Mafiascum.net

In post 143, Shadow_step wrote:

In post 140, boring wrote:We've too many players who fall into your "unacceptable RVS vote" category for them all to be scum. How'd you come to the conclusion that this one in particular is scum?

Also, what do you think of Implosion sheeping you with what amounts to a naked vote?

gut
Why, do you have a problem with my push?

I don't care about Implosion as long as he helps me lynch scum.

I'm just trying to figure out your motives. I don't care who's being pushed. I care about why. If it's just a gut read, carry on.

Gut is shorthand for experience learned on a subconscious level; anyone with the experience to have a gut read should also be able to look and explain what it is that's going into that read.

Cool, you wanna answer my question?

In post 122, Shadow_step wrote:Hello eager, do you have any early reads?

If you're talking about this one I've already stated my only read worth mentioning.

Hi, how is everyone? Wonderful weather we're having.

How may I be of service?

LUV, they're trying to run you up to L-1 right now, if you could tell me which one of them is scum and which one is mislead town that'd be great.

I don't understand this train at all.

In post 154, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How may I be of service?

Do something...

In post 155, eagerSnake wrote:LUV, they're trying to run you up to L-1 right now, if you could tell me which one of them is scum and which one is mislead town that'd be great.

I don't have any reads right now but I'm a little suspicious of Implosion.

In post 157, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 154, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:How may I be of service?

Do something...

Lead the way good sir.

In post 158, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 155, eagerSnake wrote:LUV, they're trying to run you up to L-1 right now, if you could tell me which one of them is scum and which one is mislead town that'd be great.

I don't have any reads right now but I'm a little suspicious of Implosion.

Why?

LUV is town.

In post 132, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Implosion
Serious vote. He doesn't talk about LUV at all but then votes him. Trying to flashwagon are we?

I'm trying to figure out if I agree with you on this one or not.

Implosion's logic and stances seem, to me, to be very confused.
It seems like he's holding contradictory opinions and trying to justify them after the fact because he was playing off gut and didn't think through whether they made sense together (which leans towny).

My gut doesn't like his post, but I think that's because a lot of it is talking about himself. I want to call him scummy for that, but he's responding to a direct question about his behavior, so talking about himself makes sense. He's answering a direct question after all.

So basically my head and my gut disagree on that slot.

In post 161, Gamma Emerald wrote:LUV is town.

Explain please?

Oh just the fact LUV did this last game I played with him.

Looks like LUV has been advised to play dumb and play newb like.
Needs death.

In post 164, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh just the fact LUV did this last game I played with him.

Playing completely absent annoys me, but something being annoying doesn't make it scum. But it also doesn't make me really want to jump in front of a train and yell "No this is wrong don't lynch it" and I really love doing that, so give me something to work with if this is your sincerely held belief.

In post 20, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:How is it negative? Doesn't it make you immune to nightkills?

No: Ascetic

So, do you believe eagersnake?
What is your current read on him?

Actually I wouldn't mind if everyone answers this ^

I personally think Eager could have waited a bit and tried ti develop some reads before outing that he is ascetic. More info to be gained from reactions after that.

In post 169, Shadow_step wrote:Eager could have waited a bit

Does not mesh.

In post 168, Shadow_step wrote:

In post 20, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:How is it negative? Doesn't it make you immune to nightkills?

No: Ascetic

So, do you believe eagersnake?
What is your current read on him?

I think that I'll trust it for now. Not sure about a read.

In post 167, Zoronos wrote:

In post 164, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh just the fact LUV did this last game I played with him.

Playing completely absent annoys me, but something being annoying doesn't make it scum. But it also doesn't make me really want to jump in front of a train and yell "No this is wrong don't lynch it" and I really love doing that, so give me something to work with if this is your sincerely held belief.

Legit it was the exact thing he was mislynched for. I'm hoping he'll contribute this time, but I understand if he doesn't.

@Grendel: you were there for the unclaiming in NPBR, what did you think of it?

In post 168, Shadow_step wrote:So, do you believe eagersnake?

Have no reason not to at this point. How about you?

In post 168, Shadow_step wrote:What is your current read on him?

Null. Yours?