In post 140, boring wrote:We've too many players who fall into your "unacceptable RVS vote" category for them all to be scum. How'd you come to the conclusion that this one in particular is scum?
Also, what do you think of Implosion sheeping you with what amounts to a naked vote?
gut
Why, do you have a problem with my push?
I don't care about Implosion as long as he helps me lynch scum.
I'm just trying to figure out your motives. I don't care who's being pushed. I care about why. If it's just a gut read, carry on.
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:13 am
by eagerSnake
Gut is shorthand for experience learned on a subconscious level; anyone with the experience to have a gut read should also be able to look and explain what it is that's going into that read.
In post 155, eagerSnake wrote:LUV, they're trying to run you up to L-1 right now, if you could tell me which one of them is scum and which one is mislead town that'd be great.
I don't have any reads right now but I'm a little suspicious of Implosion.
In post 155, eagerSnake wrote:LUV, they're trying to run you up to L-1 right now, if you could tell me which one of them is scum and which one is mislead town that'd be great.
I don't have any reads right now but I'm a little suspicious of Implosion.
Why?
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:37 am
by Gamma Emerald
LUV is town.
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:39 am
by Zoronos
In post 132, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Implosion
Serious vote. He doesn't talk about LUV at all but then votes him. Trying to flashwagon are we?
I'm trying to figure out if I agree with you on this one or not.
Implosion's logic and stances seem, to me, to be very confused.
It seems like he's holding contradictory opinions and trying to justify them after the fact because he was playing off gut and didn't think through whether they made sense together (which leans towny).
My gut doesn't like his post, but I think that's because a lot of it is talking about himself. I want to call him scummy for that, but he's responding to a direct question about his behavior, so talking about himself makes sense. He's answering a direct question after all.
So basically my head and my gut disagree on that slot.
Playing completely absent annoys me, but something being annoying doesn't make it scum. But it also doesn't make me really want to jump in front of a train and yell "No this is wrong don't lynch it" and I really love doing that, so give me something to work with if this is your sincerely held belief.
So, do you believe eagersnake?
What is your current read on him?
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:00 am
by Shadow_step
Actually I wouldn't mind if everyone answers this ^
I personally think Eager could have waited a bit and tried ti develop some reads before outing that he is ascetic. More info to be gained from reactions after that.
Playing completely absent annoys me, but something being annoying doesn't make it scum. But it also doesn't make me really want to jump in front of a train and yell "No this is wrong don't lynch it" and I really love doing that, so give me something to work with if this is your sincerely held belief.
Legit it was the exact thing he was mislynched for. I'm hoping he'll contribute this time, but I understand if he doesn't.
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:09 am
by Gamma Emerald
@Grendel: you were there for the unclaiming in NPBR, what did you think of it?