BWEH
VOTE: strangematter
T3 do you wanna play a chess match
Something to keep in mindIn post 176, Dwlee99 wrote:Chocolate IN BREAD is genius wtf
Also can I point out how completely bullshit this isIn post 202, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:contains multiple red flags wrt their alignment.
How is this scummy wtfIn post 208, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:wholistic approach
You only know if they're good or not if you're scum ^-^In post 208, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:the reads were good but they aren't
If you're town stop doing this shit means I townread LLD? OkIn post 232, Rogue wrote:Update on further reading I still don’t like it
VOTE: dwlee
I don’t like how they keep flip flopping with their LLD stance while their vote is still there- 228 feels very much like something you’d say to a townread you think is in a dumb tunnel… which doesn’t bode well cognitively with the whole… ya kno… vote on LLD?
This may have gotten lost but this ^^^In post 197, Dwlee99 wrote:Also if anyone got a jailkeeping role, ik it is hard to pick a target so that you don't fuck over town - feel free to target me
I think this is the case cause anarchychess was my first choice but I didn't get itIn post 288, skitter30 wrote:Fwiw i know nothing abt chess and my theory is that its two people playing, perhaps someone picked something like r/anarchychess, which would be fun
@lld on phone now but i talked abt the dwlee thing right before the post where i talked abt the shade thing
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=86835In post 314, skitter30 wrote:@dwlee i'm gonna be honest i'm not sure what you're referring to
@t3 i meant the chess game in general seems to do with you, not the fact that it's turning upside down, that was worded poorly
Who off the list are you scumreading?In post 336, The Bombay wrote:I lean town (to varying degrees of strength) on almost every player on this list.In post 198, Dwlee99 wrote:Rogue
T3
Lady Lambdadelta
That Idiot Ivan
skitter30
Shiro
I may have solved the game as well
The sole exception being Shiro, who is squarly in null at this point.
~Luke
This will be almost always the case in most games I play. I don't explain my reads unless necessaryIn post 377, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I want to note that as of yet Dwlee's votes and reads have been either
Unexplained
Or
Direct response votes to people suspecting them.
Dwlee posted a 6 person PoE and I've yet to see justification for it.
I started reading the game. If someone did something I thought was townie enough I striked them from the list until I was left with 6 people.In post 378, skitter30 wrote:I am feeling a little more ???? after my convo with dwlee last night i will say ...
Dwlee where *did* your poe come from?
As is always the case, if you want to know something you may askIn post 384, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:It will be necessary this game.In post 379, Dwlee99 wrote:This will be almost always the case in most games I play. I don't explain my reads unless necessaryIn post 377, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I want to note that as of yet Dwlee's votes and reads have been either
Unexplained
Or
Direct response votes to people suspecting them.
Dwlee posted a 6 person PoE and I've yet to see justification for it.
Eh kinda but it was townie enough for an early reads listIn post 383, jjh927 wrote:Those were basically rvs votes on you though
This is very prescientIn post 393, jjh927 wrote:I think if you give Dwlee a question with a big scope, like "explain all of your reads at once", they're not gonna answer it in the way you want