In post 17, Thestatusquo wrote:
VOTE: boonskiies
This joke is way more likely to come from scum than town in RVS.
This is where I first bring into question about if what you are saying is legit. You gave no opinion on this.
In post 40, LicketyQuickety wrote:The question, at this point, should be whether Lalendra was truthful in their claim or whether they are Scum. I think this because I think its improbable that Lalendra was doing a reaction test when that was already brought up. Its the fact that her reaction test would be so ineffective that I don't think its likely she takes that course of action. I mean, they already claimed it so there is no sense in hiding it really.
I will say its prolly very unlikely that all of Uzi, EP and Lalendra are all Scum covering for Lalendra. That would group themselves too close together as having the same opinion which I don't think is either an effective strategy as Scum, nor a probable one.
In post 43, Thestatusquo wrote: In post 40, LicketyQuickety wrote:The question, at this point, should be whether Lalendra was truthful in their claim or whether they are Scum. I think this because I think its improbable that Lalendra was doing a reaction test when that was already brought up. Its the fact that her reaction test would be so ineffective that I don't think its likely she takes that course of action. I mean, they already claimed it so there is no sense in hiding it really.
I will say its prolly very unlikely that all of Uzi, EP and Lalendra are all Scum covering for Lalendra. That would group themselves too close together as having the same opinion which I don't think is either an effective strategy as Scum, nor a probable one.
worth noting if boonskiies flips scum.
why are we wasting several paragraphs pontificating on what is obviously a newbie play while ignoring the fact that boonskiies, who is not a newbie, already did it earlier.
This is where you call into question what I have said and double down on Boon.
In post 84, LicketyQuickety wrote: In post 83, Boonskiies wrote:I’m known for claiming like 5 different times as town. I’m THE reaction test player on site. I believe every post matters.
I’m also VLA until Friday, it I’ll likely be posting occasionally within that.
This seems acceptable. What do you think tsq?
This is the second opportunity I gave you to feel out whether you were actually serious about lynching Boon.
Here you triple down on Boon being Scum.
In post 87, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm going to follow tsq on this one. Plus, I hate how Boon said they claim like 5 times in a game.
VOTE: Boon
This is where I get curious about what exactly you are doing so I play devils advocate to see what exactly you are really doing. At the time I was debating saying Boons meta is easily verifiable, but held off on that; don't know why.
In post 88, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm aware I never gave a read on tsq as well. He's making some decent points and is playing aggressive and I like that. That would be my read on him atm.
This is where I give my perspective on what tsq is doing. Notice I didn't say you were giving good points, but decent points. This was intentional.
In post 96, Thestatusquo wrote:Ep, I know. It's almost like I did that on purpose.
I don't like how lq just said that boons response was fine and then jumped into the wagon after a one sentence non-argument from me. Like, at all.
VOTE: LQ
Then you turn your hand and say you were just saying those things to see who follows you. I did follow you, but as I said before, it had more to do with trying to see what you were up to. When I said I didn't like that Boon said he claims different things like 5 times in a game, that was an honest comment because I don't think that is the way Mafia should be played because it ruins your credibility if you do that.
