Mini Normal 2071 (Game Over!)
- u r a person 2
-
u r a person 2 Jack of All Trades
- u r a person 2
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: December 9, 2018
- u r a person 2
-
u r a person 2 Jack of All Trades
- u r a person 2
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: December 9, 2018
All of this is convenient.In post 73, Inferno390 wrote:Don’t have time to get into much right now, but my preliminary scumteam 2/3 is UR2 and Exilon.103-11 0-2- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
What about my first post was scummy?In post 74, u r a person 2 wrote:@skitter The first post I think is independently scummy. The second feels like redirect of of Egix. And the interaction between them goes no where. whole thing just feels wrong.
Spoiler:
What about my second post was a redirect of Egix?
What do you mean our interaction went nowhere?"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- u r a person 2
-
u r a person 2 Jack of All Trades
- u r a person 2
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: December 9, 2018
First post: "What the heck. I have to do analysis already?" is forced. Like, even if you were actually thinking those thoughts, you still put them down in the post to posture.
Second post: You're throwing shade on two posts while dismissing the scum reads on egix's first post that were being discussed at the time
And your interaction went no where. Egix didn't follow up, and you didn't expand on the point. In fact, there have been no posts from either of you since then until you made this post where you had dropped that scum read entirely.
Do you think that interaction went somewhere? lolIn post 73, Inferno390 wrote:Don’t have time to get into much right now, but my preliminary scumteam 2/3 is UR2 and Exilon.103-11 0-2- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
VOTE: UR 2
UR2 ISO
40 almost feels more naked than Ausuka. Like it’s trying to look clothed when it is.
42 is pulling associations that aren’t even there. Me saying that I think Egix’s vote is NAI, especially when it’s clearly an RVS post, may be AI for me, but it certainly does not tie me to Egix on my own.
74: How is my post redirecting anybody, and saying that Egix and I’s conversation “went nowhere” is baloney.
75 is an attempt to vaguely defend Bob for no apparent reason.I don’t like that.
76 is your basic mudslinging.
78: First is my posting style and NAI, second is not simply “shade,”. It’s laying out my thoughts and sorting people, and I am not dismissing the reads on Egix, third, where else were you expecting that conversation to go on my end and where did I ever say I was now town reading skitter. I can scumread more than two people at a time.
In other words, this is caught scum. Help me with pressure guys."Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- Exilon
-
Exilon Mafia Scum
- Exilon
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1174
- Joined: February 16, 2010
Hum.
Please address, thanksIn post 59, Exilon wrote:
To note, are you voting because you feel I'm scummy, to assert some pressure, or something else?In post 36, Inferno390 wrote:VOTE: Exilon
I’m off-put by the tone here. Seems weird.
Skitter feels pushy
Sash feels reachy
Egix is NAI I think
What do you mean by Skitter being pushy? If anything, he's the one being pushed by like two or three different people (by his post 39, he was answering CDB, RuiRui, and Ausuka lol)
Like I get from your post 73 that you think I'm scum, but I do wanna know what changed between then and now and if then I was already scummy in your eyes. And also a reply to the other question.Feels like I've been here before.- u r a person 2
-
u r a person 2 Jack of All Trades
- u r a person 2
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: December 9, 2018
so why didn't you mention skitter in your scum team?In post 79, Inferno390 wrote:78: First is my posting style and NAI, second is not simply “shade,”. It’s laying out my thoughts and sorting people, and I am not dismissing the reads on Egix, third, where else were you expecting that conversation to go on my end and where did I ever say I was now town reading skitter. I can scumread more than two people at a time.103-11 0-2- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
I did just vote you because I wanted to put pressure on you and your posts were the scummiest out of everything I had read.
The reason I’ve paired with you with UR2 and am more sure of my scum read on you is in addition to my read on you, UR2 has now come out of nowhere it feels like to throw heavy amounts of shade in my direction, which feels very chainsaw-y."Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
Because I scumread skitter independent of you and Exilon.In post 81, u r a person 2 wrote:
so why didn't you mention skitter in your scum team?In post 79, Inferno390 wrote:78: First is my posting style and NAI, second is not simply “shade,”. It’s laying out my thoughts and sorting people, and I am not dismissing the reads on Egix, third, where else were you expecting that conversation to go on my end and where did I ever say I was now town reading skitter. I can scumread more than two people at a time.
If it’s not clear, the post above is directed to Exilon."Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
To clarify, Exilon, your posts weren’t great at the beginning and I was pressuring you for that. UR2’s reaction to what was going on and me specifically strengthened that read because it felt like a chainsaw attempt on his part which makes the most sense in a world where you are both scum.In post 82, Inferno390 wrote:I did just vote you because I wanted to put pressure on you and your posts were the scummiest out of everything I had read.
The reason I’ve paired with you with UR2 and am more sure of my scum read on you is in addition to my read on you, UR2 has now come out of nowhere it feels like to throw heavy amounts of shade in my direction, which feels very chainsaw-y."Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- RuiRui
-
RuiRui Goon
- RuiRui
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 325
- Joined: March 4, 2019
- u r a person 2
-
u r a person 2 Jack of All Trades
- u r a person 2
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: December 9, 2018
ya think? recent posts are not from a town perspectiveIn post 85, RuiRui wrote:Inferno you're moving a little too fast with your reads imo103-11 0-2- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
Just in general or compared to my last game?In post 85, RuiRui wrote:Inferno you're moving a little too fast with your reads imo
That is not what Rui said at all. Great shade though. Much wow.In post 86, u r a person 2 wrote:
ya think? recent posts are not from a town perspectiveIn post 85, RuiRui wrote:Inferno you're moving a little too fast with your reads imo"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
Okay, I want to rethink my stance on skitter now that there’s not a million things on my mind. She’s not nearly as pushy as I first thought. I think that what caught my attention is this:
This post feels weird and self aware. Coming out of a scumgame myself, this sounds like something I would say. (You know what I’m talking about Rui and Egix, the whole parroting thing.) But asa whole it doesn’t read as bad as I thought it did on first glance.In post 18, skitter30 wrote:This is the kind of rvs post i can see scum making ^^^^
(i'm not explicitly calling her scum for this rn, but noting that it comes from scum more than town imo)
This feels a lot worse than the above. It doesn’t feel like an honest defense from Ausuka. And it feels like a very aggressive defense too. Don’t really like that.In post 31, Ausuka wrote:
VOTE: skitterIn [url=https://forum.net/viewtopic.php?p=10896569#p10896569]post 18[/url], skitter30 wrote:This is the kind of rvs post i can see scum making ^^^^
(i'm not explicitly calling her scum for this rn, but noting that it comes from scum more than town imo)
it's literally just a naked vote and my standard entrance. why are you not explicitly calling me scum for it? if you think it comes from scum more than town, and the average player has a 1/4 chance to be scum, that's great odds on page 1. it feels as if you're afraid of entering a confrotantion so early more than anything else."Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- Inferno390
-
Inferno390 Mafia Scum
- Inferno390
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: October 3, 2017
- Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass
Another thought is that everyone really needs to watch how interactions with Uzi go down. Since Uzi is IC (Innocent Child), it means that where his vote goes and what he says can have a huge impact on the game and the wagons. So anyone trying to manipulate that needs to be looked at hard."Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Inferno390 GTKAS
Mafiascum Moderator Society- Sashaddin
-
Sashaddin Mafia Scum
- Sashaddin
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: May 12, 2018
- Location: Canada -5 GMT
I don't have much time tonight, Skitter looks town and this analysis was great. I'll follow...In post 79, Inferno390 wrote:In other words, this is caught scum. Help me with pressure guys.
UNVOTE: Skitter
VOTE: Urap2- RuiRui
-
RuiRui Goon
- RuiRui
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 325
- Joined: March 4, 2019
I think in practice mafia don't really bother trying to mess with the innocent child though?In post 89, Inferno390 wrote:Another thought is that everyone really needs to watch how interactions with Uzi go down. Since Uzi is IC (Innocent Child), it means that where his vote goes and what he says can have a huge impact on the game and the wagons. So anyone trying to manipulate that needs to be looked at hard.
And if you did want to catch someone doing this, it wouldn't be possible anymore since you've put everyone on high alert - it's not a tell anymore
In general, and you were mafia last game anywayInferno390 wrote:
Just in general or compared to my last game?In post 85, RuiRui wrote:Inferno you're moving a little too fast with your reads imo
That is not what Rui said at all. Great shade though. Much wow.In post 86, u r a person 2 wrote:
ya think? recent posts are not from a town perspectiveIn post 85, RuiRui wrote:Inferno you're moving a little too fast with your reads imo- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 36616
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
hey exilon, do you have a read on me?
==
can you show me an example of where you think this might be happening?In post 72, bob3141 wrote:Also if I get the feelign mafia in there arguments would prefer to hide there arguments in group. By making it appear that thre arguments are in harmony with anotehr player that they virtue of being mafia know is town . Ive seen a few examples of that but nothing realy note worthy, just somethign givign me sligth feeling
==
i don't think i'm seeing what you're seeing here; this read feels a little reach-y imoIn post 74, u r a person 2 wrote:@skitter The first post I think is independently scummy. The second feels like redirect of of Egix. And the interaction between them goes no where. whole thing just feels wrong.
also urap and bob probably (?) aren't partners together imo
oh wait reading more i think i'm mixing up egix and exilon; i can kinda see your thought process for egix/inferno but i don't particularly agree with it
==
inferno i think is town
==
? people can have scumreads and not teamread them (esp. early day1!)In post 81, u r a person 2 wrote:
so why didn't you mention skitter in your scum team?In post 79, Inferno390 wrote:78: First is my posting style and NAI, second is not simply “shade,”. It’s laying out my thoughts and sorting people, and I am not dismissing the reads on Egix, third, where else were you expecting that conversation to go on my end and where did I ever say I was now town reading skitter. I can scumread more than two people at a time.
==
kinda disagree. don't think scum!inferno posts 89, for exampleIn post 86, u r a person 2 wrote:
ya think? recent posts are not from a town perspectiveIn post 85, RuiRui wrote:Inferno you're moving a little too fast with your reads imo
kinda think you might be scum here actually
==
it was self-aware, i knew quite well that if i didn't put in the parenthesis people would ask why i wasn't voting there (hint: i wasn't actually scumreading her, it was a natural progression from the previous post - i showed an rvs post that i liked (garmr's) and then showed one that i didn't (ausuka's) )In post 88, Inferno390 wrote:This post feels weird and self aware. Coming out of a scumgame myself, this sounds like something I would say. (You know what I’m talking about Rui and Egix, the whole parroting thing.) But asa whole it doesn’t read as bad as I thought it did on first glance.ShowHiatus once more.
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx- RuiRui
-
RuiRui Goon
- RuiRui
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 325
- Joined: March 4, 2019
I agreeIn post 75, u r a person 2 wrote:72 comes from town I think.
Like it actually looks scummy af but I think it actually reads townie from some new players.- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Tbh the italics part I understand on skitter part something can appear scummy but you don't want to scum read someone for it just yet The bolded part was the impression I had at the time as well.In post 31, Ausuka wrote:
VOTE: skitterIn post 18, skitter30 wrote:This is the kind of rvs post i can see scum making ^^^^
(i'm not explicitly calling her scum for this rn, but noting that it comes from scum more than town imo)
it's literally just a naked vote and my standard entrance. why are you not explicitly calling me scum for it?if you think it comes from scum more than town, and the average player has a 1/4 chance to be scum, that's great odds on page 1.it feels as if you're afraid of entering a confrotantion so early more than anything else.
In post 28, ChannelDelibird wrote:
VOTE: skitter
Why wouldn't you vote for Ausuka here instead of keeping your vote on a random person who hadn't yet posted?
I literally held off shifting from my rvs to skitter as well. By that same accord would I be scummy as well if not why am I different if so why didn't you mention me?
In post 92, skitter30 wrote:
it was self-aware, i knew quite well that if i didn't put in the parenthesis people would ask why i wasn't voting there (hint: i wasn't actually scumreading her, it was a natural progression from the previous post - i showed an rvs post that i liked (garmr's) and then showed one that i didn't (ausuka's) )
critic here, if that was your goal I would of phrased it differently Like in my post above it seems like preemptive defence and cuts a conversation line. If you are town you pretty much soured the bait if people thought that was the bit that was scummy. Unless your going for some sort of slayers gambit.In post 20, Garmr wrote:
Personally I wouldn't of put this point down. You could of left it to see if someone did have that reaction and have them sort out their alignment.In post 18, skitter30 wrote:This is the kind of rvs post i can see scum making ^^^^
(i'm not explicitly calling her scum for this rn, but noting that it comes from scum more than town imo)
The fact you put that there feels like your cutting off a potential conversation line and seems a bit like a preemptive defence. I'm still deciding if that's scummy or null so- bob3141
-
bob3141 Jack of All Trades
- bob3141
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5002
- Joined: April 15, 2019
________________A quote above( dont know if i messed up teh quote tag)In post 92, skitter30 wrote:hey exilon, do you have a read on me?
==
can you show me an example of where you think this might be happening?In post 72, bob3141 wrote:Also if I get the feelign mafia in there arguments would prefer to hide there arguments in group. By making it appear that thre arguments are in harmony with anotehr player that they virtue of being mafia know is town . Ive seen a few examples of that but nothing realy note worthy, just somethign givign me sligth feeling
==
Nothing strogn so far but just a few things that make me lightly suspicious
Ive seen it in two of ChannelDelbird post and it just gives me a bad feeling. Nothing string but something that just looks like a predefence if you turn out to be town. By saying Ausuka convinced him and that is argument is teh same as Ausuka. Since mafia know who teh townies are, he could simply say well another proven townie thought teh same. If Aus was either lynched or died during teh night.
"Ausuka's post just makes me want to vote skitter again" forum post 63
"I very much feel like Ausuka has latched onto the same sort of vibe that I did." forum post 66- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I disagree. Scum have a easier time seeing a sinking ship than a townie and would want to jump off.In post 53, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I like Deli deciding not to further engage Skitter. I think attempting to create a theory or policy debate there is more likely to come from town than scum. Scum are more likely to want to cast suspicion on Skitter and/or anyone who shares her same sentiments on voting there.
VOTE: ChannelDelibird/vote]- bob3141
-
bob3141 Jack of All Trades
- bob3141
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5002
- Joined: April 15, 2019
Very much looks like an attempt to pretend to defend soemone but at the same time keep using the" but ....."In post 75, u r a person 2 wrote:72 comes from town I think.
Like it actually looks scummy af but I think it actually reads townie from some new players.
As well as trying to emphasize possible scummy actions but raising this in a pretend defense. So If i got lynched and untimatly revealed as town you could simply say you dint think i was scum and could hold no blame
____ - bob3141
- Garmr
- bob3141
- Garmr
- RuiRui
- skitter30
- RuiRui
- Sashaddin
- Inferno390
- Inferno390
- Inferno390
- u r a person 2
- RuiRui
- Inferno390
- Inferno390
- Inferno390
- u r a person 2
- Exilon
- Inferno390
- u r a person 2
- Inferno390
- u r a person 2
- u r a person 2