Page 42 of 140

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:39 am
by podoboq
Official Vote Count 1.23
LynchingWith 13 votes in play, it takes 7 to lynch.

boring
(5): eagerSnake, MariaR, implosion, Gamma Emerald, nn30
eagerSnake
(3): Shadow_step, boring, PenguinPower
PenguinPower
(2): Dierfire, Grendel
Shadow_step
(1): Lil Uzi Vert
implosion
(1): Prism

Not Voting
(1): Zoronos


V/LA
: Gamma Emerald

Deadline
: (expired on 2016-10-18 15:22:00)

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:40 am
by eagerSnake
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646
The question is would you hard defend town

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:40 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1022, Shadow_step wrote:Its not opportunistic. Eager has been cced. He is conf scum. Why is boring's vote opportunistic and not PP?
1) Eager was on her all day
2) Naked vote following a major case

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:41 am
by Shadow_step
In post 1020, MariaR wrote:
In post 1019, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646
I'm saying you are capable.
I don't know your meta, we only played one game where you were scum.
Okay now this is true.
Can you please vote Eager now?
*makes puppy face*

Prism you shouldn't be okay with the boring wagon because of your scum reads and you should be voting eager.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:41 am
by MariaR
In post 1026, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646
The question is would you hard defend town
I want to say uhhh Yes?
I've never been put in that spot but I imagine I would

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:42 am
by MariaR
In post 1028, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1020, MariaR wrote:
In post 1019, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646
I'm saying you are capable.
I don't know your meta, we only played one game where you were scum.
Okay now this is true.
Can you please vote Eager now?
*makes puppy face*

Prism you shouldn't be okay with the boring wagon because of your scum reads and you should be voting eager.
Pls not the puppy face
I don't see why eager would claim right at day start as scum
his logic seems to add up at least to me

Honestly I'm at the point where if boring doesn't flip scum I'm gonna take another look at snake I really think you're just wrong here.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:43 am
by eagerSnake
In post 1023, Prism wrote:Eager playing his role strongly he's doing exactly what I'd expect if he was cc'd scum
You mean I'm doing exactly what I should do regardless of alignment, which makes my actions either

A) Genuine townplay
OR
B) Perfect scumplay

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:43 am
by Shadow_step
In post 1027, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1022, Shadow_step wrote:Its not opportunistic. Eager has been cced. He is conf scum. Why is boring's vote opportunistic and not PP?
1) Eager was on her all day
2) Naked vote following a major case
That isn't what I asked.
Why isn't PP's vote also opportunistic?

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:44 am
by eagerSnake
@Gamma
I'm sure you've seen my spiel about self-voting as town... Question: Do you think that this situation warrants being a pro-town reason for wanting to be lynched?

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:45 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1032, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1027, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1022, Shadow_step wrote:Its not opportunistic. Eager has been cced. He is conf scum. Why is boring's vote opportunistic and not PP?
1) Eager was on her all day
2) Naked vote following a major case
That isn't what I asked.
Why isn't PP's vote also opportunistic?
It probably also is, but PP didn't give a BS townread on you.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:46 am
by eagerSnake
Spoiler: How I feel about this
I cannot take this anymore
I'm saying everything I've said before
All these words they make no sense
I find bliss in ignorance
Less I hear the less you'll say
But you'll find that out anyway
Just like before
Everything you say to me
Takes me one step closer to the edge
And I'm about to break
I need a little room to breathe
'Cause I'm one step closer to the edge
And I'm about to break
I find the answers aren't so clear
Wish I could find a way to disappear
All these thoughts they make no sense
I find bliss in ignorance
Nothing seems to go away
Over and over again
Just like before

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:46 am
by Shadow_step
In post 1030, MariaR wrote:
In post 1028, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1020, MariaR wrote:
In post 1019, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646
I'm saying you are capable.
I don't know your meta, we only played one game where you were scum.
Okay now this is true.
Can you please vote Eager now?
*makes puppy face*

Prism you shouldn't be okay with the boring wagon because of your scum reads and you should be voting eager.
Pls not the puppy face
I don't see why eager would claim right at day start as scum
his logic seems to add up at least to me

Honestly I'm at the point where if boring doesn't flip scum I'm gonna take another look at snake I really think you're just wrong here.
Him gambiting makes more sense than two ascetics.
Let's just imagine I was a VT and he was mafia fking ascetic.
Look at the rewards, he gets townread till day 2 at least and won't be bothered at night.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:48 am
by boring
@eager - I'm not sure you understand what buddying means. Most of what you posted was criticism. Also, why do you keep repeating that I'm happy about the conflict? I've been around for very little of this little scum theater.

@town? - eager has been coasting, and the only thing in the way of my gut scumlean was the fact that he had an uncc'd claim. A cc from an obvious town player was more than enough reason to vote him. Either way, how can so many of you accept eager's piss-poor "town" performance without resistance? I mean, eager has bragged twice now about how shitty town is playing by not calling him out for his lazy vote. You're all just taking the insult with pride, it would appear. The only positive thing I can say about this development is my wagon. It decreases the likelihood that eagerSnake, MariaR and implosion are ALL scum. I'll have to try to knock at least one out of the running.

If scum want to chainsaw me up to L-1, that's fine, but don't let them hammer without warning. I'll try to be back again tomorrow to check on things.

p-edit - S_s's play and tone were very aggressive early on.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:48 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1033, eagerSnake wrote:
@Gamma
I'm sure you've seen my spiel about self-voting as town... Question: Do you think that this situation warrants being a pro-town reason for wanting to be lynched?
It might be, but I'd prefer you not anyway, as that removes a vote to analyze, and in my first game lynches where the victim self voted were: a reasonable case(Oracle), scum, and an unreasonable case(town Tracker CCed scum Tracker).

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:50 am
by eagerSnake
Nah I wouldn't self-vote as like you said that removes information, but I wouldn't let a wagon that I'm not 100% sure of go through, instead I'd opt myself to be lynched

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:52 am
by eagerSnake
In post 1037, boring wrote:Also, why do you keep repeating that I'm happy about the conflict? I've been around for very little of this little scum theater.
Where do you get "scum theater?" Who am I scum theatering with?

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:53 am
by nn30
In post 1023, Prism wrote:
In post 1015, MariaR wrote:WHAT IS THIS BS?????
The same thing I've been saying the past 5+ pages, nn30 and implosion are my top two scumreads and despite Eager playing his role strongly he's doing exactly what I'd expect if he was cc'd scum. If it flips town I wouldn't be shocked at either of you/Gamma turning out to be scum.
In post 1016, Gamma Emerald wrote: Wagon is 5 people.
I realize.
I have exactly 0 trust in your ability to scumread. Between 614 and 628 you imply (Penguin) or directly state (7 other names) feel scummy. That's 8/13 town members. Your list in 1013 has 3 people (myself included) who I feel are towny.

I didn't respond to your line of questioning towards me originally because without an "@nn30" somewhere in the post I'm likely to skim it and assume it was addressed to someone else.

The fact that I failed to reply to you is not enough of a reason to scum read me.

As far as my read of implosion, I still don't town read him but I found his responses to my lines of questioning satisfying (for the time being). Plus he dropped off the face of the map, nobody else seemed interested in talking about him, so I moved on.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:56 am
by Prism
eagerSnake wrote:You mean I'm doing exactly what I should do regardless of alignment, which makes my actions either

A) Genuine townplay
OR
B) Perfect scumplay
I don't think realizing that getting Shadow lynched is suicidal takes a mafia genius and you're not going to sell me on that one.
In post 1030, MariaR wrote:Prism you shouldn't be okay with the boring wagon because of your scum reads and you should be voting eager.
Pls not the puppy face
I don't see why eager would claim right at day start as scum
his logic seems to add up at least to me

Honestly I'm at the point where if boring doesn't flip scum I'm gonna take another look at snake I really think you're just wrong here.[/quote]You claim at the day start and get the risk of being found ascetic out of the way immediately. I believe he's ascetic-I doubt he's a town one. You don't expect two in a game even if you're mafia.

As far as taking other looks at people, I again urge to to ISO nn30 if you are town.
In post 1028, Shadow_step wrote:Prism you shouldn't be okay with the boring wagon because of your scum reads and you should be voting eager.
I'm not okay with it and I'm voting one of my top two scumreads, I can vote Eager but I doubt it will do much good without serious reconsideration of the people on the wagon to begin with.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Eager

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:58 am
by eagerSnake
Prism have you tried to directly interact with me at all?

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:00 am
by eagerSnake
Or are you also entrapped by the logical fallacy "there cant be 2 town with ascetic"

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:00 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 936, nn30 wrote:
In post 928, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 921, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 916, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 906, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 885, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:VOTE: Shadow

If both of you are town we are seriously fucked.
Jeeeez this is terrible. When did I say all my reads are based in Eager's interactions with them?
It seemed implied and either way, I never said that was my reason for voting for you.
Then what is the reason Sherlock?
Did you iso me? You think I'm scum and ccing eager under no pressure when I didn't need to ?
I think you're gambling scum who failed to plan out a distraction.
If this is true, what was he distracting from with the CC?

My best guesses are PP and GE - since they both had (small) wagons on them when Shadow CC'd.

But... that wasn't enough pressure to do much.

What are your thoughts? What was scum!Shadow's goal with CCing?
GE and PP. Their wagons were small but there were various players discussing the cases presented against both in great detail and length. There was pressure for both players to explain their actions and things they've said. It was understood that we would be lynching Gamma or Penguin today. Discussion was happening and it was discussion that would lead to finding scum regardless of how either flipped.

I'm not entirely sure what his goal is other than to remove suspicion from one of Gamma and Penguin, maybe potentially even both. Either that or he read Snake as being a potential threat and he's willing to gamble in order to get rid of him.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:00 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 959, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 928, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 921, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 916, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 906, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 885, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:VOTE: Shadow

If both of you are town we are seriously fucked.
Jeeeez this is terrible. When did I say all my reads are based in Eager's interactions with them?
It seemed implied and either way, I never said that was my reason for voting for you.
Then what is the reason Sherlock?
Did you iso me? You think I'm scum and ccing eager under no pressure when I didn't need to ?
I think you're gambling scum who failed to plan out a distraction.
Jesus Christ, stop playing you're fucking terrible. Gambiting mafia lmao
You're the one that's terrible my friend. The only case you have on Eager is that you cannot fathom that both you and him were given the same role. You either refuse or won't take into consideration a town motive for lying. If Eager had not claimed, your read on him would be null. You have no backup plan if he flips town and if he flips scum, it's an excuse to push on anyone who defended him or didn't vote for him.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:02 am
by Prism
In post 1041, nn30 wrote:I have exactly 0 trust in your ability to scumread. Between 614 and 628 you imply (Penguin) or directly state (7 other names) feel scummy. That's 8/13 town members. Your list in 1013 has 3 people (myself included) who I feel are towny.

I didn't respond to your line of questioning towards me originally because without an "@nn30" somewhere in the post I'm likely to skim it and assume it was addressed to someone else.

The fact that I failed to reply to you is not enough of a reason to scum read me.

As far as my read of implosion, I still don't town read him but I found his responses to my lines of questioning satisfying (for the time being). Plus he dropped off the face of the map, nobody else seemed interested in talking about him, so I moved on.
More of nn30 not actually caring about what I'm saying and just giving a response for the sake of it.

Does anyone want to go read #797?

P-edit @Eager: Not really, no. Feel free to vote implosion or nn30 if you want. It's also not a logical fallacy, you're significantly less likely to be town because of it.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:02 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
I don't get the case for boring, she's new to site so it's possible she has never seen scum act like Shadow had acted early on in the game, she stated reasons for why she found Eager's claiming terrible and she called him out for coasting. I can see why she voted for Eager.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:03 am
by eagerSnake
boring has experience on another site