Mini 1024 - Pop Mafia - Game Ovah

Tazaro · Post Post #7 (isolation #0) » Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:39 am

/confirm

Tazaro · Post Post #10 (isolation #1) » Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:32 am

We need 4 more people to give their confirmations.

Tazaro · Post Post #12 (isolation #2) » Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:24 am

I think it's more likely there's only two scum, but four people are in the dark right now.

Tazaro · Post Post #17 (isolation #3) » Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:12 pm

I'm v/la on Tuesday and/or Wednesday/Thursday. Probably not so much on Thursday, and maybe I'll be fine Wed afternoon sometime

Tazaro · Post Post #18 (isolation #4) » Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:11 am

Confirm, people!

Tazaro · Post Post #22 (isolation #5) » Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:32 pm

I'll be a calm cool and collected diva this time around... except for when I mud wrestle you divas.

Tazaro · Post Post #28 (isolation #6) » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:41 am

Faraday wrote:
Tazaro wrote:I think it's more likely there's only two scum, but four people are in the dark right now.
Also what are you basing this on? Where did you pull the number 2 from?

Whenever I knew what the number of mafia in a 12-people games was, there were 2 mafia members. I have not played a lot of games, though.

Tazaro · Post Post #30 (isolation #7) » Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:35 am

@MOD: based on what I've seen from iiiiiiq, he may have issues related to being busy, can the day start now that all but one have confirmed?

Tazaro · Post Post #54 (isolation #8) » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:40 am

Taz wrote: Whenever I knew what the number of mafia in a 12-people games was, there were 2 mafia members. I have not played a lot of games, though.

Can you show me a 12 player game you played in w/ a 2 scum?[/quote]
One word: ongoing

I just got back from what I did today. I need to read this stuff in this thread.

Tazaro · Post Post #56 (isolation #9) » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:43 am

Read between the lines.

Tazaro · Post Post #57 (isolation #10) » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:44 am

I am in like six games, so I have to come back after I've written some stuff in them.

Tazaro · Post Post #59 (isolation #11) » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:59 am

VOTE: TheLonging

For post 50.

Tazaro · Post Post #61 (isolation #12) » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:08 am

For accusing Switz of bandwagoning in your post 50 when he bona fidely justified his vote.

Tazaro · Post Post #63 (isolation #13) » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:14 am

There was nothing scummy about my comment to Gandalf about the number of mafia; it is not a tell.

Tazaro · Post Post #69 (isolation #14) » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:35 pm

Iecerint wrote:@ Taz -- What did you mean by "four people are in the dark"?

At that point, four people had not confirmed; they were waiting in the shadows (i.e., waiting in the wings).

Tazaro · Post Post #76 (isolation #15) » Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:30 am

TheLonging wrote:Oh boy, THIS is gonna be a fun game

I don't see it going anywhere right now.

Tazaro · Post Post #83 (isolation #16) » Thu Aug 19, 2010 6:16 am

Captain Meister needs to respond to Switz's #82. Switz makes a good point.

Tazaro · Post Post #94 (isolation #17) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:48 am

gandalf5166 wrote:Yeah, CM reeks of scum. It would be one thing to say, "I agree with Iece", but saying that, and then later acting like you had a different case is really scummy.

Are you hesistant to vote for him?

Tazaro · Post Post #108 (isolation #18) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:00 am

The Captain Meister wagon that people have hastily got on to: can you say day one mislynch?

Tazaro · Post Post #109 (isolation #19) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:02 am

animorpherv1 wrote:What the hell did I do this time? I've never played with you before Captain.

Somehow, he knows about you o_O.

Tazaro · Post Post #111 (isolation #20) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:46 am

That's something we agree on; Captain is not the obv scum that some of the others' seem to be portraying him as.

Tazaro · Post Post #113 (isolation #21) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:07 am

His posts don't seem scummy and he has explained himself.

Tazaro · Post Post #115 (isolation #22) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:12 am

Your attack on me is not townish.

Tazaro · Post Post #116 (isolation #23) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:15 am

TheLonging wrote:
vote: taz

I wanted to vote him first for exactly those reasons but oh well.

Those reasons are not adequate.

Tazaro · Post Post #117 (isolation #24) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:17 am

Townish voting and attacking incorporate adequate reasons.

Tazaro · Post Post #120 (isolation #25) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:44 am

That wasn't a Random vote that TL did. It was a vote with reasons, apparently the same as jason's. They were not silly reasons.

Tazaro · Post Post #121 (isolation #26) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:46 am

The above post ^ was in response to Icerint.

Tazaro · Post Post #123 (isolation #27) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:13 pm

What's stupid?

Tazaro · Post Post #124 (isolation #28) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:14 pm

about what I've said?

Tazaro · Post Post #133 (isolation #29) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:49 pm

@TL: Well, you were agreeing with jason's reasons. Whosever ideas they were, they were certainly not adequate.

Tazaro · Post Post #138 (isolation #30) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:29 pm

it's not like I just decided to blurt out speculation stuff; I was thinking that I was correcting Gandalf's assumption that there would be 3 scum; my comment was based on what I thought the number would be in response the Gandalf's own assumption.

Tazaro · Post Post #139 (isolation #31) » Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:30 pm

It was natural to the conversation with Gandalf; I wasn't blurting forced speculation into the picture.

Tazaro · Post Post #142 (isolation #32) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 4:17 am

TheLonging wrote:
Tazaro wrote:@TL: Well, you were agreeing with jason's reasons. Whosever ideas they were, they were certainly not adequate.
did jason vote for you first or second? I voted you because of shitty setup speculation, not because of Jason's

you said you wanted to vote for me for "those reasons." who proposed those reasons before you did? Jason, right? He voted for me because of setup speculation, so you agreed with jason, which was what I was saying.

Tazaro · Post Post #143 (isolation #33) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 4:18 am

Double Post:
This is where you wanted to vote for me for "those reasons.":

TheLonging wrote:
vote: taz

I wanted to vote him first for exactly those reasons but oh well.

And I don't know who I am. Looked her up though, she's a decent star.

Tazaro · Post Post #145 (isolation #34) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:36 am

Well, I'm a fair motherf*****

Unvote

FoS: TheLonging

FoS: Faraday

FoS: jason

Wouldn't know who to vote for if I have to choose between all of you, though.

Tazaro · Post Post #147 (isolation #35) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:00 am

It's stupid to vote for that. What's wrong with my understanding that two scum in a twelve player theme game seems balanced to me coupled with my experience with two scum in a twelve player game?.

Tazaro · Post Post #149 (isolation #36) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:13 am

But, I DON'T know. It's really nothing to fuss about.

Tazaro · Post Post #151 (isolation #37) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:40 am

The problem with linking is: ongoing.

Tazaro · Post Post #152 (isolation #38) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:42 am

So lesson I've learned today: do not say stuff that is only backed up by ongoing game content that cannot be linked to or expressed specifically.

Tazaro · Post Post #154 (isolation #39) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:55 am

gandalf5166 wrote:If they're ongoing, how do you know that there are two scum?

It's not "they're," if I implied plurality, I was wrong; and there is really only one explanation for how I know. If you catch my drift.

Tazaro · Post Post #155 (isolation #40) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:56 am

Tazaro wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:If they're ongoing, how do you know that there are two scum?
It's not "they're," if I implied plurality, I was wrong; and there is really only one explanation for how I know. If you catch my drift.

I'm going to leave it at that.

Tazaro · Post Post #156 (isolation #41) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:58 am

By the way,

FoS: people who have not posted much

Tazaro · Post Post #161 (isolation #42) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:10 am

Faraday wrote:
Tazaro wrote:It's stupid to vote for that. What's wrong with my understanding that two scum in a twelve player theme game seems balanced to me coupled with my experience with two scum in a twelve player game?.
it may imply some sort of inside knowledge, If you'd assumed 3 scum I'd have not thought anything of it as that's the norm and pretty much what always happens, the fact you don't make me question why you're thinking there's 2. so it's not that there's set-up speculation but the nature of it. also stop the ongoing games references plz, it's not very subtle. that said...

I have not seen the end of any but one game. So I do not have three scum experience like you people do.

Tazaro · Post Post #163 (isolation #43) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:17 am

The unvote was because I do not want to treat TheLonging different than the other people he pointed out. The FoS of three people was my way of saying that I think there is fishy business going on for at least one of the people who got on my case for that whole speculation deal, and the FoS of the less actives is my way of expressing "POST moar, People!" to them.

Tazaro · Post Post #165 (isolation #44) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:28 am

Korashk is his name. He is an inactive.
I am not going to play eenie meenie moe with my "speculation-spastic" suspects (thanks for unvoting, Faraday), who are all equal in my eyes, for the purpose of voting. I want to see more info as the games goes on so that I can pick one distinctly for voting.

Tazaro · Post Post #171 (isolation #45) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:28 pm

animorpherv1 wrote: Taz is town, IMO.

Willing to present reasons for this opinion perhaps?

Tazaro · Post Post #174 (isolation #46) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:51 pm

Switz's tunneling of Captain Meister makes him suspicious to me.

Tazaro · Post Post #175 (isolation #47) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:01 pm

animorpherv1 wrote:
Tazaro wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote: Taz is town, IMO.
Willing to present reasons for this opinion perhaps?
I agree with the LOL moment.

IMO, I think you are being helpful, without looking being so helpful you are scummy. If that makes any sense.

Yah, I think I played positively, I just don't have the oomph that my scum play can have at times.

Tazaro · Post Post #176 (isolation #48) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:02 pm

EBWOP: wrong tense: I think I've been playing positively.

Tazaro · Post Post #178 (isolation #49) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 4:22 pm

ZONEACE wrote:
unvote POLICY VOTE:TAZ

You have an unhelpful playstyle and add useless posts to the game that make reading a pain in the ass. SCUM HUNT OR SHUT UP.

You've seen my scum play. Give me a chance; I am not going to act like you've seen me play before. I am going to be more sturdy and less jumpy.

Tazaro · Post Post #180 (isolation #50) » Sat Aug 21, 2010 4:35 pm

What about anime's comment that I was helpful?

Tazaro · Post Post #181 (isolation #51) » Sun Aug 22, 2010 2:00 am

animorpherv1 wrote:EBWOP:

Taz is town, IMO.

Am I the only one who's that clearly town in your mind?

Tazaro · Post Post #182 (isolation #52) » Sun Aug 22, 2010 2:02 am

EBWOP: THAT should be emphatic. Like if you're fat but never realized it until you looked in a mirror for the first time: I'm THAT fat!

Tazaro · Post Post #185 (isolation #53) » Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:44 am

Captain Meister wrote:Errr, I meant ZONE-ie. Maybe if you were more active you'd know where I stand?

You don't have to put the -ie. We know you chose the wrong person's name.

Tazaro · Post Post #186 (isolation #54) » Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:51 am

And damnit Zoneace, policy lynching me for something that's more apparent in ongoing game content than in this game where I'M PLAYING DIFFERENTLY is quite convenient for you to vote someone and then lurk apparently

VOTE: ZONEACE

Tazaro · Post Post #188 (isolation #55) » Sun Aug 22, 2010 4:13 am

Tazaro wrote:
ZONEACE wrote:
unvote POLICY VOTE:TAZ

You have an unhelpful playstyle and add useless posts to the game that make reading a pain in the ass. SCUM HUNT OR SHUT UP.
You've seen my scum play. Give me a chance; I am not going to act like you've seen me play before. I am going to be more sturdy and less jumpy.

By the way, Zoneace, I will see you when Reboot mafia starts

Tazaro · Post Post #191 (isolation #56) » Sun Aug 22, 2010 7:27 am

TheLonging wrote:My brain is fried

By something I said?

Tazaro · Post Post #205 (isolation #57) » Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:32 pm

the feelin of tl is unfalsifiable because it's not based on stuff he can share with us, therefore the feeling is moot to us.

Tazaro · Post Post #214 (isolation #58) » Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:03 am

Faraday wrote:
Iecerint wrote:@ Faraday -- The point of a nationality claim is that we can rule out the value of "ZA claimed unknown clearly he is scum"-type thinking depending upon what people claim.
Well the problem with this is we're not Zoneace and we don't actually know who he's familiar with. What happens if he turns out to be someone reasonably famous that he just doesn't know? Is he lying? I mean I dunno if a nationality claim helps narrow that down.

I agree with Faraday; I don't see nationality as being that much of a helpful thing in determining whether people's claims are genuine.

Tazaro · Post Post #225 (isolation #59) » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:22 am

Switz wrote:Zoneace, on the other hand, is not coming off town. This post is the kicker:

ZONEACE wrote:
unvote POLICY VOTE:TAZ

You have an unhelpful playstyle and add useless posts to the game that make reading a pain in the ass. SCUM HUNT OR SHUT UP.

Also, meister, posts like that don't help the problem. instead of complaining about inactivity, why don't you do some player analysis, share your thoughts on different players, tell us who you think is scum. There are 7 pages, everyone's posted at least a few times, I'm sure you should be able to come up with reads on a few of us.

Also, whoever said me not having heard of my pop star because the sample scum pm in the OP says people didn't know who Cheryl Cole was, you're wrong. The sample PM say she was snubbed by North American countries. It makes no mention of being unknown, but being unwanted. (and I agree, no one really wants Cheryl Cole over here).

If Zoneace is lynched, I think his flipping town will indicate that Switz is opportunistic scum.

Tazaro · Post Post #226 (isolation #60) » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:23 am

Double post: Zoneace's flipping scum will indicate that Switz is town. I don't think scum would do that ^ kind of bussing when Zoneace is not having a terrible amount of votes now.

Tazaro · Post Post #242 (isolation #61) » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:13 am

Guys, I was today and more tonight. Don't have time to read, got to run.

Tazaro · Post Post #243 (isolation #62) » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:13 am

EBWOP: I was busy today.

Tazaro · Post Post #249 (isolation #63) » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:44 am

jasonT1981 wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:Hi Nopoint! You better not kill me N1 again. And......... ZONEACE's blatant OMGUS does not go unnoticed by me.
VOTE: ZONEACE
And now I find myself being a hypocrite. I've always hated the term OMGUS.

nopointinactingup wrote:What sup Gandalf, have you got the SK role of your dream today? Needless to say, you too had better not kill me N1 again =). It's late right now so I'd probably go to bed before doing any reading. Gimme tomorrow for a catch up post.
Something about this exchange irks me... i don't like it.

Come on! Elucidate on your dislike.

Tazaro · Post Post #264 (isolation #64) » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:13 pm

Captain Meister wrote:I also think smilies are very fishy when it comes to mafia.
I could support a gandalf lynch today. Maybe.

This is kidding, right?

Tazaro · Post Post #267 (isolation #65) » Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:34 pm

The smiley talk is fail.

Tazaro · Post Post #271 (isolation #66) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:08 am

Captain Meister wrote:The smilies have nothing to do with my case. It's half gut, half interactions so it's a very tentative read right now but it hasn't been looking good for him. It's also not enough to stray, cause like I said it's something for later.

I'm not sure what you are exactly referring to with "it hasn't been looking good for him."

Tazaro · Post Post #280 (isolation #67) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:03 am

He has no case on Gandalf. What horrendous game play.

Vote: Captain Meister

Tazaro · Post Post #283 (isolation #68) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:37 am

TheLonging wrote:e_e is mine

Tazaro · Post Post #284 (isolation #69) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:41 am

Faraday wrote:captain continues to look town

He plays like newbscum though. Not like I'm the one that should be saying this...

Tazaro · Post Post #286 (isolation #70) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:46 am

You keep evading the presentation of points agains Gandalf >:|

Tazaro · Post Post #287 (isolation #71) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:51 am

Captain Meister wrote:Faradie: I MISS U ALREADY <3 COME BACK TO ME!

Why? Does Faraday not ask you to present points against Gandalf

Tazaro · Post Post #288 (isolation #72) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:52 am

Faraday needs to ask Captain Meister to present Gandalf points. CM should have no buddying comfort.

Tazaro · Post Post #304 (isolation #73) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:20 pm

Captain Meister wrote:Please, tell me what possible benefit there is for providing a gandalf case? Anybody.

Like the benefit of us seeing that your statement that you would support a Gandalf lynch isn't just blowing smoke. If you can't support that statement, then it's detriment to you and goodbye to you if we're closing in on you for the kill.

Tazaro · Post Post #305 (isolation #74) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:22 pm

Or a benefit like the benefit of you actually being a person in this game that does thinking before jumping on people who you want to lambaste

Tazaro · Post Post #306 (isolation #75) » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:22 pm

Or a benefit like the benefit of you actually being a person in this game that does thinking before jumping on people who you want to lambaste

Tazaro · Post Post #310 (isolation #76) » Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:48 am

Why do I have a nagging feeling that my vote's on a person who's faux scummy due to bad play?

Tazaro · Post Post #312 (isolation #77) » Fri Aug 27, 2010 6:45 am

Does Captain Meister really not understand that he drew fire at gandalf and is expected to defend that drawing of fire?

Tazaro · Post Post #329 (isolation #78) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:26 am

Too bad that Captain Meister has gotten himself into a bad corner. He really can't defend himself against what he said that ruins his credibility.

Tazaro · Post Post #330 (isolation #79) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:31 am

The thing he said that ruins his credibilty was either a matter of not realizing that Gandalf should not be jumped on if there was no case against him, or was a matter of impulse posting the "I also think smilies are very fishy when it comes to mafia. I could support a gandalf lynch today. Maybe" thing.

Tazaro · Post Post #344 (isolation #80) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:39 am

jasonT1981 wrote:TL, sorry what is BWing? I'm a little out of it today and don't know the term lol.

It's BandWagoning. I, myself, prefer it to just be spelled out.
You know what? I'm going to vote for whom I think is the most devious. CM does not seem devious, but is very likely more of a VI than I.
Who's devious from the way they've been playing and participating?
Switz

Unvote

Vote: Switz

Tazaro · Post Post #345 (isolation #81) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:42 am

Double post: And

FoS: Zoneace

for the policy lynching stuff.

Tazaro · Post Post #346 (isolation #82) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:02 am

...the PL stuff which you're not doing anymore.

UN-FoS: Zoneace

Tazaro · Post Post #352 (isolation #83) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:52 pm

jasonT1981 wrote:wow... I missed TheLonging' vote. I was sure I was placing him at -1

Not sure if SRS.

Tazaro · Post Post #353 (isolation #84) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:53 pm

TheLonging wrote:tomorrow's lynch should def be taz, no doubt

more lynchings of me...

Tazaro · Post Post #355 (isolation #85) » Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:06 pm

serious

Tazaro · Post Post #364 (isolation #86) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:57 am

This thread in the Coney Island index still has a moon symbol; I thought it was still night

Tazaro · Post Post #366 (isolation #87) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:02 am

Captain Meister wrote:Switz is probscum too, but I wouldn't be opposed to a gandalf lynch.

To use your phrase, why did he have to play so probscummy?

Tazaro · Post Post #373 (isolation #88) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:38 am

Captain Meister wrote:Stop rolefishing, fucktard.

Could this be bussing? Existential thoughts for a better tomorrow.

Vote: Gandalf

Tazaro · Post Post #375 (isolation #89) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:45 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
Captain Meister wrote:Stop rolefishing, fucktard.
Okay, you've already told us you're a power role, you may as well just tell us what your role is.

Doesn't this situation call for unvoting CM? Outed power role...

Tazaro · Post Post #377 (isolation #90) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:50 am

Captain Meister wrote:I don't have much time right now, but we're NOT lynching jason today. Just trust me on this one.

If this is a fake insinuation of having a town power role, you do it at your own peril. Early fakeclaiming fails very frequently.

Tazaro · Post Post #379 (isolation #91) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:44 pm

animorpherv1 wrote:IMO, CM and Tazaro areon to something, but I'm going to wait and see what everyone else says before I vote.

What are we BOTH on to?

Tazaro · Post Post #380 (isolation #92) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:47 pm

Tazaro wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote:IMO, CM and Tazaro areon to something, but I'm going to wait and see what everyone else says before I vote.
What are we BOTH on to?

Answer is obviously Gandalf.

Tazaro · Post Post #385 (isolation #93) » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:30 am

hmm... gandalf exposed as absolute scum?

Tazaro · Post Post #392 (isolation #94) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:51 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
Captain Meister wrote:Stop rolefishing, fucktard.
Okay, you've already told us you're a power role, you may as well just tell us what your role is.

What in the world could make sense about disclosing which power role you are? It gives mafia a judgment call to make regarding whether the power role is worth killing or worth skipping to try to take a shot at a more powerful power role.

Tazaro · Post Post #394 (isolation #95) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:02 am

Eh, I don't very heavily feel a gandalf-scum

UNVOTE

Tazaro · Post Post #396 (isolation #96) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:23 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
Tazaro wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:
Captain Meister wrote:Stop rolefishing, fucktard.
Okay, you've already told us you're a power role, you may as well just tell us what your role is.
What in the world could make sense about disclosing which power role you are? It gives mafia a judgment call to make regarding whether the power role is worth killing or worth skipping to try to take a shot at a more powerful power role.
The only reason mafia would not kill a claimed power role is to start WIFOM, barring a vanillaless game.

Well, Captain Meister, this answer from Gandalf is decent justification for calling for you to claim your role; I see that the mafia's being expected to kill a claimed power role is a good point. Therefore, Gandalf is not going to be closer to the cluthches of a noose via a vote from me.

Tazaro · Post Post #397 (isolation #97) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:28 am

Double post: eh, not "justification" in the sense that you are necessitated to fullclaim because mafia will kill you anyway, it's just that you might as well do that fullclaim, unless you want to tell us that that attempt of indicating a power rule was a gambit you pulled like a rabbit out of your hat, but I don't think you have the skill to fake that.

Tazaro · Post Post #399 (isolation #98) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:25 am

Who knows whether he'll be killed before he gets to tell us something like jason is innocent

Tazaro · Post Post #400 (isolation #99) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:26 am

Tazaro wrote:Who knows whether he'll be killed before he gets to tell us something like jason is innocent

I mean, if CM is nightkilled we would have a confirmed town based on CM's telling us so.

Tazaro · Post Post #402 (isolation #100) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:34 am

Iecerint wrote:Er, right. That's why some form of breadcrumbing is normative. CM just decided not to do it very elegantly (or did it inelegantly by accident, w/e).

What does that have to do with Gandalf being wrong-at-best about what to do with CM, though? O.o

Maybe Gandalf is thinking that jason's being confirmed town, as a result of the prospect of a fullclaim of CM as a cop with an investigation on jason, may be a benefit that would be lost if CM dies without sharing the info.

Tazaro · Post Post #405 (isolation #101) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:15 am

I mean if you flip as cop as a result of dying, then a claim of jason's innocence from you before you that dying would have no reason to be false, unless you would weirdly lie as a cop about someone being innocent whom you have not investigated as innocent or investigated at all.

Tazaro · Post Post #406 (isolation #102) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:17 am

ebwop: ignore the you in "before you that dying."

Tazaro · Post Post #409 (isolation #103) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:31 am

Captain Meister wrote:I know it'll be hard, but everything will become clear in a not very long amount of time.

As we're as open as anybody about their role I highly doubt the scum will leave us alive and you'll have your answers then. Otherwise if we're alive we'll answer for ourselves.

"we're"? Did I realize you were a hydra before now? No.

Tazaro · Post Post #412 (isolation #104) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:48 am

Iecerint wrote:(Called suspension of disbelief.)

I don't understand what you are talking about ???

Tazaro · Post Post #413 (isolation #105) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:50 am

Iecerint wrote:
Vote: Taz

Now you're crossing a line.

What line? The line of suspension of disbelief? Suspension of disbelief of what?

Tazaro · Post Post #415 (isolation #106) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:05 am

TheLonging wrote:As I said before, Taz is next on my to lynch list.

Hopefully this is not because of something involving "suspension of belief" that's not elaborated on. What, Icerint?

Tazaro · Post Post #419 (isolation #107) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:10 am

Maybe I'm totally not mentally connecting the points on which TheLonging is voting for me. And I'm missing why Icerint is voting for me.
What's the thought process?

Tazaro · Post Post #421 (isolation #108) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:56 am

Vote: TheLonging

I'm a dirty player, so read between the lines, guys: @TheLonging, you should know that I'm town in this game: appeal to *cough*probability*cough*. You of all people should know that, so you are attacking a known town.

Tazaro · Post Post #422 (isolation #109) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:58 am

Yah, I feel dirty after saying that.

Tazaro · Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:08 am

My case, which prompted my vote, necessitates OMGUS: it wouldn't exist if you weren't declaring me as scum in this game.

Tazaro · Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:09 am

Tazaro wrote:My case, which prompted my vote, necessitates OMGUS: it wouldn't exist if you weren't declaring me as scum in this game.

For clarity, "it" is "my case."

Tazaro · Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:28 am

TheLonging wrote:So you admit your case is so bad it goes to OMGUS

also why didn't you vote me or FOS me when I declared you scum yesterday?

I actually felt too timid to do something like that. Now, I just don't care how it comes across.

Tazaro · Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:46 pm

TheLonging's played much more acerbically and opportunistically than gandalf imo. He followed Icerint's vote, perhaps seeing that the Gandalf wagon wasn't strong, and probably sees my weak play as a good thing to do dig at.

Tazaro · Post Post #432 (isolation #114) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:28 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:
TheLonging wrote:"The only reason mafia would not kill a claimed power role is to start WIFOM, barring a vanillaless game."
That was my point, dumbass.

My... TheLonging is very oriented toward attacking in this game. Hang him on the noose

Tazaro · Post Post #433 (isolation #115) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:32 pm

TheLonging wrote:"The only reason mafia would not kill a claimed power role is to start WIFOM, barring a vanillaless game."

Seriously, how many people are you going to try to discredit with using their words as weapons, TheLonging?

Tazaro · Post Post #438 (isolation #116) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:15 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote:I'm going to
vote;gandalf
for two reasons:

1. He wants to /in to my Mini but has 4 Mini games
Thx lulz.

If only I thought you were scum, can you prove it lol?

Tazaro · Post Post #441 (isolation #117) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:22 pm

Tazaro wrote:
Captain Meister wrote:I know it'll be hard, but everything will become clear in a not very long amount of time.

As we're as open as anybody about their role I highly doubt the scum will leave us alive and you'll have your answers then. Otherwise if we're alive we'll answer for ourselves.
"we're"? Did I realize you were a hydra before now? No.

Role information after he said "we?... My post after the "we're" had nothing to do with role, but with hydra. SO WTF?. What you talkin' about, Icerint?

Tazaro · Post Post #443 (isolation #118) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:33 pm

Iecerint wrote:There's a really default interpretation to his sudden use of a plural pronoun that you're either missing or pretending to miss. It seems really obvious to me -- on par with "jason is a sweetie guys just sayin."

I think you're pretending.

Oh, you're saying I drew the wrong thought from his use of "we."

Captain Meister wrote:As we're as open as anybody about their role

But who else was open about their role besides Captain Meister, did I miss something? Since Captain Meister was the only one I've seen who was open about their role, and I looked at his join date, I went to the conclusion that CM was a hydra who was using a head that decided to say "we... but yeah, CM's "we're as open as anybody about their role," is wtf: who else besides CM was open with their role? No one.

Tazaro · Post Post #444 (isolation #119) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:38 pm

Double post: so yeah, I'm either stupid or I saw Captain Meister say something that doesn't grammatically make sense in terms of pronouns.

Tazaro · Post Post #445 (isolation #120) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:44 pm

Iecerint wrote:I can no longer believe that you're innocently oblivious to how to handle the situation with CM. That post of yours after he used "we," after I'd just explained why pushing for more role information was a bad idea, is extremely scummy.

Again, what you talking about? What did the hydra comment have to do with pushing for role information?

Tazaro · Post Post #447 (isolation #121) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:10 pm

But what didn't make sense about his Proposition [insert letter here] is "open as anybody about their role" having "we" as it's subject, barring "we" referring to a hydra. No one else was open about their role besides CM.

Tazaro · Post Post #450 (isolation #122) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:45 am

Captain Meister wrote:Gandalf still needs rope.
This hydra discussion makes you both look like blithering idiots, just stop.

Can you articulate non-confusingly why he needs rope?

Tazaro · Post Post #451 (isolation #123) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:57 am

Captain Meister wrote:This hydra discussion makes you both look like blithering idiots, just stop.

If you hate it, then don't talk in pluralities when you don't have to. And what you talking about with this idiot claim...

Tazaro · Post Post #455 (isolation #124) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:19 am

jasonT1981 wrote:Since Ive never played a completed game with you.. I don't have a meta read on you... but I will say, your play has been slightly different now from what I am used to... it seems more settled in this game as we moved along.

You have actually responded not too bad to pressure. So for now I will

unvote

Suspicions from day one, jason? How is it possible for the suspicions to be resurrected after having put them in a casket in this post of yours?

Tazaro · Post Post #457 (isolation #125) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:45 am

jasonT1981 wrote:
Tazaro wrote:
jasonT1981 wrote:Since Ive never played a completed game with you.. I don't have a meta read on you... but I will say, your play has been slightly different now from what I am used to... it seems more settled in this game as we moved along.

You have actually responded not too bad to pressure. So for now I will

unvote
Suspicions from day one, jason? How is it possible for the suspicions to be resurrected after having put them in a casket in this post of yours?

Complete rubbish, I never said my suspicion of you was in a casket and dead... I simply said I was a bit happier with your play as it seemed more settled. But nice attempt to try and make me look dirty there

jasonT1981 wrote:Since Ive never played a completed game with you.. I don't have a meta read on you... but I will say, your play has been slightly different now from what I am used to... it seems more settled in this game as we moved along.

You have actually responded not too bad to pressure. So for now I will

unvote

But why are those suspicious now stronger at this time? Did the stuff I've done recently retroactively aggravate whatever I did before?

Tazaro · Post Post #459 (isolation #126) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:05 am

Yah, I make no bones about me having a horrible town play style.

Tazaro · Post Post #460 (isolation #127) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:08 am

I knew casket was a quaint metaphor to use. Should have said that it was put to bed.

Tazaro · Post Post #462 (isolation #128) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:20 am

jasonT1981 wrote:love this quick flip flop and backtrack within one post

Tazaro wrote:Double post: And
FoS: Zoneace
for the policy lynching stuff.

Tazaro wrote:...the PL stuff which you're not doing anymore.
UN-FoS: Zoneace
And who died in the night? ZA... coincidence?

All too ready to point out this ZA thing, Jason? You just had this point in your sleeve that no one else was thinking about. Hmm...
Votes on me from Jason and TL. Guess my FoSes of people who were voting me before were pretty accurate:
They were:

FoS: TheLonging

,

FoS: Jason

, and the fos of the odd TOWN man out

FoS: Faraday

Tazaro · Post Post #463 (isolation #129) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:25 am

jasonT1981 wrote:Ok, show me where I put to bed any notion of you being scum. Show me exactly where I said you are not scum like you suggested.

I hate beating metaphors to death when they are becoming a barrier. "Bed" as in a suspicion that is quiescent. It's the point of how STRONG your suspicions were compared to then and now. They were quiescent back then, so how can what I've done recently strengthen retroactively the inherent suspiciousness of my actions back then, which is what you are saying by day one suspicion, and the Zoneace thing is making me think that you're scum buddies' killing of Zoneace had me flipflopping as a perq to push me as scum.

Tazaro · Post Post #464 (isolation #130) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:27 am

Tazaro wrote:
jasonT1981 wrote:Ok, show me where I put to bed any notion of you being scum. Show me exactly where I said you are not scum like you suggested.
I hate beating metaphors to death when they are becoming a barrier. "Bed" as in a suspicion that is quiescent. It's the point of how STRONG your suspicions were compared to then and now. They were quiescent back then, so how can what I've done recently strengthen retroactively the inherent suspiciousness of my actions back then, which is what you are saying by day one suspicion, and the Zoneace thing is making me think that you're scum buddies' killing of Zoneace had me flipflopping as a perq to push me as scum.

ebwop: the killing of Zoneace by your scum buddies had my flippflopping as a perq of it, pushing me as scum as a benefit.

Tazaro · Post Post #467 (isolation #131) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:09 am

Hmm...

Unvote

Vote: Taz

I actually have a interesting roleclaim that I can disclose at some point. And it's town aligned, i'm not scum. We'll see what happens now.

Tazaro · Post Post #471 (isolation #132) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:25 am

It's the usual suspects from me: you, TheLonging. As for number three, it's getting to the point where ani is too aloof, as it were, and lacking of content to be town.

Tazaro · Post Post #472 (isolation #133) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:30 am

animorpherv1 wrote:IMO, CM and Tazaro areon to something, but I'm going to wait and see what everyone else says before I vote.

This was the catalyst, namely, me and CM discussing with Gandalf and then Icerint chimed in. So what are we going to make of those things that have just happened instead of tunneling on me as a victim of vultures?

Tazaro · Post Post #474 (isolation #134) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:43 am

I'm not going to newly invent anything to add to my, I guess you'd say, insubstantial cases that I've expressed, and I believe you are saying that you actually see some case, so you are free to pick it apart as you can give counterpoints that you can create. I unvoted for Gandalf; that was indicative of me seeing his input to the discussion I was involved in and deciding he justified himself well.

Tazaro · Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:38 am

Basically, I can't assuage that point you've made.

Tazaro · Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:41 am

hmm... jason's alignment could go either way. I should have expected he would still play the millar-repelling way he did in Ghostbusters.

Tazaro · Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:51 am

The crux of it is, you are an aggressive player, and I don't respond well to that especially when aggressive players vote for me. I'm really bad at defense.

Tazaro · Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:54 am

For what it's worth, TheLonging is much more likely to be scum than jason. My vote's on TheLonging, and I probably wouldn't make the rash decision of voting for jason if TheLonging wasn't there to vote for. I'm so rash.

Tazaro · Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:04 am

I'm so rash... at times. Like when I rashly voted for myself and forgot my vote was temporarily off of TheLonging

.

Unvote

TheLonging

Tazaro · Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:05 am

Vote: TheLonging

Tazaro · Post Post #485 (isolation #141) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:07 pm

You admit I could be town; that admission is believable.

Unvote

Tazaro · Post Post #489 (isolation #142) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:33 pm

Ninja'd by one post by jason and one post by Jarti.
My Post in response to jason's post that was before the ninja posts:
I previously had a hard time thinking that he could actually think I was scum, and instead thought he was going to be unwaveringly pushing me as someone that he purportedly viewed as absolute false scum for town to lynch. But now that he admits that he is not necessarily unrelenting about the fact that I am scum, this means that a strategy of unwaveringly pushing me as someone that he views as absolute scum is not necessarily what he's doing. This lack of necessity means that the uncertainty, that exists in my mind, of what he's doing is causing me to not view my vote on TL as justified on the grounds it once was.
My post in response to Jason's ninja post:
I am suspicious of animorpherv, who is not scumhunting at all. I do not know what in the world his positions on people are, and he said something about Gandalf but then mentioned something about waiting. He avoids attention, and Aloof is his alias.

Tazaro · Post Post #490 (isolation #143) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:46 pm

And I'll follow that up with a vote. This will get attention by the scruff of the neck.

Vote: Animorph

Tazaro · Post Post #492 (isolation #144) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:10 pm

TheLonging wrote:I don't think you understood me. It was a criticism of what you were doing; I think you're more likely scum than VT. Your self-voting could have only led to those two things. However, since you have played scummily and antibrainily, I can most likely come to the conclusion; you're scum.

Yah, I believe you should see me as LIKELY scum. I've played horribly enough to give that impression.

Tazaro · Post Post #493 (isolation #145) » Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:27 pm

But, I think I can survive. I hope. I see Faraday and CM as less aggressive toward me.

Tazaro · Post Post #495 (isolation #146) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:53 am

Darn, people aren't very active on Sunday.

Tazaro · Post Post #496 (isolation #147) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:48 am

*pulls fire alarm*
What do I have to get people to not be the sleeping dead?

Tazaro · Post Post #497 (isolation #148) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:50 am

animorpherv1 wrote:IMO, CM and Tazaro areon to something, but I'm going to wait and see what everyone else says before I vote.

This is a classic fencesitting scumpost by the way.

Tazaro · Post Post #499 (isolation #149) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:58 am

Eh, no one's going to suspect Ani. Everyone loves him apparently.

Tazaro · Post Post #501 (isolation #150) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:05 am

animorpherv1 wrote:
Tazaro wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote:IMO, CM and Tazaro areon to something, but I'm going to wait and see what everyone else says before I vote.
This is a classic fencesitting scumpost by the way.

And you know that this is classic BECAUSE? I've been on this site for 2 years. I THINK I know how this site plays mafia than you do. Just a thought.

You've just said absolutely nothing. Nothing that actually counters my accusation.

Tazaro · Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:00 am

TheLonging wrote:I fence sit a lot when I'm not sure about a player (IE their play overall balances out to be null). In this case, I would think that Faraday is null. Also yes it was an attack, and just so you know, my question on how long Tazaro has played is honest, because I want to get a feeling if he has more experience than his join date indicates (like how I played mafia before this etc.)

I played my absolutely first game in July. And animorph has done more than fencesit; he's basically done absolutely no scum hunting.

Tazaro · Post Post #509 (isolation #152) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:27 pm

Iecerint wrote:Over the course of this game, though, I have had a little more of a town gut read on him than I usually do, partly due to PoE.

Gut is inherently unexplainable, and your PoE is unexplained. I do not digest your post well.

Tazaro · Post Post #511 (isolation #153) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:35 pm

So if I'm reading into what you are implying correctly, you are alluding to ani and I as scum together?

Tazaro · Post Post #512 (isolation #154) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:52 pm

Tazaro wrote:So if I'm reading into what you are implying correctly, you are alluding to ani and I as scum together?

It really doesn't make sense that Ani's weird vote on Gandalf makes your vote on me more solid, Icerint. I shouldn't be screwed by ani's play that has nothing to do with me and everything to do with himself and his alignment.

Tazaro · Post Post #514 (isolation #155) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:04 pm

Iecerint wrote:1. You are scummy even if you are not scum with ani.
2. Ani's action looks particularly scummy to me if you (Taz) are scum.

So what we have here is: (1)I'm more likely scum than not scum AND (2)Ani is scummy if I'm scum, so I think it should be concluded that you should NOT have a townread in your gut towards Ani. Seriously, what?

Tazaro · Post Post #516 (isolation #156) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:11 pm

Ani townread WAS gut... Is it true that your Ani townread IS gut?

Tazaro · Post Post #518 (isolation #157) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:26 pm

Thanks for making it clear; I feared you were sneakily trying to lessen the pressure or suspicion on Ani by your town gut read comment in post 508.
The point was, I didn't want jason's scumhunting against Ani to be derailed:

jasonT1981 wrote:Taz is right... apart from his 2nd post, he has just been content to post one liners if even.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 2#p2458992

animorpherv1 wrote:I'm going to
vote;gandalf
for two reasons:

1. He wants to /in to my Mini but has 4 Mini games
2. Because he is acting scummy (see:earlier this Day Phase)
1) what has him wanting to /in your game got to do with voting him?
2) Please show examples of this scummy... you have said very little on him in fact, your vote was the very first mention of Gandalf And since have not mentioned him what so ever.

Tazaro · Post Post #519 (isolation #158) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:30 pm

Answer jason's post that I quoted above, ANI!!!

Tazaro · Post Post #527 (isolation #159) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:30 am

gandalf5166 wrote:Wait, what happened to the Taz wagon? We all decided to vote ani instead? Come on guys, scum bus when they're flailing, we can lynch ani tomorrow.

Why does it matter which one's lynched first if we're both scum?

Tazaro · Post Post #531 (isolation #160) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:03 am

TheLonging wrote:I have read both gandalf and ani in scum.

Why do I not believe you? In fact, your saying that you are more suspicious of ani makes me want to vote for Gandalf

Unvote

Vote: Gandalf

Tazaro · Post Post #532 (isolation #161) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:08 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
Tazaro wrote:
gandalf5166 wrote:Wait, what happened to the Taz wagon? We all decided to vote ani instead? Come on guys, scum bus when they're flailing, we can lynch ani tomorrow.
Why does it matter which one's lynched first if we're both scum?
It doesn't, I'd just rather lynch you first >.> Especially considering that he's really only scum if you're scum.

I think it's because lynching me first is timing that would suit your purposes,

Tazaro · Post Post #534 (isolation #162) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:25 am

I don't want Gandalf making decisions in the witches' cauldron of the scum qt tonite. He needs to die.

Tazaro · Post Post #536 (isolation #163) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:31 am

The thing is, I was picturing a scenario in which TheLonging would help push an ani lynch. Why would he do that? And then I thought of: perhaps ani would flip town, and this flip would be used by TheLonging's scum team to prosecute me because I started the ani wagon. TheLonging's sudden saying that gandalf AND ani were scumpicks, and his insistence that ani would be the one that would be supported by him as a lynch victim, makes me think that TheLonging runs the risk of pushing for a mislynch that could be used against me, and Gandalf is playing the other side of it, trying to get me lynched today.

Tazaro · Post Post #538 (isolation #164) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:49 am

Tazaro wrote:The thing is, I was picturing a scenario in which TheLonging would help push an ani lynch. Why would he do that? And then I thought of: perhaps ani would flip town, and this flip would be used by TheLonging's scum team to prosecute me because I started the ani wagon. TheLonging's sudden saying that gandalf AND ani were scumpicks, and his insistence that ani would be the one that would be supported by him as a lynch victim, makes me think that TheLonging runs the risk of pushing for a mislynch that could be used against me, and Gandalf is playing the other side of it, trying to get me lynched today.

This is the content, nopoint. I can always explain myself when I'm town.

Tazaro · Post Post #539 (isolation #165) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:57 am

Iecerint wrote:
NP wrote:Taz is town likely.

NP wrote:What's this? Another content illusion Taz?
?

Yeah, nopoint's read on me is based on whether I'm actually trying to eek out content or not. Throughout this game, I've tried to explain myself and help with my content. Sometimes I do a somewhat slovenly or lackadaisical job at it and can't coherently express my thoughts. But my heart's in it nonetheless.

Tazaro · Post Post #541 (isolation #166) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:27 am

Why are you suspicious of Ani, and I would should I believe you actually are? This sudden ani agreement from you makes me reconsider what I thought of Ani. Gandalf is more suspicious than ani and should be lynched given the opportunity that we could lynch Gandalf, this is obvious, but you would, if given the opportunity, rather lynch ani over gandalf?

Tazaro · Post Post #542 (isolation #167) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:28 am

ebwop: and WHY should I believe you actually are?

Tazaro · Post Post #543 (isolation #168) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:29 am

gandalf5166 wrote:
nopointinactingup wrote:What about your lynch?
That isn't going to happen >.>

I beg to differ now.

Tazaro · Post Post #545 (isolation #169) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:39 am

My mondo suspicion of you, TheLonging, makes me go crazy about what you say about other people. It's just the timing of when you said ani was suspicious to you and not saying it before then that is bugging me. I don't understand how I managed to unvote for you, though, but Gandalf's hopefully able to get enough votes to die.

Tazaro · Post Post #546 (isolation #170) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:47 am

Double post: An even better question for TheLonging: Why isn't Gandalf MORE suspicious than ANi?

Tazaro · Post Post #548 (isolation #171) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:50 pm

*Bumping this thread to the top of my View your posts threads.*

Tazaro · Post Post #551 (isolation #172) » Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:14 am

Faraday wrote:Guys is Ghostwriter invisible? I mean I could HAMMAH Gandalf to quote rosso carne but I think GW's more likely scum at this stage of the game.

GW's not here because of INTERNET ACCESS issues.

Tazaro · Post Post #557 (isolation #173) » Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:52 am

jasonT1981 wrote:Have you played in games where Taz is scum, TL?

The problem with this question is: There's a certain rule that can't be broken.

Tazaro · Post Post #558 (isolation #174) » Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:53 am

Let's target Gandalf, guys.

Tazaro · Post Post #567 (isolation #175) » Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:43 am

mass claim

Tazaro · Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:24 am

I'm Britney f***in Spears. There is a quicktopic that I have tried to put people into.

Tazaro · Post Post #608 (isolation #177) » Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:23 am

You're the right person to ask me that question of whom I targetted: I targetted Iecerint during N1.

Tazaro · Post Post #617 (isolation #178) » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:29 pm

Iecerint wrote:OK, you need to specify how your ability works immediately.

Here's how it went down. I tried to recruit Iecerint, but it failed. Iecerint must be confirmed town BECAUSE I can ONLY recruit people who are either vanilla princesses or mafia prima donna. Iecerint claims to have a power role, so that explains why I couldn't recruit him, so that's a perfect explanation for why that recruitment failed. Then I tried to recruit theLonging; if TheLonging claimed to have a power role, then I wouldn't believe him because my recruitment of him was successful. So unless TheLonging is lying about being a vanilla princess, which he wouldn't have known would have been the better fakeclaim instead of lying about having a power role, we have three confirmed townies.

Tazaro · Post Post #620 (isolation #179) » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:21 pm

GhostWriter wrote:Sounds like a God Father-ish role to me, which, when you think about it, makes sense because God Fathers can have the ability to appear as a townie.

My role, you talking about my role as GF?? o_o??

Tazaro · Post Post #621 (isolation #180) » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:22 pm

The only reason to talk about my role as being GF is... scum motivation, or maybe not...

Tazaro · Post Post #623 (isolation #181) » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:27 pm

Oh. Hmm... TheLonging is not off the hook; I knew I might have got a scum in the qt when I recruited him. And he seemed to overact, bewildered that I was town in the qt.

Tazaro · Post Post #629 (isolation #182) » Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:52 am

I suspect that I may die tonight...

Tazaro · Post Post #630 (isolation #183) » Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:52 am

So either GW or TL should be the lynch.

Tazaro · Post Post #641 (isolation #184) » Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:23 am

Captain Meister wrote:@Faraday/Iece/Taz/GW: What made you choose on whom you would use your night action(s)?

I chose Icerint because he seemed pretty neutral in manner. i chose TL to see if the recruitment would fail which would allow me to conclude that he was town. But now I know that he could either be a mafia prima donna or a vanilla princess.

Tazaro · Post Post #652 (isolation #185) » Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:06 am

Where's ani?

Tazaro · Post Post #670 (isolation #186) » Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:07 pm

nopointinactingup wrote:Haven't you read the recent discussion???
There is a discrepancy between GW and Faraday's Night action
.

TL knows there is a discrepancy; I mean, isn't

that

the point that TheLonging's getting at with the following?:

TheLonging wrote:I knew his claim perfectly, it's GW's role + Faraday's role that can't make sense.

Tazaro · Post Post #680 (isolation #187) » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:56 am

I'll hammer whomever you guys choose; not very much choosing going on, though.

Tazaro · Post Post #684 (isolation #188) » Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:41 am

TheLonging wrote:I could talk in the QT.

Tazaro and I are confirmed, and anyone else he's recruited

Hmm... I'm thinking that if you were mafia, then at the time of this post of yours, you would have perceived that you being in my QT was a mod mistake, which is not something that you were giving the impression of having perceived. And if you were scum, how would you be so confident in taking advantage of a mod mistake if you thought the mod could rectify it by preventing you from talking in it anymore, which I could tell everyone if it happened and incriminate you?
Hmm, and I'm thinking we can see whether we trust GW vs. Faraday; I think it's a fact that Faraday looks more townish, and I think that GW's roleblocking of TheLonging was something he thought he could say because TheLonging had said something happened to him, which could only be roleblocking. The rule of thumb for me is that it's more facepalm-worthy to lynch the person who seems more town and find out that the other person was scum than it is to lynch the other guy who's not as townish and find out that the other person was good at seeming townish.

Vote: GhostWriter

Tazaro · Post Post #685 (isolation #189) » Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:48 am

Double post:

Tazaro wrote:
TheLonging wrote:I could talk in the QT.

Tazaro and I are confirmed, and anyone else he's recruited
Hmm... I'm thinking that if you were mafia, then at the time of this post of yours, you would have perceived that you being in my QT was a mod mistake, which is not something that you were giving the impression of having perceived. And if you were scum, how would you be so confident in taking advantage of a mod mistake if you thought the mod could rectify it by preventing you from talking in it anymore, which I could tell everyone if it happened and incriminate you?
Hmm, and I'm thinking we can see whether we trust GW vs. Faraday; I think it's a fact that Faraday looks more townish, and I think that GW's roleblocking of TheLonging was something he thought he could say because TheLonging had said something happened to him, which could only be roleblocking. The rule of thumb for me is that it's more facepalm-worthy to lynch the person who seems more town and find out that the other person was scum than it is to lynch the other guy who's not as townish and find out that the other person was good at seeming townish.

Vote: GhostWriter

EBWOP: ...which SEEMED to could have only been roleblocking--before the neighborizing stuff was revealed. Also, it is has to decided whether the rest of you think that GW's roleblocking claim can be believed to be a fakeclaim. Perhaps he assumed that no other roleblocking role existed? Or maybe I should switch to TL as my vote who's been my GUT scumread throughout the game.

Tazaro · Post Post #688 (isolation #190) » Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:35 am

GhostWriter wrote:Question: Why would someone assume that a roleblock obscured his READS? Why would anyone think that would be the claim to make to match his reaction? Hell, the best thing to do would be to not involve him in the claim, and barring that, to claim miller or something, but not to claim roleblocker that blocked him and somehow think my blocking him did anything to his reads. I fail to see your logic.

Sounds like you have your story straight

Unvote

Tazaro · Post Post #689 (isolation #191) » Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:39 am

Double post: I guess given that Faraday thinks he was roleblocked, should we believe Faraday?

Tazaro · Post Post #690 (isolation #192) » Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:40 am

Tazaro wrote:Double post: I guess given that Faraday thinks he was roleblocked, should we believe Faraday?

EBWOP: given that Faraday CLAIMS he was roleblocked, should we believe Faraday? That is the question.

Tazaro · Post Post #705 (isolation #193) » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:50 am

Boggles my mind, this game.

Tazaro · Post Post #709 (isolation #194) » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:52 am

Faraday wrote:You didn't miss a lot

I guess this means that the recent discussion has not given us a lot to work with.

Tazaro · Post Post #713 (isolation #195) » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:53 am

Until further notice, assume that I want a no lynch

Vote: No Lynch

Tazaro · Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:27 am

Ani should be replaced.

Tazaro · Post Post #730 (isolation #197) » Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:11 am

Faraday wrote:Actually do we have a list of claims? I noticed a trend with the claims

If there's a trend you notice, by all means, state that trend.

Tazaro · Post Post #747 (isolation #198) » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:08 am

I actually welcome drmyshotty's reads on this whole thing.

Tazaro · Post Post #751 (isolation #199) » Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:51 am

I guess since I'm the person to die, there need not be a no lynch.

Unvote

Informational lynch:

Vote: Ghostwriter