Anyway, the fact that lynching obviously won't kill certain people is a strange wrinkle. Don't know what to do with that. Suppose I'll just
Random Final Fantasy III Quote:
"You'd best be frozen."
-Battle text
I'll bet kills are spell and attack based and reduce HP as well, rather than just killing the target. Though it would make sense if the mafia attack was more than 500 HP. They may even have more than one option for attack.Fletcher wrote:When someone is lynched, they LOSE 500 HP, AND AREN'T NECCISARILY DEAD.
Really sorry, I keep seeing that avater with a little video game character and instantly think "Fletcher"Quagmire wrote:solid074: The name's Quagmire, not Fletcher.
Gon wrote:as to the "chunks" we'll probalby hear more about them later on, since there are 3 possibilities 1) its something to so with the gaining of 21hp, 2) the loot being fired out the window (hambone's loot that is) or 3) absolutely nothing with evens of last night.
I was going to say something here like "Just tell me those things aren't related", when I realized that the only thing they had in common for sure was the time of night when they occured.quagmire wrote:12:30 AM: The sleepy castle does not hear a series of "chunk!"s shooting out into the landscape. SatricialBob has gained 21 HP, as has Hambone. Both Hambone and SatricialBob are at 521 HP.
Does this look like a case of "You can't fire me, I quit." to anybody else? He starts doing tons of FoSes, then he realizes that he's doing too many, so he says "I'm doing too many" as if that somehow makes it better.Enforcer wrote:FOS: EnforcerFor FOSing so many people. I mean, Jeez, what's with me?
I can't stress this enough. This game is based on Final Fantasy IV, which was released in America on the SNES as Final Fantasy III. There was no "Overkill" signal in FFIV, there also weren't a whole lotn of other things that showed up later. If it isn't in IV, just get it out of your head right now.Rosebud wrote:It appears (Based on the deathscene last night) that mafia attacks take off 500 hp. I think we'd know if there were overkill.
Why?Quagmire wrote:Also,The day is going to be deadlined. Deadline for this day is going to be Tuesday, at 9:00 PM Central Time.
Rosebud wrote:I think we'd know if there were overkill.
So you have no clue about the source material, but you have opinions about how it will affect the game. It's hard to tell if this is intentional misdirection or just motormouthed stupidity.Rosebud wrote:Solid, as I said before, I have basically no knowledge of the theme, and I'd rather not go gamehunting for the sake of one mafia game. I did skim one of the walkthroughs on GameFAQs, so I'm slightly less clueless.
This fits in very nicely with my theory that you are, in fact, a retard.Enforcer wrote:Honestly, why the heck would I, with no attention on me, stand up and throw FOS's around if I was mafia. It would be the most retarded mafia play ever, especially on Day One with cops around.
Yes, everybody. I'm a thickheaded moron with chronic tunnel vision. That's why I've changed direction mid-post when an possibility seemed more likely based on my most recent thoughts. That's also why my suspicions have changed on average of once per page during this game.Jericho wrote:Enforcer mightve acted arrogant, but solid's a tool. Solid is one of those thick-headed morons who are convinced that in order to play mafia well you have to form an opinion and then develop a case of chronic tunnel vision and never ever change your mind no matter what anyone says. He also is the Greatest Mafia Player of All Time because he has everything figured out and has "moved me up his scum list", as if anyone cares. Whatever.![]()
Are you mith?
The assumption I used in interpreting this was that nobody would be foolish enough to believe that a particular strategy was best and not try to use it himself. Therefore, saying that I thought this was the best strategy implied that I was using it. I now understand that this was in reference to Jericho's playing, and not my own, and I am ready to address that now.Jericho wrote:Enforcer mightve acted arrogant, but solid's a tool. Solid is one of those thick-headed morons who are convinced that in order to play mafia well you have to form an opinion and then develop a case of chronic tunnel vision and never ever change your mind no matter what anyone says.
The original reason for my vote was that it seemed too obvious to go after Enforcer and that meant that a mafia member might use that as an opportunity to blend.I wrote:Unvote: Enforcer, Vote: Jericho for engaging in the all too easy practice of Enforcer bashing.
Rhino wrote:So do I - I'm going to Vote: Enforcer, for acting like he's the sole arbiter of when we're allowed to bandwagon.
Jericho had voted Enforcer for the same reason that Rhino had voted for him, without adding anything of his own, so it seemed logical at the time.Jericho wrote:wow i didnt know you were in charge cos your telling evreyone when to vote in this gmae. unvote, vote enforcer
I assume that this was in response to this post, in which my conclusion was essentially that I had no conclusion, only some new questions. The reason that my vote still stands is that, rather than defend his vote in some way, he immediately changed on the basis that I was right(About what I don't know).Jericho wrote:The more I hear from enforcer the more I think he's not scum, just arrogant. But solid's right, he is still very suspicious looking because of Rhinos death. unvote enforcer and FoS: enforcer
Jericho wrote:I wasn't "after" you, as you said before,
Funny, I just checked the entire posting record for this alias and couldn't find the word "after" in it anywhere.Jericho wrote:throughout all of the quotes I've used above, [solid074] implies and outright says that I've been "after him".
No, it's not weird, considering that, until this post...Jericho wrote:Isn't that a bit weird, considering I haven't voted for him or even FoS'd him until now? Makes me wonder what he's got to hide.
...I did not even imply that Jericho had said anything relating to suspicions of myself. The fact that no vote or FoS was present in the above post is immaterial, as the only logical interpretation is a direct attack on my own playing. Makes me wonder what he's got to hide.Jericho wrote:Enforcer mightve acted arrogant, but solid's a tool. Solid is one of those thick-headed morons who are convinced that in order to play mafia well you have to form an opinion and then develop a case of chronic tunnel vision and never ever change your mind no matter what anyone says. He also is the Greatest Mafia Player of All Time because he has everything figured out and has "moved me up his scum list", as if anyone cares. Whatever.
Are you mith?
solid074 wrote:This fits in very nicely with my theory that you are, in fact, a retard.Enforcer wrote:Honestly, why the heck would I, with no attention on me, stand up and throw FOS's around if I was mafia. It would be the most retarded mafia play ever, especially on Day One with cops around.
Actually one of the things that makes me ludicrously suspicious of Enforcer is Rhino's death, though indirectly. It would make sense that an anti-town would do it to frame Enforcer(Good use of a day kill actually) but the evidence swings against that. Rhino was an investigative role. Which means that last night he found out about something. Then he quietly put his vote on enforcer with no explanation and left it sitting there. Very often an investigator does that because he got lucky and found scum, but doesn't want to reveal himself if he doesn't have to. Now that he's dead and we know it makes it seem very logical that he would be scum, though it doesn't explain the motive behind the death.
So what else could this mean? I like to play my own devil's advocate. It could mean that the mafia is trying to disassociate from Enforcer, not likely this early in the game, unless they think his stupidity is that much of a liability. Perhaps he belongs to a seperate evil group. That would fit in with the mafia trying to frame him and an investigation finding him evil. Which brings another possibility to mind. Enforcer could be a good role that would appear bad based on his abilities. We don't know how much Rhino knew about the game. Maybe he got a result like "Enforcer can steal" and figured that a thief had to be evil, when in fact he was Locke, who is a good guy.
So yeah, the evidence can be interpretted for Enforcer.
By the way, I wasn't "Testing" anyone. I'm being this abusive because you really are that stupid.
Unvote: Enforcer, Vote: Jericho for engaging in the all too easy practice of Enforcer bashing.
Jericho wrote:OK, I'm using msword to compose my posts from now on so you guys will quit complaining about my spelling and typing. Sorry for that.![]()
The more I hear from enforcer the more I think he's not scum, just arrogant. But solid's right, he is still very suspicious looking because of Rhinos death. unvote enforcer and FoS: enforcer
solid074 wrote:Of all the reactions I thought to get out of Jericho this one was not what I expected.
I expected him to complain that first day votes are rarely better than random, or to defend his vote for Enforcer as being somehow logical. The first I couldn't have refuted(Though it wouldn't have done a whole lot for making him look innocent). The second, who knows what would have happened. But for some reason he takes a third approach that I didn't expect at all.
Instead he retracts his vote, but leaves an FoS. As if to say "Gee, he's got a point, this does look suspicious, I'd better back off. I'll leave an FoS to make it look like I'm still following my own line of reasoning though.". Which of course moves him higher up my scum list for trying to do things thatlooknon-scummy rather than things thatarenon-scummy.
To which I got this response...solid074 wrote:Did I mention that Jericho apparently missed the ramifications of the "Devil's advocate" part of my post?
My point was that ultimately, I couldn't really interpret the data satisfactorily, and Occcam's razor was no help, so I was left to wonder what the motives were behind Rhino's vote and the cause of his subsequent death.
So here's my argument restated with a little extra perspective. I gave a two paragraph discussion of Rhino's death, as is my wont. midway through I decided to play devil's advocate, changed my mind(as evidenced by my admittance: "So yeah, the evidence can be interpretted for Enforcer."). To all of this Jericho replied that he agreed. For starters there was nothing to agree with. At most, my argument was ambivalent. And somebody who did not wish to misrepresent me would have noticed that. On top of that(and this is hindsight) he agreed with an argument that turned out to be against an innocent(Not quite as powerful an allegation, I know). I even called him on this at the time, adding in how he didn't defend his vote or say "it was only random", which was a rather poorly formed argument. I still stand behind the logic, but understand why it was misinterpretted. Never mind. The next thing that happened was that Jericho called me "A tool" and "One of those thick-headed morons", implied that I thought I was "The Greatest Mafia Player of All Time" and then said that nobody cares what I think even though I represented one tenth of the towns voting power at the time. Basically it was an inflammatory post that I believe was composed specifically to make me angry, and I have further evidence to this based on similar tactics taken with others.Jericho wrote:Enforcer mightve acted arrogant, but solid's a tool. Solid is one of those thick-headed morons who are convinced that in order to play mafia well you have to form an opinion and then develop a case of chronic tunnel vision and never ever change your mind no matter what anyone says. He also is the Greatest Mafia Player of All Time because he has everything figured out and has "moved me up his scum list", as if anyone cares. Whatever.![]()
Are you mith?
This seemed to be a more general attempt to make "players" angry. Perhaps it was directed at Misha, who responded the most to it.Jericho wrote:cos bandwagonings how you get infromation o nthe first day. no one looks suspicius the first day so you bandwagon someone to see how pepole vote and then maybe someone looks suspicius from that. fos misha
Basically, I think Jericho has been playing the town from day one, and I'm sorry I helped him so much by wasting so much time.Jericho wrote:wow i didnt know you were in charge cos your telling evreyone when to vote in this gmae. unvote, vote enforcerEnforcer wrote:FOS: Jericho because it was, in fact, too early to bandwagon. Bandwagons are based usually on suspicious behavior, but yours was groundless. Fearing serpents doesn't count
I reccomend a bandwagon on one of these three.