Page 54 of 140

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:14 pm
by Gamma Emerald
So now that you say that, I'm leaning less scum on you, and more scum on PP. Guess you were right about that unwillingness to follow not meaning anything.

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:14 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1325, Gamma Emerald wrote:So now that you say that, I'm leaning less scum on you, and more scum on PP. Guess you were right about that unwillingness to follow not meaning anything.
@Dier
UNVOTE:

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:15 pm
by Dierfire
@Gamma Emerald
In post 1323, Gamma Emerald wrote:I can see how you might say that,
however
, it is my personal policy to suspect whomever performed the suspicious action more than the person the action was performed at.
I have listed suspicious actions from both of you with regard to the other.

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:15 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Wait.
My vote wasn't on Dier was it. It was on boring.
VOTE: boring

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:16 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1327, Dierfire wrote:
@Gamma Emerald
In post 1323, Gamma Emerald wrote:I can see how you might say that,
however
, it is my personal policy to suspect whomever performed the suspicious action more than the person the action was performed at.
I have listed suspicious actions from both of you with regard to the other.
Okay. Is there a way to rectify this without flips?

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:19 pm
by Dierfire
I promise that I will continue to evaluate and update throughout the game. I like to think that I am not inordinately susceptible to confirmation bias, and I always read and try to understand the perspectives even of players that I find suspicious.

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:20 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Do you have any scumreads outside us and Eager?

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:27 pm
by Dierfire
No, I've no other players that I'm reading as Mafia at this time.
I'm reading as Town: Prism, Shadow_step, nn30, Zoronos, implosion, and Grendel (strongest reads are Shadow_step and Zoronos)
I'm reading as Null: Lil Uzi Vert, MariaR, and boring (first two I haven't made much effort to read, boring I've read but not found anything especially indicative of alignment)

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:30 pm
by Dierfire
With that, I'm going to sleep. I'll be back tomorrow.

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:19 pm
by Zoronos
So, catching up a tad. That Dierfire interaction is really dense and I'll work on unpacking it in the morning. Some of the thoughts I liked, and some seem off track.
So, for the sake of clarity Dierfire, your scum reads are Eager, Gamma, and Penguin? You are further of the opinion that Gamma and Penguin's set of disagreements around the competing trains was theater / scum distancing and that they could be scum together?
Am I understanding this correctly?

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:22 pm
by Zoronos
In post 1320, Shadow_step wrote:No point asking Eager for a full claim, he will probably claim a strong pro town role to draw a CC, so that his buddies can kill that player. No thanks.
We should absolutely ask for a full claim; if a PR dies to kill a scum, yay we killed a scum. There's basically no PR I wouldn't trade for a dead scum, especially a D1 dead scum.
I'm not nearly as LOCK SOLID SCUM KILL KILL as you are, and I think you need to appreciate that a lot of other players in this game aren't either. Trying to ram the lynch through as fast as possible is a bad plan.

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:30 pm
by Zoronos
In post 1227, boring wrote: p-edit: @Zoro. I gave you what I have to give. I can't say where I was going next with my train of thought on PP because as I said, I was distracted by Grendel. I guess you're just going to have to be dissatisfied. Did you have any other questions that I can help you with, or is that the extent of your questioning?
So, are you still of the opinion that Penguin is scum?

Let's take it on faith that Eager is scum for the purpose of this exercise - We've had a couple trains at -1 at this point after the counterclaims (yours and Eagers). We didn't see any intent to hammer on either train. So, based on what you've seen so far, who do you feel is his most likely scumbuddy? (again, we're assuming that he's scum for the purpose of this exercise. Benefit of the doubt and all that). Are his partner's on you to counterwagon? Bussing him? Talk to me about the flow of events in the game and how that relates to the scum gameplan.

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:07 pm
by Prism
@Dierfire
I promised to review it awhile back but yeah, it's been pretty low priority. I'll get to it when I have time if it's still relevant.
In post 1303, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still don't buy the case on boring, well I don't buy it enough to believe she's the correct lynch for today.
@LUV:
Can you explain in your own words, ie. minimal "I agree with X" even if it's true, what's wrong with the case on boring?

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:18 pm
by Shadow_step
In post 1335, Zoronos wrote:
In post 1320, Shadow_step wrote:No point asking Eager for a full claim, he will probably claim a strong pro town role to draw a CC, so that his buddies can kill that player. No thanks.
We should absolutely ask for a full claim; if a PR dies to kill a scum, yay we killed a scum. There's basically no PR I wouldn't trade for a dead scum, especially a D1 dead scum.
I'm not nearly as LOCK SOLID SCUM KILL KILL as you are, and I think you need to appreciate that a lot of other players in this game aren't either. Trying to ram the lynch through as fast as possible is a bad plan.
I'm not trying to ram an eager lynch. The counter wagon on boring is bs and there is no real case on the slot.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:16 am
by nn30
In post 1321, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1197, eagerSnake wrote:Yay my first time being MLed as town
This is another scum flailing lie, he got mled in the last game we played together.
Can you link me to this game?

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:32 am
by eagerSnake
In post 1321, Shadow_step wrote:This is another scum flailing lie, he got mled in the last game we played together.
This is a lie.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:37 am
by eagerSnake
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=67948

This is the game he is referring to in which I:
In post 0, SirCakez wrote:eagerSnake - Endgamed Day 4 - Town Bulletproof Cop

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:51 am
by eagerSnake
In post 1297, Dierfire wrote:UNVOTE: PenguinPower
VOTE: eagerSnake

I want a full claim from eagerSnake.
Yeah... That's not how this works...

Interesting, though.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:19 am
by nn30
In post 1321, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 1197, eagerSnake wrote:Yay my first time being MLed as town
This is another scum flailing lie, he got mled in the last game we played together.
In post 1341, eagerSnake wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=67948

This is the game he is referring to in which I:
In post 0, SirCakez wrote:eagerSnake - Endgamed Day 4 - Town Bulletproof Cop
@Shadow - any rebuttal?

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:32 am
by Shadow_step
Hmm I got my facts wrong. Eggman and eager were both useless I thought eager got lynched for the cult win.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:32 am
by podoboq
Official Vote Count 1.31
LynchingWith 13 votes in play, it takes 7 to lynch.

boring
(4): MariaR, implosion, nn30, Gamma Emerald
eagerSnake
(4): Shadow_step, boring, PenguinPower, Dierfire
implosion
(1): Prism
Shadow_step
(1): Lil Uzi Vert

Not Voting
(3): Zoronos, Grendel, eagerSnake


V/LA
: none

Deadline
: (expired on 2016-10-18 15:22:00)

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:36 am
by eagerSnake
In post 1294, eagerSnake wrote:VOTE: Unvote

For now to see where things go
@Mod:
I unvoted in 1294

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:11 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 1337, Prism wrote:
@Dierfire
I promised to review it awhile back but yeah, it's been pretty low priority. I'll get to it when I have time if it's still relevant.
In post 1303, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still don't buy the case on boring, well I don't buy it enough to believe she's the correct lynch for today.
@LUV:
Can you explain in your own words, ie. minimal "I agree with X" even if it's true, what's wrong with the case on boring?
I already touched on it earlier and while I don't town read her I don't find the cases against her very strong. She's basically being scum read for people viewing the tone of her posts as happy about the conflict between Shadow and a Snake yet there is no evidence to show that she is. People also seem to forget that she wasn't fond of Snake's play this game and probably had a slight town read on him so her voting for him shouldn't be that surprising.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:22 am
by nn30
In post 1347, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 1337, Prism wrote:
@Dierfire
I promised to review it awhile back but yeah, it's been pretty low priority. I'll get to it when I have time if it's still relevant.
In post 1303, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I still don't buy the case on boring, well I don't buy it enough to believe she's the correct lynch for today.
@LUV:
Can you explain in your own words, ie. minimal "I agree with X" even if it's true, what's wrong with the case on boring?
I already touched on it earlier and while I don't town read her I don't find the cases against her very strong. She's basically being scum read for people viewing the tone of her posts as happy about the conflict between Shadow and a Snake yet there is no evidence to show that she is. People also seem to forget that she wasn't fond of Snake's play this game and probably had a slight town read on him so her voting for him shouldn't be that surprising.
Up until the CC Snake was her 2nd highest town read. That's more than a 'slight town read' IMO.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:26 am
by Shadow_step
Voting unvote isn't the correct format of unvoting.