Magna
Kat
Mac
Charter (unless Untrod is scum)
Haschel
Scum:
peanut
Raj
LMP
Untrod
Kmd4390 wrote:Town:
Magna
Kat
Mac
Charter (unless Untrod is scum)
Haschel
Scum:
peanut
Raj
LMP
Untrod
Vote Untrod
Haschel Cedricson wrote:Vote: Untrod Tripod. He knows why.
You serious?Haschel Cedricson wrote:I ignored it because I gave none of the fucks about it. None of them.whats even weirder is the fact that Haschel completely ignores it and just randomly votes like hes in auto pilot.
A bunch of reminiscing about previous games that I wasn't a part of and have no intention of reading? Not interested. And my vote wasn't random.
Yeah, I'm here for the playerlist. I watched Seinfeld once I think.Katsuki wrote:@freak: How is signing up for THE MOD rather than the flavor jerkish?
I don't think LMP called his a serious vote and then refused to explain it.Haschel Cedricson wrote:Also, does anybody find it odd that Kmd wants me to explain my "He knows why" but doesn't wand LMP to explain his "He knows why", even though the two were made for differing reasons?
Talitha wrote:Raj: WHY would you claim when you won't even answer peoples' questions?
This game is really frustrating.
Really? He got a Town Role PM now? Interesting change.Talitha wrote:I like the new-improved peanutman
Where's the scums?Talitha wrote:I could see BV as scum, but can't see why this would mean Raj is town. Decent chance he's bussing IMO.
Well, if your suspicion of peanut was on some mild thing in Peanut's posts or something, I could see that. But you just said you thought he was lurker scum. If Peanut chose to lurk because he was scum, why does anything The Fonz has done make Peanut's lurking any less of a scum tell?Talitha wrote:Um, he wouldn't. Are you suggesting that I should have formed a firm opinion on Peanut's alignment from his 5 posts and not be able to change that opinion based on The Fonz's greater number of posts? You're crazy. Actually, going over my iso I don't even think I ever articulated my mild suspicion of peanutman. So what the heck are you on about??Kmd wrote:Talitha, if Peanut was lurking scum, why would The Fonz have to carry the exact same strategy?
Ok.Talitha wrote:Kmd:
1. Not all lurkers are scum but my philosophy is that they deserve suspicion because it's harder to catch them when they're not posting.
2. The lurker in question flaked, therefore it becomes more likely he was just busy and less indicative of his alignment.
Charter is smart enough to know that a list isn't a reason to vote. A list is just a way to show where you stand. I quoted the list to show that I was just voting a read from before. I was trying the whole early Day 1, just vote from the background thing that Glork and a few others have done in the past, but I couldn't stick to it. So I just quoted my earlier scum/town reads and showed that I was switching from one scum read to another. Rajjksldfjkslf;jadskf responded with OMGUS attacks on me and that post where he says Magna and I should know he's town because we've seen him as town before. This was the scummiest thing Rajkdlfjadskfjask said, which is why I was happy with my vote. The whole list thing comes in when Rajjdkfljasdklfjads says it was my reasoning. My response was that I hadn't posted any reasoning. Charter is trying to say that because I quoted my list when I voted, my list must have been my reasoning (obviously, the list was just my early reads).charter wrote:Why everyone should vote Kmd:
Doesn't give any reason for voting Raj, but all he talks about is Raj being scum. Raj calls him out for citing his list as his reason for voting him, Kmd claims he didn't (even though he quotes his list just on top of his vote for Raj). He actually spends more time talking about how he caught Raj in another game, but gives no reasons Raj is scum in this game.
Kmd also spends quite a bit of time explaining to us how he plays as scum (118, 163). I'm sure everyone else found it as helpful as I did.
That is why I listed three options.Jahudo wrote:I mean how can you or anyone besides myself tell Haschel gave a bad claim and not a scum fake claim?Kmd4390 wrote:Scum is Option 3.Jahudo wrote:How are you separating bad from scum in this case?Kmd4390 wrote:2) hascheltown claimed his role a jahudoscum countered a bad claim to get a mislynch
Or someone creating a fakeclaim who subconsciously thinks "I'll say that I do this every night" and forgets that it needs to be changed due to the fact that this game is nightless. I dunno. I can see both sides of this one though. The same "slip" is just as possible with a town player who is simply claiming his role and forgot to make the change in his mind. I'm basically not using it as a tell one way or the other because it can just as easily go either way.Jahudo wrote:UT's point about Haschel saying "night" would be a horrible reason for hypo-scum to think they could attack the claim itself. Its like saying villager instead of vanilla townie, everyone knows what is intended because its in the OP. Scum are aware of the OP. So the tell is not on one's alignment but how closely they are paying attention to the flavor of the game.
My bad, forgot about that. The fact that you claim to see the point on Jahudo, but still want to find a way to make the case on Haschel work still stands though.The Fonz wrote:Erm, hello? The point of the vote was to prove I can't vote. Why wouldn't I 'vote' Untrod, when if he's telling the truth it can't affect him? Are you paying any attention at all? I could have self-voted, it would have achieved the same thing.
Yeah, the claim itself is null IMO.Jahudo wrote:KMD said #2 makes sense and he prefers my lynch. I am asking him why HC's claim looks bad town and not bad scum.