I found one already!
Give me a couple of pages and I'll find the rest.
Yes. I have already done 1/7th of a dayvig.rajrhcpfreak wrote:can we just dayvig these self voters?
Actually, I was more interesed in how you were pre-emptively reflective about it, while Max was not. It wasn't the vote itself, it was how you reacted to your own vote and called attention to it.chaotic_diablo wrote:Simple, nothing. People just use it as an excuse to scapegoat someone for a bandwagon. It's the same as the question "How does a random vote tie in with your actions?". I find it hard to understand why players dislike it and name it "suspicious" when there actually isn't anything suspicious about/behind it.
rajrhcpfreak wrote:scum usualy arnt usefull
Wrong and wrong. Scum usually try to appear as useful as possible. I always try to play townie by day, regardless of my role, and I know of several others that play the same way.Coron wrote:It is in scum's best intrest to be unuseful, so from this we can deduct that:
intentionally unuseful=scummy
Says you. I still think it looks like you were trying to pre-empt the attention you're receiving now.chaotic_diablo wrote:Mostly because I found another selfvoter, only to find out that Max just had a bad random streak. Aside from that, I just called attention to it to disprove raj's assumption.
I found scum, obv.TB wrote:Another small thing:
Forgive me for missing the obvious, but what exactly did you find?Thesp wrote:I found one already!
Give me a couple of pages and I'll find the rest.
I think you're using WIFOM because it's cool to say "WIFOM", not because it's actually what's happening here. I just fail to see what scum would gain from a self-vote, and fail to see why scum would be more likely to self-vote than town would. I also think you've failed to show they would.Coron wrote:You're using a wifom arguement in a situation where it doesn't really apply.
Wow, this statement is scumtacular.Mackay wrote:I have moved on, c_d. You will notice that I am no longer voting for you. Could you explain to me why you choose to focus on me?
Then he goes on for 45 lines on (IMHO) useless discussion. :rolleyes:TB wrote:Second, definately not all discussion is usefull. If there is an argument between townies over a small thing (such as the target of a random vote, a spelling error or whatever), it will hurt the town more than it helps.
NOTHING GOOD IS COMING OF IT. USEFUL INFORMATION IS BEING LOST IN ALL THE INANE DRIVEL.Mackay wrote:I hate the quote-and-reply game
I talk enough as it iswithoutresponding to things point-by-point.
Sorry again, all.
Whom is this directed at? Please be precise. Your life is on the line.chaotic_diablo wrote:What troubles me most are the people who bandwagon TB and are not reading any of his posts and are instead, taking the side of the person who they support, assuming that he's made a good argument. IMO, the bystanders are just looking for a way to end day one as quickly as they can.
Like who? Or are you going to continue to vaguely throw out accusations without substance?chaotic_diablo wrote:The post is mostly directed to Raj. However, I feel that there are others who also fulfill the requirements to an extent.
Because your craptacular answers will get you vigged/lynched. I swear if I wasn't so sure TB hadn't made some major slip up I would vote for you forty times over now. If I could lynch two people at once you would be the other. plzdiekthxbaichaotic_diablo wrote:How so?
Masterchief wrote:Sorry people I forgot about this game too and like thesp, i too am getting annoyed with all of these long posts. Also, I was wondering What evidence we have against tb?
This is the biggest for me.Thesp wrote:Then he goes on for 45 lines on (IMHO) useless discussion. :rolleyes:TB wrote:Second, definately not all discussion is usefull. If there is an argument between townies over a small thing (such as the target of a random vote, a spelling error or whatever), it will hurt the town more than it helps.
But I think I see something fascinating here...it appears like TB knows the people arguing to be townies.
Does he usually let slip that he thinks several people are pro-town?Primate wrote:I nearly lynched TB in the last game I was in with him for the exact reasons that you lot are thinking of lynching him now.
You said, "I feel that there are others who also fulfill the requirements to an extent", in regards to:chaotic_diablo wrote:I'd like you to get to the point.
I asked you whom those were. You evaded the question. I suspect therechaotic_diablo wrote:What troubles me most are the people who bandwagon TB and are not reading any of his posts and are instead, taking the side of the person who they support, assuming that he's made a good argument. IMO, the bystanders are just looking for a way to end day one as quickly as they can.
Let's wait for him to respond in any instance. We'll get him prodded if we need to.Masterchief wrote:Has anyone here besides me noticed that TB still has not put up a cunter argument. Not even a poorly planned, really bad defense?I'm about to vote him, but I'm going to give it a bit and see if he dosen't respond yet.
qftMasterchief wrote:You know, to me this is just sayin "Ok guys. Sorry for not posting in such a long time. I'm trying to make a defense without you guys figureing out I'm scum." Tell me what the rest of you think.
This is 100% accurate. Let's please kill TB. That gives us the most info right now, too.ibaesha wrote:First of all, I don't find Thesp's suggestion suspicious at all. Considering the situation of a suspicious person who has claimed vanilla townie, a stalling game and the need of his replacement, it makes perfect sense. I wonder if Masterchief thought this all the way through before making that FoS. At any rate, it sends up a bit of an alarm bell to me about Masterchief. This type of thing makes me wonder if he's trying to -look- pro-town by FoSing.
Quick? It's been 18 days. And what's the replacement going to do? Say, "No, it's really not me, I promise!" Might as well give the mafia their time to talk now so they'll have their choice all ready when zu_Faul gets back.Masterchief wrote:I don't understand why all of us are so quick to lynch someone, of whom we haven't even given there replacement a chance to defendthemselves.
How will this be different from how you've played this game anyway? If you don't post more, I will ask for you to be replaced. We don't need the nonsense you've given us this game.Coron wrote:I'm gonna be gone for a week but I may drop in randomly.
I thought TB was scum and said something that implied he knew you to be town. I was wrong in that regard. I'm very, very happy returning to this vote.chaotic_diablo wrote:Elaborate.Thesp wrote:Vote: chaotic_diablo.
My first theory was wrong, so what "cleared" c_d in my mind is now gone.
I got the impression that I would be vigged during the night after such a bad play yesterday...
IMO, the kill could have been Sk or vig, or scum if they're insane.
I didn't, but I can see where you got that inference.wintergreen wrote:Thesp, did you mistake Coron for connor?
I don't think you're reading my posts. My broken theory doesn't prove you're scum, it removes proof that you're town. If you look at my posts from yesterday, you might find part of where I'm coming from. You really are screaming scum more and more with every post.chaotic_diablo wrote:I'm not seeing how the broken theory can prove that I'm scum. I'm guessing you have more support for your vote? Out with it.
plsvotechaotic_diablokthxbaiconnor wrote:sorry i have been soooooooooooooooooo busy whats been going on then
Proposed Prod PM wrote:Greetings! You're receiving this message from Mini 335 because you have not posted in the last 72 hours. Come back! Mafia games are a lot more fun when people are posting and participating. Other people are counting on you too...be a part!
My apologies, I'm just trying to make it as easy as possible for you, since I know that running a game takes a lot of effort, and it's apparently been hard for you to get on with regularity for prods and vote counts and the sort this game. Just trying to look out for my mod!zu_Faul wrote:... I know myself how to prod a player. I see that as an insult.
I already would have done it, but wasn't on the computer yesterday.
You could counter the boredom by speedlynching chaotic_diablo or wintergreen.bluemonick wrote:Counter RandomUnvote, Vote: Masterchief
Estatic.
Somehow I don't care, since I want to see some real participation from you, and I thought a prod might help, and it was consistent. I love to see that you care about seeing the game helped along. What's wrong with a prod?Coron wrote:You don't pay attention to the actual last posts of these players do you? If you did you'd realize you're an idiot for requesting a prod on me. K. Thnx.