In post 713, Pepchoninga wrote:In post 706, Anotora wrote:In post 701, Pepchoninga wrote:In post 699, Anotora wrote:You don't get to decide how your posts are read by others, Pep. That's kind of the point of the game.
Yes I do, when you are completely shifting there meaning. This is common tactic of scum. You are shifting my comment so they can apeal to your cause when I've explained multiple times the meaning of that post.
So I'm gonna ask you now. You gonna claim?
Rolefishers gonna rolefish, lol
I'm not role fishing. But you are trying to make me look bad with ONE quote. You don't have a good case on me and you don't seem in the slightest to be interested in digging up one. Also lets not forget your contradict way of reading the way and not having any real arguments against any of your case. You seem to be trying to look active by making big post where you just say how people look more scummy then you.
UNVOTE: Srceenplay
VOTE: Anotora
In post 724, -Grey- wrote:In post 723, Pepchoninga wrote:
Yes I'm asking him would he. To see his reaction. I'm telling him to do it like Alisae.
And I've explained what him refusing to reveal and him doing it would do imo.In post 689, -Grey- wrote:In post 688, Anotora wrote:I can hardly believe I'm saying this, but Srceenplay is right and Alisae is wrong in this claiming argument. Town has nothing to gain from me claiming, but scum would be happy to see me do it.
Congratulations, you just softed PR and painted a target on your forehead.
The only reason you shouldn't claim now is if you're actually VT.
There is zero town motivation in continuing to pressure for a claim after this post.
In post 727, Anotora wrote:I think Pepcho is mad at me for re-rousing -Grey-'s suspicion of him. Hah.
(Sorry for the triple post.)
In post 726, Anotora wrote:In post 713, Pepchoninga wrote:In post 706, Anotora wrote:In post 701, Pepchoninga wrote:In post 699, Anotora wrote:You don't get to decide how your posts are read by others, Pep. That's kind of the point of the game.
Yes I do, when you are completely shifting there meaning. This is common tactic of scum. You are shifting my comment so they can apeal to your cause when I've explained multiple times the meaning of that post.
So I'm gonna ask you now. You gonna claim?
Rolefishers gonna rolefish, lol
I'm not role fishing. But you are trying to make me look bad with ONE quote. You don't have a good case on me and you don't seem in the slightest to be interested in digging up one. Also lets not forget your contradict way of reading the way and not having any real arguments against any of your case. You seem to be trying to look active by making big post where you just say how people look more scummy then you.
UNVOTE: Srceenplay
VOTE: Anotora
This is thinly veiled OMGUS btw
In post 727, Anotora wrote:I think Pepcho is mad at me for re-rousing -Grey-'s suspicion of him. Hah.
(Sorry for the triple post.)
In post 627, Srceenplay wrote:My game play has been consistent all game.
In post 634, mlmooney89 wrote:In post 631, Pepchoninga wrote:Now, just to clear my words. What I say is that I see a lust for a fast lynch in some people. That doesn't necessarily make them scum, but going for not well though lynch increases the chance of a misslynch. Pressure is made to force reactions which inturn help you to get a good case. And you should not feel rushed to do that. That is what I'm saying. If there is someone who does give a lot of food to fead upon and people have come to a consensus then by all means a lynch could happen earlier. It's just we have time and we should be able to use it as we wish without necessarily making us look scummy.
Still takes away the effect by TELLING scum that we want to review every wagon before we lynch. If they think they have time to move the wagon they won't be pressured at all.
In post 649, -Grey- wrote:In post 644, mlmooney89 wrote:
Because you are a good player. I've played with good players before and being a good player means I don't trust you until I see something more solid.
What gives you the idea that I'm a good player?
Why does me being a good player make you automatically assume I'm scum unless proven otherwise?
In post 723, Pepchoninga wrote:Yes I'm asking him would he. To see his reaction. I'm telling him to do it like Alisae.
And I've explained what him refusing to reveal and him doing it would do imo.
In post 735, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 723, Pepchoninga wrote:Yes I'm asking him would he. To see his reaction. I'm telling him to do it like Alisae.
And I've explained what him refusing to reveal and him doing it would do imo.
I can't see how would you plan a reaction test based on the fact an L1 player is going to claim or not
BTW not game related : the avatar is annadog's fault. blame her who forcibly made me join to her army!
In post 734, Frozen Angel wrote:he didn't say that. You're kinda twisting his words here ...
In post 624, mlmooney89 wrote:He is scum until proven innocent.
In post 737, Garmr wrote:
I honestly think anno should claim that way we can get it lynching him over and done with. If he claims vt his pretty much wasted everyone's time and shown that his more interested in surviving than helping town. If he claims power role he either gets counter claimed or goes through the night phase. If he ends up dead then his town if he doesn't we discuss from there.
In post 742, Frozen Angel wrote:I missed that sorry
In post 734, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 649, -Grey- wrote:In post 644, mlmooney89 wrote:
Because you are a good player. I've played with good players before and being a good player means I don't trust you until I see something more solid.
What gives you the idea that I'm a good player?
Why does me being a good player make you automatically assume I'm scum unless proven otherwise?
he didn't say that. You're kinda twisting his words here ...
In post 744, Frozen Angel wrote:the one you asked those questions based
In post 746, -Grey- wrote:You're doing some mental gymnastics here if you're implying that I should have requoted text that was already quoted in my post to cater to you.
In post 748, Frozen Angel wrote:pedit : no I just apologized for missing that - never said you had to do anything else. You're the one who is trying to make something out of this.