scooby wrote:Also you wanted a case? Here is a case:
You have 34 posts, of which:
- are fluff or promises to post (iso 1, 2, 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
- 1 is a very weird "town vs. town" comment that you later justify as gut, iso 4, iso 9.
- 1 is a defense of Morthas and a wrong attack against avas for "he wasn't talking to you specfically" when Morthas clearly did, iso 5.
- 1 is another weird "this seems like a scum bussing tactic", iso 12
- 1 is a contradiction with your previous stance on rewq: you said you didnt agree with rewq scum in iso10 but then you voted him in iso 13 and to L-1!.
- 1 is an overreaction to the race vs race theory that made you fullclaim when no one asked you to (trying to look town with a power role that fits your fakeclaim). iso 19
- 1 is a blatant lie, since you were the only one asking rewq to fullclaim, iso 23.
- 1 is another contradiction with your previous stance on Espe: you said you didn't see him a scum in 27. Once you got the support for DemonHybrid, you somehow forgot what you said about him.
Question, why were you posting ion other games and not here over the past days?
ISO 12 + 13 make complete sense, you say my bussing theory is "weird" then you say that I was contradicting myself on Rewq being scum.
WHY?
IS0 19 isn't an "overreaction" it was a completely viable question seeing how KJ was "confident". And it didn't lead me to full claiming, that's misrepsentation at a HIGH level.
ISO 27 isn't a contradiction, I said "You're doing a lot of sheeping I don't think scum would have the balls to do" when someone spoke up about this being his scumplay, I kind of put off my stance on him.
kiwieagle wrote:So your defense is
"i have not been paying attention to this game so all your points are null."
Are you
Are you serious?