This post contains responses to a lot of things, including some things that are all the way back on page 2, because this game has been going so fast I didn't have time to answer said things at the time.
dcorbe wrote:The votes right now are pretty much random, but this this sounds like you're breadcrumming about your involvement with others.
Unvote Vote: Erratus Apathos
You obviously don't understand what breadcrumbing is.
dcorbe wrote:EBWOP because my quote tags came out messed up
massive wrote:I'm not sure I get how Erratus's post could be construed as "breadcrumming" (sic) ... mind explaining that one?
I'm just trying to get a pressure wagon going on someone so we can do as you suggested below, rather than simply saying "we should move past the random voting stage now" and doing nothing about it. You've basically just ensured that no wagon will form.
massive wrote:And I also think we can probably move past the "random voting" since we're on page three.
FoS: Massive
for being anti-scumhunting
As I mentioned, this post is weird. What massive said was not the least bit "anti-scumhunting".
dcorbe wrote:What's wrong with taking anything seriously? You can take something seriously and still have fun with it. I'd be concerned about anyone who is able to coast through a game without making a serious attempt at scum hunting. It's in the town's best interests to take a few things seriously and it's in the scum's best interests not to.
It's just that you take
everything
so seriously. The other game we're both in is indicating to me that it's a playstyle thing, but it is nonetheless weird.
dcorbe's q21 vote is OMGUSy and not particularly well-founded. His EA vote was actually based on a tell, not an "anti-scumhunting attitude", even if EA's "slip-up" isn't the greatest tell ever.
roflcopter's post 80, except for the part about me, is 100% correct. EA's reaction is becoming a lot more revealing than the tell itself. EA is getting really pissed off about this, which I know is a tell for me. I realize I'm sort-of going back on my initial reason for voting EA here, but events today have made me think this tell isn't all that reliable.
EA wrote:And if I've done something that supposedly 100% of people who do are scum, then why in the hell would you be uncomfortable putting me at L-whatever? If town Kuribo was really 100% certain I was scum, he'd have no reason not to vote me even if he was hammering. And it's not even relevant how close I am to lynch, since when you first brought up your allegedly 100% scumtell I wasn't anywhere near lynch.
This is silliness. He's not 100% sure, obviously.
dcorbe wrote:If he were lynched right now and flipped town it would likely be scum hammering
That's a dangerous assumption. Scum might not be so reckless.
I think I like my vote where it is, and this EA/kuribo thing is providing a lot of information. Please, continue.