Mini Normal 1888 - TwoFace Mafia - Game Over
- aronagrundy
-
aronagrundy Mafia Scum
- aronagrundy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: September 13, 2016
- FireScreamer
-
FireScreamer Mafia Scum
- FireScreamer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: February 5, 2017
- Location: Prestwick, United Kingdom
While I can follow the logic that someone overeager to defend at this point is a possible scumread, I don't understand then voting the defended and not the defender.In post 50, aronagrundy wrote:That said, dog's resistance to the fire wagon makes me want to vote fire so
VOTE: fire
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DogWatch- aronagrundy
-
aronagrundy Mafia Scum
- aronagrundy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: September 13, 2016
- FireScreamer
-
FireScreamer Mafia Scum
- FireScreamer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: February 5, 2017
- Location: Prestwick, United Kingdom
Because it is a wagon with no substance that will dissipate and then if I ever flip it certainly doesn't look bad for him.In post 52, aronagrundy wrote:Well I've just wanted to get a wagon going honestly.
That said 51 is bad. Why would scum!dogwatch be resisting town!fire's wagon at this stage in the game?
Also your logic is player X is scum. Player X defended player Y. So I will vote for player Y.
Do you not see the issue there?- aronagrundy
-
aronagrundy Mafia Scum
- aronagrundy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: September 13, 2016
- FireScreamer
-
FireScreamer Mafia Scum
- FireScreamer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: February 5, 2017
- Location: Prestwick, United Kingdom
If dog isn't scum then what relevance does him defending me have? He would be uninformed. The only way you can read him defending me as me being scum is if you also read it as him being scum. Otherwise it is obviously a null tell.In post 54, aronagrundy wrote:Exactly, which is why his defense lacks substance. If it's going to dissipate anyway, is anyone really going to give him towncred for defending your wagon?
I also never said dog was scum. I've wanted to start a wagon and felt like fucking with him
You are doing things that don't make logical sense and hiding it behind a teehee attitude.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: aronagrundy- aronagrundy
-
aronagrundy Mafia Scum
- aronagrundy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: September 13, 2016
- FireScreamer
-
FireScreamer Mafia Scum
- FireScreamer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: February 5, 2017
- Location: Prestwick, United Kingdom
I've pointed out exactly why I reacted. What you are doing doesn't logically follow the reasoning you are giving for it. Even if you want to giggle it all away as "I was only pretending".In post 56, aronagrundy wrote:I didn't have a read on you when I voted you. But I didn't like your reaction. This is why early game wagons are fun- aronagrundy
-
aronagrundy Mafia Scum
- aronagrundy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: September 13, 2016
- FireScreamer
-
FireScreamer Mafia Scum
- FireScreamer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: February 5, 2017
- Location: Prestwick, United Kingdom
You don't seem to be able to argue against my point that what you were doing didn't make sense. So I am confused by your conclusion that someone reacting against dissonance is scummy.In post 58, aronagrundy wrote:I wasn't pretending to be looking for reactions- aronagrundy
-
aronagrundy Mafia Scum
- aronagrundy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: September 13, 2016
- aronagrundy
-
aronagrundy Mafia Scum
- aronagrundy
- FireScreamer
-
FireScreamer Mafia Scum
- FireScreamer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: February 5, 2017
- Location: Prestwick, United Kingdom
And I have explained why it isn't in the slightest and why any basis on a read on me starting with !scumdog should end with !scumdog. Now we are talking in circles.In post 61, aronagrundy wrote:51 assumes that I thought dog was scum, which i admit could be a fair interpretation of my vote. But I also explained why assuming scum!dog is opposing town!fire's wagon is shaky logic- Barleycorn
-
Barleycorn Goon
- Barleycorn
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 19, 2017
this was your first explicit reason for voting fire.In post 50, aronagrundy wrote:That said, dog's resistance to the fire wagon makes me want to vote fire so
VOTE: fire
this is the second reason you vote fire.In post 54, aronagrundy wrote: I also never said dog was scum. I've wanted to start a wagon and felt like fucking with him
fire's point seems to be that neither reason logically supports your fire vote. do you disagree?
personally, i fail to see how fucking with dogwatch is a reason to vote fire.
what is your point, arona? that you don't like fire's reaction to your vote? what don't you like about it? it's possible that 60 goes into this but it's incredibly unclear.
arona is obfuscating in this conversation. but i don't know if it's intentional.- Barleycorn
-
Barleycorn Goon
- Barleycorn
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 19, 2017
my question is riffing off this, what is the reaction from fire that you don't like?In post 58, aronagrundy wrote:I wasn't pretending to be looking for reactions- Barleycorn
-
Barleycorn Goon
- Barleycorn
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 19, 2017
In post 49, aronagrundy wrote:
Well it was more of a gut feeling, but then when mozamis didn't follow through it became an empty post when it shouldn't have been.In post 34, NorskaBlue wrote:
How's that? Transcend mentioned four people (two FoS, two tr) but only voted for one. What rings hollow about him wanting to find out the others? And what is suspicious about empty posts? I'm not saying they're good, but this early in the game, it can be a bit tricky to provide any useful content.In post 32, aronagrundy wrote:Because like transcend is probably voting one of his suspects so the question kind of rang hollow for me and then mozamis just doesn't follow through?? I guess I just feel like it's an empty post
i don't get this progression in the context of your fire vote being to fish for reactions.In post 50, aronagrundy wrote:That said, dog's resistance to the fire wagon makes me want to vote fire so
VOTE: fire
were you scumreading fire at the time of 50? were you scumreading mozamis at the time of 50?
VOTE: arona- Eddie Cane
-
Eddie Cane Jack of All Trades
- Eddie Cane
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8638
- Joined: February 7, 2017
didn't I have the same? why does fires wagon bother you?In post 44, DogWatch wrote:Fire has three votes now with zero reasoning behind them. Can the three of you explain? We're getting out of the rvs stage at this point. Which reminds me to remove my random vote UNVOTE:
wagons are good early on. also, this game progressed out of RVS very fast which is nice.- DogWatch
-
DogWatch Goon
- DogWatch
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 464
- Joined: February 16, 2017
- DogWatch
-
DogWatch Goon
- DogWatch
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 464
- Joined: February 16, 2017
- DogWatch
-
DogWatch Goon
- DogWatch
- Shadow_step
-
Shadow_step Mafia Scum
- Shadow_step
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2956
- Joined: May 12, 2016
- Location: 221B, Baker Street
This is so obvious scum.
ShowThe shadows betray you, because they serve me.
"Chrim and Shadow_step town MVPs. There was a point at the game I was legitimately in fear." ~Zach
"I'm mightily impressed by Shadow's ability to find town PR's, by the way. He was the one directing the first two nightkills." ~Michel- Shadow_step
-
Shadow_step Mafia Scum
- Shadow_step
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2956
- Joined: May 12, 2016
- Location: 221B, Baker Street
**ignores every question asked to it**
**let me create a counter wagon to my wagon**
Basically scum who's scared of getting lynched.
Everyone pile on DogwatchShowThe shadows betray you, because they serve me.
"Chrim and Shadow_step town MVPs. There was a point at the game I was legitimately in fear." ~Zach
"I'm mightily impressed by Shadow's ability to find town PR's, by the way. He was the one directing the first two nightkills." ~Michel- Barleycorn
-
Barleycorn Goon
- Barleycorn
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 19, 2017
just clarifying, was this sarcastic?In post 48, Shadow_step wrote:
Concerned townie much?In post 44, DogWatch wrote:Fire has three votes now with zero reasoning behind them. Can the three of you explain? We're getting out of the rvs stage at this point. Which reminds me to remove my random vote UNVOTE:- Barleycorn
-
Barleycorn Goon
- Barleycorn
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: February 19, 2017
what questions has dogwatch ignored?In post 71, Shadow_step wrote:**ignores every question asked to it**- Shadow_step
-
Shadow_step Mafia Scum
- Shadow_step
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2956
- Joined: May 12, 2016
- Location: 221B, Baker Street
No it wasn't.
It's trying to show that he's being pro town by asking a bunch of people as to why they are RVS voting Fire. Being on 3 votes is nothing. It's L-4, what's the big deal?ShowThe shadows betray you, because they serve me.
"Chrim and Shadow_step town MVPs. There was a point at the game I was legitimately in fear." ~Zach
"I'm mightily impressed by Shadow's ability to find town PR's, by the way. He was the one directing the first two nightkills." ~Michel - Shadow_step
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Barleycorn
- Barleycorn
- Shadow_step
- Shadow_step
- DogWatch
- DogWatch
- Eddie Cane
- Barleycorn
- Barleycorn
- Barleycorn
- FireScreamer
- aronagrundy
- FireScreamer
- aronagrundy
- FireScreamer
- aronagrundy
- FireScreamer
- aronagrundy
- FireScreamer
- aronagrundy
- FireScreamer
- aronagrundy