Mini 147: Warhammer 40,000 - Game Over!


User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #47 (isolation #0) » Sun Jan 02, 2005 8:47 pm

Post by mathcam »

First, sorry for not noticing the game had started.

Second, why is lynching me the safest plan, JD? What are you talking about?

As to the mass role-claims, while not a horrible plan, it does involve its fair share of risks. For one, if
no one
's claim appears shady, then all we've done is exposed exactly where all our powerful pro-town roles are to the mafia, which is obviously bad. Second, it's also possible that some of the shadier claims turn out to be pro-town, in which case we've not only revealed our power-roles, we've also given the scum a couple of free lynches.

On the other hand, if there are, say, exactly 12 roles that the 12 of us could be, then it's pretty safe to say that claiming names (not abilities) would be an awesome play. If there's a large number, this benefit is diminished. Maybe someone with a bit more knowledge about the theme could say something on this matter.

Vote: JDTay
for pretending his vote is anything but random or crap.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #51 (isolation #1) » Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:38 pm

Post by mathcam »

But if, as Aelyn and kleimar suggest, that there's plenty enough character to go around, then there's little point in doing that. Yes, we
might
catch scum in a lie, but in the process we may reveal all our powerful roles (certain names certainly go with certain roles, at least heuristically).

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #56 (isolation #2) » Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:46 pm

Post by mathcam »

My point was just that you can often tell what the role is just by the character name, or at least form a decent opinion, so depending on the game of course, name-claiming might be just as bad as role-claiming.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #69 (isolation #3) » Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:38 am

Post by mathcam »

JDTay wrote:I have no idea what's going on, so I'll go with the safest plan.

vote mathcam
JDTay wrote:I'm still waiting to hear from mathcam, it's part of my perfectly safe strategy.
JDTay wrote:I've just been doing random day one stuff like you guys. Why do I get singled out?
So is voting for me a plan, or is it random?

I'm happy with my vote.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #89 (isolation #4) » Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:04 pm

Post by mathcam »

Hm, 2 townies, a cop, and a vig dead. Not good. It's been a while...I need a re-read.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #100 (isolation #5) » Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:10 pm

Post by mathcam »

I wouldn't think so, personally.

And I think an
FOS: kleimar
is in order for that immediate vote on inHim today. It's scummy for someone to defend someone who turns out to be scum, but to attack someone who turns out to be innocent isn't overtly scummy...scum and town are both equally likely to do this. But I'm not FOSing him for disagreeing with me, but for so quickly trying to get votes started today, especially since we're in such a near-lynch-or-lose situation.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #104 (isolation #6) » Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:49 am

Post by mathcam »

I would say it's becoming standard (though certainly not a rule) to indicate a double-kill of one person in the death scene, which would indicate whether or not the SK and mafia both targeted the same person.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #105 (isolation #7) » Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:27 pm

Post by mathcam »

Dum dum de dum.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #110 (isolation #8) » Thu Jan 27, 2005 5:27 am

Post by mathcam »

Aelyn, the last half of your post reads "There hasn't been much said recently, so I'm going to wait until people say something before I comment." That's pretty selfish, isn't it?

Vote: Kleimar
just to get things stirring.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #112 (isolation #9) » Thu Jan 27, 2005 10:17 am

Post by mathcam »

Fair enough. "Selfish" was probably a little harsh.
Aelyn wrote:Secondly, Vote: Mathcam. With one vote already on Kleimer and none on anyone else yet, plus an FOS which could become a vote.
Well, that's
my
FOS, so I doubt it'll materialize into another kleimar vote. And with 8 alive, it's 5 to lynch, so it's not like I'm handing scum an easy target. I'm just trying to get the game moving.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #114 (isolation #10) » Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:12 pm

Post by mathcam »

Ah, okay. It was almost a week ago, and not on this page, though, so I don't feel too bad about not remembering it.

And I'm by no means critizing you for not jumping on the bandwagon...nothing wrong with playing conservatively.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #117 (isolation #11) » Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:51 am

Post by mathcam »

Ok, well there are now a bunch of people that haven't posted in quite some time. Anyone not posting today is going to become a target for me. Just a warning.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #121 (isolation #12) » Sun Jan 30, 2005 11:19 am

Post by mathcam »

Vote: The_Machine
for his one post in 3 weeks.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #124 (isolation #13) » Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:21 am

Post by mathcam »

I'm not sure why, but I seem to find just about everything kleimar posts scummy. I suppose with 8 alive (and thus 5 to lynch), a third lurker bandwagon vote is nothing too surprising...I don't know what it is. Hopefully, the Machine will get back to us soon.

cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #132 (isolation #14) » Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:59 pm

Post by mathcam »

Well, that's enough people with mild suspicions on kleimar for me. Plus, Machine posted, so...

Unvote: Machine, Vote: Kleimar


When's the deadline?

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #144 (isolation #15) » Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:33 am

Post by mathcam »

Unvote: kleimar


Interesting thought on Aelyn. I'll wait until Aelyn confirms coincidence/non-coincidence before analyzing.

I'm tempted to vote for the machine.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #155 (isolation #16) » Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:32 am

Post by mathcam »

MD? You mean MO?

I wonder if no lynch isn't our best option. If there's one group of three (which there's not), it's probably our best idea just by numbers. If there's two groups left, there's a decent chance that one of them will kill one of the others off. At this point, I'm quite happy to trade a townie for a scum, especially if the scum we get is an SK, saving us an extra kill each night.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #158 (isolation #17) » Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:37 am

Post by mathcam »

Yeah, and this is the whole basis for the motivation for no lynch...that with two groups randomly picking people to kill, there's a good chance that one of them will hit the other.

I didn't check your numbers, but if you think no lynch
might
be best with one group of 3 scum left, then you should definitely think it's best with a group of 2 and a group of 1 acting separately (I think).

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #165 (isolation #18) » Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:23 pm

Post by mathcam »

And it's not like the mafia-in-collusion theory really holds any water...what have they gained by doing this stunt if they're mafia? I think coincidence is by far the best explanation.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #169 (isolation #19) » Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:59 am

Post by mathcam »

The thing that bothers me is how screwed we far if we lynch a townie today. Then we're probably looking at 3 out of 7 players remaining being scum, going into night, where they get to do their killing.

On the other hand, I feel like we
should
have enough information to make an intelligent lynch by now, but I don't see who. I think I need to seriously go through the thread again.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #175 (isolation #20) » Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:15 pm

Post by mathcam »

Aelyn's numbers were somewhat self-admittedly crap. They were estimates, and obviously inaccurate ones. I don't mean because of Aelyn's inability to do math, which I'm sure is fine, it's because no one can know the probabilities without knowing the rest of the roles left in the game. So my only comments that used that numbers were in terms of his beliefs..."If he believed those numbers, then blah blah blah..."

And yes, the hope is that the scum kill each other. There
were
two kills night one, and unless I'm misremembering (I don't really know anything about warhammer either), I feel like people have identified the two night-killers, so that Pooky (the vig) couldn't be the explanation for the extra kill. If that's the case, isn't it clear that there's two killing groups? What's the other explanation?

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #185 (isolation #21) » Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:36 am

Post by mathcam »

We probably have a doc left, warp, so your "best tomorrow" numbers would probably actually include a doc-protect.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #188 (isolation #22) » Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:52 pm

Post by mathcam »

Yeah, I was only thinking about cases C and D at that time, in which case scum killing scum isn't an option.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #193 (isolation #23) » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:51 pm

Post by mathcam »

And more importantly, known to the role-blocker. We should definitely investigate this further.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #194 (isolation #24) » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:58 pm

Post by mathcam »

Hey, I just noticed that in Dr. Seuss mafia, there's a discussion about Pooky being a vigilante, and he claims to have been a vig and made kills nights 1 and 2. So it's not infeasible that our mystery kill night one was from Pooky the vigilante.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #199 (isolation #25) » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:02 pm

Post by mathcam »

I agree with Max (can I call you Max? Mumum?). That's awfully *convient* for the scum that this supposed role-blocker can't implicate them in fashion. Hm.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #208 (isolation #26) » Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:39 am

Post by mathcam »

Alright, I really need to spend some time figuring out if there's any way kleimar
isn't
full of crap. Warpdragon does a good job of poking holes in kleimar's claim and subsequent posts, and I was mildly suspicious of kleimar
before
any of that happened.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #224 (isolation #27) » Thu Feb 17, 2005 6:46 pm

Post by mathcam »

Okay, I've finally caught up with notes on everything.

First, I think Aelyn did an excellent analysis in post 209, making most of the points that I had amassed in my reread.

Second, kleimar's defense to this was mediocre, but still better than I expected. The only reason I'm not voting him is because we suspect this player to be in the game, and no one has counter-claimed. Plus, I feel like there's enough information out there that we should really be able to work this out.

I would really like to know how likely it is that:
1) The second kill night 1 was made by Pooky. Someone familiar with Warhammer (i.e. Aelyn), please comment on this.
2) How likely is it, from the theme point of view, that Ghazhkull is a mafia along with a couple of other scum.

If they are both likely, I think the best explanation for the situation is that Ghazhkull is in the mafia group and has the extra ability of role-blocking. This would make Ghazhkull both a scum and a role-blocker, would make the whole "How does the Ghazhkull work?" thing make more sense, etc.

Take it away, Aelyn (and anyone else).

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #228 (isolation #28) » Fri Feb 18, 2005 1:10 pm

Post by mathcam »

There are several reasons why Pooky would make a N1 kill but not a N2 kill, not least of which is "because he felt like it." It's also quite possible that he tried, and got role-blocked or had his target doc-protected.

I apologize for my ignorance, but based on my lack of Warhammer knowledge, I'm not sure what the answer to either of my above questions were.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #233 (isolation #29) » Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:41 pm

Post by mathcam »

Aelyn wrote: 2) There's maybe a 5% chance that, if Ghazghkull is in the game, he's in the Mafia. 10% tops, to my mind.
What assumptions are being made here about the make-up of the scum group? Couldn't it be, say, a big bad guy from each of three different factions, united as one to defeat "the good guys"?

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #235 (isolation #30) » Sun Feb 20, 2005 3:10 pm

Post by mathcam »

I know I'm just picking you on here, but if you wouldn't be surprised, then why only 10% tops?

I'm only making this a key issue because this was the most likely explanation for the scenario that kleimar wasn't scum, so I'll need to do some serious thinking if you really think it unlikely.

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #238 (isolation #31) » Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:33 pm

Post by mathcam »

Okay, I'm sold. Just too many things don't quite fit. It's possible that kleimar's telling the truth, but in my mind, it just makes so much more sense if he's scum.

Vote: kleimar


Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #245 (isolation #32) » Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:07 am

Post by mathcam »

The...killer...is....

*slumps over dead*

Cam
User avatar
mathcam
mathcam
Captain Observant
User avatar
User avatar
mathcam
Captain Observant
Captain Observant
Posts: 6116
Joined: November 22, 2002

Post Post #304 (isolation #33) » Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:19 am

Post by mathcam »

I thought it was really fun. And well done, Aelyn. As you can tell from my protects, you were one of my leading candidates for innocents.

Cam

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”