1371: Futurama Mafia! (Game Over!)
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 25, numberQ wrote:Uhh is there any particular reason this joke wagon (that I jokingly added on to) is now being seen as serious?
UNVOTE:
Because you're scum?
Actually idon't know, but my vote has become been sitting on you for too long and it has become grimy now so I'll remove it.
UNVOTE: numberQ, VOTE: DrippingGoofBall
I think this is how I'm meant to welcome you?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
I don't think we should massclaim, some of the main characters would be obviously certain power roles and I don't see that we need to reveal those yet.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 79, Acosmist wrote:ITT: scum are really excited that they got main characters as fakeclaims
Did you? So why aren't you claiming him/her then?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Why on him? You had too other suspicions you announced during day 1, where do they sit now?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 142, Eidolon wrote:Cheery dog, what was your opinion on yesterdays wagon? Do you have any suspicions right now?
They went to fast without enough discussion, I wasn't willing to actually vote on Acomist's because I could see it gaining to much speed, however I did egg it on slightly because he did seem the most scummy at the time, but not enough in my mind for the wagon to completely fill.
In post 157, Venmar wrote:Sorry, guess I forgot. I'm allowed like small posts atm.
I'll popcorn it to Cheery Dog ( whatever the fuck your name is )
John Zoidberg.
Popcorn can go to NumberQ.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
VOTE: Tangion
I'm not seeing enough input here, and without any proper scumreads from me yet, you're have to do since it's impossible to read you from your one post on page 1.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Yes.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Sorry but why are we voting Toon Fighter because you think you've found his buddies? What makes it more likely that it's bussing and not buddying?roflcopter wrote:In post 185, AngryPidgeon wrote:
in conclusion, vote toon now. we'll deal with the rest of his scumteam after he hangs.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
EBWOP wrong term :/
wait I don't think there is a term for what I was asking, I'll have to attempt to explain it then.
not just picking someone at random?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 206, roflcopter wrote:cheery dog's vote for tangion is awful. why vote the obviously inactive (not lurking, completely inactive) guy over taking a position on either of the leading wagons?
In post 202, Cheery Dog wrote:Sorry but why are we voting Toon Fighter because you think you've found his buddies? What makes it more likely that it's bussing and not buddying?
this is a misrepresentation of the votes for toon fighter. nobody's vote (as far as i can tell) have anything to do with "finding his buddies," they have to do with tf being scum. the idea of someone being his buddy is a conclusion drawnfromknowing tf is scum, not a factor driving that conclusion.
because he is still lurking, he had come onto the site since the start of day 2 and hasn't posted.
The accusations that have been flying around look to me more that you've found someone else scummy and because you're voting TF, you've found that they must be buddies.
It would also be that I don't see TF being this obv100%scum from his 4 posts he has made.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 224, Eidolon wrote:
Your interpretation of this seems twisted and contrived.
Please tell me, who exactly is suspecting people for the wrong reasons, and why?
They may not be wrong reasons, however since I don't understand the full state of what the reasons actually are I can't actually call them wrong and therefore I can't answer this question since I don't know if they are wrong reasons, they are however reasons I'm not understanding
My interpretation of this is twisted and confused, because my understanding of what is happening is twisted and confused, the two go together.
In post 226, Eidolon wrote:Also, cheery dog, do you think that tangion is scum? do you think that your vote will get him to come back and talk? who are your suspects among the active players?
RC, the fact that mafia are potentially given fake claims is not the point. if a character fits much more into the town category than the potential fake claim category, (which, he's honestly one of the only characters in the show that does) i see no reason to go after them immediately, before some flips have given us more information into the game. i see no need to lynch venmar today unless there is something very overwhelmingly scum about him, which there certainly hasn't been.
The currently most active players are currently reading to me as town and thus Tangion is scum via PoE.
While the other inactives are also on my radar, I felt that the person who has only given us a OMGUS post is currently the most likely.
The least towny of the actives are rolfcopter and numberQ so I guess you could say those are my suspicions.
The Potential fake claim category would include characters which would be obv town, how is the town category actually different from the potential fake claim category?
I would think any character would fit the same into both categories. I believe that the professor is probably also town, but that doesn't mean it's not a potential fake claim, we should be still pressing on people if they are playing scummy even if they do have obv town names.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 261, rapidcanyon wrote:
I am not sure if the "bussee" is scum, so we might not reach a lynch on him. But with Rofl, AP has my vote so it is a more practical lynch.
Also, why are you voting for TF? If you think Rofl is bussing, let's lynch Rofl.
Pedit: I am not acting scummy. You are just saying that out of nowhere.
This looks a lot like my response to the TF case, just the opposite way around of who is voting who.
If we think rolf is bussing, then the bussee must also be scum, because that's how bussing works. What makes rolf the better target when both of them could be town?
In post 268, rapidcanyon wrote:@ NumberQ and Blastoide, I think rapidcanyon is a better choice than Venmar. Notice how he tried to derail the TF wagon and presented an alternate target? It makes sense to do so as scum. Let's lynch rapidcanyon today and we can come back and analyze his behaviors with respect to the others tomorrow.
FTFY
In post 281, rapidcanyon wrote:It is not "rolefishing." I am trying to figure out if you are town. You have two votes on you from me and TF. If you want to wait till you have 5, that is your perogative.
Please give your definition of 'rolefishing' so that I can understand how it is not rolefishing.
UNVOTE: , VOTE: rapidcanyonHolder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
So I'm not allowed to offer my opinion on things that happened while I was asleep?rapidcanyon wrote:You are just quoting nonsense that has already been responded to and casting a random vote, dumbass.
and it's not a random vote, my previous vote was random, this one is there because of the second quote I posted.
In post 287, rapidcanyon wrote:You are just quoting nonsense that has already been responded to and casting a random vote, dumbass.
So why were you posting nonsense?
and you're yet again OMGUSing people you cast suspicion onto you.
rapidcanyon wrote:If you want to vote for TF, that is fine but it makes no sense to vote for me based on nothing.
If I wanted to vote for TF, I would, however I want to vote you so I am.
rapidcanyon wrote:Also, if you don't agree that TF is scum, then vote Rofl or Eidolon. Are you really that DENSE and STUPID that you don't know who is voting for who and randomly cast votes without thinking?
Why should I be voting people I believe are town?
Just because you perceive yourself as town doesn't mean you are actually acting town.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
You don't have to be on a wagon to be able to derail it.
TF was and still is null to me, therefore I don't know if he is scum or not. Where did I actually come out and say anything about disagreeing with the TF wagon?
All I said was that I didn't understand how he was 100%obvscum.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 297, rapidcanyon wrote:Cheerydog, do you seriously expect me to believe that it doesn't strike you as suspicious that Angry lists Rofl as one of his scumreads and me as one of his town reads while voting TF but when me and Rofl vote each other, he votes for me?
If you were town, you would be voting Angry or one of the many suspicious people right now instead of pulling a couple of random quotes out of your ass and voting me. There is no ways you are town. If you are,
1) unvote
2) Read the thread
3) Vote for obvious scum
and I mean, actually read. If you can't muster the effort to read and are town, you really shouldn't be playing this game.
Why should I be voting people (Angry) I believe are town again?
And I'm pretty sure I've already established that I'm suspicious of you (and so have other people, seeing as you have a wagon on you), so why are you condradicting yourself?
Cheery Dog wrote:Just because you perceive yourself as town doesn't mean you are actually acting town.
I'll follow the plan for you if you like though;
1)unvote
2) RVS=#Q wagon, DGB replaces in, Name claim starts, Acosmist is tunnelled by almost everyone and is lynched. DGB dies. (venmar gives a acosmist case in Post 108) You open day 2 with NK speculation, you then vote venmar who had FOS'ed you doing Day 1. (example one of OMGUS). TF wagon starts. AP/rofl both accuse each other of bussing TF. You bring out major character analysis in Post 173. In Post 174, you call rofl town and TF scum. I fail to understand the TF wagon. (which also happened to be the only bit of this thread I hadn't read fully). Post 273: You come up with why venmar is scum and completely ignore his 108 (which you had mentioned in an earlier post) and place words in his mouth about his Post 103 and question him on this which was already done during Day 1 (aka 107 by #Q) and he gave answers to it in 108. You come and accuse rofl of bein scum in Post 249 and start rolefishing on the following page (something you had also done regarding venmar). This is also where you derailed the TF wagon, by telling people to vote rofl. AP votes you and you accuse him of being scum (more OMGUS points for you). You continue to flail around getting nowhere towards getting rofl voted for. I came in with "random quotes" and a "random vote" on you. You started attacking me and didn't answer my question about how you were not rolefishing. In the end you OMGUS me as well. You continue flailing and insulting randomly followed by asking me to reread the thread.
3) So after I've just reread the game, I think I can safely vote the obvious scum...
VOTE: rapidcanyon
What do you know, I was voting them already.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 297, rapidcanyon wrote:Cheerydog, do you seriously expect me to believe that it doesn't strike you as suspicious that Angry lists Rofl as one of his scumreads and me as one of his town reads while voting TF but when me and Rofl vote each other, he votes for me?
Nope, he has every right to change his opinions.
In post 298, rapidcanyon wrote:Are you seriously stupid cheerydog? There are 4 scummy people who parked their voted on toonfighter for ABSOLUTELY no reason.
Eidolon for instance asks me why I thought Venmar was scummier. I explain it to her and she does NOTHING. She doesn't switch her vote. She just parks it on TF for absolutely no reason despite the case on Venmar being infinitely stronger. She isn't dense or stupid as town. She is scum. She, Cheerydog, and Venmar.
The venmar case is stronger because you believe yourself to be this "obvtown everyone sheep me" player?
here's a hint for you: You're not DGB and your playstyle doesn't work that way.
Venmar is the only one I see that didn't give a reason for his TF vote other than agreeing, Eidolon was also mostly agreeing but she had given him suspicion in the previous post. Ap and rofl did give reason for their votes however, while I may not think they were good ones they were still there, and thus not "for ABSOLUTELY no reason."
I wasn't convinced by your venmar case (as it was flawed and I just proved that via my reread), so why should I believe it to be superior when I was actually more convinced by the TF case(s).
Also in case you haven't noticed it, your insults aren't helping me not want you dead.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 303, rapidcanyon wrote:There is NOTHING convincing about the TF case. You are just stupid to believe it. HE made 4 freaking posts. My case on Venmar was airtight. You are scum. There is no way a rational townie would believe that the case on TF was stronger than the one on Venmar. Anyways, my role auto-confirms me so time to die, scum.
Contradiction alert!
In post 173, rapidcanyon wrote:
I have trouble finding out the exact meat of the reason we are voting Toonfighter since I see two separate cases. AP's 151 is decent as is Eidolon's 155. Eidolon says that Venmar's claim is townish and toonfighter is suspicious as well. I can see where she is coming from but I find Venmar overwhelmingly more suspiciousespeciallybecause of his claim as I outlined above.
and venmar is a more airtight case because you find his claim suspicious?
and your role auto-confirms you how?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Fun Fact: Scum are capable of fake-claiming roles and abilities that might not exist in a game.
I quoted because that post was fairly large and I only needed that bit of it to reference (and guess what within that quote there is a link to the whole post omgwtfbbq)Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 316, Venmar wrote:I'd like to say that based off my own role name, I would believe Zoidberg to be a town player.
How can your rolename mean anything towards my alignment?
In post 314, AngryPidgeon wrote:Paranormal activities are lame; you are scum for thinking they aren't.
How does what movies someone has enjoyed in the past relate to someone's alignment?
I could also see bender being a watcher, but not as the obvious role choice (but I don't really want to play outguess the mod), however the fact he brought out a roleclaim unprompted means I think I do actually have something on him.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 329, rapidcanyon wrote:
I haven't given any reasoning on Cheerydog? His play makes it obvious that he is scum. I pointed this out. He just popped in, quoted a couple of random posts and voted me. If that doesn't scream "scum", I don't know what does.
The vote on you is not random.
The quotes I placed there were not random.
You have been finding anything that attacks you to scream "scum".
That's no case on me.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Why are you so against opinion changes?
Here I'll show you how an opinion can change
I had called rofl and #Q the least towny, they are however not scummy enough at that stage to deserve a vote.
108 is still part of yoursecond contradiction, which is where you ignored it.
Later that page you came up with wanting people to get off TF and turn onto rofl - this post is where you started to become scumread of mine.
The next page you were pushing people and trying to derail the TF wagon and place people onto rofl without good reason.
Rofl became more of a townread at about #278 and didn't do anything to make it not the case since.
I came back on at #285 as you continued to rolefish after you had said you weren't rolefishing.
Then started this whole fight with you insulting me every post for no reason other than you not liking my vote on you.
Your new posts on the current page show that you're just caught in the middle of what is happening now and not in the past, maybe you should reread the entire thread.
In post 331, rapidcanyon wrote: I am not entirely sure on Venmar at least
I thought your case on him was 'airtight'.
day thread?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Sorry if I'm skipping over stuff when you start flailing and rolefishing.
Your 273 is also a bunch of tosh you threw together with your current read of venmar, eidiolon because she had accused you of acting scummy (and is correct with her statement) and TF because it's just obvious to be slighty suspicious of people that people you know to be town were suspecting.
The middle bit of your case is that I defended Venmar, since I have already said where I found faults in your case, there is no point in stating them again, you're just going to attack with whatever garbage you can find.
I also ignored the last of your case, because you just completed read that whole thing wrong.
I wasn't convinced by any of the cases presented at the start of today, as shown by the fact I went and voted an inactive. If I had to have chosen one, it would have been TF.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 343, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Bachelor #1Cheery, if Rapid flips town, how would that change your reads one me, Eidolon, rofl, and TF?
Your scumpoints would probably go up, for getting him to paraphase his role and also you still haven't talked about #173 like you were going to
Eidolon would increase in towniness for saying the rapid has acted like this as town before.
rofl would still be town, as his posts still seem town motivated to me, they just weren't seeming as town motivated when he was one of my active player suspicions.
TF hasn't interacted with rapid yet, so I'm unsure about him, probably going to stay the same.
Pedit: and Rapid's case on me isn't the exact same thing except reversed?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 354, Eidolon wrote:In post 345, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 343, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Bachelor #1Cheery, if Rapid flips town, how would that change your reads one me, Eidolon, rofl, and TF?
Your scumpoints would probably go up, for getting him to paraphase his role and also you still haven't talked about #173 like you were going to
Eidolon would increase in towniness for saying the rapid has acted like this as town before.
rofl would still be town, as his posts still seem town motivated to me, they just weren't seeming as town motivated when he was one of my active player suspicions.
TF hasn't interacted with rapid yet, so I'm unsure about him, probably going to stay the same.
what does this mean? who are you suspicious of and why?
If you'd read the post I was talking about (Post 235), you'll see that I said I believed at that stage all the active players were likely town, rofl at that stage was one of my weaker reads, however I see more town motivation now.
My current suspicious are rapidcanyon for all his flipfloping with his vote, the rolefishing (which until the question I asked is answered is still going to be rolefishing), the attack of everyone who doesn't agree with him and trying to get everyone to sheep him.
NumberQ for his hammer, though I see reason for why he doesn't want to nameclaim from town.
TF because of my biggest scumread's continual pointless defence of him
Tangion is also a weak read for only posting the once, but that doesn't give much.
In post 362, rapidcanyon wrote:I am not certain about TF scum. I think it is Cheery. Angry, if you think it is Cheery, then vote him.
Also, Eidolon, if you are town, don't be swayed by a mere command from Rofl as opposed to an entire case from me.
Yet you wanted people to move into voting rofl by a mere command.
In post 382, rapidcanyon wrote:Re 379: It is level of detail and reasoning given in the case that explains Cheery's scum motivation that makes it a better case, not just the number of words although giving a detailed case takes more words.
Look, I am not watching my biggest scumread. If you want to be watched, prove to me that you are town.
Wait I thought I was your biggest scumread, seeing as you made this big case on me.
In post 388, rapidcanyon wrote:@ Angry, if they are both scummy, let's lynch Cheery.
Anyways, I am still on Cheery. Let's go for him first. I am far more certain of him being scum. Why? I actually interacted with him. I know for a fact that he presented poor reasoning for voting me - too convenient. I know that lied and misrepped. I know that he made baseless accusations. I don't know what TF is like. We can get a better idea by having him be replaced and analyzing the posts.
Pedit: You are dumb if you think I am going to watch my biggest scumread.
So rofl is still your biggest scumread then? Why are you the more certain of me being scum if rofl is your biggest scumread?
In post 394, rapidcanyon wrote:
There is just no way you are town, period. You basically voted TF because Rofl told you to and ignored my well thought out case because of "holes" you wouldn't mention. My logic isn't flawed, you just say it is. I never said I was a better player than you. I know you are a much better player than me both as town and as scum and I always openly admitted it. I just don't think you are town this game. First, you unvote Venmar for no reason, then you refuse to vote for Cheery.
You seriously need to calm down your ego.
Anyway, what are the votes currently? I'm thinking of moving onto TF because him and RC are double buddying each other, but I don't what to be accidentally hammering while the replacements are still reading up.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 406, rapidcanyon wrote:
Why I think TF is town? I don't know whether he is town. I just don't think we should lynch a lurker when a much stronger scum read appears. Cheery has posted. His defence is inadequate. I pointed out the flaws in his defence. Most of it just read like trying to appease me while keeping him vote on me which is based on poor reasoning.
If I was trying to appease, maybe it's because you were fucking insulting me in every post you made, and I don't appreciate being insulted.
That whole page of things was that you refused to believe I had found you scummy when you clearly had been
Whatever at least I know for next time, I react 'scummy' to insults.
and wtf is with your complete 360 turn on Eidolon?
rapidcanyon wrote:In post 405, Cheery Dog wrote:
Wait I thought I was your biggest scumread, seeing as you made this big case on me.
Pretty clear case of someone pretending not to understand something that is relatively clear: As I have repeated over and over and over, Rofl is my scumread based on behavior pending confirmation. We'll wait for him to confirm himself next Day. I'll go from there based on Rofl.
I mean your entire block of responses have been scummy and anti-town. You ask questions that have already been answered. I am about 99% convinced you are scum.
Because you're this "town" player that needs to be leading, and me attacking you means I'm "scummy/anti-town".
Seriously? I'm 99% "scum" yet based on rofl's behaviour he's a bigger scumread, which would imply bigger than 99%, you are way too convinced of your reads. Where does everyone else you've accuse of being scum sit in these percentages?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Of course you find someone else that attacks you to be scum.
Thanks for providing us with the half the town team though.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Your reasons in much shorter words as follow.
"You attacked me and didn't follow myobvtownlead, you must be scum!"
so yes, I'm going to ignore them, they're not any good.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Yes I agree with Piggy's analysis, however not with what you've made of it. I didn't answer that question straight away as I had to go figure out what you were actually talking about.
I believe that town should be making cases, however not push on it continuously because if it's a good case, people will follow it without needing to be pushed and pushed into reading over the same case.
If it doesn't attract any buyers the moment it is brought out, then it's not a good case and pushing on it further is just a scum claim.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
I don't agree entirely with her wagon analysis.rapidcanyon wrote:Explain more about how much you agree with her. Do you disagree on any parts of her post?
I'm not sure about how scummy the lack of the venmar wagon is, but since you initiated it and then tried to buy people off it and move onto rofl (because he had tried to get people on TF), I'm fairly certain venmar is town since you're scum. and therefore that wagon not existing is fine with me.
TF, I have started to believe he is lurkscum because of your defence of him, however he is still null depending on your flip until he actually gets around to posting more.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 421, roflcopter wrote:In post 418, Cheery Dog wrote:If it doesn't attract any buyers the moment it is brought out, then it's not a good case and pushing on it further is just a scum claim.
this is both extreme and inaccurate
You can add to a case that isn't moving later, but just pushing without adding anything new is worthless if the case wasn't grabbed on straight away.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 425, rapidcanyon wrote:The reason I ask Cheery's opinion on Piggy's post is that I wanted to see if he disagreed with any part of it. This would indicate either a scumteam or Cheerytown/Piggyscum. If he had agreed with all of it, I would be more inclined to go with Cheeryscum and piggytown.
Anyways, it is the first option so I think Piggy is the most suspicious followed by Cheery followed by Venmar.
You were 99% convinced that I was scum before, and now you're adding yet another person above me? ...because of one post.
Your reads aren't making any sense.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
There would also be time constraints about it, but yes I will stop talking about that theory here (and possibly make a thread about it in mafia discussion after the game).
@rapid Why would people making blanket statements be a good policy lynch?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 438, AngryPidgeon wrote:
In post 416, Cheery Dog wrote:Your reasons in much shorter words as follow.
"You attacked me and didn't follow my obvtown lead, you must be scum!"
Does that come from scum though?
Why did you remove my italics?
From the scumgame I think rapid is trying to play, yes.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 456, Eidolon wrote:
Cheery Dog, if you think TF is scum due to the way RC is defendng him, don't you think it's beneficial for a TF lynch? I don't see RC being lynched today.
I already said I was likely to be moving my vote there depending on the current level of votes (which seems to be L-1 now), so now I'm going to wait to see if he has anything to defend himself with.
Also I feel we need this day to keep going up closer to deadline since there is still a lot of people that have contributed much, and day 1 was cut short.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
You're the one dancing around the TF wagon, seeing as you were on and then off, along with rapid.
By dancing around you're referring me not wanting to quickhammer a null read based of my thoughts on someone else?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
Piggy nameclaimed Lord Nibbler in her replace in post.
In post 527, AngryPidgeon wrote:there is literally a 0% chance of calculon being a vig.
What makes calculon have no chance of being a vig? When scruffy the janitor is a gunsmith.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 528, rapidcanyon wrote:Ugh, so annoying. Wish everyone just lynched Cheerydog or Piggy.
Pedit: IF he is town, then I am pushing for Cheery's lynch. Come to think of it, we should have lynched Cheery. Rofl obviously isn't confirmed. He could be mafia rolecop. Let's see his flip, if he is guilty, Rofl is the obvious watch target. If TF is town, then no.
If he's still a vig, then you should still be watching rofl as that's still a guilty to the gunsmith.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 547, AngryPidgeon wrote:Whatever. If there is a vig, kill Cheery. If there is a doc protect RC. RC watch rofl. Rofl investigate whoever you want.
You trying to get town to do your scum dirty work during night as well now?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 551, AngryPidgeon wrote:.
Cheery claims TF is a null read.
Cheery has a nul read on Tangion for lurking.
Cheery votes Tangion and says he is scum for PoE.
Why not vote TF? Because TF is scum.
Look at the wagon size at those times. Why should I have put someone onto L-1 that I had a null read on?Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
I had null reads on almost everyone at that stage. There wasn't enough information from Day 1 that I was able to actually gain any scumreads fromHolder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
The scum (provided I'm correctly assuming that anyone in rapid's field of fire is town) are going to have a field day with that.
Though if you are actually scum, there's now a almost guarateered mislynch of me coming soon.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 574, rapidcanyon wrote:I watched Rofl.
I can confirm that Eidolon was visited. I won't say yet by who.
I think we should wait for Rofl's results and then lynch Cheery or Piggy.
VOTE: rapidcanyon
Watcher is a fakeclaim, I visited rofl last night.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
It's alright, I'm a Doctor!
I targeted vijay night 1 because they were the other one DGB had called town and exempt from the nameclaim.
Had Acomist flipped scum, I was going to protect DGB (which I probably should have done anyway, but that's all hindsight now), but since he didn't I decided to not protect the person my vote was on.
In truth I didn't think about my night one protect much, since I was sure I would have been nightkilled after my Post 68, when I posted it I instantly regretted it, and I didn't really want to post it before I did actually post, but that was the only reason I knew why I didn't want to nameclaim.
and that thought did actually put me off scumhunting the rest of day 1 and the start of day 2, which is also why I went for a random vote when I discovered I was still alive.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
a. because I saw what vijay posted as to why he could have been excluded.
b. leading a mislynch does not mean you don't have a say in what I should listen to nor does it mean you're not town.
c. I decided to not protect him because of the mislynch.
d. read.
In post 655, Cheery Dog wrote:
In truth I didn't think about my night one protect much, since I was sure I would have been nightkilled after my Post 68Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 666, rapidcanyon wrote:@ Eidolon, I thought TF was town and you were determined to disregard everything I say no matter what so I thought it was the only way to save him and lynch Cheery or Piggy who I thought were scum. I know it was a mistake. I shouldn't have tried to save TF at all. You were totally right about him and I was wrong. I thought I was going to be mislynched because I had a ton of votes on me and you, Rofl, Angry, Cheery all suspected me and Venmar did as well I think.
You had 3 votes on you, if you are in fact a vanilla townie, that is extremely stupid play, and not even something that should be done at L-1, let alone L-3...
All pretty much all you had on you besides (what I think were two half-hearted votes before mine) was the argument I was having with you.
Even as a power role, that's not a good idea.
anyway, Lynch all liars.
no problem, you were the obvious choice to protect, since my thought process led to there probably being an ninja on the scumteam if the watcher claim turned out to be true.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
[quote="In post 738, Venmar"]Fine, i'll claim.
I am Professor Hubert J. Farnsworht, aTown Inventor( I'm still fucking bewildered how no one guessed that before Eidolon did )
- By the way, anyone with a brain could have deducted this if you paid attention to some of my posts.
From your role name, I had guessed you would likely to have been one, and never said anything because town doesn't need role speculation.
Also, so much WIFOM from rapidcanyon it isn't funny.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
I think there is actually only 3 votes out of 5 needed on him. I also think we need to see numberQ & havingfitz's replacement post (and claim) before we end this day.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 793, rapidcanyon wrote:I am not trying to misdirect bets whatever that means but I think self-meta is valid in this case. This game has been going on for a month. I have never played a game this long before. It would be nearly impossible to stick to my town meta. I have never been scum on mafiascum before in any completed game.
While not part of the scumteam, a serial killer is still scum.
In post 823, rapidcanyon wrote:
What about me? I made 230 posts. Many of those are dedicated to finding scum.
and the rest are dedicated to insulting people and OMGUSing people.
Also how does 230 posts by you make you an information less lynch?
In post 846, rapidcanyon wrote:
Cheery and Piggy obviously want me lynched because I suspect them. The possibility that they are scum together is there, but it is small. The rationale is that Cheery knows that Piggy didn't visit anyone when I claimed she did so as a scum tactic, he could have contradicted me knowing I was lying about Piggy. There were never two kills in the same night either so we have no proof there is a vig.
Both of us started wanting you lynched before you suspected you, way to twist the truth.
I thought I had another quote to put here about him saying he would be better off vigged. This is an indication that there is a mafia doctor, and my bet is currently on it being Angry.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 858, Eidolon wrote:Yes, he always does the wall thing but when close to a lynch, as scum he's less likely to provide so many walls or analysis,he kinda just repeats himself a lot about why he is innocent, or the case on him is bad, and insults his accuser,from what i remember.
Well the bold bit has definitely been happening this game.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
In post 862, rapidcanyon wrote:
Look, I am sorry I insulted you. I apologize.
Coming to your actual accusation, the keyword is "just." Eidolon's argument was that I do "just" that when scum, as opposed to providing tons of analysis.
Your apology is accepted, however it doesn't mean that you're not scum.
From what I've noticed you have actually been doing the first option of why you are innocent, just in wall form. (though I may have actually started skipping some of your posts, since even if you are town (which I highly doubt), I'm more than happy to still have you as today's lynch because of your gambit)Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!
well fitz is being replaced so he isn't going to show up, we'll just have to wait for the replacement.
I have no idea what is happening with numberQ, but given he hasn't shown up yet, he's probably going to end up being replaced as well.Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.-
-
Cheery Dog Kayak
- Kayak
- Kayak
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: June 30, 2012
- Location: OMG BALL!