Hey, guys! Sorry for may absence. What's happening?
*reads*
Ah. Right, okay, I see what you did there.
To answer an earlier question, a "lepton" is a ploy whereby scum claim cop, present a guilty investigation of an innocent and, when it comes up innocent, say "oh, whoops, I guess I must be paranoid". That's one of the reasons why cops don't usually come out on Day 1, even with a guilty investiagtion (but instead breadcrumb the guilty party in case they get lynched/nightkilled). So, thanks to Winter for starting this all.
I guess my recourse is to point out that (1) Winter has
guaranteed
her sanity (as I understand it), and that you know have two people claiming that kirby's scum (since I'm innocent, obv), and point to probability; are we supposed to believe that it's as likely that the crazy cop investigated the proper cop while the proper cop investigated scum
and
the crazy cop cam out first, Day 1, than it is that a cop was foolish enough to come out Day 1 and the scum tried a gambit to get an extra day/night (perhaps because he has a one-shot night ability, or perhaps out of desperation and "no downside)?
Of course the latter is more likely, but what you must consider is how
much
more likely it is (since Kirby's claimed that lynching him = lynching cop). It's a shame pm-quoting's disallowed in this game, but I think the next step is to require a name-claim from Kirby; if it's plausible, require one from me. I'll start by claiming
not-cop
(to simplify things) but I'd ask people to bear in mind this isn't the usual cop coming out with a result - before he claimed, his death was assured, and he's been accused himself. He lacks plausibility.
Obv,
confirm vote: Kirby
, and I hope that what I've written makes sense (basically, don't forget / dismiss winter's input and the fact the it preceded Kirby's claim).