In post 543, Plessiez wrote:And while I'm rereading people ...
sword of omens
:
I don't think you ever said why you asked this.
In post 309, sword_of_omens wrote:If you like, I can do a whole drawn out post touching on each of the claim points
, although it would take a bunch of time for me to do, especially this late in the day..but bottom line is I think his trap was poorly timed and not fully thought through.I prefer Guille or Ztife.
I would like this, actually. Just a sentence or two on each claim would be (more than) enough to be getting on with.
Sorry, I thought I had answered you…the reason I asked the question is that Saulres usually asks a lot of thoughtful questions and is pretty active as town. I was curious if you had played with him before…I thought if you were scum and knew how he played, you might want to try and take him out early, as you were pushing for his lynch pretty hard...
As far as touching on the claims..it mainly comes down to whether or not you believed him about his “trap”, which I was inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt…going back:
Claim 1:
Pless wrote: I've already said why I don't believe saulres had suspicions of Ztife after 96. He was challenged to give reads by Rufflig. He replied in 118 and did not mention any suspicions of Ztife. But, according to saulres, the plan to “trap” Ztife hadn't been decided on yet. As town, I see no reason for him not to share suspicions of Ztife when asked to give reads. Hence, I do not believe he had any.
(Saulres has attempted to justify this, in his 218, by suggesting he merely “suspected” Ztife, but didn't have a “scumread” on him. Not only does this not actually fit the words he used, it feels like a pedantic, hair-splitting argument. If you suspect somebody more than anybody else, you say so when asked for reads. You at least need a reason not to do this, and saulres doesn't have one.)
This i’ve already touched on..Saul’s posting in his 118 about not being able to fully form reads on someone who he’s waiting on answers from is consistent with his 218 post. By 96 he could have had suspicions, but didn’t put it down as a read, because he was waiting on answers from Ztife. His 118 does come off as frustrated...
Claim 2:
Pless wrote:Staying with 118, I don't believe Saulres's claim to have only ever pretended to suspect D3f3nd3r as part of a trap. In 118, he says that D3f3nd3r “clearly has a lyncher wincon”. But we're now supposed to believe that Saulres mentioned this, even though he thinks it has nothing to do with D3f3nd3r's actual alignment? Really now. Actual suspicions on Ztife were too trifling to mention, but he felt like throwing this out without intending it to suggest D3f3nd3r had an anti-town win condition? I think this “read” was intended to pave the way toward saulres eventually voting for D3f3nd3r. I think he saw the wagon and decided he wanted to join it.
Saulres doesn’t mention D3f as scum or town in 118. He states that he thinks he has a lynchcon..lynchcon does not necessarily mean anti-town..town members can have lynch-cons..
Given that this is a bastard game and especially given the fact that in the sign-up thread, SAD mentioned it in the rules:
SerArthur wrote: The setup is partly based on different agendas. So a player might have a secret agenda in addition to their factional win condition
Claim 3 - 6
Saul explained this with his “TRAP” ...although, i still think it was poor;y thought out.
As far as being ruined, it was more of the attention and pressure that was quickly brought up against Saul before Ztife could respond that probably ruined it..
It unravelled pretty quickly and with a lot of attention before anything really could pan out either way...like i said, Saulres is pretty decent town when he tries and
is pretty insightful...so i’d rather err on the side of caution with him on D1.
********
now for the new day....
As far as the Guille kill goes..his flip states that his action is ”activated” which would mean that he would have to choose when to do it..and seeing as that there are no other bodies, (other than Ztife), i seriously doubt he activated it...Guille was a leading wagon, on D1 so he makes sense as a vig kill...Ztife could have investigated him and got killed for it, but that would mean that either the scum kill was blocked, or they forgot to send it in, which i seriously doubt, not to mention the fact that Ztife claimed cop which makes sense as a priority kill for scum.
I seriously doubt Ztife was strong-armed, as that (i believe Ruifflig mentioned ) would defeat the 1 –shot doc purpose..
Qwints can’t have been CPR..for Ztife to have died mafia had to have been blocked, or not send in a kill, which is highly unlikely..
2 things here...
Not really sure what the point of a 1-shot naive doctor would be, but it is bastard game..that said, i really doubt a 1-shot naive doc would be in the game...
Qwints could be lying about being a 1 shot doc...if that’s the case, why not just say he doc’d someone else though and not the NK?
More than likely he was J/K’d or role blocked...seeing as he crumbed doc, it’s pretty feasible that he was role-blocked..this would then mean that there’s a good possibility of Saulres lying about being blocked...i really don’t see town motivation of J/K’ing Saulres on a night where he’s set to prove himself town...
OTOH Saulres does looks good for a scum roleblock and easy follow up mislynch, and if town does have a J/K then Qwints could have been targeted if they didn’t catch his crumb..
Odds are against Saulres on this, though...and i usually try and play a safe game...i won’t like the fact that every day we are going to have to question Saulres’ alignment each day as it will just distract the town.
That said, i might be willing to vote for him today if nothing more certain comes up...
I really do not like all of the claims this early in the game...considering the scum know who each other are, all we are doing is prioritizing the scum kills for them..
D3f’s wierd name claim seemed off to me...i really don’t see why he felt the need to claim Flanders when he did...he said it was a counterclaim, but Saulres didn’t claim Flanders...