Page 95 of 167

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:25 am
by RadiantCowbells
I would be utterly unsurprised if scum had a cop role to get towncred from the miller claim. That said, no we're not lynching them today.

Anotora? =]

Also, if she's town then scum are basically required to have an ascetic...

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:26 am
by RadiantCowbells
YOU SHOULD EAT SOME GODDAMN FROSTED FLAKES YOU FILTHY INTIMIDATE USING EXTREMESPEED BURNING CHOICE BAND WEARING ARCANINE

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:26 am
by Firebringer
ur rude, i am going to have captain crunch.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:28 am
by Firebringer
ohhh rc, I met you (titus), it was fun playing board games and stuff with you.
do it again sometime.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:28 am
by Frozen Angel
^

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:29 am
by Garmr
In post 2344, mlmooney89 wrote:
In post 2341, Garmr wrote:Calls people assholes when they offer advice. Pretty much calls town assholes when they do a none emotional response -grey-. Self projecting much.

Sure your not new to mafia but that's like saying i'm not new to league of legends so I can be diamond (after 100 normal games). The fact that 2339 was meant to be nice and helpful not sarcastic.
You were calling me bad at my role because you 'were obvious town' that was your opinion and yet you were being rude. Then you tell me how to play by -your- standards. Again I was just saying that based on the wagons I wanted to lay off you, SP, and Anotora. YOU fished for me being a cop. If that isn't anti town I don't know what is. If you felt I was soft claiming the town thing to do would have been to keep it to yourself to see what I would do with the info not blast it to everyone that a cop cleared you. But you have the arrogance to tell ME how I could have done that better... So yeah I was ticked at you. Plus the asshole persona thing was from day one's actions. That's the whole reason I investigated you because how you were acting was more off putting than I could easily say was town. That being said I know you are town so I won't tunnel you nor argue further.

On another note. I'm now worthless tonight so can't be of anymore use as a cop. >.>
Yeh my roles gimped tonight as well. Also you pretty much were screaming cop I didn't even need to fish you. All someone had to do was read that one post.

Also I do have the gull to tell you how you could of done better but is it really arrogant to do so? Maybe it's arrogance to not heed advice for the future.

This part is arrogance through. People were calling for fa ability (if she is town) to be used on me or grey. I don't see how I was so off putting to the majority of the player base.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:30 am
by Garmr
In post 2353, Firebringer wrote:ohhh rc, I met you (titus), it was fun playing board games and stuff with you.
do it again sometime.
Do you want me to add you to the dnd/roleplaying chat that titus,diamond and stuff are in.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:30 am
by Firebringer
In post 2356, Garmr wrote:
In post 2353, Firebringer wrote:ohhh rc, I met you (titus), it was fun playing board games and stuff with you.
do it again sometime.
Do you want me to add you to the dnd/roleplaying chat that titus,diamond and stuff are in.
surez.
hows life with you garmr?

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:31 am
by Frozen Angel
I'm busy tonight but for now

VOTE: Gamma

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:31 am
by RadiantCowbells
I am not lynching Gamma today, sorry.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:32 am
by Frozen Angel
the first sentence had no relation to the the vote btw

I'm busy tonight so I won't be online anymore.

The reasons behind vote must be obvious

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:32 am
by Garmr
In post 2357, Firebringer wrote:
In post 2356, Garmr wrote:
In post 2353, Firebringer wrote:ohhh rc, I met you (titus), it was fun playing board games and stuff with you.
do it again sometime.
Do you want me to add you to the dnd/roleplaying chat that titus,diamond and stuff are in.
surez.
hows life with you garmr?
Pretty chill but i'm ill at the moment. Kinda sucks through that you guys play dnd at such early times and on inconvient days. It used to be 12 pm australian time on a Saturday.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:33 am
by RadiantCowbells
I could easily see both town AND scum having an ascetic to reduce the power of the PRs.

I could also see a rolestopper on scum side to keep them safe from town investigations.

I don't trust you FA and I'm not letting you dictate the lynch.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:36 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 2359, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am not lynching Gamma today, sorry.
They are scum read the way they reacted to me saying they scum claimed D1

pedit : I don't care RC - I dont care what you see.

You can see a scum role stopper who guessed there is a heavy inves town after miller claim and claimed 1 shot role stopper day 1

but that's fine. I have no intention to argue.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:37 am
by RadiantCowbells
Even if you are town, I'm not particularly inclined to trust your reads given SAJ was your doing and you tried to shove my lynch down everyone's throats today.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:37 am
by Frozen Angel
ascietic is counter point of me. It makes no sense with miller

It is perfect as a godfather for weak cop and it will deflect the alignment cop.

= ascetic is scum

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:39 am
by RadiantCowbells
I get that reasoning, but have you considered there could be two ascetics on both alignments to further neuter the insane investigative potential that town has?

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:40 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 2364, RadiantCowbells wrote:Even if you are town, I'm not particularly inclined to trust your reads given SAJ was your doing and you tried to shove my lynch down everyone's throats today.
oh fu.k .ff

I'm not responsible for that lynch alone. players including you voted SAJ saying they were scummy.

I was saying they were scummy cause they were.

They did something scummy so they were my best bet for lynching scum - like the way they were for so many other people who actually voted them

I sense no guilt imo

and I never claimed I'm a goddess in this game so you don't bother if your going that direction as well.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:42 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 2366, RadiantCowbells wrote:I get that reasoning, but have you considered there could be two ascetics on both alignments to further neuter the insane investigative potential that town has?
2 ascietics , 1 miller , 1 role stopper, 1 cop , 1 weak vanilla cop , 1 watcher = 7 tpr + 1 already flipped vt = 8 town

your saying town started this with 3 vanillas?

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:42 am
by Frozen Angel
oh I miscalculated :/

6 tpr - 4 vanillas

but still :/

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:43 am
by Frozen Angel
UNVOTE:

fuck it

I need to think - I'm too tired atm bye

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:44 am
by RadiantCowbells
3 vanillas. I am, of course, a 1-shot bulletproof.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:44 am
by Anotora
In post 2366, RadiantCowbells wrote:I get that reasoning, but have you considered there could be two ascetics on both alignments to further neuter the insane investigative potential that town has?
It's only really insane potential if you take mlmooney's claim for fact.

VOTE: Pepchoninga

TBH I'm totally stoked to have my suspicion of Pepcho somewhat confirmed.

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:45 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 2371, RadiantCowbells wrote:3 vanillas. I am, of course, a 1-shot bulletproof.
:/

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:46 am
by RadiantCowbells
In post 2372, Anotora wrote:
In post 2366, RadiantCowbells wrote:I get that reasoning, but have you considered there could be two ascetics on both alignments to further neuter the insane investigative potential that town has?
It's only really insane potential if you take mlmooney's claim for fact.

VOTE: Pepchoninga

TBH I'm totally stoked to have my suspicion of Pepcho somewhat confirmed.
Well, do you take Mlmooney's claim for fact?