Open 67 Two of Four (a7) Over! before 578

[Greasy Spot]

Well she can't help find scum either, so she is a hindrance to the town.

[DoctorJimmy]

Well she can't help find scum either, so she is a hindrance to the town.

Is her not being able to say anything or change her vote for the last few RL days of Day 1 really enough of a hindrance to lynch based on that, rather than who you find scummy?

[shaft.ed]

I'll give you guys the extension to accomidate Greasy Spot and farside22. Day Ends Friday.

[Near]

Trying to find a reason to join the bandwagon? It makes me scummy that I asked you why you found farside scummy and got frustrated at you ignoring my questions? I don't understand this at all.

No it looks like you were trying to get on a bandwagon.

Thanks for finally explaining your suspicion on farside, though.

This makes me less suspicious. Because you thanked me. I know it's stupid, but it does.

[Lowell]

I still think Doc J is the lynch for today.

[shaft.ed]

You look up at the scoreboard. It still reads Home: 5 Away: 2
DoctorJimmy's name is now in lights with two bulbs blaring next to it.
The clock reads 1:08:42 but suddenly jumps to 4:08:42 and continues its descent. You swear you can hear Uncle Theo muttering curses through the thick walls.

Vote Count

DoctorJimmy

(Near, Lowell)

Near

(farside22)

Lowell

(Erratus Apathos)

Greasy Spot

(Thorbjorn)

Not voting DoctorJimmy, Greasy Spot

Thorbjorn has not picked up his third prod, he will be replaced.

[DoctorJimmy]

DoctorJimmy

-

SCUM

. Mostly it is his behavior during the P2 near/farside debate that puts him here. He looks like he's trying to foment further discussion while making a bit of a friend in Near. Also, he was quick to chastise and vote moz in post 10.

How on earth is trying to cause further discussion scummy? I'm not sure where you've gotten this impression that I'm trying to make friends with Near, either. You referred to post 59, but that post consists of me being confused and asking Near to explain himself better, not of me entering the argument on his side.

You still haven't responded to any of this, Lowell.

[Erratus Apathos]

With an imminent deadline, we really need to be deciding who the lynch is.

I'm thinking Greasy is the lynch. His push for a Farside lynch is not only as opportunistic as all nine rings of hell (Hey, let's lynch the player who can't claim or defend herself!) but hypocritical given that he hasn't done any scumhunting himself. And in a format where one mislynch means LyLo, lynching someone just for having limited access is not something that could possibly strike me as a good idea.

Unvote, Vote: Greasy Spot

[Greasy Spot]

I was not pushing for her lynch it was simply a suggestion being as she was going to be here. It would only strike Farsides scum partner the wrong way not the other townies.

[shaft.ed]

You notice the faint hum of the intercom turning on. Uncle Theo then barks "I give you bastards an extra three hours and this is how you use it? I missed Wapner for this crap!"

[DoctorJimmy]

DoctorJimmy

-

SCUM

. Mostly it is his behavior during the P2 near/farside debate that puts him here. He looks like he's trying to foment further discussion while making a bit of a friend in Near. Also, he was quick to chastise and vote moz in post 10.

How on earth is trying to cause further discussion scummy? I'm not sure where you've gotten this impression that I'm trying to make friends with Near, either. You referred to post 59, but that post consists of me being confused and asking Near to explain himself better, not of me entering the argument on his side.

You still haven't responded to any of this, Lowell.

I'm sick of waiting.

Vote: Lowell

His case against me is based on three things, as shown in the quote: 1. I tried to instigate discussion. 2. I tried to make a friend in near (he claimed that I entered the near/farside debate on his side). 3. I was quick to chastise moz for his L-1 vote.

1 is not scummy, 2 is incorrect, and I'm far from the only one to do 3. It's been over a week and he still hasn't addressed any of this.

Also,

FoS: Greasy Spot

for claiming that only scum would object to lynching someone who can't claim or defend themselves.

[Lowell]

Nice OMGUS vote there.

And, for the record, 2 is correct and 3 is very very scummy.

[Greasy Spot]

I don't like Lowell. His post in 74 reeks of scum trying to over analyze to look like a townie.

vote: Lowell

[Greasy Spot]

EBWOP: Not post 74, Post 82.

[Lowell]

unvote, vote greasy spot

. If it's going to be between myself and GS, it has to be him.

[Greasy Spot]

unvote, vote greasy spot

. If it's going to be between myself and GS, it has to be him.

Wow! OMGUS vote. How is this not scummy?

[shaft.ed]

DrippingGoofball replaces Thorbjorn effective now

You look up at the scoreboard. It still reads Home: 5 Away: 2
GreasySpot's name is now in lights with three bulbs flashing next to it.
The clock reads 1:09:14 and continues its descent.

Vote Count

Greasy Spot

(DrippingGoofBall, Lowell, Erratus Apathos)

Lowell

(Greasy Spot, DoctorJimmy)

Near

(farside22)

DoctorJimmy

(Near)

[DrippingGoofball]

Who should we kill and why? Convince me.

[Greasy Spot]

Uh,...not me. I am the COP.

[Lowell]

haha WOW.

mod

give us a 2-day extension, okay?

[Lowell]

unvote, vote doc jimmy

unless I hear a counterclaim.

[Erratus Apathos]

Unvote, Vote: Near

for deadline lurking. (Yeah I see you posting in your other games as recently as yesterday, does two days to deadline not prompt you to post?)

[DrippingGoofball]

unvote, vote doc jimmy

unless I hear a counterclaim.

Is there a case against Dr. Jimmy? This game has five pages.

[DrippingGoofball]

The one thing that jumps out at me right now is that Near seems to be rather defensive. And as has been pointed out, is now deadline lurking.

I'll take a closer look at Lowell but my meta on him is that he always sets my scumdar on fire.

[Near]

Responding to my prod. sorry for the absence. My thoughts coming up.