Lquiz - 2 (IH, ChannelDelibird)
Blackberry - 1 (Light-kun)
IH - 1 (populartajo)
farside22 - 1 (Aegor)
yellowbounder - 1 (farside22)
Not voting: killa seven, Lquiz, yellowbounder
6 to lynch.
ChannelDelibird wrote:Lquiz wrote:I'm starting to become wary of Aegor, claiming scum is just such a strange tactic, is his "just for reactions" to cover a mistake up, i don't know, but i don't really want to lynch a townie d1, so i'm going to unvote, and see what he says.
Unvote Aegorunvote, vote: Lquiz
If you think someone is scummy, VOTE FOR THEM. As IH says, you're far too cautious.
If Aegor is town then there's like a big percentage of being one scum in that wagon.Lowell wrote:I think Lquiz just doesn't know what he's doing.
I'd rather see more votes on Aegor.
Poetry is good. I'm not on acid. Vodka is better. Don't encourage the monkey. NOW SHUSH. WE SHALL NOT HEAR ANOTHER WORD FROM YOUR SCUM-DRENCHED MOUTH. Sorry, it just feels good to say that. You can actually talk. It will be better that way. But don't encourage the monkey.Aegor wrote:LOL. I felt like I was listening to a Dadaist poetry recitation or watching someone on an acid trip. Thanks BB.
Lowell wrote:No fear. Lowell is here.
Lowell wrote:vote popular
\Lowell wrote:Just random. Unless it's not.populartajo wrote:?Lowell wrote:vote popular
Lowell wrote:unvote, vote Aegor. Kill all annoyances.
Lowell wrote:You mean the 2-vote wagon? Yeah, way too fast. Very prudent.
Lowell wrote:"I did (scummy thing X) to get reactions. (Player Y) reacted by calling it scummy. Ergo, (player Y) is scum."
Man, you could right the book on scumhunting.
Lowell wrote:To right the book. Like, to right that which is askew. To right the wrongs. To correct it.
There, see? Perfect.
You say very little Lowell. Very little indeed. I mean, you could at least try and put some meat in your post, you're mostly just echoing the consensus, and don't push anything new. Be bold, you know?Lowell wrote:I think Lquiz just doesn't know what he's doing.
I'd rather see more votes on Aegor.
:shocked:kun wrote:Aegor, did not appear to be anything like a joke
In another game, I'm pretty sure I put someone at lynch-1 to test for reactions (it's done, BTW). That's a risk. What risk was involved here, exactly?I would hardly risk one so early and without having a better reason than those given for doing so
Out of curiosity, is there some hidden formula that determines these percentages? 12%? That's not even a nice number.Aegor would have been about 43% is he had attempted to play off the accusation, but by addressing it, he loses about 12% in suspicion for the moment.
It wasn't a bad move. No one died. No one could have been annihilated by a quicklynch. No PR was outed (lol). It had 0 risk involved, and now we have a flow of information (which is different from discussion).In my eyes, it was a bad move whether Aegor is mafia or town. (Worse if mafia, obviously.)