There is a distinct difference between this and,Paradoxombie wrote:"If I think a player's opinion coincides with what benefits scum, that player is scummy"
She voted someone because their actions looked scummy - ie they look like scum. You voted her because her actions don't look town (to you). If someones actions don't look like town you still have to explain how they benefit scum.Paradoxombie wrote:I voted her because she was against a massclaim, and I thought/think that a massclaim benefits the town.
What if he is just stupid, saw daykill and didn't think that it could be a ruse. I think this is more likely than him saying "Bye guys, I'm taking this off my watched list", and then reading along, just to get a few days worth of lurking.Paradox wrote:I don't think Xtoxm is as stupid as you guys seem to think. I think he's playing on your perceptions of his stupidity so he can just disappear for awhile. What kind of person leaves a game before the mod even posts their death? Especially in a game as warped as this one, I'd wait to make sure nothing unusual happens. And I don't think it's the norm to say that you're removing the game from your watched topics. That's what makes me think Xtoxm is trying to mislead us.
I did not say that I would vote anyone else, what was implicit in that statement was that I would not vote any of the five people mentioned. These were for a variety of reasons, and I wanted to make it clear that if a wagon formed on them I would prefer a No-Lynch to a lynch on them. However, with anyone else I was still open to the fact that they could be scum, so if something came up later in the day it was possible that I would move my vote there, as I did with xyzzy as I thought his wagon may actually come to a lynch, as opposed to para who was remaining stale for a while, with many people refusing to vote for him.Para wrote:Note the underlined part. It seems a hypocritical to go after Lawrencelot for leaving open opportunities to vote people, when he's basically doing the same by listing who he won't vote(therefore implying he'll vote for anyone else[as confirmed by his vote on xyzzy]). He's actually opening himself to far more than Lawrencelot who listed 3 wagons of preference.
I tried to kill Para because I thought, and still think he is the most likely to be scum. I have no idea who killed NabNab, he was playing pretty strong, I guess that many scum players would have been worried about him.Lawrencelot wrote:Rogueben, I think you're blocked by shaft.ed. Can you elaborate on why you tried to kill paradoxombie? And who do you think killed nabnab?
But there are other options here besides you being town.Xtoxm wrote:You know I am town, I killed volkan.
I can categorically deny that I targeted you. My target for last night was definitely Kison, this is why I am confused as Kison came out with his results prior to you announcing that you targeted me.Lawrencelot wrote:Or you. Kison says you were my aim, which is true, so I was your aim?
If all three of you do this then I feel there is not much else I will be able to do.Pseudo-vote wrote:I believe that Rogueben is the last scum and would like to lynch him.
Ah but you see he doesn't. He knows I'm town.Xtoxm wrote:Kison - Why are you not voting for RB? Seriously...You know he's scum...
I asked him whether he got my kill directed to you. He confirmed that he got my PM and that my target last night was you.Kison wrote:Rogueben, you did say something about checking with Guardian about something. What'd that yield?
I just hope that Guardian hasn't been a bastard in some way. For example me being an incompetent vig (this is mere speculation). I see this as unlikely but I will be sad if it's the case.Xtoxm wrote:What do you mean?Rogueben wrote:I doubt this is the case, but if you've played funny buggers with us Guardian then I'm going to be a sad man.
I agree with this. This is the main reason why I've been confused every morning.Xtoxm wrote:The main reason of doubt related to your kill failures is Link being an incompetant vig doesn't really make sense.