On second thought I might be fine lynching Lalendra?In post 369, Tchill13 wrote:Why don't you want to lynch lalendra?In post 366, Irrelephant11 wrote:Lalendra what are your townreads
Tchill why do you want to lynch Lalendra
Oh. I guess I get itIn post 264, Tchill13 wrote:Mumble's iso shows no effort in solving or generating content. Only states reads.
I halfway expect him to fake claim at intent.
applies to him too, so I'm curious why he gets a pass from youIn post 264, Tchill13 wrote:Mumble's iso shows no effort in solving or generating content. Only states reads.
I halfway expect him to fake claim at intent.
I highlight posts, where Irrelephant flips and flops on nauci - hints that shes scum, then calls her town, then soft defends her by saying that everyone is piling on her wagon for shit reasons, and then proceeds to say "ah yeah I can she why her votes are scummy"In post 354, Rei wrote:ok but what are you trying to tell us by this
do you mean how he said he didnt find her towny but then called her towny? If so I find it strange that in the first quote you highlighted the part that makes it seem like a contradiction
because when i read the rest of the paragraph it made sense to me and he says later that her being scummy is somehow scummy
If I'm wrong about what you meant then by all means correct me
???????????????????????????In post 377, Irrelephant11 wrote:
Yeah I mean I get not wanting to lynch lynchbait (as Nauci said Lalendra is)
I also get wanting to lynch active lurkers
*shrug* yeah Lalendra could maybe be the lynch
I don't have any intentions to be slipping anywhere. Feel free for anyone to scrutinize me.In post 353, Rei wrote:It's mostly gut feeling but I feel like he's somehow just slipping there, and every time someone starts to suspect him or vote him the focus switches on someone else
Why?In post 386, DrDolittle wrote:tbh im not seeing lalendra scum
Effort isn't alignment indicative.In post 378, Tchill13 wrote:I think kop is putting in effort.
Even though his reads are super weird and I don't agree with them I could see them coming from a "tryhard" town so to speak.
Do you think he’s town or scum?In post 322, Nauci wrote: Based on skimming 5 of Mumble's past games I think there's a hollistic difference but I don't want to mention it this early and disrupt the behavior
If he's scum, he is prob getting bussed.In post 394, ejjinami wrote:but seriously, I'll be surprised if nauci's wagon was pure.
Again, what do you think about the people on and off nauci’s wagon? (just comment on my previous post please)In post 326, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Aww man, you had a 50/50 choice and chose the wrong one.
If you're gonna vote a low poster, it needs to be Kop. I'd much prefer you to join the Nauci wagon though.
Wait, can you explain why is twain there again?In post 327, Irrelephant11 wrote:Someone explain the Nauci wagon to me, because I really don't think she's the scummiest player so far in a game with Kop, Lalendra, twain, DDL, and lurky!NSG???
You forgot about Lalendra.In post 341, Alchemist21 wrote:I’ve been leaning Town on BBT. Mumble I’ve been null on (but that 331 looks Town). Kop I’m not sure about and could probably wagon him for a bit if it helps me with my reads. I think my read on her could be influenced by other voters if they were scummy enough to make me think they’re taking advantage of it but nobody gave me that vibe.In post 340, ejjinami wrote:What do you think of the people on nauci’s wagon? Do you think it would influence your read on her?In post 299, Alchemist21 wrote:Nauci wagon is still a great wagon.
Btw, @Tchill, I’d be glad if you answered 302. I did not write it just to let it stay there. thanks
Yeeeeep,In post 342, Irrelephant11 wrote: I do get the feeling Nauci cares about the game somewhat, so idk where that feeling comes from for you. Though I'm agreed she could be playing better/isn't reading players deeply before providing reads. Unsure if it's AI, though like I said I don't like her votes. Hmmm yeah I could be wrong about her, she looks prettybystander-y rn.
Who do you want to lynch?In post 345, Kop wrote:[-----snipped the post------]
In post 360, Alchemist21 wrote:@Reiand the CW to her also that formed also makes me think she’s likely scum.I haven’t seen anything from Nauci to reverse my read
This ^ is the only read on nauci you posted. Is this what you were talking about?In post 83, Alchemist21 wrote:VOTE: Nauci
I don’t like how in the same post they give a description of irrelephant as an excellent scum player who can’t be caught by a single post only to then claim to have caught them by a single post. You gave no reference to their Town game and to me it reads like you trying to say “hey this guy’s dangerous as scum and you won’t be able to catch him, but don’t worry because I know exactly how they work and have already caught them for you!”
Assuming there are no scums among the shitters, who would you want to lynch?In post 376, Tchill13 wrote:Same as my reasoning with mumble.
Did you really think it'd be any different?