Mini Theme 2162: Wherewolf [Game over | Village win]

Elements · Post Post #23 (isolation #0) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 6:43 am

Game solved

Almost50 - town
brighteningskies - town
Elements - town
Galron - town
insomnia - town
ItalianoVD - ww
Pine - town
spicer1209 - ww
Tayl0r Swift - town
TheFuzzylogic99 - town
WeyounsLastClone - ww

Elements · Post Post #68 (isolation #1) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 10:25 pm

In post 54, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:IMHO

claim
corrupt/no corrupt

I don't think this helps at all, but I don't think it doesn't help. Especially given we already have a sinner claim.
It's just a moot point rlly.
NC

thinking about it.... we should maybe decide who the clairvoyaant should investiagate....This way we are able check if that player is corrupt via Innkeeper. If we have a bard then even beter but I think we can win with an inn keeper and clairvoyant, What do you think Alamost?

I had thought about this, but then surely the wws just kill whoever the clairvoyant targets?
Unless there's a witch who can stop the kills I don't see how that's particularly helpful

Elements · Post Post #72 (isolation #2) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:20 am

hmm, yes
in that case i'd like wmc to be copped atm

Elements · Post Post #78 (isolation #3) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:46 am

why do you hate me a50?

Elements · Post Post #80 (isolation #4) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:10 am

it's a waste

Elements · Post Post #82 (isolation #5) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:24 am

yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste

Elements · Post Post #84 (isolation #6) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:40 am

In post 83, brighteningskies wrote:
In post 82, Elements wrote:yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste
A non corrupt result is never a waste as it proves you're telling the truth

it's a waste if it's on me

Elements · Post Post #87 (isolation #7) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:39 am

are you all rlly bad at reading within the lines?
I've basically claimed at this point

Elements · Post Post #91 (isolation #8) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:09 pm

In post 90, Tayl0r Swift wrote:yeah and my post gave you a big out to not fullclaim, yet instead you went and made the claim more explicit.

yea, i didn't read it but your town, my bad

Elements · Post Post #92 (isolation #9) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:10 pm

i don't think it matters too much

Elements · Post Post #94 (isolation #10) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:31 pm

I am not claiming priest

Elements · Post Post #120 (isolation #11) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:25 pm

alternatively you could trust me FOR A SINGLE NIGHT, get two town confirmed and then we can win this thing.

Elements · Post Post #123 (isolation #12) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:34 pm

me and presumable the one that gets checked

Elements · Post Post #124 (isolation #13) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:36 pm

In post 122, Almost50 wrote:Also, would you be willing to eliminate the Spicer slot today?[/vote]
im good with that
Do you have any confident reads?[/vote]
TS is town

VOTE: And since we're at it, why did you pick brighteningskies for a N0 check?

I didn't, i picked wlc because they page topped on page three

Elements · Post Post #127 (isolation #14) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:44 pm

In post 126, Almost50 wrote:Like, if that;s true then why aren't you campaigning for his elimination already??

yes, because someone pagetopping means they're scum

Elements · Post Post #128 (isolation #15) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:52 pm

In post 125, Almost50 wrote:How do you get confirmed in that situation? And why are you assuming your check will return a clear?

probablility

Elements · Post Post #131 (isolation #16) » Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:03 am

im not claiming clairvoyant

Elements · Post Post #133 (isolation #17) » Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:10 am

i don't have a night 0 result, I picked no target, I had every reason to not pick anyone

Elements · Post Post #135 (isolation #18) » Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:15 am

WHY DO YOU WANT ME TO CLAIM
i'M NOT STALLING I'M JUST NOT CLAIMING
I THOUGHT SOMETHING I SAID EARLIER MADE IT OBVIOUS WHAT MY ROLE IT BUT APPARENTLY NOT

Elements · Post Post #137 (isolation #19) » Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:32 am

In post 136, Almost50 wrote: 1st: I am nominating you on the ballot

sure

2nd: I humbly request that you do not join or replace into any games I am in. I will do the dame to you.

I think that is a good idea. We are clearly incompatible in every conceivable way.

Elements · Post Post #140 (isolation #20) » Tue Sep 08, 2020 3:15 am

i soft claimed but I didn't soft claim clairvoyant

Elements · Post Post #145 (isolation #21) » Tue Sep 08, 2020 4:38 am

cop = clairvoyant

Elements · Post Post #147 (isolation #22) » Tue Sep 08, 2020 4:43 am

In post 143, Galron wrote:
What do you mean cop? I don't see an alignment cop role. I'm confused at that.

then what was this

Elements · Post Post #212 (isolation #23) » Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:20 pm

wow
you are all so paranoid

Elements · Post Post #213 (isolation #24) » Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:21 pm

and i blame it all on a50

Elements · Post Post #217 (isolation #25) » Wed Sep 09, 2020 10:52 pm

In post 216, brighteningskies wrote:Oh btw Pine: "Italiano is clearly a Jester. Night kill it with fire. Scum, you can't afford for us to get nervous and eliminate him the normal way."

Actually scum does maybe benefit from a Jester being in the game because they mess around and cause confusion the wolves can hide behind and then if we do burn the Jester the next day we don't get a burn - which again could benefit the wolves because they might not be burned on the ballot. So I wouldn't necessarily rely on the wolves to deal with him and would suggest if we do think he is a Jester burning him as soon as possible to limit the negative effects of the no burn the next day.
(Please tell me if this sentence makes less sense than I thought it did I'm a bit tired today)

I'm pretty sure pine knew that but wanted to try and get the wolves to kill them anyway.

Elements · Post Post #220 (isolation #26) » Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:18 am

I'm the bard
don't ballot me

Elements · Post Post #234 (isolation #27) » Thu Sep 10, 2020 6:53 am

In post 82, Elements wrote:yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste

this is what I thought would've given it away

Elements · Post Post #242 (isolation #28) » Thu Sep 10, 2020 8:30 am

In post 235, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 234, Elements wrote:
In post 82, Elements wrote:yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste
this is what I thought would've given it away
not really. even now i dont see why that says youre a bard.

you can only see a non corrupt result if there is a bard

Elements · Post Post #244 (isolation #29) » Thu Sep 10, 2020 8:41 am

no one is ccing my bard claim