Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:33 am
Or they can just vote the person independantly with their own reasons as to why they're scum?
My plan is much simpler.In post 575, Alisae wrote:Or they can just vote the person independantly with their own reasons as to why they're scum?
PleaseIn post 573, RadiantCowbells wrote:And no, don't take me wrong, it's just that since I have huge respect for females and sometimes it really bugs me off when I have to read them in a game like that.
No.In post 537, Alisae wrote:Screenplay answer this.In post 529, Alisae wrote:LOLWTF WHY?
Are you basicly saying that you have no stance on what is going on and that you have no reads?
Most adorable kid on the internet... or she was.In post 582, Alisae wrote:Grey I forgot Boxxie was a meme lol.
If you have reads then give them.In post 583, Srceenplay wrote:No.In post 537, Alisae wrote:Screenplay answer this.In post 529, Alisae wrote:LOLWTF WHY?
Are you basicly saying that you have no stance on what is going on and that you have no reads?
hope that answers your question.
I like your style.In post 583, Srceenplay wrote:No.In post 537, Alisae wrote:Screenplay answer this.In post 529, Alisae wrote:LOLWTF WHY?
Are you basicly saying that you have no stance on what is going on and that you have no reads?
hope that answers your question.
I have taken a stance.In post 585, Alisae wrote:If you have reads then give them.In post 583, Srceenplay wrote:No.In post 537, Alisae wrote:Screenplay answer this.In post 529, Alisae wrote:LOLWTF WHY?
Are you basicly saying that you have no stance on what is going on and that you have no reads?
hope that answers your question.
If you have stances to take then take them.
If your tactic is to annoy us, you are in the right direction.In post 587, Srceenplay wrote:I have taken a stance.In post 585, Alisae wrote:If you have reads then give them.In post 583, Srceenplay wrote:No.In post 537, Alisae wrote:Screenplay answer this.In post 529, Alisae wrote:LOLWTF WHY?
Are you basicly saying that you have no stance on what is going on and that you have no reads?
hope that answers your question.
If you have stances to take then take them.
Thats what she saidIn post 571, -Grey- wrote:I think you're doing excellent for ESL.In post 570, Pepchoninga wrote:Cmon, English is not my first language and I still belive my spelling is pretty good compared to other people like me.In post 565, -Grey- wrote:Also, you still need to spell check. Lol.In post 563, Pepchoninga wrote:I wasn't insulting anybody really. I was just saying that the 2-3 posts that were discussed didn't make sence and were contradicting themselves.In post 560, -Grey- wrote:If you're going to insult somebody's intelligence... spell check.In post 522, Pepchoninga wrote:Lol, I can't follow what you wanna say. Cuz it makes zero sence really.
Also you are one to talk about insulting...
Sense is not spelled with a c.
?In post 573, RadiantCowbells wrote:And no, don't take me wrong, it's just that since I have huge respect for females and sometimes it really bugs me off when I have to read them in a game like that.
Uhhhhh, sarcasm too much?In post 574, -Grey- wrote:Alisae, you are amazingly awesome at this game and I would like to sheep all your votes for a record-breakingly fast town win, however the fact that my doing so would cause you to scumread me and in effect cause a mislynch forces me to vote suboptimally in order to survive.
I do, however, have an idea to solve the problem. If you vote the scum, and then unvote, everyone else can lynch the scum without sheeping your amazing vote.
Sound like a plan?!
Glad we're at a mutual understanding.In post 592, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm not lynching you today FA. If you are in fact town then just focus on scumhunting.
VOTE: AnotoraIn post 593, Anotora wrote:So, from my understanding, Pepcho voted for Srceenplay in RVS, kept the vote there for about fifteen pages, removed it "because my RVS vote seems to be causing so much trouble", and then just REVOTED Srceenplay for no additional reason because now he's under pressure to make a case.
...And people think my contribution is worse than his?
What does that tell you about your contribution?In post 593, Anotora wrote:...And people think my contribution is worse than his?
Feels like they're trying to derail the wagon by shadethrowing.
Ugh, no. I kept my RVS vote, because I saw no need to remove it. Then I removed it to show people that I'm not gonna sit and do nothing as I was accused. And then Screenplay started playing like that and since he was one of my top scum targets from before I put a pressure lynch on him. This does not seem to bother him, so it is just making me more confident in the lynch.In post 593, Anotora wrote:So, from my understanding, Pepcho voted for Srceenplay in RVS, kept the vote there for about fifteen pages, removed it "because my RVS vote seems to be causing so much trouble", and then just REVOTED Srceenplay for no additional reason because now he's under pressure to make a case.
...And people think my contribution is worse than his?