Page 30 of 167

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:07 pm
by Anotora
Y'know, I was going to go to sleep, but maybe it's better for the town if I just stay up so that you can keep talking.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:21 pm
by Anotora
In post 713, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 706, Anotora wrote:
In post 701, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 699, Anotora wrote:You don't get to decide how your posts are read by others, Pep. That's kind of the point of the game.
Yes I do, when you are completely shifting there meaning. This is common tactic of scum. You are shifting my comment so they can apeal to your cause when I've explained multiple times the meaning of that post.

So I'm gonna ask you now. You gonna claim?
Rolefishers gonna rolefish, lol
I'm not role fishing. But you are trying to make me look bad with ONE quote. You don't have a good case on me and you don't seem in the slightest to be interested in digging up one. Also lets not forget your contradict way of reading the way and not having any real arguments against any of your case. You seem to be trying to look active by making big post where you just say how people look more scummy then you.

UNVOTE: Srceenplay

VOTE: Anotora
This is thinly veiled OMGUS btw

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:22 pm
by Anotora
I think Pepcho is mad at me for re-rousing -Grey-'s suspicion of him. Hah.

(Sorry for the triple post.)

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:37 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 724, -Grey- wrote:
In post 723, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 721, -Grey- wrote:
In post 718, Pepchoninga wrote:Wrong. I don't really care if he claims.
In post 701, Pepchoninga wrote:So I'm gonna ask you now. You gonna claim?
Clearly.
Yes I'm asking him would he. To see his reaction. I'm telling him to do it like Alisae.

And I've explained what him refusing to reveal and him doing it would do imo.
In post 689, -Grey- wrote:
In post 688, Anotora wrote:I can hardly believe I'm saying this, but Srceenplay is right and Alisae is wrong in this claiming argument. Town has nothing to gain from me claiming, but scum would be happy to see me do it.
Congratulations, you just softed PR and painted a target on your forehead.

The only reason you shouldn't claim now is if you're actually VT.
There is zero town motivation in continuing to pressure for a claim after this post.
Well, if this is your reason to lynch me and put Ano as null it is pretty laugable. But really I didn't understand your post the way it was meant to be.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:38 pm
by -Grey-
In post 727, Anotora wrote:I think Pepcho is mad at me for re-rousing -Grey-'s suspicion of him. Hah.

(Sorry for the triple post.)
Don't sprain your shoulder patting yourself on the back. I never stopped scumreading him.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:41 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 726, Anotora wrote:
In post 713, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 706, Anotora wrote:
In post 701, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 699, Anotora wrote:You don't get to decide how your posts are read by others, Pep. That's kind of the point of the game.
Yes I do, when you are completely shifting there meaning. This is common tactic of scum. You are shifting my comment so they can apeal to your cause when I've explained multiple times the meaning of that post.

So I'm gonna ask you now. You gonna claim?
Rolefishers gonna rolefish, lol
I'm not role fishing. But you are trying to make me look bad with ONE quote. You don't have a good case on me and you don't seem in the slightest to be interested in digging up one. Also lets not forget your contradict way of reading the way and not having any real arguments against any of your case. You seem to be trying to look active by making big post where you just say how people look more scummy then you.

UNVOTE: Srceenplay

VOTE: Anotora
This is thinly veiled OMGUS btw
Nope it would be OMGUS if I just blindly voted you. I just find your recent posts to be more and more scummy and with an actual case on you I feel good lynching you.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:42 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 727, Anotora wrote:I think Pepcho is mad at me for re-rousing -Grey-'s suspicion of him. Hah.

(Sorry for the triple post.)
Ummm, going too cocky after you got some support? You seem to have grown more confident but nothing more.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:13 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 627, Srceenplay wrote:My game play has been consistent all game.
Consistently doing nothing is still doing nothing.

Its like repeatedly multiplying in 0. it might look like doing something good but in the end you will just stay in that 0 forever.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:14 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 634, mlmooney89 wrote:
In post 631, Pepchoninga wrote: Now, just to clear my words. What I say is that I see a lust for a fast lynch in some people. That doesn't necessarily make them scum, but going for not well though lynch increases the chance of a misslynch. Pressure is made to force reactions which inturn help you to get a good case. And you should not feel rushed to do that. That is what I'm saying. If there is someone who does give a lot of food to fead upon and people have come to a consensus then by all means a lynch could happen earlier. It's just we have time and we should be able to use it as we wish without necessarily making us look scummy.
Still takes away the effect by TELLING scum that we want to review every wagon before we lynch. If they think they have time to move the wagon they won't be pressured at all.
That's not true actually

but It makes me feel good about you - when I see you care about this.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:23 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 649, -Grey- wrote:
In post 644, mlmooney89 wrote:
In post 635, -Grey- wrote:
In post 624, mlmooney89 wrote:Grey- I wouldn’t put anything past him. He is scum until proven innocent.
Where do you get the basis for this remark about me?
Because you are a good player. I've played with good players before and being a good player means I don't trust you until I see something more solid.
What gives you the idea that I'm a good player?

Why does me being a good player make you automatically assume I'm scum unless proven otherwise?
he didn't say that. You're kinda twisting his words here ...

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:39 am
by Frozen Angel
In post 723, Pepchoninga wrote:Yes I'm asking him would he. To see his reaction. I'm telling him to do it like Alisae.

And I've explained what him refusing to reveal and him doing it would do imo.
I can't see how would you plan a reaction test based on the fact an L1 player is going to claim or not

BTW not game related : the avatar is annadog's fault. blame her who forcibly made me join to her army!

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:19 am
by RadiantCowbells
UNVOTE:

:thinking:

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:53 am
by Garmr
In post 703, -Grey- wrote:Ano, don't claim.

This should help you not claim:

VOTE: Pepto Ninja
I honestly think anno should claim that way we can get it lynching him over and done with. If he claims vt his pretty much wasted everyone's time and shown that his more interested in surviving than helping town. If he claims power role he either gets counter claimed or goes through the night phase. If he ends up dead then his town if he doesn't we discuss from there.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:04 am
by mlmooney89
In post 735, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 723, Pepchoninga wrote:Yes I'm asking him would he. To see his reaction. I'm telling him to do it like Alisae.

And I've explained what him refusing to reveal and him doing it would do imo.
I can't see how would you plan a reaction test based on the fact an L1 player is going to claim or not

BTW not game related : the avatar is annadog's fault. blame her who forcibly made me join to her army!
Lol thank you for mentioning the avatar. I was thrown off for a moment and was gunna 'harass' ya. (On the phone I hafta keep zooming in to read names :p

Also y'all my name is Mandy if that helps with pronouns or easier to remember.

Also also I'm here and what not but it appears to just be arguing and tunneling again so I will wait till I get to work and my desktop to say anything relevant.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:09 am
by Frozen Angel
who is tunneling who Mandy?

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:23 am
by -Grey-
In post 734, Frozen Angel wrote:he didn't say that. You're kinda twisting his words here ...
No, I'm not.
In post 624, mlmooney89 wrote:He is scum until proven innocent.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:25 am
by -Grey-
In post 737, Garmr wrote:
In post 703, -Grey- wrote:Ano, don't claim.

This should help you not claim:

VOTE: Pepto Ninja
I honestly think anno should claim that way we can get it lynching him over and done with. If he claims vt his pretty much wasted everyone's time and shown that his more interested in surviving than helping town. If he claims power role he either gets counter claimed or goes through the night phase. If he ends up dead then his town if he doesn't we discuss from there.
Nope, I'm not lynching Ano today.

Pepto Ninja is a much better vote.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:26 am
by Frozen Angel
I missed that sorry

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:28 am
by -Grey-
In post 742, Frozen Angel wrote:I missed that sorry
Funny, it was in the post you quoted.
In post 734, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 649, -Grey- wrote:
In post 644, mlmooney89 wrote:
In post 635, -Grey- wrote:
In post 624, mlmooney89 wrote:Grey- I wouldn’t put anything past him.
He is scum until proven innocent.
Where do you get the basis for this remark about me?
Because you are a good player. I've played with good players before and being a good player means I don't trust you until I see something more solid.
What gives you the idea that I'm a good player?

Why does me being a good player make you automatically assume I'm scum unless proven otherwise?
he didn't say that. You're kinda twisting his words here ...

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:32 am
by Frozen Angel
It's not funny at all. I just didn't pay attention to where the quote begun and I kindda skimmed the paged I missed before so I wasn't remembering that particular phrasing - so you're response felt out of place. - his second post - the one you asked those questions based - was saying a completely different pov

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:33 am
by -Grey-
In post 744, Frozen Angel wrote:the one you asked those questions based
False. It was a continuation of an ongoing discussion.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:35 am
by -Grey-
You're doing some mental gymnastics here if you're implying that I should have required text that was already quoted in my post to cater to you.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:35 am
by -Grey-
In post 746, -Grey- wrote:You're doing some mental gymnastics here if you're implying that I should have requoted text that was already quoted in my post to cater to you.
Sigh. Fixed.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:37 am
by Frozen Angel
That didn't feel like that when I was commenting on it

pedit : no I just apologized for missing that - never said you had to do anything else. You're the one who is trying to make something out of this.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:43 am
by -Grey-
In post 748, Frozen Angel wrote:pedit : no I just apologized for missing that - never said you had to do anything else. You're the one who is trying to make something out of this.
I just find it interesting that anyone could possibly consider me to be twisting Mandy's words when those very words were in the same post.

I'm just trying to figure out if it's due to inattention, which means you're bad, or manipulation, which means you're scum.

Considering your accusation was so easily debunked, it suggests that you were inattentive, and thus bad. Which I find difficult to comprehend because you don't seem bad.

Are you bad, Angel?