Mafiascum.net

In post 772, Frozen Angel wrote:I don't see why psp asking Ano for claim in L1 is a bad thing. I think his "this was for reaction" makes no sense though.

Too bad for your narrative that Pepto was pushing for a claim at L-2, not L-1.

In post 762, Pepchoninga wrote:

In post 753, Srceenplay wrote:

In post 737, Garmr wrote:

In post 703, -Grey- wrote:Ano, don't claim.

This should help you not claim:

VOTE: Pepto Ninja

I honestly think anno should claim that way we can get it lynching him over and done with. If he claims vt his pretty much wasted everyone's time and shown that his more interested in surviving than helping town. If he claims power role he either gets counter claimed or goes through the night phase. If he ends up dead then his town if he doesn't we discuss from there.

Don't agree

UNVOTE:

Why?

@gamr
Hurry up and get it over with? Why rush the day. Haven't even heard much from alt and now we have a replacement coming.
Claim a PR so another PR can CC. Why don't we all just claim D1, would that make it easier for you? Maybe change this games meta were you claim on L-2? What would you like???

In post 652, BigYoshiFan wrote:

With 13 votes available, it takes 7 to lynch.

Anotora (L-2) - Garmr, Srceenplay, -Grey-, Frozen Angel, Alisae

L-2

In post 663, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Antora

Cheesecake.

L-1

In post 674, RadiantCowbells wrote:UNVOTE:

L-2

In post 701, Pepchoninga wrote:

In post 699, Anotora wrote:You don't get to decide how your posts are read by others, Pep. That's kind of the point of the game.

Yes I do, when you are completely shifting there meaning. This is common tactic of scum. You are shifting my comment so they can apeal to your cause when I've explained multiple times the meaning of that post.

So I'm gonna ask you now. You gonna claim?

Fishy fishy.

In post 773, Frozen Angel wrote:why did I went down in your list?

Twice now, I've caught you misrepresenting the gamestate.

If you have r/l issues I'm sorry, but you should replace out if you can't dedicate the attention the game requires. I'm not letting you skate.

In post 775, -Grey- wrote:

In post 772, Frozen Angel wrote:I don't see why psp asking Ano for claim in L1 is a bad thing. I think his "this was for reaction" makes no sense though.

Too bad for your narrative that Pepto was pushing for a claim at L-2, not L-1.

wait who did RC unvoted then in last page?

In post 778, -Grey- wrote:

In post 773, Frozen Angel wrote:why did I went down in your list?

Twice now, I've caught you misrepresenting the gamestate.

If you have r/l issues I'm sorry, but you should replace out if you can't dedicate the attention the game requires. I'm not letting you skate.

I never misrepresented the game state - I'm just trying to make sure I'm understanding it correctly

I'm dedicating the attention game requires as much as I can and you're request - that I should replace out means nothing to me.

now you need to explain why is what you're just saying is scummy - not paying attention that much - cause from my exp scums have a better reason to be all cought up and into things. It's like you're trying to throw everything you see around you to see what sticks.

I ahve another question : why was a I a town lean before in you're last read list?

In post 780, Frozen Angel wrote:now you need to

Stopped reading right there.

I don't need to do anything but find scum.

You can think whatever you want of me, that's not my concern.

In post 781, -Grey- wrote:

In post 780, Frozen Angel wrote:now you need to

Stopped reading right there.

I don't need to do anything but find scum.

You can think whatever you want of me, that's not my concern.

That's blantly false. A town win condtion - assuming you're claiming to have won - is to make sure all scums are dead. Unless you're a ascietic bulletproof lynchproof vigilant or a bulletproof innocent child vigilant what you just said makes no sense.

You need to answer the questions that are asked from you because from you're pov I must have more than 50% chance to flip town regardless of you're read (regardless of you're alignemnt). You're read on me is litterally irrelivent. Thats according to your wincondition to answer my concerns and That must be your concern.

Why were you town reading me before? why me missing some details tonight is scummy in your eyes - why are they something that scum wanna do?

Wow!! I feel like I was. Being yelled at.

assuming you have one*

In post 752, Frozen Angel wrote:regarding the things you asked - the choice of words - if they weren't used by mandy before would be blantly twisting and really scummy but it wasn't the case so the quations actually feel ok now.

and Mandy kindda - sligtly - contradicted herself - first she said you're scum until she finds a strong towny thing then she appeased like she has you as null and is not comfortable declaring you as town.

There is a difference between the two - that is annoying.

No see the situation is I don't have anything against him except he is good at being naughty. So he should be null under those circumstances but in my notes and thoughts I label him scum. I wouldn't ever lynch someone on my thoughts with no proof so while I still see him as scum I hafta treat him like null.

In post 780, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 778, -Grey- wrote:

In post 773, Frozen Angel wrote:why did I went down in your list?

Twice now, I've caught you misrepresenting the gamestate.

If you have r/l issues I'm sorry, but you should replace out if you can't dedicate the attention the game requires. I'm not letting you skate.

I never misrepresented the game state - I'm just trying to make sure I'm understanding it correctly

I'm dedicating the attention game requires as much as I can and you're request - that I should replace out means nothing to me.

You are participating just fine. Don't worry about that aspect.

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... em_Lynched

Excellent reading. Highly recommended for all town because it prevents scum from being able to redirect your attention.

That said, we need more Pepto votes.

You don't need to give the guides of abr to me... FFS

and focusing on scum and getting them lynched won't mean you shouldn't answer my questions. You asked me questions and explained you're concerns and I answered them. Now that I asked some you're saying I should just replace out and you have no responsibility in answering them?

You're a funny guy

In post 789, Frozen Angel wrote:Now that I asked some you're saying I should just replace out

Lie number three.

I suggested you replace out if you couldn't devote the required attention to this game before your questions.

{-Grey-}
{RadiantCowbells, Garmr}
{Firebringer}
{Obvious Alt, mlmooney89, kentofan, Anotora}
{Srceenplay, Alisae, KNPD}
{Frozen Angel, PeptoNinja}

In post 790, -Grey- wrote:

In post 789, Frozen Angel wrote:Now that I asked some you're saying I should just replace out

Lie number three.

I suggested you replace out if you couldn't devote the required attention to this game before your questions.

lol

Nope I didn't "lie" even once in the game.

You asked me to replace out if I can't get devote the required attention in the game in response to why you put me down as scum read instead of answering why you're scum reading me. You practically tried to make me ashamed of my play to not answer why the action you're talking about is scummy.

and by putting me lower in that list you're still not doing shit to justify you're read. you're not playing the game you're just being a show man.

You're using of word "lie" is really intresting

what did I about again?

In post 793, BigYoshiFan wrote:

S

e

c

r

e

t

A

g

e

n

t

J

i

n

r

e

p

l

a

c

e

s

k

e

y

e

n

p

e

y

d

e

e

.

W

e

l

c

o

m

e

!

Hello!

In post 740, -Grey- wrote:

In post 734, Frozen Angel wrote:he didn't say that. You're kinda twisting his words here ...

No, I'm not.

In post 624, mlmooney89 wrote:He is scum until proven innocent.

Lie #1 debunked.

In post 775, -Grey- wrote:

In post 772, Frozen Angel wrote:I don't see why psp asking Ano for claim in L1 is a bad thing. I think his "this was for reaction" makes no sense though.

Too bad for your narrative that Pepto was pushing for a claim at L-2, not L-1.

Busted lie #2

In post 790, -Grey- wrote:

In post 789, Frozen Angel wrote:Now that I asked some you're saying I should just replace out

Lie number three.

I suggested you replace out if you couldn't devote the required attention to this game before your questions.

You're pathological.

{-Grey-}
{RadiantCowbells, Garmr}
{Firebringer}
{Obvious Alt, mlmooney89, kentofan, Anotora}
{Srceenplay, Alisae, Jin}
{Frozen Angel, PeptoNinja}

Corrected for replacement name.

The first is not a lie. It's a misunderstanding.

The second is not a lie. It's remembering events in different orders.

The third is practically the absolute truth and calling it a lie is just you're poor attempt for dodging my questions which is asking why the two above is scummy ^

VOTE: Grey I only omgus scum.

THE PAGETOP IS MINE