In post 350, Road Kamelot wrote:Hm
So youve learned my mafia behaviour from sitechat. Fascinating
OH and youve realized im the type of player who would jump in to buddy a wagoned townie bc in this game you came to the conclusion that i was jumping in to buddy a wagoned townie
Circular logic bro
I mean, I get that my words aren't connecting, you aren't the first and won't be the last who feel that I'm faking an argument, in or outside mafia. So I wonder how I'm going to make you understand that this post feels incredibly wrong.
It starts with the sarcasm in the first sentence. Sarcasm in argumentation is nearly always a sign that the user checked out of the conversation. Be that because of frustration or because there's not actually an argument. It's a sign of saying something where they don't want to say anything constructive. Road isn't frustrated here, but can't continue the argumentation that I don't know her well enough to read buddying into a post of hers.
The second part, beyond what it actually says, follows up similarly. Bro again could signify frustration, but that's really not going on. It's depreciatory, where part of the zing of her defense has to come from attacking person making the argument against her (me). It's not ad hom, but has the same flavour. She feels that a defense has to be either retaliatory or that her defense requires the attacker to look weaker. Given that her wagon isn't going anywhere, I'd say she posted it with a motive.
Surrender, imagine and of course wear something nice.