Page 79 of 167

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:21 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 1944, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 1942, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 1935, Frozen Angel wrote:Why are you repeating me
Me?
yes
Where have I done that

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:21 pm
by Anotora
I just realized it makes zero sense for -Grey-'s claimed role to announce targets in advance.

Like Firebringer and Panther have said, it should only be used to confirm town.

Because if he announces that he's going to investigate someone, scum can just kill him to frame whomever he investigated.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:23 pm
by Frozen Angel
In post 1951, Anotora wrote:Because if he announces that he's going to investigate someone, scum can just kill him to frame whomever he investigated.
I am a role stopper dah

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:25 pm
by RadiantCowbells
Uhh you're probably all gonna get modkilled.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:25 pm
by RadiantCowbells
Maybe not modkilled but definitely force replaced. You can't do that.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:26 pm
by Frozen Angel
In post 1932, Frozen Angel wrote:so you had no read on them - you had no clear read on other players. you wanted a townlean of yours to die to push someone rude who could be as eiather alignment next day?
In post 1933, Pepchoninga wrote:You were ready to blindly vote someone who you TR, just so you can persue someone tomorrow? What if it was a TvT. This is stupid really.
You repeating ^

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:27 pm
by Anotora
I don't see how you RBing someone makes a difference.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:28 pm
by Frozen Angel
I'm not a role blocker

I am a rolestopper

:facepalm:

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:28 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 1954, RadiantCowbells wrote:Maybe not modkilled but definitely force replaced. You can't do that.
I guess apologizes are needed.

There weren't any game breaking information or anything like that, so I hope we will be able to continue the game.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:29 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 1955, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 1932, Frozen Angel wrote:so you had no read on them - you had no clear read on other players. you wanted a townlean of yours to die to push someone rude who could be as eiather alignment next day?
In post 1933, Pepchoninga wrote:You were ready to blindly vote someone who you TR, just so you can persue someone tomorrow? What if it was a TvT. This is stupid really.
You repeating ^
I never read the posts that were made when I was writing mine. And no, we have simular saying but different meanings.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:30 pm
by Anotora
In post 1957, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm not a role blocker

I am a rolestopper

:facepalm:
I knew I was missing out on something really big as it related to your role power. I thought that "rolestopper" was just the new terminology for roleblocker or something. What is the difference? I'm so sorry.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:31 pm
by Frozen Angel
@pep how is the meaning of your post different?

@Anotoro It's exactly the opposite of roleblocker. I role block whoever is trying to target my target! I make them ascietic bulletproof

Thats why Gamma is practically a confscum

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:32 pm
by Frozen Angel
I mean I make my target ascietic bulletproof

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:34 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 1961, Frozen Angel wrote:@pep how is the meaning of your post different?

@Anotoro It's exactly the opposite of roleblocker. I role block whoever is trying to target my target! I make them ascietic bulletproof

Thats why Gamma is practically a confscum
Idk how to explain it, like read the posts. They aren't the same.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:37 pm
by Anotora
So the possibilities are:

-Grey- dies, flips his claimed role, we get two confirmed scum (you and his target)
or
-Grey- lives and we get a semiconfirmed town.

The only risk is that there might be a scum RB who can block you from protecting -Grey-.

I get it now.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:39 pm
by Frozen Angel
No if he dies that means his target is scum OR I was scum who killed him myself and didn't role stop him

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:41 pm
by Anotora
UNVOTE:

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:42 pm
by Pepchoninga
Well whatever it is, we need to wait for Grey to make final discussion on Jin lynch or whatever.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:42 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 1966, Anotora wrote:UNVOTE:
You know this doesn't count.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:43 pm
by Anotora
UNVOTE:

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 10:47 pm
by Anotora
In post 1859, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm - and so many other people are not voting SAj for keyen replace out. That is a hardcore misrepresentation.

What do you mean he active lurked till pressure? He had two posts before pressure and he presented a case/point of view in his first one.
I said SAJ; I meant the slot in general.

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:16 pm
by Frozen Angel
In post 1969, Anotora wrote:UNVOTE:
what about my role changed your mind about aliesa?

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 12:14 am
by -Grey-
In post 1804, Frozen Angel wrote:LOL

IT is! But You just screwd up because we already have a Miller and a 1 shot role stopper claim and a weak vanilla cop.

You're role is practically scum utility!

LOL
Anotora also softed a PR.

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 12:15 am
by -Grey-
In post 1807, Alisae wrote:VOTE: Alisae
FA I think my town flip helps town at this point.
No. Get the hell back on Jin.

Nothing helps town more than scum death

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 12:17 am
by -Grey-
In post 1822, Anotora wrote:
In post 1821, Alisae wrote:
In post 1820, Anotora wrote:
In post 1819, Alisae wrote:Also it's a gambit.
VOTE: Alisae
Lynch all liars.
Trying to start a policy lynch when Jin is at L-1.
FA, what does this read to you as?
I think it's REALLY INTERESTING that you're specifically asking FA for an opinion.
I think it's REALLY SCUMMY that you're trying to disrupt Jin's wagon.