Amrun wrote:VOTE: VP Baltar
For getting me lynched in [redacted].
Are you giving VPB credit for my fine work?
Budja wrote:^ I was one of the instigators of this wagon. What makes my reasons comparatively bad?
Amrun wrote:But it was feeble, for DDD. I want more from him to know that wasn't a "I have to pretend to suspect someone" post.
farside22 wrote:The budja case I don't see. Budja is someone I think I understand better then most. I caught on to what he was saying and I think Tans is putting words in his mouth (so to speak). I don't know if the misrep is on purpose but everything that Tans says doesn't = scum hunting, hence my continuing vote and questions to him.
Budja wrote:Yes Locke, I get it, I am slack here. If I don't constantly post, I find it very hard to read back and decide.
VP Baltar wrote:Kise wrote:I don't want to actively find Dexter or Rita and join town in case you guys suck. I'm thinking the mod's idea behind my role is that I can instantly lose as survivor, unless I put forth the effort to join town via my action. I'm still interested in playing as normal.
I don't really see any other way to interpret this.
Amrun wrote:Well, I'm hardly focusing on it, am I? It was a topic of discussion so I thought I'd say what I thought.
LynchMePls wrote:DDD wrote:On the survivor topic, if Kise is indeed a true survivor that means he can win with the scum team and thus if he makes MYLO/LYLO he is likely to vote with scum to achieve his win con. Thus while he doesn't hurt us terribly now we need to keep a close eye on him and if indeed his win con can be changed to town-aligned that would be something we'd have a vested interest in.
We would have no way of confirming if his win con could be changed or not. I don't think we can trust "Hey guys, I changed my win con, I'm town now" later in the game..
farside22 wrote:DDD: I asked you. I still would like an answer
Did Budja give a reason for his vote? You called it the weakest reason, but hell I never even saw a reason for his vote. So why is Budja called out and not Kise?
VP Baltar wrote:@DDD - Are you saying you think it's reasonably likely there are no scum on the Budja wagon? What are your thoughts on LMP?
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:farside22 wrote:DDD: I asked you. I still would like an answer
Did Budja give a reason for his vote? You called it the weakest reason, but hell I never even saw a reason for his vote. So why is Budja called out and not Kise?
He didn't give an explicit reason but I think it's pretty obvious from the context that it was a generic and pointless "lol, pressure" vote.
Amrun wrote:Do I know who Rita is in flavor? Certainly.
Do I know who Rita is in game? Afraid not.
Looks like my setp spec wasn't so bad after all, DDD.
Amrun wrote:P-edit: But my question is that if Dexter isn't scum, who is? I can see Dexter as scum or town, for this season. He was the enemy in s2, the big killer.
Amrun wrote:That is a more obvious route. Just saying I think my idea is cooler.
farside22 wrote:A) Reeeaallly? Your case on Budja was crap and your floating by saying nothing in the game. How is that obv town?
B) What? I want someone I believe is scum lynched, how is that lazy? I stated my thoughts on Budja and disagreed with the reasoning for his lynch. Hell I didn't even see the case and you called me scum with him.
Your scum reads are what now? You have no other suspects you named besides me or talked about so........
farside22 wrote:C) Why is it bizarre? He hammered a player without waiting for a claim. You think players should ignore that? Why?
Is a claim of a survivor all it takes? Do you believe every claim that players claim?
And final hello welcome to day number fucking 2 where only 1 person died, where is the SK/Vig then if it's "guaranteed".
VP Baltar wrote:sotty and DDD , do you think Amrun is likely scum? scale of 1 to 10. same scale for LMP.
farside22 wrote:I was busy looking at Tans. Yes All I stated was I don't see the case and you called me scum with Budja, so I'm scum now with who because>>>>????
farside22 wrote:As for lazy, you have no room to talk. You used a reason that was invalid and when I pointed it out you backtracked and called it based on how he made his statement.
BS is BS.
Also how nice of you to never make a statement about other players. It must make it easier for you to use that excuse every day as scum.
I've seen scum claim miller. I wouldn't say the survivor claim was unprompted, but I have to double check the vote count at the time.
farside22 wrote:Are you defending your town read right now?
*cough* hypocrite *cough*
farside22 wrote:I'm sorry are you saying in mafia you never missed something and saw something in hindsight after the fact? Are you really arguing that as a case?
As for why I didn't I already stated focas on Tans' in case you missed that I will just repeat it and it's pretty evident in day 1 if, you know you actual read the game.
farside22 wrote:You were not around and it took me two times to ask and for you to ignore my question till day 2.
I would like to ask for someone who wishes to call me out for not responding earlier about your weak vote......how come it took you 2 times for you to answer the question?
farside22 wrote:I asked about what was Budja's weak case on Tans was because before all budja stated was:
post 27
unvote, vote tanstalas
post 43
Sometimes no words are more effective as you just proved.
I see an undercurrent of tension in your words. Too much small talk.
Also FYI, I am not online all the time too.
farside22 wrote:Now lets move onto some hypocrisy
If sotty or sociopath were actually what I considered at risk then I’d defend them
There was a time that SP was at 4 vote:
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p3093925
During this time DDD never responded about SP or the votes on him in the least.
farside22 wrote:2nd: now that you have made your statement about SP and your reasoning. Did you see a post day 1 where I called Budja town?
Go look I dare you.
Bahahahahaha I'm sorry you don't see Sotty blinders on based on null meta on you. I found her point weak on you. It was mostly null and deserved to be questioning. When she is stubborn about null meta I have to point out how much a dumass she is being.
Don't worry you pretty head there DDD. I will get to my big post by.........hopefully tomorrow.
tanstalas wrote:@DDD, Hinduragui and Sotty - What are your feelings on KKN?
Fargrass wrote:Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Bahahahahaha I'm sorry you don't see Sotty blinders on based on null meta on you. I found her point weak on you. It was mostly null and deserved to be questioning. When she is stubborn about null meta I have to point out how much a dumass she is being.
Don't worry you pretty head there DDD. I will get to my big post by.........hopefully tomorrow.
If this is directed at me I have no blinders in regards to Sotty; she's cleaned my clock before as scum and she's the player I'd worry most about being scum in this game. However, in the last two games where she was scum (one was in her sottyrulez hydra) I got a gut scum read on her and I'm simply not getting that here.
I'm talking about sotty having blinders on. You on the other hand have turned lazy since our last game. Are you so worried that you need to fit in your meta as scum and town that you don't try to scum hunt or do anything that you used to do? Do you just follow the player you find most town and hope their right?
VP Baltar wrote:I don't think voting common denominators is necessarily the best way to find scum. KKN is playing like a dead fish so far, so I think he probably needs a pointy stick more than a noose at this point. I'd really prefer one of my top two picks or possibly hinduragi.
Fargrass wrote:Have we played a game together other than Quiz Show Mafia because that was formatted so differently as to basically be unusable in terms of meta (and of course that even ignores the sample size issues)?
And you were damn good at reading players that game. The format was different but you made points (yes I was scum) but even I could say and most did that it was from a town point of view. This game no. Also as I just said to VBP I don't have time to check mounds of meta and recalling a game from my past is my best with limited time.
Mostly I have to breeze read looking at your recent meta, which I deemed lazy.
Amrun wrote:Sotty and DDD need to get on board with the voting business, here - as well as others.
tanstalas wrote:VP Baltar wrote:ok everyone vote for either farside or blackberry now. we need a claim. people on wagons going nowhere are being useless if they are town.
Just wondering why you include farside but not yourself or Socio who have wagons just as big?
Anyhow..
Vote:Farside
Blackberry wrote:DDD- Post 148 - I want to know what you meant by "wait for him to do something scummy"?
Amrun wrote:But I do want to hear what they say about it in this situation.
VP Baltar wrote:tanstalas wrote:Hinduragi wrote:Goddammit. My router went out. I reread from my phone while I was gone but couldn't post anything because it would've been too big and I can't organize my thoughts from there. I'll have some kind of catchup post up tonight.
Too much delaying, I have done this as well when I have been scum, lurking close to deadlines and trying to fly under the radar. It is obvious that you are ignoring this thread as you are very active elsewhere on the site.
Unvote
Vote: Hindu
That's L-1
Well, if you are actually isoing his account, you'll see there is a large gap with no posting from June 23-27, so I do believe his router went out. That being said, I agree with you that he was posting up a storm in Defcon Mafia and can't manage nary a single content post here for us. What's the deal, Hind?
Hinduragi wrote:I'm Esmee Pascal, the replacement Lieutenant. I am very occupied with my personal life so I have very little time to focus on my police work, thus I am only a 2-shot tracker. Why 2? Trust me, I don't get it either. On Night 1, I tracked Socio and saw him visit Locke Lamora.
Hinduragi wrote:Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Hinduragi wrote:I'm Esmee Pascal, the replacement Lieutenant. I am very occupied with my personal life so I have very little time to focus on my police work, thus I am only a 2-shot tracker. Why 2? Trust me, I don't get it either. On Night 1, I tracked Socio and saw him visit Locke Lamora.
Socio?
Yes, Sociopath. The guy I suspected at the end of D1. I've been voting him all of today too.
tanstalas wrote:VP Baltar wrote:Today we should lynch Blackberry or Kid Know Knothing.
Vote:Blackberry
Whoa, why did you suddenly switch from Socio who you were voting yesterday?
VP Baltar wrote:he said he has no abilities, meaning he's vt. Also, blackberry speaks the truth about lynching socio benefits here.
And the above is strange as well. Please explain reasoning,as I am apparently slow.
VP Baltar wrote:I'm still open to lynching BB, DDD. I think now that the AGM-DDD-VPB townie alliance of win is solidified, we can just have our own convos here in thread and lynch where we think is necessary. You still think BB is the better lynch over tans?
tanstalas wrote:@DDD - I softclaimed my rolename, and looking back at my ISO you can probably tell who I am, even before the softclaim. If you really think that I would be scum with that rolename.. lol
VP Baltar wrote:This page makes me giggle like a Japanese school girl.
Fargrass wrote:AlmasterGM wrote:Mod: Can you please spoiler text out Tans's post on the last page? I'm about to watch Season 2 and I really don't want it ruined.
Fortunately, I was reading on phone and could look away fast enough before my eyes absorbed the content.
Mod please don't
Don't join a Dexter Season 2 game if you don't want people to talk about season two man.
tanstalas wrote:Also don't like people claiming trackers and DDD's reaction to them claiming said role "Oh yeah that fits with how he's played" or "Yeah that fits with the name/character"
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:To be ironichis role and flavor does fit the character. Also, this is my vote not moving.
tanstalas wrote:VPB, go look at the games I linked where he hammered his scum buddies.
Whatever, I don't care anymore. I have made my cases, you think I am scum, just lynch me.