second
[insert]whitty remark about voting [/insert]
L-3 isn't all that bad, had his vote put her at L-1 so quick I could see your point, and even then had someone hammered right after we could have a list of suspects to go from, so right now it seems like you are trying to beStarbuck wrote:Unvote: kikuchiyo
I'm not comfortable with her having 4 votes already.
Vote: J.R.
I'm not comfortable with you seeing that and putting her at L-3.
I think at all is a bit of a stretch. He has posted 7 times now (not counting the double post). The attention is on you because you are calling it on yourself.Starbuck wrote:Sibelius is the guy who hasn't posted at all and who was prodded in the same post that I was by Kdub.
Or do you not check the player list, Kiku?
Bv310 why do you believe Rumblebuffin is "the most obscure Giant in Narnia"?bv310 wrote:Are you really trying to claim the most obscure Giant in Narnia as your role? (Yes, I looked it up)Starbuck wrote:Rumblebuffin
kikuchiyo wrote:In case you missed this.kikuchiyo wrote:Wolf: So basically, anyone getting lynched can search the wiki for a name and you will believe them?
In case you missed that.wolframnhart wrote:@dybeckbut the reason I believe the role isn't because of the vanilla claim (did she claim vanilla or was it just the name?) but it was because of the name and the characters part in the story.
I am going to be honest I am not sure,
True he has voted Starbuck so that must be his "top suspect" but he still hasn't given a real case against her in his own words, he is just ridding off dybeck.wolframnhart wrote:I believe Starbucks' claim. Again I am not going to try and out guess the mod on which characters he put in the game, but her role makes sense to me.Bv310 is definitely someone of interest to me though due to his past few posts ,and I would rather the day not end until he at least tries to make a case against either PZ or Starbuck if those are still his top two suspects, and in his own words not a rehash.
The bolded part. You say you trust dybeck, and still have yet to post a case against your top two suspects. You have voted Starbuck true, but i want a case against her in your own words.wolframnhart wrote:@RBT
Do you not see anything scummy about not voting someone that you have called scummy when it would have been a hammer, but then voting them when you can be L-1 and just say you trust another player? Bv310 still hasn't even done this for me:
True he has voted Starbuck so that must be his "top suspect" but he still hasn't given a real case against her in his own words, he is just ridding off dybeck.wolframnhart wrote:I believe Starbucks' claim. Again I am not going to try and out guess the mod on which characters he put in the game, but her role makes sense to me.Bv310 is definitely someone of interest to me though due to his past few posts ,and I would rather the day not end until he at least tries to make a case against either PZ or Starbuck if those are still his top two suspects, and in his own words not a rehash.
Ok let me see if I have this right, because this post just stinks of scum to me.manho wrote:@wolf, i don't see the reason behind starbuck's wagon strong enought, and think that was a scum-pushed wagon, so my initial suspicious go to dybeck. but then find that the starbuck lynch is very informative, and starbuck is still neutral in my scum list, so decide to lynch her. i didn't say we need starbuck lynch quickly, and i'm still waiting for a case from her before her lynch.
if the new case seems better then the old one, who cares if it is three days away? Stop trying to convince people to vote you because of time restraints.manho wrote:so everyone is starting new cases when deadline is just 3 days away? lynching the claimed vanilla townie is almost a standard procedure
there is no way we can do the following things: settling into another wagon, getting a claim from the lynchee, unvoting after the lynchee claim a powerrole, getting to another wagon and repeating the same procedure, and finally lynching someone, in 3 days.
so please get back to starbuck's lynch.
He excuses himself for being lazy, then admits his vote against me was purely lurker, and then his Evil vote was just OMGUSNarnian wrote:I have to admit my play has been a bit lazy today. I ended up with a lurker vote and then an OMGUS vote because there was a wagon there. Day 2 should have more evidence out there than that.
Alot of RL stuff going on, but Ill certainly look more closely to see if I can find better conculusions.
As kiku already said, rolecops get roles, not names. The fact that RBT tries to confirm PZ also means two things in my head, A) Buddying attempt or B)PZ possible partner with RBT, though that would mean RBT hoping she doesn't get lynched or else PZ would be in trouble afterwards.RBT wrote:<snip>2) PZ is indeed Lucy
3) I know that because I'm a rolecop.<snip>