Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 4:46 pm
Yes claiming before a lynch is good but why do it if it's not needed. Needlessly claiming is bad for town.In post 671, Alisae wrote:Becuase claiming before a lynch is pro-town?
Yes claiming before a lynch is good but why do it if it's not needed. Needlessly claiming is bad for town.In post 671, Alisae wrote:Becuase claiming before a lynch is pro-town?
Are you implying that it's not needed?In post 675, Srceenplay wrote:Yes claiming before a lynch is good but why do it if it's not needed. Needlessly claiming is bad for town.In post 671, Alisae wrote:Becuase claiming before a lynch is pro-town?
So..... Nvm then? Talk about it later.In post 678, Alisae wrote:Ano is at L-2 because RC unvoted so that when Ano get's home, they can post shit.
Angora equals antoraIn post 662, Alisae wrote:Huh?In post 661, Firebringer wrote:Town: angoraHuh?In post 661, Firebringer wrote:Scum: Frozen angel
No I mean explain the reads.In post 681, Firebringer wrote:Angora equals antoraIn post 662, Alisae wrote:Huh?In post 661, Firebringer wrote:Town: angoraHuh?In post 661, Firebringer wrote:Scum: Frozen angel
Nah it's the best wagon here.In post 682, Firebringer wrote:Btw shit wagon
You should really start thinking about where you go wrong in every single game as town, Once in a while.In post 661, Firebringer wrote:Scum: Frozen angel
You act like it's a crime to notice both townish and scummish things that a given player does. Don't act as if I'm being unclear on who my main scum suspects are. I'm not. I have not been wishy-washy. I just want to take all a player's pros and cons into account, rather than making tunnel cases. Which I think is a big difference you and I have.In post 638, Garmr wrote:To be fair alisae anotora has been shade throwing at their town reads the whole game.
Congratulations, you just softed PR and painted a target on your forehead.In post 688, Anotora wrote:I can hardly believe I'm saying this, but Srceenplay is right and Alisae is wrong in this claiming argument. Town has nothing to gain from me claiming, but scum would be happy to see me do it.
You know here is another example of the saying - "Long post are not always better"In post 690, Anotora wrote:So, guys, here's my case for why lynching me today is a bad idea:
- Whether I flip scum or town (hint: I will flip town), mine is a relatively low-information lynch compared to the info you would be getting from lynching Pepcho or Srceenplay. I really haven't engaged much yet directly with people like Frozen Angel and RadiantCowbells, but if you learn something from Pepcho's flip, you end up learning something about pretty much every other player in the game except kentofan. And if Srceenplay winds up being scum, which is very likely, then you will learn a *heck of a lot* based on who was willing to defend his scummy activity and who wasn't. To be explicit about it, if Srceenplay flips scum, we can pretty much proceed to wagon Pepcho D2 unless/until new information comes up.
- I am an active poster, and that alone makes me worth keeping around. At least I don't try to obstruct others from reading me the way Srceenplay has the whole game (and Pepcho has done on occasion with meaningless posts). I'd much rather the town doesn't carry dead weight like Srceenplay on its back. Even if I'm scum, which I'm not, wouldn't you rather have me be an obvious suspect later on, than be stuck with Srceenplay or Pepcho clouding the waters?
- Pepcho and Srceenplay are, in fact, scummier than I am. Maybe I still have a long way to go, convincing people of this, but it's true. All game long, Srceenplay's posts have been just terrible, and he's only improved them in hopes of warding off his newfound wagon. Pepcho's gameplay, to me, absolutely screams out bussing. Peeps like Garmr and Grey have been on my case for what feels like the lion's share of the day now, but my posting has wavered little. You can't say that about either of them, and it's really suspicious.
I realize this post might make it sound like I favor a Srceenplay lynch moreso than a Pepcho lynch. That isn't true. I think Pepcho is a lot worse than Srceenplay because Pepcho has gone out of his way to defend another scummy player, while the reverse is not true. But it seems like the rest of the playerlist sees Srceenplay as the main alternative to lynching me. I'm okay with that, though not thrilled.
Ummm, no this isn't strange at all, even tho it's done for the second time without any explanation.
I would suspect those are your reads?In post 694, -Grey- wrote:{-Grey-}
{RadiantCowbells, Garmr}
{Frozen Angel, Firebringer}
{Obvious Alt, mlmooney89, kentofan}
{Srceenplay, KNPD, Alisae}
{Anotora, PeptoNinja}
You've only really posted regarding keyenpeedee once, in post #486. I think it's interesting that you put keyenpeedee and Srceenplay on the same tier of scumminess. Srceenplay is really far scummier than keyenpeedee and I think almost everyone but you can agree to that.In post 694, -Grey- wrote:{-Grey-}
{RadiantCowbells, Garmr}
{Frozen Angel, Firebringer}
{Obvious Alt, mlmooney89, kentofan}
{Srceenplay, KNPD, Alisae}
{Anotora, PeptoNinja}
Please call me Pep, it will make your life easierIn post 695, Anotora wrote:Pepcho, I still feel comfortable reading your post #289 as a defense of your pal, and I hope everyone else takes a look at it, too.
You're right to demand an explanation from RC about the vote/unvote thing, though.