Page 12 of 140

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:40 am
by podoboq
Official Vote Count 1.07
LynchingWith 13 votes in play, it takes 7 to lynch.

Zoronos
(2): DierFire, boring
Lil Uzi Vert
(2): Shadow_step, PenguinPower
implosion
(2): nn30, Gamma Emerald
boring
(1): eagerSnake
PenguinPower
(1): Grendel
Gamma Emerald
(1): implosion

Not Voting
(4): Zoronos, Slandaar, MariaR, Lil Uzi Vert


Deadline
: (expired on 2016-10-18 15:22:00)

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 2:42 am
by eagerSnake
Good morning *sips coffee, smokes pipe*

There's a scum who is intent on breaching the town block /note

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 2:48 am
by Gamma Emerald
Are you referring to boring, or do you have another scumread?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:35 am
by boring
He probably is. I'm the only person who's vocalized annoyance with the concept of a fake town block. I can do it again too. Only VI's and scum would be content with the idea of unconfirmed town being placed on a town block pedestal.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:30 am
by Shadow_step
In post 276, eagerSnake wrote:There's a scum who is intent on breaching the town block /note
Elaborate.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:32 am
by Shadow_step
@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:34 am
by Gamma Emerald
Also boring: are you satisfied with my explanation of the thing between me and Grendel?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:40 am
by nn30
In post 231, nn30 wrote:Also, implosion went dark after leaving his vote on luv. It's been ~18 hours since he last posted (compared to some pretty heavy activity on his part early on).

He could just be lurking for legit reasons.

Or he could have started lurking in response to getting some heat and just let the thread move past thinking about him.
In post 247, implosion wrote:Took longer than I thought to get to this game today so forgive what is about to be a multipost because I think they're more readable than walls. Alas.
These posts occur next to one another (mine was 243, his was 247). I posted in 243 about Implosion potentially using lurking as a scum tactic. He then starts his series of posts, with an explanation for not being around
but totally ignores the fact that I mentioned this as potentially scummy
.

It's like he wants to discredit my reaction to him lurking without directly engaging/responding to me.

He then makes a series of posts responding to older stuff and totally ignores that I've voted for him in 229.

More implosion votes please.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:43 am
by nn30
Just realized I misread my own post numbers. The posts didn't occur as closely together as I originally stated. I called Implosion out on lurking in 231, not 243.

Still I think it's unlikely that he didn't read what I said towards him. I think he ignored it intentionally.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:58 am
by boring
In post 280, Shadow_step wrote:@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?
I'm pretty sure I've addressed this at length, but I can answer again. I think he's telling the truth, and I think that unless his only role modifier is ascetic, he made a mistake announcing it so quickly. Factor in his town block nonsense, and I have him as strong town with questionable judgement.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:00 am
by implosion
Phone post.

Gamma, I'll read luv later. I have limited time and for now thought addressing other things would be more worth that time. And if you think I'd accuse you of omgus then I question whether you actually read what I said... it isn't omgus if you give material reasons.

Nn, i really have no idea what you want from me. I respond to events in the order I read them (i.e. The order they were posted) and I did respond to what you said. Would you rather I respond to what you say first, before reading the rest of the game in order? Would you like me to mold my real life schedule around this game? I really have no idea why you're calling my posting pattern scummy.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:01 am
by boring
In post 281, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also boring: are you satisfied with my explanation of the thing between me and Grendel?
I guess. I mean, you explained it alright, I was just hoping there'd be more to it.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:04 am
by Gamma Emerald
I said the bit about OMGUS because I figured someone else would accuse me of it.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:21 am
by boring
Gamma, is it safe to say that your mutual scum-reading with implosion is centered around your differing reads on LUV, or am I over-simplifying. If I'm wrong, please correct me.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:24 am
by nn30
In post 285, implosion wrote:
I really have no idea why you're calling my posting pattern scummy.
@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:25 am
by MariaR
Oh boy things have picked up I guess townreading people comes really easy to you guys hm?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:25 am
by MariaR
In post 289, nn30 wrote:
In post 285, implosion wrote:
I really have no idea why you're calling my posting pattern scummy.
@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
What I get from what you're saying is he's only posting when it's convenient for him to post yes?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:34 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 288, boring wrote:Gamma, is it safe to say that your mutual scum-reading with implosion is centered around your differing reads on LUV, or am I over-simplifying. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
More about the fact he wouldn't read LUVs wall post. He said he will so the scumread shifts to light town because I liked his response.
VOTE: Zoronos
This is still scum.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:35 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 289, nn30 wrote:
In post 285, implosion wrote:
I really have no idea why you're calling my posting pattern scummy.
@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
I understand but don't find it scummy.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:41 am
by nn30
In post 291, MariaR wrote:
In post 289, nn30 wrote:
In post 285, implosion wrote:
I really have no idea why you're calling my posting pattern scummy.
@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
What I get from what you're saying is he's only posting when it's convenient for him to post yes?
Yep.

Also that from 247 - 261 he addresses a significant number of issues, but ignores the ones I've raised with him. The most he responds to me is by giving an explanation for why he hasn't posted in a while.

Apologizing for not posting for a while would have been a fine explanation - had he directed it at me. Instead, to me, it feels like he tried to slip an explanation under the radar without having to directly confront me on anything. THAT felt more scummy than the post pattern itself.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:02 am
by MariaR
In post 294, nn30 wrote:
In post 291, MariaR wrote:
In post 289, nn30 wrote:
In post 285, implosion wrote:
I really have no idea why you're calling my posting pattern scummy.
@town - can you follow my line of reasoning? I ask because I want to see if Implosion is the only one not understanding me.
What I get from what you're saying is he's only posting when it's convenient for him to post yes?
Yep.

Also that from 247 - 261 he addresses a significant number of issues, but ignores the ones I've raised with him. The most he responds to me is by giving an explanation for why he hasn't posted in a while.

Apologizing for not posting for a while would have been a fine explanation - had he directed it at me. Instead, to me, it feels like he tried to slip an explanation under the radar without having to directly confront me on anything. THAT felt more scummy than the post pattern itself.
I think you're looking into that a bit to much and overthinking I don't think that's what he was going for that seems way to smart

I do think you're town though for all this

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:06 am
by Shadow_step
In post 280, Shadow_step wrote:@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?
Maria, same question.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:08 am
by Shadow_step
Gamma I really think your Zoronos vote is terrible. What is your case against him?
I think there are better places to put your vote, like PP.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:11 am
by Gamma Emerald
My case is Zoronos reacted badly to Grendel FOS on him.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:13 am
by MariaR
In post 296, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 280, Shadow_step wrote:@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?
Maria, same question.
I thought he was clear cause I didn't know mafia could have that power but I see no reason to lie. So I think it's real regarding if he's town or mafia I'd say town because I just think town would have that more often than scum because we would need a crazy amount of pr's to counter it as already stated