Mini Normal 1920 (Game Over)

[gerryoat]

VOTE: eevee

VOTE: Tchill
Why you voting for eve?

says the person who was voting for eevee before mulch

Why you acting like our votes are the same? His was serious mine was rvs.
VOTE: gerry

lmao

[Tchill13]

Well the eevee vote was just because it looked like a wagon might take off out of rvs. Bomber actually seems a little odd. Even states he'd vote mulch based off play style. I feel that you should more importantly vote someone for stuff that seems AI. Other than in RVS of course. The point idanyboy brings up seems odd to me as well.

VOTE: bomber

[Bomberman]

I don't read people based on one philosophy because players play different and have different approaches to the game. I think you are a very emotional player and believe I would have a better chance deliberating your alignment once you're calmed down.

[Tchill13]

I made a naked vote with no explanation what gives you the right to think that's serious? Lol

[EeveeLution Army]

Or is a well placed illusion by scum. I have an old saying. Question everything and believe onlg half of what is said.

[iDanyboy]

Mulch, I disagree with you when you say that your wall is very well done. Most of your points are NAI witch you admit but then you use them as if they are, you are also using your arguments selectively as MMM points out. You state things as if they are facts when they are not such as when you call yourself or tchill the easiest push.

but it REEKS of authenticity

Another example.

I made a naked vote with no explanation what gives you the right to think that's serious? Lol

Well the eevee vote was just because it looked like a wagon might take off out of rvs.

[mastina]

I do apologize for this but today is the one-month anniversary for me and JaeReed being together. <3

As a result, for the rest of the day, I will be JaeReed's slave and thus...
...Not be around for modding. Apologies; love comes first. <3

Fourth Votecount

:

Mulch - 3 (massive, Formerfish, Lil Uzi Vert)

LmkGuy - 2 (EeveeLution Army, MMM)

gerryoat - 2 (LmkGuy, iDanyboy)
Bomberman - 2 (Mulch, Tchill13)
EeveeLution Army - 1 (gerryoat)
MMM - 1 (aronagrundy)

Not Voting - 2 (MordyS, Bomberman)

With

13

alive, it takes

7

to lynch.

Day 1's deadline is Tuesday, July 11th, @ 1:30 PM PDT--(expired on 2017-07-11 16:35:36).

V/LA Notices/Mod Notes:

• mastina, the moderator, is V/LA over weekends.
  

[Tchill13]

Alright Dany boy youre maki good points. I still think mulch is town. I still think bomber seems odd.

[EeveeLution Army]

Awwww mastina thats so sweet <3

<<< <3 >>>

[EeveeLution Army]

Alright Dany boy youre maki good points. I still think mulch is town. I still think bomber seems odd.

....whats the point of this post?

[Tchill13]

Dany boy is town to me now.

[massive]

Do you want to give some more details on what those "good points" were?

[EeveeLution Army]

Why not just say that and exclude the extra stuff thst doesnt help the read

[gerryoat]

I do apologize for this but today is the one-month anniversary for me and JaeReed being together. <3

As a result, for the rest of the day, I will be JaeReed's slave and thus...
...Not be around for modding. Apologies; love comes first. <3

just a reason to lurk

VOTE: mastina

<<< Just in case there's any doubt on the matter, votes for the moderator do not count in any way, shape, or form; gerry's vote will remain where he last placed it. >>>

[gerryoat]

also congrats

<<< Thank you. <3 >>>

[MMM]

Oh, and I normally read on GAMM but it gets me lynched so I decided to do GAMM this game but actually give reasons to back it up

What is GA--

Hmm my lingo is rusty what is GAMM again? Also yeah i don't like how he completely tosses away your reads. He should at least explain why its wrong here.

It's not common; I think I created it, I forgot to explain it early game.

Gut, Authenticity, Motivation, and Meta. Those are the 4 things everyone should be reading others on.

Ok fair nuff but I think meta is a downright bu--

I agree with three of those things. Meta however. Meta can change if the player is good enough to see it.

Yeah this is gonna be one of those games. Fuck my life.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Lazyness is not gonna be in this game. If I am going to try, everyone is going to try.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

It's poorly executed and you look extremely nervous

I agree with the former but not the latter. Walk me through that.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Well, if you really believed in everything you're saying was for the benefit of town, you wouldn't make posts that posture yourself like #108

..If you aren't nervous, why are you responding to me so haphazardly? This shouldn't even be a discussion from your perspective if I am just neglecting your 'legitimate efforts'

Yeah I'm still not seeing his play here to be of someone who's agitated or on the edge. I think he's trying to talk his way into a town leader like role and it comes off a bit as projecting since he's been downright cringe about it.

There's nothing I gain out of interacting with you at this moment if you're going to just defend yourself blindly instead of seeing that perhaps you need to change your mindset/attitude. Note that I haven't voted you because I believe there is a slight chance you are just Noobtown, but I will say that if you continue to play in the way you are I would have no issue voting you

So you're considering policy lynching him?

Can you give me some thoughts on everyone else who's posted? I know Mulch has been the loudest poster in the room but I'm starting to feel like you have an agenda, and not one that has any town motivation.

Hmm my lingo is rusty what is GAMM again? Also yeah i don't like how he completely tosses away your reads. He should at least explain why its wrongs here.

It's not common; I think I created it, I forgot to explain it early game.

Gut, Authenticity, Motivation, and Meta. Those are the 4 things everyone should be reading others on.

Logic is what we see as true. If scum is good enough your "logic" will be a well constructed lie.

Yes. It's a bad way to read people. Authenticity is better. If someone is BELIEVING what they are saying, even if they have the worst logic in the world, that makes them town.

This is really bad theory.

You only need motivation.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

I made a naked vote with no explanation what gives you the right to think that's serious? Lol

What doesn't give him the right?

[Lil Uzi Vert]

I do apologize for this but today is the one-month anniversary for me and JaeReed being together. <3

As a result, for the rest of the day, I will be JaeReed's slave and thus...
...Not be around for modding. Apologies; love comes first. <3

Congrats!

Only 13 more days until me and Chickadee's one-month anniversary

<<< We're practically couple-twins. <3 >>>

[MMM]

VOTE: Bomberman his logic seems off to me. Dislike Gerry's reaction to being voted. Like the concerns Danyboy brought up.

[Bomberman]

Well, if you really believed in everything you're saying was for the benefit of town, you wouldn't make posts that posture yourself like #108

..If you aren't nervous, why are you responding to me so haphazardly? This shouldn't even be a discussion from your perspective if I am just neglecting your 'legitimate efforts'

Yeah I'm still not seeing his play here to be of someone who's agitated or on the edge. I think he's trying to talk his way into a town leader like role and it comes off a bit as projecting since he's been downright cringe about it.

There's nothing I gain out of interacting with you at this moment if you're going to just defend yourself blindly instead of seeing that perhaps you need to change your mindset/attitude. Note that I haven't voted you because I believe there is a slight chance you are just Noobtown, but I will say that if you continue to play in the way you are I would have no issue voting you

So you're considering policy lynching him?

Can you give me some thoughts on everyone else who's posted? I know Mulch has been the loudest poster in the room but I'm starting to feel like you have an agenda, and not one that has any town motivation.

Hmm my lingo is rusty what is GAMM again? Also yeah i don't like how he completely tosses away your reads. He should at least explain why its wrongs here.

It's not common; I think I created it, I forgot to explain it early game.

Gut, Authenticity, Motivation, and Meta. Those are the 4 things everyone should be reading others on.

Logic is what we see as true. If scum is good enough your "logic" will be a well constructed lie.

Yes. It's a bad way to read people. Authenticity is better. If someone is BELIEVING what they are saying, even if they have the worst logic in the world, that makes them town.

This is really bad theory.

You only need motivation.

He read pretty confrontational to me, and I presumed it was nervous because he kept asserting himself and even dared me once or twice to vote him. Not sure what it was about, really. He came after me because I told him his post was purely conjecture and then insisted that I read it again, but I guess he just sees things in only one perspective given that I already told him what I felt about his wall.

That being said, I wouldn't advocate a policy lynch, nor is this really the place to talk about. I think that his behavior is inherently anti-town, but trying to get everyone to vote someone on those premises isn't going to do the town any good, which is why I am hoping to reason with him because I think his slot is salvageable; I wouldn't shed any tears if he was gone though. My statement on voting him if he didn't fix his play was only to reaffirm his anti-town behavior.

I have nothing too substantial to note about the other players, only gut feeling, and my focus on Mulch is because he was giving me more to look at, even if I feel like it was inevitably wasted given how uncooperative he was being. Do you think if Mulch had a scumteam, they would let him wreak havoc in the way he is?

[gerryoat]

VOTE: Bomberman his logic seems off to me. Dislike Gerry's reaction to being voted. Like the concerns Danyboy brought up.

VOTE: bomberman how does this make you feel

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Well, if you really believed in everything you're saying was for the benefit of town, you wouldn't make posts that posture yourself like #108

..If you aren't nervous, why are you responding to me so haphazardly? This shouldn't even be a discussion from your perspective if I am just neglecting your 'legitimate efforts'

Yeah I'm still not seeing his play here to be of someone who's agitated or on the edge. I think he's trying to talk his way into a town leader like role and it comes off a bit as projecting since he's been downright cringe about it.

There's nothing I gain out of interacting with you at this moment if you're going to just defend yourself blindly instead of seeing that perhaps you need to change your mindset/attitude. Note that I haven't voted you because I believe there is a slight chance you are just Noobtown, but I will say that if you continue to play in the way you are I would have no issue voting you

So you're considering policy lynching him?

Can you give me some thoughts on everyone else who's posted? I know Mulch has been the loudest poster in the room but I'm starting to feel like you have an agenda, and not one that has any town motivation.

Hmm my lingo is rusty what is GAMM again? Also yeah i don't like how he completely tosses away your reads. He should at least explain why its wrongs here.

It's not common; I think I created it, I forgot to explain it early game.

Gut, Authenticity, Motivation, and Meta. Those are the 4 things everyone should be reading others on.

Logic is what we see as true. If scum is good enough your "logic" will be a well constructed lie.

Yes. It's a bad way to read people. Authenticity is better. If someone is BELIEVING what they are saying, even if they have the worst logic in the world, that makes them town.

This is really bad theory.

You only need motivation.

He read pretty confrontational to me, and I presumed it was nervous because he kept asserting himself and even dared me once or twice to vote him. Not sure what it was about, really. He came after me because I told him his post was purely conjecture and then insisted that I read it again, but I guess he just sees things in only one perspective given that I already told him what I felt about his wall.

That being said, I wouldn't advocate a policy lynch, nor is this really the place to talk about. I think that his behavior is inherently anti-town, but trying to get everyone to vote someone on those premises isn't going to do the town any good, which is why I am hoping to reason with him because I think his slot is salvageable; I wouldn't shed any tears if he was gone though. My statement on voting him if he didn't fix his play was only to reaffirm his anti-town behavior.

I have nothing too substantial to note about the other players, only gut feeling, and my focus on Mulch is because he was giving me more to look at, even if I feel like it was inevitably wasted given how uncooperative he was being. Do you think if Mulch had a scumteam, they would let him wreak havoc in the way he is?

I don't see it. I don't think he was very afraid of you at all during that exchange. Most of his responses read really condescending and I usually equate that on this site to projecting with new players in most cases.

I believe that scum will do anything to win. Mulch's behavior has garnered him a position of control and as a result he's been able to steer the game in any direction he chooses. If he was scum, I can easily see his partners letting him continue until he cannot get away with it anymore.