Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:14 pm
So now that you say that, I'm leaning less scum on you, and more scum on PP. Guess you were right about that unwillingness to follow not meaning anything.
@DierIn post 1325, Gamma Emerald wrote:So now that you say that, I'm leaning less scum on you, and more scum on PP. Guess you were right about that unwillingness to follow not meaning anything.
I have listed suspicious actions from both of you with regard to the other.In post 1323, Gamma Emerald wrote:I can see how you might say that,however, it is my personal policy to suspect whomever performed the suspicious action more than the person the action was performed at.
Okay. Is there a way to rectify this without flips?In post 1327, Dierfire wrote:@Gamma EmeraldI have listed suspicious actions from both of you with regard to the other.In post 1323, Gamma Emerald wrote:I can see how you might say that,however, it is my personal policy to suspect whomever performed the suspicious action more than the person the action was performed at.
We should absolutely ask for a full claim; if a PR dies to kill a scum, yay we killed a scum. There's basically no PR I wouldn't trade for a dead scum, especially a D1 dead scum.In post 1320, Shadow_step wrote:No point asking Eager for a full claim, he will probably claim a strong pro town role to draw a CC, so that his buddies can kill that player. No thanks.
So, are you still of the opinion that Penguin is scum?In post 1227, boring wrote: p-edit: @Zoro. I gave you what I have to give. I can't say where I was going next with my train of thought on PP because as I said, I was distracted by Grendel. I guess you're just going to have to be dissatisfied. Did you have any other questions that I can help you with, or is that the extent of your questioning?
In post 1303, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still don't buy the case on boring, well I don't buy it enough to believe she's the correct lynch for today.
I'm not trying to ram an eager lynch. The counter wagon on boring is bs and there is no real case on the slot.In post 1335, Zoronos wrote:We should absolutely ask for a full claim; if a PR dies to kill a scum, yay we killed a scum. There's basically no PR I wouldn't trade for a dead scum, especially a D1 dead scum.In post 1320, Shadow_step wrote:No point asking Eager for a full claim, he will probably claim a strong pro town role to draw a CC, so that his buddies can kill that player. No thanks.
I'm not nearly as LOCK SOLID SCUM KILL KILL as you are, and I think you need to appreciate that a lot of other players in this game aren't either. Trying to ram the lynch through as fast as possible is a bad plan.
Can you link me to this game?In post 1321, Shadow_step wrote:This is another scum flailing lie, he got mled in the last game we played together.In post 1197, eagerSnake wrote:Yay my first time being MLed as town
This is a lie.In post 1321, Shadow_step wrote:This is another scum flailing lie, he got mled in the last game we played together.
Yeah... That's not how this works...In post 1297, Dierfire wrote:UNVOTE: PenguinPower
VOTE: eagerSnake
I want a full claim from eagerSnake.
In post 1321, Shadow_step wrote:This is another scum flailing lie, he got mled in the last game we played together.In post 1197, eagerSnake wrote:Yay my first time being MLed as town
@Shadow - any rebuttal?In post 1341, eagerSnake wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=67948
This is the game he is referring to in which I:
I already touched on it earlier and while I don't town read her I don't find the cases against her very strong. She's basically being scum read for people viewing the tone of her posts as happy about the conflict between Shadow and a Snake yet there is no evidence to show that she is. People also seem to forget that she wasn't fond of Snake's play this game and probably had a slight town read on him so her voting for him shouldn't be that surprising.In post 1337, Prism wrote:@DierfireI promised to review it awhile back but yeah, it's been pretty low priority. I'll get to it when I have time if it's still relevant.In post 1303, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still don't buy the case on boring, well I don't buy it enough to believe she's the correct lynch for today.@LUV:Can you explain in your own words, ie. minimal "I agree with X" even if it's true, what's wrong with the case on boring?
Up until the CC Snake was her 2nd highest town read. That's more than a 'slight town read' IMO.In post 1347, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I already touched on it earlier and while I don't town read her I don't find the cases against her very strong. She's basically being scum read for people viewing the tone of her posts as happy about the conflict between Shadow and a Snake yet there is no evidence to show that she is. People also seem to forget that she wasn't fond of Snake's play this game and probably had a slight town read on him so her voting for him shouldn't be that surprising.In post 1337, Prism wrote:@DierfireI promised to review it awhile back but yeah, it's been pretty low priority. I'll get to it when I have time if it's still relevant.In post 1303, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still don't buy the case on boring, well I don't buy it enough to believe she's the correct lynch for today.@LUV:Can you explain in your own words, ie. minimal "I agree with X" even if it's true, what's wrong with the case on boring?