Mini Normal 1905: Complete

WhyMafia · Post Post #3325 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:18 pm

In post 3319, Michael Lee wrote:
In post 3314, rb wrote:I'm here reading, trying to make proper sense before I vote. A lot of ideas are going around and some of them make surface sense but I disagree because some of them seem really implausible unless my reads are just THAT shit. I'll have to entertain that possibility and rethink this game I guess.

Fuck lylo.
I'll help you out either me or whymafia is conf. scum because otherwise any 2 others could lynch whymafia and win the game since I have my vote on him since forever now (backhand had his vote on him as well tbh)

Except barely anyone have been on concurrently except you and backhand!

rb · Post Post #3326 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:23 pm

I'd rather lynch Backhand than WM tbh.

rb · Post Post #3327 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:24 pm

Sorry this headache is fucked, I'm trying rn

WhyMafia · Post Post #3328 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:26 pm

I'm willing to go Backhand first
But Michael is dying tomorrow then

WhyMafia · Post Post #3329 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:28 pm

In post 3080, Melanora wrote:You know, backhand really hasn't offered much this whole game.

In post 3087, Michael Lee wrote:
In post 903, Backhand wrote:Whymafia is probably town. If we're going to pick a compromise shrug of a lynch, I'd rather it be choof than flubber.

In post 947, Backhand wrote:
Boonskiies wrote:

Ugggghhh....he is so scummy! This makes me absolutely not okay with flubber being lynched.

Also against the flubber lynch--it just seems real unlikely that none of you (boon), gamma, rb, tywin, and whymafia are scum, and all of those people were ok with it.

In post 948, Backhand wrote:EBWOP: and michael, forgot he was on the flubber wagon too.

In post 1252, Backhand wrote:Sigh. I'm not seeing flub, won't be hammering. Rb, I kind of agree with you, but mostly don't want tfl to have made it to day 2, with 50 pages, without a single goddamn opinion.

In post 1707, Backhand wrote:Woke up, caught up. On phone, will post more at work.

Two thoughts: choof really needs to not tell us, and ideally flip a coin, for protecting tywin tonight.

And flubber is the lynch that gets us the most info. I would have little confidence in whichever of the kasu or boon wagons we get going now, we're too scattered.

Vote flubber

In post 1824, Backhand wrote:
In post 1812, Kasumeat wrote:Backhand, would you be willing to lynch one his scumbros Michael or Gamma today instead?
In order, I'd prefer:

Flub
Michael
Gamma
Boonskiies wrote:
In post 1725, Backhand wrote:OK, let's break out the scenarios.

Tywin is scum

OK, he claims rolecop. He has to hope:

A. He doesn't get countered
B. He doesn't get targeted by choof and choof dies (WEAK jailkeeper, remember?)
C. There's not an SK, because they probably want him dead whether they believe him or not.

Now, smart mafia (I don't totally want to get into this but I assume they'll figure it out) might decide to target choof so either way, only choof dies. But if tywin is lying, we've got some other power roles I would think, they'll know what to do.

this implies that Backhand knew that if Choof targeted Tywin, that Choof would die. He tried to fix it, but the response given points towards it even more, as the conclusion from that shouldn't be to go and defend Tywin.
Yes, in the hypothetical I very clearly titled: Tywin is Scum.

I don't see how you're not seeing that there are so many ways to verify his claim during the night.

In post 1880, Backhand wrote:Doesn't the straight split also indicate that flub could be scum? In which case gamma/michael/why/cool are probably town and their switch isn't indicative.

For the record, the
funniest
team is mel/rb/tfl. They'd be having a great day without having really done a thing.

In post 2688, Backhand wrote:Well.

OK flubwagon, if you think flub is scum you're running out of practical partners to pair him with. Time to move on?

In post 2733, Backhand wrote:
In post 2706, Michael Lee wrote:look I think flubber + mel could be scum together simply for they scream the same way, and their "HOW HOW HOW" posts remind me of each other (and ive seen scum do this a lot of time, prob unconsciously or they affect each other in the QT, same mindstate, etc. so they tend to act the same towards some things)

kill flubber today
Down for Mel, but who is third in that group?

In post 2715, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:
Vote Flub

Going on gut that Boon was a counter wagon on the Flub wagon

Counterwagon led by who exactly?

In post 2768, Backhand wrote:
In post 2767, Michael Lee wrote:honestly I do think entire scumteam was on the tywin lynch
Mel was on the tywin lynch. . . just saying.

In post 2747, Kasumeat wrote:The only people who townread Tywin are scum. Lynching him was correct.
Well, that's not true.

In post 2740, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote: You are assuming that bc Boon flipped town his reads are good. Not sure if theres a term for assuming a flipped player reads are correct but it seems that this is whats happening
We don't know that they're right, but we do at least know they were honest. Gets a slight promotion for that.

In post 2769, Backhand wrote:
In post 1276, Dierfire wrote:
VOTE COUNT 1.14

Flubbernugget (6): Gamma Emerald, WhyMafia, Michael Lee, Tywin Lannister, CooLDoG, rb
Tywin Lannister (4): Kasumeat, Backhand, Boonskiies, Flubbernugget
rb (1): choof

No Vote (2): Melanora, TheFuzzylogic99

With 13 players living, 7/13 votes are required to lynch.

And to reiterate, I can't look at this vote count and think its at all likely that flub is scum.

In post 2795, Backhand wrote:Better cool than flubber. . . although I'm not sure why ScumCool doesn't just hammer TownFlub.
ISO'd Backhand and quoted relevant posts. Has been pushing townies all game and like a lot of them - then pushes flubber for a moment which I wanted to give towncred BUT later on he goes on and keeps pushing townielynches over flubber all the time. This guy is almost confirmed scum. Quoted the cooldog-backhand post because I can't completely fit it inside my hand (as to whether they're a team or not) but it could be distancing so I won't read into that. I'll read into his actions and he hasn't pushed flubber/cooldog consistently / that hard.

VOTE: Backhand

honestly backhand - cooldog wouldn't be a crazy team right now right? if we're going to give boon and fuzzy some credit for killing flubber

Notice that Mel brings Backhand up
Not Michael

Anyways, I'll save the rest if my tirade against Michael for tomorrow

rb · Post Post #3330 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:29 pm

VOTE: Backhand

Whatever.

I'm sticking to my top scumread of the last 2 days.

WhyMafia · Post Post #3331 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:30 pm

In post 3330, rb wrote:VOTE: Backhand

Whatever.

I'm sticking to my top scumread of the last 2 days.

I knew I could count on you

TFL when you get on, hammer when you see fit
Tomorrow is Michael vs Me

rb · Post Post #3332 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:33 pm

I need to take a nap and I find it hard to see myself voting the slot that's been a strong TR for most of the game in Michael Lee OR lynching WM who's my second strongest TR.

rb · Post Post #3333 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:33 pm

Ugh I'm fkn paranoid now

WhyMafia · Post Post #3334 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:34 pm

In post 3332, rb wrote:I need to take a nap and I find it hard to see myself voting the slot that's been a strong TR for most of the game in Michael Lee OR lynching WM who's my second strongest TR.

Decisions decisions

WhyMafia · Post Post #3335 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:35 pm

In post 3333, rb wrote:Ugh I'm fkn paranoid now

Just relax
We have like 20 days
Unvote Backhand if you want more time to think

rb · Post Post #3336 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:37 pm

Either you or me will die tonight is my guess.

WhyMafia · Post Post #3337 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:39 pm

In post 3336, rb wrote:Either you or me will die tonight is my guess.

Probs you
Michael probs thinks he can win a 1 v 1 against me
Killing me looks fishy, although it could be WIFOM

Backhand · Post Post #3338 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:44 pm

TFL, if rb read the game and is town he has to know that michael or why are scum. I can't be scum with him or we would have hammered together. I can't be scum with you because we would have hammered together (plus you know we aren't scum together). He can't know that michael and you aren't scum together, yet he votes for me anyway. Because he thinks he can sucker you.

Vote whymafia

But they're right about one thing: feel free to hammer whenever.

WhyMafia · Post Post #3339 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:46 pm

So it's all down to TFL

WhyMafia · Post Post #3340 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:47 pm

In post 3338, Backhand wrote:TFL, if rb read the game and is town he has to know that michael or why are scum. I can't be scum with him or we would have hammered together. I can't be scum with you because we would have hammered together (plus you know we aren't scum together). He can't know that michael and you aren't scum together, yet he votes for me anyway. Because he thinks he can sucker you.

Vote whymafia

But they're right about one thing: feel free to hammer whenever.

Sigh
Only 1 potential team was concurrently online TFL

rb · Post Post #3341 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:53 pm

i re-read this day

my brain still hurts

Backhand · Post Post #3342 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 3:56 pm

In post 3340, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 3338, Backhand wrote:TFL, if rb read the game and is town he has to know that michael or why are scum. I can't be scum with him or we would have hammered together. I can't be scum with you because we would have hammered together (plus you know we aren't scum together). He can't know that michael and you aren't scum together, yet he votes for me anyway. Because he thinks he can sucker you.

Vote whymafia

But they're right about one thing: feel free to hammer whenever.
Sigh
Only 1 potential team was concurrently online TFL

Backhand Posts at 4:05
RB: Posts at 4:10
Backhand: Posts at 4:15

Not true

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #3343 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:05 pm

Vote Back........

Man , I hope I made the right choice

Backhand · Post Post #3344 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:06 pm

For fuck's sake, tfl, did you read? You'd better be why's scumbuddy.

rb · Post Post #3345 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:07 pm

isn't that L-1 anyway?

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #3346 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:13 pm

I think its a lynch.........
wm- ML BH
BH-WM, RB and FL

Backhand · Post Post #3347 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:14 pm

No, its not.

WhyMafia · Post Post #3348 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:20 pm

Nope
Backhand is dead

WhyMafia · Post Post #3349 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:21 pm

In post 3342, Backhand wrote:
In post 3340, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 3338, Backhand wrote:TFL, if rb read the game and is town he has to know that michael or why are scum. I can't be scum with him or we would have hammered together. I can't be scum with you because we would have hammered together (plus you know we aren't scum together). He can't know that michael and you aren't scum together, yet he votes for me anyway. Because he thinks he can sucker you.

Vote whymafia

But they're right about one thing: feel free to hammer whenever.
Sigh
Only 1 potential team was concurrently online TFL
Backhand Posts at 4:05
RB: Posts at 4:10
Backhand: Posts at 4:15

Not true

That's not concurrent