Mini Normal 1873 (Game Over)

karnos · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:10 am

In post 647, XnadrojX wrote:
Karnos ISO that I haven't responded to significantly.

First of all, notice how he COMPLETELY disregards my counter argument about Alisae (who was a townread back then) after he tries to push me flimsily about my opinions, which I completely destroy in my counter argument.
He then just disappears, not even a time range to when he'd be back.

"notice how he COMPLETELY disregards my counter argument about Alisae"

What argument are you talking about? The one you made in 358? How exactly was I supposed to respond to something you said in 358 when my post to you came before it?

But hey, I'll respond to it now. You are lying. You are probably scum.

This is what I posted:

he is saying Alisae is making a reachy case ("He's picking up on and pushing things that scum normally dont bother with.")

That is a fucking exact quote of your words. Don't try to deny it now. If you don't call "pushing things that scum normally dont bother with" reachy, WTF do you call it?

"He then just disappears, not even a time range to when he'd be back."

Wow. Pot, meet kettle. You were completely absent from the thread for more than 48 hours over Monday & Tuesday. When exactly are you claiming I disappeared?

karnos · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:14 am

Also, for anyone who still thinks this asshole is town, just look at how he is willing to throw his logic in the toilet as soon as he is caught in a contradiction.

In post 177, XnadrojX wrote: He isn't "just" being g aggresive. He's picking up on and pushing things that scum normally dont bother with.

In post 221, XnadrojX wrote:
I don't like cases of "scum would/wouldn't do this"
Anything can be shaken off like that.

This is not town thinking.

In 177 XnadrojX is perfectly happy to give Alisae a towny pass for doing stuff

scum wouldn't do

.

In 221 he suddenly took a 180, and is saying he doesn't like cases like "

scum wouldn't do

" something.

I'm still thinking we are smart enough to turn this around and wagon some scum, but if it comes down to a karnos lynch you must promise me you will lynch this asshole as soon as my alignment flips.

PranaDevil · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:07 am

Karnos, calm your temper, calling someone an asshole only makes me want to PL you now. This is a game where we should be critical of everyone (even town reads), there's no benefit to getting pissed off at some for having a case on you and it doesn't lead to a fun experience for anyone.

What I will say is (without looking back over things as I'm on a phone at the moment... unlimited phone data is good, but no home internet is bad, and I have limited tethering, until Feb 7th most posting will be via the phone, but then will be more careful with data and spread it evenly), I like karnos' point regarding Jordan's complete contradiction. So on that point I want to hear how Jordan plans to explain himself, as it does scream scum forgetting something they said earlier.

Garmr · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:12 am

In post 649, karnos wrote:
In post 638, Garmr wrote: Hmm that's a toughie because tbh while I'm really confident on my karnos scum read the others not so much.
Have we ever played together? Why are you so confident in your read?

Because your obvious scum what a stupid question.

Garmr · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:18 am

In post 652, PranaDevil wrote:Karnos, calm your temper, calling someone an asshole only makes me want to PL you now. This is a game where we should be critical of everyone (even town reads), there's no benefit to getting pissed off at some for having a case on you and it doesn't lead to a fun experience for anyone.

What I will say is (without looking back over things as I'm on a phone at the moment... unlimited phone data is good, but no home internet is bad, and I have limited tethering, until Feb 7th most posting will be via the phone, but then will be more careful with data and spread it evenly), I like karnos' point regarding Jordan's complete contradiction. So on that point I want to hear how Jordan plans to explain himself, as it does scream scum forgetting something they said earlier.

I don't normal butt in and I will leave the rest to Jordon to defend but.

Hypocritical and/or double standards doesn't mean scum I have seen town be hypocritical before in even more blatant and in your face ways. 651 is pretty much worthless.

Garmr · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:27 am

Will say through a part of 650 is a total garbage if you look back and actually do research of actual quotes not just take so called karnos quotes at face value. You can easily see some warped posts.

karnos · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:30 am

XnadrojX & Garmr share a PT. Probably because they are both scum.

TheRealGin-N-Tonic · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:41 am

Is it weird that I don't remember this playstyle from you Karnos?

karnos · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:41 am

In post 652, PranaDevil wrote:Karnos, calm your temper, calling someone an asshole only makes me want to PL you now.

You have a point. I am looking back at my post and I regret resorting to personal attacks.

XnadrojX, I'm sorry for that. But you are still scum.

karnos · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:51 am

In post 657, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:Is it weird that I don't remember this playstyle from you Karnos?

Is this the game you are comparing with?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=69768

I don't disagree, lots of factors effect my play-style.

TheRealGin-N-Tonic · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:53 am

So what changed?

PranaDevil · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:19 am

In post 656, karnos wrote:XnadrojX & Garmr share a PT. Probably because they are both scum.

Explain. I still view Jordan as scummy, but not Garmr, so would like to see where you got this conclusion from.

karnos · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:26 am

I had a couple random votes on me throughout that game, but I was never in a situation where I had the largest wagon. I play a bit different when someone is trying to lynch me.

karnos · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:30 am

In post 661, PranaDevil wrote:
In post 656, karnos wrote:XnadrojX & Garmr share a PT. Probably because they are both scum.
Explain. I still view Jordan as scummy, but not Garmr, so would like to see where you got this conclusion from.

I'd like to see them explain first.

Garmr · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:41 am

In post 656, karnos wrote:XnadrojX & Garmr share a PT. Probably because they are both scum.

Lol I wish I had a pt with someone But i'm alone this game. Also one of the trashiest responses ever.

Garmr · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:42 am

In post 663, karnos wrote:
In post 661, PranaDevil wrote:
In post 656, karnos wrote:XnadrojX & Garmr share a PT. Probably because they are both scum.
Explain. I still view Jordan as scummy, but not Garmr, so would like to see where you got this conclusion from.
I'd like to see them explain first.

No you can't dodge a question like that bad karnos.

PranaDevil · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:49 am

There's literally nothing for them to explain. You made a baseless statement, gave nothing to back it up, and now expect them to explain something they clearly won't agree with (even if they are scum, they're highly unlikely to admit to having a PT). So, again, get explaning. You've shot up on my scum read for that, so I'm completely happy to vote for you over AA if your next response doesn't give a legitimate explanation that makes sense.

karnos · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 5:59 am

In post 665, Garmr wrote:
In post 663, karnos wrote:
In post 661, PranaDevil wrote:
In post 656, karnos wrote:XnadrojX & Garmr share a PT. Probably because they are both scum.
Explain. I still view Jordan as scummy, but not Garmr, so would like to see where you got this conclusion from.
I'd like to see them explain first.
No you can't dodge a question like that bad karnos.

Yeah okay, that is you. Still going to give XnadrojX a chance. Unless you speak for him?

Did he already tell you how to answer in scum chat?

PranaDevil · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:16 am

vote: karnos

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:07 am

Yay!

Page 27 guys...come onnnn. We need a lynch and it need to be Karnos.

ThinkBig · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:16 am

VOTE: Karnos

L-1

<<< Yes, this was in fact L-1. This time. >>>

Policy lynch.

ThinkBig · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:25 am

In post 667, karnos wrote:Yeah okay, that is you. Still going to give XnadrojX a chance. Unless you speak for him?

Did he already tell you how to answer in scum chat?

Stop throwing shades.

I don't even think the scum team has day chat

karnos · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:25 am

You know what, go for it.

I don't have the patience to try to break of a clique of fanatics.

Just make sure you lynch XnadrojX & Garmr, in that order, after me.

karnos · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:26 am

In post 671, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 667, karnos wrote:Yeah okay, that is you. Still going to give XnadrojX a chance. Unless you speak for him?

Did he already tell you how to answer in scum chat?
Stop throwing shades.

I don't even think the scum team has day chat

I'm VOTING XnadrojX.

Get your terms right.

ThinkBig · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:27 am

In post 673, karnos wrote:
In post 671, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 667, karnos wrote:Yeah okay, that is you. Still going to give XnadrojX a chance. Unless you speak for him?

Did he already tell you how to answer in scum chat?
Stop throwing shades.

I don't even think the scum team has day chat
I'm VOTING XnadrojX.

Get your terms right.

^^Lynch this please^^

I know who you're voting for and you're throwing shades at everyone.

What terms am I not getting right?