Mini 2036: Charging Up! - Game Over
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Inb4 confirmed scumIn post 54, GuiltyLion wrote:VOTE: Vaxkiller
ez
the worst I'm not scum this time! RC I'm still not scum this time!-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
With a bullet to the brain or a case of lynching asphyxiationIn post 81, northsidegal wrote:
-shrug-In post 79, RadiantCowbells wrote:i'm skeptical that nsg is town here.
sometimes, at night, i'm skeptical whether the sun will come up again or if it'll be dark out forever. i think both of our problems are solved the same way.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
But how about later?
How about now? Since this a catch up and all-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Tagging this as pinging my scumdar. This is something scum does often, picking a small little thing and trying to make it into more than it is.In post 108, Lady Angel wrote:
I don't form reads very fast. So yeah, that was the thing that stuck out the most to me so far. How can you even call out "Lurkers" before there's 24 hours passed?In post 103, GuiltyLion wrote:I had no problem with Manatee's poke on slimer and I'm not sure why it caught interest between both lane and Kokichi. feels like there could be scum between those two
Vax is still a good vote IMO
Lady Angel, do you really think Porkens' comment is the most scum-indicative/noteworthy thing that has happened so far? I'm surprised that this was what you felt was most important to comment onIn post 93, Lady Angel wrote:
Why would you post this less than 24 hours into the game..?In post 66, Porkens wrote:too many lurkers
Bonus points for not posting anything after calling out lurkers less than a day in, too.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Porkens
Probably not the most scummy thing ever but I have nothing else right now.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Here's scum #2In post 121, lane0168 wrote:
Indirectly you could make that argument if you wanted. It would be incomplete. I wanted clarification, you didn't acknowledge or respond. More than once. And that's why I am voting you. And now I'm trying to figure out why you didn't just say it was a misunderstanding in the first placeIn post 118, ManateeDude wrote:so im literally being wagoned b/c of an early game misunderstanding?-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Maybe the worst wasn't so bad after all, or perhaps it's just an obvious readIn post 135, the worst wrote:
wolfyIn post 108, Lady Angel wrote:don't form reads very fast. So yeah, that was the thing that stuck out the most to me so far. How can you even call out "Lurkers" before there's 24 hours passed?
Probably not the most scummy thing ever but I have nothing else right now.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
In post 135, the worst wrote:
wolfyIn post 108, Lady Angel wrote:don't form reads very fast. So yeah, that was the thing that stuck out the most to me so far. How can you even call out "Lurkers" before there's 24 hours passed?
Probably not the most scummy thing ever but I have nothing else right now.
Can someone with meta knowledge of this person tell me if unnecessary walls are common for them?In post 139, lane0168 wrote:
You just answered my questions... To you, my interest in the situation was scummy. I wanted to figure out how/why you were disinterested. I asked you about it. And you just now answered.In post 130, GuiltyLion wrote:okay so let's drill into this Manatee/Lane thing a bit
in my view, slimer's original comment was nothing more than a joke and NAI. but I can easily imagine how someone else may not see it as just a joke and could have inferred some weird/unnecessary shade in it. I don't agree with that read, I don't immediately share Manatee's suspicion, but I can understand it so I also don't see it as disingenuous, especially for a page 1 read/vote. And that's entirely the level of thought I feel is necessary to evaluate the whole thing. I have a plausible town explanation for Manatee's behavior, no solid reason to prefer an alternative scum!explanation, and therefore it's not worth diving into further.In post 111, lane0168 wrote:When someone votes seriously, I'm interested. You don't have to be. But I want to know what he means. He doesn't want to explain it. Can you explain it? If not, does it matter to you the reasons for people's cases? If not, why not?
You can't seem to imagine this relatively simple town!Manatee explanation for his vote and that's more concerning to me. How much can Manatee really offer beyond what he's said already? He thought the shade that he saw in that post was weird so he voted it. What more would you expect him to explain? Yours doesn't feel like a productive line of questioning, it looks more like busy work to start conflicts and get a foot in the game. Maybe in the abstract, "are weird posts scummy?" is a good question for the Mafia Discussion board, but if you want to dive that deep into every single vote or claim that anyone makes you're going to rapidly lose sight of the bigger picture and create a bunch of tangential arguments that only become noise in the thread.
And what also looks bad is how you're strawmanning me here - I have never suggested that "the reasons for people's cases" don't matter to me. But Manatee's vote was a) not nearly at the level I would call a 'case', and b) already sufficiently explained for what it was
I can imagine it coming from town or scum, that is why I asked about it. I had questions. I wanted them answered. If I couldn't imagine them coming from town, my questions would've been paired with a vote. A vote that came later after manatee wouldnt acknowledge the questions. And were ultimately explained away as a misunderstanding. Which can come from town or scum, but doesnt pass the smell test.
I can see scum latching on to something pregame to insert THEMselves into the game immediately.
Again, I'm not offended if you didn't feel the need to dive into it, but I did. And I'm not exactly satisfied with the "so I'm being wagoned for a misunderstanding" bit. Not much of a wagon, and there wouldn't be one at all if he just answered the questions. I can't say for certain there wouldn't be I guess, but not answering was the biggest reason for voting him.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
I fall firmly in the camp of finding town just as important if not more so than finding scum readsIn post 161, theslimer3 wrote:I mean, the idea of someone proving that their town to get a free "hey, I'll help you lynch whoever you want" just seems anti-town in the way of trying to find scum.
The the inscentive is "I'll lynch you" if you dont. I mean who the hell does that?-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
In post 161, theslimer3 wrote:I mean, the idea of someone proving that their town to get a free "hey, I'll help you lynch whoever you want" just seems anti-town in the way of trying to find scum.
The the inscentive is "I'll lynch you" if you dont. I mean who the hell does that?
Scum #3In post 163, theslimer3 wrote:You could be sherlock holmes, I'd still be iffy about your judgment. Theoretically of course-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
In post 161, theslimer3 wrote:I mean, the idea of someone proving that their town to get a free "hey, I'll help you lynch whoever you want" just seems anti-town in the way of trying to find scum.
The the inscentive is "I'll lynch you" if you dont. I mean who the hell does that?In post 163, theslimer3 wrote:You could be sherlock holmes, I'd still be iffy about your judgment. Theoretically of course
I appreciate this post. It shows process of thought and a second guessing about personal reads which scum often lacks. Hard trIn post 167, northsidegal wrote:i don't really have one right now. slimer is someone who i remember seeing in a lot of the games that i read before my first game and around that time of my first games, but i don't really remember any specific meta nor do i think it would be smart to think that it'd be the same after all this time.
on an individual level, tone-wise i've felt like he's been pretty natural, but looking at it again just right now content-wise he's kind of lacking which makes me lean towards scum. i don't get the sense that there are reads that he really cares about from his posting - he's just sort of making conversation with people. that being said, i've been kind of sitting back when it comes to reads myself, so i'm not sure necessarily how scum-indicative it is.
obviously i was just talking about this but his concern over you sheeping me kind of pings me. like, is "if i realize that you're town i will help you lynch your scumreads" really something that's that scary to think about? it also seems to assume that you're town too - or at least, he hasn't showed any concerns that you might be scum doing all this.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Okay now what about the people I'm scum reading? I'll trust my judgment over yours btw.In post 238, RadiantCowbells wrote:DS understand that the person you claimed as a hard townread is someone that I am hard scumreading and have never been wrong on
so I'd calm down on saying that you're the best unless you're scum here.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Ooh, saucey. So you both think that I am scum and that I am sussing one of my teammates in my opening salvo? Can you go further into your scum read on me? Expound, if you will. I assume it is not solely based on me townreading one of your scum reads?In post 239, RadiantCowbells wrote:that said I think that you're scum
I think the entire scumteam is DS/Slimer3/NSG-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
You havent really done anything to prove your case on NSG, and I literally just asked you to expound on why you are scum reading them and you havent.In post 249, RadiantCowbells wrote:In post 240, DS wrote:
Okay now what about the people I'm scum reading? I'll trust my judgment over yours btw.In post 238, RadiantCowbells wrote:DS understand that the person you claimed as a hard townread is someone that I am hard scumreading and have never been wrong on
so I'd calm down on saying that you're the best unless you're scum here.In post 241, DS wrote:
Ooh, saucey. So you both think that I am scum and that I am sussing one of my teammates in my opening salvo? Can you go further into your scum read on me? Expound, if you will. I assume it is not solely based on me townreading one of your scum reads?In post 239, RadiantCowbells wrote:that said I think that you're scum
I think the entire scumteam is DS/Slimer3/NSG
like holy trinity of terribleIn post 243, DS wrote:RC, I notice that you have been tunneling NSG since post #17. What was this deeply insightful read that you got off of her yarrr post?
1) discrediting my NSG read
2) trying to get towncred because they 'sussed one of their teammates in their opening salvo' like scum aren't gonna distance early
3) making the excuse for not voting NSG that they're gonna trust their reads over mine
when someone says they have an 100% accurate read somewhere and that you're wrong I would expect anyone who makes the claim to be this competent to figure out if the claim is true
when someone rolls scum with NSG and has this big of an ego I expect them to think that they can deflect and discredit me and that's exactly the response that we got.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
spoiler alert: it was solely based on me townreading one of his scum readsIn post 241, DS wrote:
Ooh, saucey. So you both think that I am scum and that I am sussing one of my teammates in my opening salvo? Can you go further into your scum read on me? Expound, if you will. I assume it is not solely based on me townreading one of your scum reads?In post 239, RadiantCowbells wrote:that said I think that you're scum
I think the entire scumteam is DS/Slimer3/NSG-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Yeah, you don't have to. Yet the real question is, can you?In post 254, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't have to prove my case on NSG.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Kokichi, you gonna hardclaim mafia roleblocker or do you want me to do it?In post 257, RadiantCowbells wrote:
You should eitherIn post 253, Kokichi Oma wrote:
Lol this should be funIn post 222, DS wrote:The worst has been replaced with the best. Nice to meet you all, my name is DS and I am the GOAT, but you'll come to know that shortly.
Let's play.
1) hardclaim scum in your next post
2) vote NSG-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
yarrrIn post 259, RadiantCowbells wrote:
making a case just gives the opportunity for scumfuck mcgee no.2 aka DS to attack the reasonsIn post 258, DS wrote:
Yeah, you don't have to. Yet the real question is, can you?In post 254, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't have to prove my case on NSG.
plus it's a lot effort
when i can just say that NSG is scum-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
VC 1.8
theslimer3(3): ManateeDude, Porkens, Vaxkiller
lane0168(2):northsidegal, Gamma Emerald
Porkens (2):theslimer3,Lady Angel
ManateeDude (2): Kokichi Oma,lane0168
RadiantCowbells (1): Not_Mafia
Vaxkiller (1): GuiltyLion
northsidegal(1): RadiantCowbells
Lady Angel(1): DS
Not Voting (0):
With 13 players alive it takes 7 to lynch
The deadline is 17 October 11:30am UTC-4, or in 11 days, 1 hour, 34 minutes
-----------
Current reads and where they fall on the vote count.
Game can't be that easy can it?-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
These two posts pinged me on slimer. I often find that scum tries to sway town opinion by asking rhetorical questions meant to invite an already positioned answer. The "theoretically of course" is a hedgeIn post 234, DS wrote:In post 161, theslimer3 wrote:I mean, the idea of someone proving that their town to get a free "hey, I'll help you lynch whoever you want" just seems anti-town in the way of trying to find scum.
The the inscentive is "I'll lynch you" if you dont. I mean who the hell does that?
Scum #3In post 163, theslimer3 wrote:You could be sherlock holmes, I'd still be iffy about your judgment. Theoretically of course-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
This and the other wall I quoted is what I picked up as scummy from lane. Over complicating a simple response to seem as if there is more thought behind it than there is. However this is the shakiest of my three reads, which is why I asked for meta on themIn post 230, DS wrote:
Here's scum #2In post 121, lane0168 wrote:
Indirectly you could make that argument if you wanted. It would be incomplete. I wanted clarification, you didn't acknowledge or respond. More than once. And that's why I am voting you. And now I'm trying to figure out why you didn't just say it was a misunderstanding in the first placeIn post 118, ManateeDude wrote:so im literally being wagoned b/c of an early game misunderstanding?-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
I also didn't like the swing near vc 1.2 where lane had been the first vote on an rc wagon with lady, then two others hopped on and lane unvoted and then this happened shortly after
The fact that two of my scum reads happened to lynch the same person at nearly the same time is glorious scum synergy and interesting when combined with my third read on lane and what I previously mentionedIn post 93, Lady Angel wrote:
Why would you post this less than 24 hours into the game..?In post 66, Porkens wrote:too many lurkers
Bonus points for not posting anything after calling out lurkers less than a day in, too.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Porkens-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Thought progression is a uniquely town oriented spew. Scum already knows the alignment and has to explain their thoughts. Often times townies start typing and don't know where they are gonna land on someone until the words hit the page and the submit button is hit. That's what I was picking up on.In post 291, lane0168 wrote:
Hard tr for essentially fence sitting and second guessing a null read? I'm not following that oneIn post 235, DS wrote:
I appreciate this post. It shows process of thought and a second guessing about personal reads which scum often lacks. Hard trIn post 167, northsidegal wrote:i don't really have one right now. slimer is someone who i remember seeing in a lot of the games that i read before my first game and around that time of my first games, but i don't really remember any specific meta nor do i think it would be smart to think that it'd be the same after all this time.
on an individual level, tone-wise i've felt like he's been pretty natural, but looking at it again just right now content-wise he's kind of lacking which makes me lean towards scum. i don't get the sense that there are reads that he really cares about from his posting - he's just sort of making conversation with people. that being said, i've been kind of sitting back when it comes to reads myself, so i'm not sure necessarily how scum-indicative it is.
obviously i was just talking about this but his concern over you sheeping me kind of pings me. like, is "if i realize that you're town i will help you lynch your scumreads" really something that's that scary to think about? it also seems to assume that you're town too - or at least, he hasn't showed any concerns that you might be scum doing all this.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
You are 100% correct that I do not have a sense of the game state, which is one of the good/bad things about being a catchup sub. You can look at the thread objectively without being tainted by in thread machismo and yet if the context of a post doesn't translate to a reread, then, you can be negatively impacted.In post 294, lane0168 wrote:
You're correct. Not too much can be drawn from it. But if you draw nothing from it, then what do you get? Like you called out lady angel for nitpicking at game start... Scum and town have to do that if the game is going to go anywhere.In post 290, DS wrote:In summation: I felt as if that entire train of thought was unnecessary and the wall was fluff. I've never played a game with pregame before but I can't imagine too much can be drawn from it.
I'm going to assume you skimmed the game looking for things that stood out to you without really comprehending the game state. Considering to think that entire post was unnecessary from my point of view
Solid observation.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
How much more evidence could someone possibly have on a being with only 4 posts? No, her third post and the timing of her votes in reference to the wagons at the time are what I'm scumreading off of.In post 295, lane0168 wrote:Do you have more evidence on lady other than nitpicking in her third post?-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
If you assume it is me and NSG why are you not voting NSG who you supposedly have a lock scumread on? Logic doesnt follow there.In post 358, RadiantCowbells wrote:eh
i'm gonna just assume that i was right on nsg and ds
VOTE: DS
if you're town it's my turn to trust you 0 so you should be sheeping me NSG.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
In post 353, RadiantCowbells wrote:LA is kind of transparently town and DS's lane push was absolute, absolute garbage
really good equity there
slimer3's reaction to you was also awful (and i thought at the time svs) but not quite as sure that it's not something that's necessarily scummy
You do realize I never pushed on lane right? I said that was the shakiest of my reads and asked the whole thread for meta to parse them. The interaction with me last night gave me town vibes, I wouldnt vote lane today.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Am I not allowed to stir the pot? Can you explain your ideas of RC's thought progression on NSG and her alignment during that conversation and then reflect on how that translates into his vote on me?
For reference he says:
In post 352, RadiantCowbells wrote: can we vote slimer or DSIn post 354, RadiantCowbells wrote:please don't scumread me for backing off on you I can't deal with it rnIn post 358, RadiantCowbells wrote:eh
i'm gonna just assume that i was right on nsg and ds
VOTE: DS
if you're town it's my turn to trust you 0 so you should be sheeping me NSG.
So his read goes from NSG lock scum with Slimer/DS to not scum reading NSG to saying it is NSG and DS but then not voting NSG who he supposedly has a lock scumread on.
Progression makes no sense.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
And actually that makes even less sense when you look at "if you're town it's my turn to trust you 0 so you should be sheeping me NSG."
Because he said during his vote on me "eh I'm gonna just assume that i was right on NSG and ds" so if you are townreading NSG why are you voting me?
Progression fail.-
-
DS Goon
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
In post 398, RadiantCowbells wrote:{RC}
{Slimer, Lady Angel, Manateedude}
{Porkens}
{NM}
townpool as of now, NM being only slightly > null
Now you have slimer in your town pool? You were just saying you wanted to lynch either him or me.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
you just said I was 85% scum....In post 414, RadiantCowbells wrote:if you think me saying "no you don't get to say that a post is 90% likely to come from town" is 'degrading your skill' then idk what to tell you.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
Oh yeah I picked up that you were mentally burdened this game for sureIn post 419, RadiantCowbells wrote:
When I say someone is 85% scum it comes off of a long line of being able to accurately deduce said percentages and comes with a heavy mental burden.In post 415, DS wrote:
you just said I was 85% scum....In post 414, RadiantCowbells wrote:if you think me saying "no you don't get to say that a post is 90% likely to come from town" is 'degrading your skill' then idk what to tell you.-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
In post 416, Lady Angel wrote:Did my homework. Think I'm ready to present.
VOTE: Northsidegal
Something about RC and NSG's de-escalation felt very off to me, and while I can't claim to be in either of their headspaces, I wanted to check it out. So I went and read through part of Lynch The Wolves, a game in which RC was Scum and NSG was town, and here's a summary of what I found:
RC, as Scum, could've pushed onto NSG using the same tactic he did here (claiming to be able to read her 100% of the time), but likely didn't too much because it would've looked bad when NSG flipped town. However, RC did vote on NSG at one point, when NSG was the leading wagon, and unlike this game, backed off quickly. Why didn't we have a repeat of this game? Because RC knew NSG was town. He even brought up his ability to read her 100% of the time just to discredit a fellow scum's SR on her. So it makes sense that RC's different reaction indicates a different situation here.
Reading through the rest of the game, I started to see shades of this RC when he attempted to bus a partner, and while he got more frustrated there than he did here, it was still close enough for me to draw a few conclusions:
- RC gets like this when he really believes he's correct and isn't being listened to
- RC gets like this when he's trying to bus someone and isn't being listened to
Their de-escalation felt natural enough from the prespective of someone seeing it from the outside for me to think it's the first one with a slight possibility of it being a bus, but either way in this line of thought NSG has a higher-than-other chance of flipping scum.
Lady angel / RC scum team confirmed-
-
DS
-
-
DS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 347
- Joined: October 5, 2018
- Location: San Francisco
-
-
-
-