my read on Dier.


Lololololololol

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:25 pm
by MariaR
Shadow why am I not snakes buddy when I'm the one hardcore defending him?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:25 pm
by MariaR
Like the fact you haven't even outted my name yet is like ????

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:26 pm
by Shadow_step
Didn't interact = scum buddies hahhhahahahahhahahahaha

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:27 pm
by eagerSnake
In post 998, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 994, nn30 wrote:
In post 992, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 991, Shadow_step wrote:No, DF and Grendel will hopefully vote Eager then prism and zoro will need to hammer.

If Eager is scum, Dier and Grendel are likely partners.


How so?

The fact Eager didn't really interact with either of them. I will admit this perception is colored by my read on Dier.


Never felt the need to interact with them they were posting plenty and being questioned already... lol this doesn't even matter though be I'm town

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:27 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1004, Shadow_step wrote:Didn't interact = scum buddies hahhhahahahahhahahahaha

That's why I included the part about my Dier read influencing it.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:28 pm
by Shadow_step
In post 1002, MariaR wrote:Shadow why am I not snakes buddy when I'm the one hardcore defending him?


Let me finish laughing first :lol:

Because I can see you doing this as either alignment.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:28 pm
by eagerSnake
In post 1002, MariaR wrote:Shadow why am I not snakes buddy when I'm the one hardcore defending him?

In post 1003, MariaR wrote:Like the fact you haven't even outted my name yet is like ????

This has been raising my eyebrow as well but lol he's probably just stuck in his tunnel

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:29 pm
by MariaR
Hard defending my sucm buddies isn't really my play to be fair!

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:30 pm
by nn30
In post 999, Shadow_step wrote:GE's reason is BS and so is Eager's. Difference in perception of something doesn't mean boring is scum.


This defense is BS.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:31 pm
by Shadow_step
Maria the only lynch that is acceptable today is eager. There is no other way to resolve this.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:31 pm
by eagerSnake
I'll have to meta dive Sonia to see if it might be indicative of alignment

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:32 pm
by Prism
Phone post so I'll make it fast.

Minimum 2 scum on that boring wagon but I really wouldn't be surprised if it's all 3.

P-edit: Eager/Implosion/nn30/LUV are all acceptable lynches so far.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:32 pm
by MariaR
The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:33 pm
by MariaR
In post 1013, Prism wrote:Phone post so I'll make it fast.

Minimum 2 scum on that boring wagon but I really wouldn't be surprised if it's all 3.

P-edit: Eager/Implosion/nn30/LUV are all acceptable lynches so far.
WHAT IS THIS BS?????

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:33 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1013, Prism wrote:Phone post so I'll make it fast.

Minimum 2 scum on that boring wagon but I really wouldn't be surprised if it's all 3.

P-edit: Eager/Implosion/nn30/LUV are all acceptable lynches so far.

Wagon is 5 people.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:34 pm
by Shadow_step
In post 1010, nn30 wrote:
In post 999, Shadow_step wrote:GE's reason is BS and so is Eager's. Difference in perception of something doesn't mean boring is scum.


This defense is BS.


?? You seriously make me wanna bang my head on the wall.
Have you seen why GE is voting boring? Because she perceived my play as aggressive, he doesn't see it as aggressive. So boring must be scum, how does that even make sense?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:35 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1017, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1010, nn30 wrote:
In post 999, Shadow_step wrote:GE's reason is BS and so is Eager's. Difference in perception of something doesn't mean boring is scum.


This defense is BS.


?? You seriously make me wanna bang my head on the wall.
Have you seen why GE is voting boring? Because she perceived my play as aggressive, he doesn't see it as aggressive. So boring must be scum, how does that even make sense?

Also her opportunistic vote on Eager.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:36 pm
by Shadow_step
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646


I'm saying you are capable.
I don't know your meta, we only played one game where you were scum.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:36 pm
by MariaR
In post 1019, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646


I'm saying you are capable.
I don't know your meta, we only played one game where you were scum.
Okay now this is true.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:37 pm
by nn30
In post 1017, Shadow_step wrote:Have you seen why GE is voting boring? Because she perceived my play as aggressive, he doesn't see it as aggressive. So boring must be scum, how does that even make sense?



I have. I quoted it and added to it too.

I agree with GE's logic.

Your play was not aggressive early on.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:37 pm
by Shadow_step
Its not opportunistic. Eager has been cced. He is conf scum. Why is boring's vote opportunistic and not PP?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:38 pm
by Prism
In post 1015, MariaR wrote:WHAT IS THIS BS?????
The same thing I've been saying the past 5+ pages, nn30 and implosion are my top two scumreads and despite Eager playing his role strongly he's doing exactly what I'd expect if he was cc'd scum. If it flips town I wouldn't be shocked at either of you/Gamma turning out to be scum.
In post 1016, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wagon is 5 people.
I realize.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:39 pm
by nn30
In post 1022, Shadow_step wrote:Its not opportunistic. Eager has been cced. He is conf scum. Why is boring's vote opportunistic and not PP?


This implies that we trust you 100%. Which we obviously do not.